Advertisement

The Journal of Value Inquiry

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 455–457 | Cite as

The Mathematics of Wisdom

  • Robert E. McGrathEmail author
Discussion
  • 44 Downloads

As a psychologist steeped in quantitative methods, I am drawn to the fantasy that probabilistic thinking can enrich our understanding of any concept, even one as venerable as wisdom. I will offer two examples of how our understanding of wisdom might be enhanced by statistical thinking.

The first is what I will call the (possible) myth of the wise. There is a tradition in both moral philosophy and religion of talking about groups of people who have achieved a level of wisdom that sets them apart from the rest of humanity. Examples include the saint or bodhisattva in religion, the superman or the virtuous in philosophy. Is this an accurate description of the nature of wisdom, or is it—as Campbell (1949) suggested for the heroic archetype—merely a useful cultural fiction?

There are statistical methods that have been developed to address questions of dimensions versus categories. My colleagues and I have now conducted two studies applying these methods to data reflecting level of positive...

Notes

References

  1. Badhwar, N.K. 1996. The limited unity of virtue. Noûs 30: 306–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, D.M., and R.E. McGrath. 2018. Are there virtuous types? Finite mixture modeling of the VIA Inventory of Strengths. Journal of Positive Psychology 14: 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. 1949. The hero with a thousand faces. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Doris, J. 1998. Persons, situations and virtue ethics. Noûs 32: 504–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Le, T.N. 2008. Cultural values, life experiences, and wisdom. International Journal of Aging and Human Development 66: 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McGrath, R.E., T. Rashid, N. Park, and C. Peterson. 2010. Is optimal functioning a distinct state? The Humanistic Psychologist 38: 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nunnally, J.C., and I.H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityTeaneckUSA

Personalised recommendations