Advertisement

International Ophthalmology

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 1851–1861 | Cite as

The evaluation of the risk factors for capsular complications in phacoemulsification

  • Şule Berk Ergun
  • Sücattin İlker Kocamış
  • Hasan Basri Çakmak
  • Nurullah Çağıl
Original Paper
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To determine and quantify the risk factors for disruption of lens capsule integrity during phacoemulsification.

Methods

The medical records of the patients who had undergone phacoemulsification cataract surgery and had a complication associated with lens capsule were reviewed. Consecutive cases were also reviewed in reverse chronological order as a control group. The exclusion criteria were pediatric cataracts, traumatic cataracts and lens dislocation. As a result, 403 uncomplicated and 83 complicated eyes were analyzed. The differences between the complication group and the group without complications regarding the risk factors were shown by employing the Chi-square test and Fischer’s exact test. The variables having the level of significance (p < 0.25) after the Chi-square test and Fischer’s exact test were enrolled into the multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis.

Results

Age (60–69/≤80) (p = 0.017), male gender (p = 0.006), pupil size ≤3 mm (p = <0.001), mature–brunescent cataract (p = <0.001), anterior chamber depth <2.5 mm (p = 0.001), posterior polar cataract (p = 0.006), diabetic retinopathy(p = <0.001), coronary artery disease (p = 0.098) and surgeon factor (junior resident/senior resident, p = 0.015; senior resident/specialist in ophthalmology, p = 0.026; junior resident/specialist in ophthalmology, p = 0.020) were among the factors significantly related to a capsule complication. An Excel program has been developed according to these results to predict the probability of capsule complication.

Conclusions

Higher-risk cases can be predicted preoperatively, thus allowing surgeons to take appropriate precautions, better informing the patient and better selecting the cases especially for trainee surgeons.

Keywords

Lens capsule integrity Phacoemulsification Posterior capsular rupture Risk factors 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zaidi F, Corbett M, Burton B, Bloom P (2007) Raising the benchmark for the 21st century—the 1000 cataract operations audit and survey: outcomes [published ahead of print October 18, 2006]. Br J Ophthalmol 91:731–736Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Desai P, Minassian D, Reidy A (1999) National cataract surgery survey 1997–8: a report of the results of the clinical outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1336–1340CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tabin G, Chen M, Espandar L (2008) Cataract surgery for the developing world. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 19:55–59CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ang GS, Whyte IF (2006) Effect and outcomes of posterior capsule rupture in a district general hospital setting. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:623–627CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Najjar DM, Awwad ST (2003) Cataract surgery risk score for residents and beginning surgeons. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:2036–2037CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muhtaseb M, Kalhoro A, Ionides A (2004) A system for preoperative stratification of cataract patients according to risk of intraoperative complications: a prospective analysis of 1441 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1242–1246CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Habib MS, Bunce CV, Fraser SG (2005) The role of case mix in the relation of volume and outcome in phacoemulsification. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1143–1146CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Kugelberg M, Montan P, Stenevi U, Thorburn W (2011) Decreasing rate of capsule complications in cataract surgery: eight-year study of incidence, risk factors, and data validity by the Swedish National Cataract Register. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:1762–1767CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narendran N, Jaycock P, Johnston R et al (2008) The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55,567 operations: risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye 23:31–37CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blomquist PH, Morales ME, Tong L, Ahn C (2012) Risk factors for vitreous complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:208–214CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JY, Ali R, Cremers SL, Yun SC, Henderson BA (2009) Incidence of intraoperative complications in cataract surgery performed by left-handed residents. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1019–1025CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Artzen D, Lundstrom M, Behndig A, Stenevi U, Lydahl E, Montan P (2009) Capsule complication during cataract surgery: case-control study of preoperative and intraoperative risk factors: Swedish Capsule Rupture Study Group report 2. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1688–1693CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rutar T, Porco TC, Naseri A (2009) Risk factors for intraoperative complications in resident-performed phacoemulsification surgery. Ophthalmology 116:431–436CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chakrabarti A, Singh S (2000) Phacoemulsification in eyes with white cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1041–1047CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brazitikos PD, Tsinopoulos IT, Papadopoulos NT, Fotiadis K, Stangos NT (1999) Ultrasonographic classification and phacoemulsification of white senile cataracts. Ophthalmology 106:2178–2183CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kuchle M, Viestenz A, Martus P, Handel A, Junemann A, Naumann GO (2000) Anterior chamber depth and complications during cataract surgery in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 129:281–285CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goverdhan S, Anderson L, Lockwood A, Kirwan J (2009) Risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss during cataract surgery. Eye 24:389–390CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vasavada A, Singh R (1999) Phacoemulsification in eyes with posterior polar cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:238–245CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gavris M, Popa D, Caraus C, Gusho E, Clocotan D, Horvath K, Ardelen A, Sangeorzan D (2004) Phacoemulsification in posterior polar cataract. Oftalmologia 48:36–40PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uday Devgan, MD, FACS, FRCS(Glasg) (2011) Ocular Surgery News U.S. Edition, July 25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sparrow J, Taylor H, Qureshi K, Smith R, Johnston R (2011) The cataract national data set electronic multi-centre audit of 55 567 operations: case-mix adjusted surgeon’s outcomes for posterior capsule rupture. Eye 25:1010–1015CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mittra RA, Borrillo JL, Dev S, Mieler WF, Koenig SB (2000) Retinopathy progression and visual outcomes after phacoemulsification in patients with diabetes mellitus. Arch Ophthalmol 118:912–917PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Squirrell D, Bhola R, Bush J, Winder S, Talbot J (2002) A prospective, case controlled study of the natural history of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy after uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br J Ophthalmol 86:565–571CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK (2007) The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 125:1215CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin KR, Burton RL (2000) The phacoemulsification learning curve: per-operative complications in the first 3000 cases of an experienced surgeon. Eye (Lond) 14(Pt 2):190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tyson S (2005) A System for Preoperative Stratification of Cataract Patients According to Risk of Intraoperative Complications: a Prospective Analysis of 1441 Cases. Evidence-Based Ophthalmology 6:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Şule Berk Ergun
    • 1
  • Sücattin İlker Kocamış
    • 2
    • 4
  • Hasan Basri Çakmak
    • 2
  • Nurullah Çağıl
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyNumune Training and Research HospitalAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of MedicineHitit UniversityÇorumTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of MedicineYıldırım Beyazıt UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Bahçelievler Mah. Melikgazi CadÇorumTurkey

Personalised recommendations