Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 281–286 | Cite as

The effect of trabeculectomy on contrast sensitivity, corneal topography and aberrations

  • Fereshteh Abolbashari
  • Asieh EhsaeiEmail author
  • Ramin Daneshvar
  • Nasrin Moghaddas Sharif
  • Ahmad Gholami
  • Naeemeh Monfared
  • Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini
Original Paper
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of trabeculectomy on corneal topography, corneal sensitivity and aberrations.

Methods

Twenty-four eyes of 24 subjects with open-angle glaucoma who required glaucoma filtration surgery were assessed. The evaluation of corneal topography, corneal sensitivity and aberrations were done before the trabeculectomy procedure, 1 week and 1 month after the trabeculectomy.

Results

There were significant differences in cylindrical power (P = 0.02), contrast sensitivity at 12 cycle/degree spatial frequency (P = 0.04) as well as high order aberration (P = 0.04) and high order without spherical component (P = 0.02) following trabeculectomy. However, significant differences were found for keratometric results and Fourier index in 3 and 6 mm pupil diameters between pre- and post-trabeculectomy (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

According to the findings of the current study, trabeculectomy affects contrast sensitivity at 12 cycle/degree spatial frequency, higher-order aberration and higher order without spherical component aberration 1 month after trabeculectomy. Being knowledgeable about these changes may lead to some advancement in post-surgical management of patients particularly in early stages following trabeculectomy.

Keywords

Trabeculectomy Corneal topography Contrast sensitivity Aberrations 

Notes

Funding

Deputy of Research of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Grant Code: 922878).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya’ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP, Mariotti SP (2004) Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 82:844–851Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Glaucoma Society (2011) Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma, 3rd edn. http://www.eugs.org/eng/EGS_guidelines.asp. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  3. 3.
    Mantravadi AV, Myers JS (2010) Reconsidering trabeculectomy’s strengths and weaknesses. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 38:827–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cairns JE (1968) Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 66:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spaeth GL (1980) A prospective, controlled study to compare the Scheie procedure with Watson’s trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg 11:688–694Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watson PG (1981) Trabeculectomy. Dev Ophthalmol 1:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kanski JJ (2016) In: Bowling B (ed) Kanski’s clinical ophthalmology: a systematic approachGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Claridge KG, Galbraith JK, Karmel V, Bates AK (1995) The effect of trabeculectomy on refraction, keratometry and corneal topography. Eye 9:292–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietze PJ, Oram O, Kohnen T, Feldman RM, Koch DD, Gross RL (1997) Visual function following trabeculectomy: effect on corneal topography and contrast sensitivity. J Glaucoma 6:99–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumari R, Saha BC, Puri LR (2013) Keratometric astigmatism evaluation after trabeculectomy. Nepal J Ophthalmol 5:215–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Owsley C (2003) Contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 16:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL et al (1993) The lens opacities classification system III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 111:831–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alwitry A, Patel V, King AW (2005) Fornix vs limbal-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Eye 19:631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shigeeda T, Tomidokoro A, Araie M, Koseki N, Yamamoto S (2002) Long-term follow-up of visual field progression after trabeculectomy in progressive normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmology 109:766–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen WJ, Mannis MJ, Brandt JD (1992) The effect of trabeculectomy on corneal topography. Ophthalmic Surg 23:395–398Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cunliffe IA, Dapling RB, West J, Longstaff S (1992) A prospective study examining the changes in factors that affect visual acuity following trabeculectomy. Eye 6:618–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goins K, Smith T, Kinker R, Lewis J (1990) Axial anterior chamber depth after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmologica 200:177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rasooly R, Benjamin L, Casson R (2001) Change in lens thickness after trabeculectomy. Int Ophthalmol 24:25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Francis BA, Wang M, Lei H, Du LT, Minckler DS, Green RL et al (2005) Changes in axial length following trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 89:17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fukuoka S, Amano S, Honda N, Mimura T, Usui T, Araie M (2011) Effect of trabeculectomy on ocular and corneal higher order aberrations. Jpn J Ophthalmol 55:460–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fereshteh Abolbashari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Asieh Ehsaei
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ramin Daneshvar
    • 3
  • Nasrin Moghaddas Sharif
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ahmad Gholami
    • 1
    • 2
  • Naeemeh Monfared
    • 1
    • 2
  • Seyed Mahdi Ahmadi Hosseini
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Refractive Errors Research CenterMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  2. 2.Department of Optometry, School of Paramedical SciencesMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran
  3. 3.Khatam Anbia Eye HospitalMashhad University of Medical SciencesMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations