Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 2013–2020 | Cite as

Corneal thickness, residual stromal thickness, and its effect on opaque bubble layer in small-incision lenticule extraction

  • Jiaonan Ma
  • Yan Wang
  • Liuyang Li
  • Jiamei Zhang
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effects of the central corneal thickness (CCT) and residual stromal thickness (RST) on the formation of opaque bubble layer (OBL) during small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

A total of 345 eyes from Refractive Surgery Center database at Tianjin Eye Hospital that had been subjected to SMILE surgery and followed for 6 months were included in this study and divided into OBL and OBL-free groups. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data for all eyes were evaluated and analyzed using multivariate regression analysis. After adjustment for several confounding factors, potential associations of CCT and RST with OBL were elucidated by determining odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

In total, 22 of the 345 eyes developed various degrees of OBL during the femtosecond laser scanning phase of SMILE surgery. After adjustment for age, sex, and refractive errors, significant relationships were detected between CCT and RST and OBL formation (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02–1.06; OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02–1.05, respectively, P < 0.001). Smooth curve fitting revealed an increased risk of OBL in the presence of an increased CCT or RST. However, visual outcomes were comparable between the two groups at both 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions

The results suggest that OBL formation during SMILE surgery is more likely in eyes with a thicker cornea. CCT and RST can be considered independent risk factors for OBL formation. Although this phenomenon may disturb the surgical procedure, it is unlikely to affect the postoperative visual outcome.

Keywords

Central corneal thickness (CCT) Residual stromal thickness (RST) Opaque bubble layer (OBL) Small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the technical support of Tianjin Eye Hospital and Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81670884). The funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

This study was adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of Tianjin Eye Hospital.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Juhasz T, Loesel FH, Kurtz RM, Horvath C (1999) Corneal refractive surgery with femtosecond lasers. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron 5:902–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JØ (2014) Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:403–411CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian H, Ke Z, Chen Y, Yang G, Li H, Zhou X (2016) Four-year observation of predictability and stability of small incision lenticule extraction. BMC Ophthalmol 16:149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, Zhou D, Zhou J (2016) Clinical outcomes of smile and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 32:256–265CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2013) Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 29:810–818CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Gobbe L, Archer TJ, Carp GI (2015) Optical zone centration accuracy using corneal fixation-based SMILE compared to eye tracker-based femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg 31:586–592CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aristeidou A, Taniguchi EV, Tsatsos M, Muller R, Mcalinden C, Pineda R (2015) The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser. Eye Vis 2:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, Krueger RR (2003) First clinical results with the femtosecond neodynium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 19:94–103PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luengo Gimeno F, Chan CM, Li L, Tan DT, Mehta JS (2011) Comparison of eye-tracking success in laser in situ keratomileusis after flap creation with 2 femtosecond laser models. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:538–543CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ide T, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Haft P, O’Brien TP (2009) Second femtosecond laser pass for incomplete laser in situ keratomileusis flaps caused by suction loss. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:153–157CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ide T, Kymionis GD, Goldman DA, Yoo SH, O’Brien TP (2008) Subconjunctival gas bubble Formation during LASIK flap creation using femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg 24:850–851PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Srinivasan S, Herzig S (2007) Sub-epithelial gas breakthrough during femtosecond laser flap creation for LASIK. Br J Ophthalmol 91:1373CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srinivasan S, Rootman DS (2007) Anterior chamber gas bubble formation during femtosecond laser flap creation for LASIK. J Refract Surg 23:828–830PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaiserman I, Maresky HS, Bahar I, Rootman DS (2008) Incidence, possible risk factors, and potential effects of an opaque bubble layer created by a femtosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:417–423CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu CH, Sun CC, Huikang MD, Chienchieh HJ, Liu CF, Chen HF (2014) Opaque bubble layer: incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:435–440CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jung HG, Kim J, Lim TH (2015) Possible risk factors and clinical effects of an opaque bubble layer created with femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 41:1393–1399CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Courtin R, Saad A, Guilbert E, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D (2015) Opaque bubble layer risk factors in femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 31:608–612CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Son G, Lee J, Jang C, Choi KY, Cho BJ, Lim TH (2017) Possible risk factors and clinical effects of opaque bubble layer in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg 33:24–29CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu M, Zhou Y, Wu X, Ye T, Liu Q (2016) Comparison of 120- and 140-μm SMILE cap thickness results in eyes with thick corneas. Cornea 35:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soong HK, Malta JB (2009) Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology. Am J Ophthalmol 147:189–197CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shah R, Shah S (2011) Effect of scanning patterns on the results of femtosecond laser lenticule extraction refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1636–1647CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamed AM, Fekry AY (2016) Refractive small-incision lenticule extraction: push-up and push-down techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1713–1715CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jacob S, Nariani A, Figus M, Agarwal A, Agarwal A (2016) White ring sign for uneventful lenticule separation in small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 42:1251–1254CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang Y, Dou R (2015) The effect of corneal biomechanics of the OBL during SMILE. Cataract Refract Surg Today Eur March:1–3Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinical College of OphthalmologyTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Tianjin Eye Hospital and Eye Institute, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Clinical College of OphthalmologyTianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations