The Journal of Value Inquiry

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 479–485 | Cite as

Four Ways to Conceive of Wisdom: Wisdom as a Function of Person, Situation, Person/Situation Interaction, or Action

  • Robert J. SternbergEmail author

Mahatma Gandhi was wise; Adolf Hitler was not. When one sees examples of wise versus unwise people, one generally can distinguish them without too much trouble and reach some sort of agreement as to their wisdom among many people. But what exactly is it that distinguishes wise from unwise people? On that issue, there is much more disagreement.

Part of the disagreement in identifying wise people is in distinguishing the attributes that separate wise from unwise people, and even in deciding whether wisdom is a property of an individual, a situation, a person-situation interaction, an action, or some combination. I shall review these different views here, drawing on a selection of essays in a symposium in this journal on wisdom and adversity.

Wisdom as a Property of the Person

The most common view of wisdom, by far, is of wisdom as a function of a person. Roughly speaking, there are three models meaning (Smith & Medin, 1981), which can be applied to wisdom in a person—a defining features...



  1. Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275-324. https :// 27503 02500 3004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baehr, J. (this issue). Wisdom, suffering, and humility. Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  3. Brady, M. S. (this issue). Why suffering is essential to wisdom. Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  4. Clayton, V.P., and J.E. Birren. 1980. The development of wisdom across the life-span: A reexamination of an ancient topic. In Life-span development and behavior, vol. 3, ed. P.B. Baltes and O.G. Brim Jr., 103–135. New York, N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, D. (this issue). Perfectionism as a proxy for wisdom: A review of longitudinal studies of adversity and perfectionism. Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  6. Glueck, J., Bluck, S., & Weststrate, N. M. (this issue). More on the MORE life experience model: What we have learned (so far). Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  7. Grossmann, I. 2017. Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12 (2): 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kidd, I.J. 2018. Adversity, wisdom, and exemplarism. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (4): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McRae, E. 2018. Suffering and the Six Perfections: Using Adversity to Attain Wisdom in Mahāyāna Buddhist Ethics. The Journal of Value Inquiry 52 (4): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mischel, W. 1996. Personality and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  11. O’Grady, P. (this issue). Theoretical wisdom. Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  12. Open Science Collaboration (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349,
  13. Plews-Ogan, M., Ardelt, M., & Owens, J. (this issue). Growth through adversity: Exploring associations between internal strengths, posttraumatic growth, and wisdom. Journal of Value Inquiry. Google Scholar
  14. Smith, E.E., and D.L. Medin. 1981. Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sternberg, R.J. 1998. A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology 2: 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sternberg, R.J. 2019. Why people often prefer wise guys to guys who are wise: An augmented balance theory of the production and reception of wisdom. In Cambridge handbook of wisdom, ed. R.J. Sternberg and J. Glueck, 162–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development, College of Human EcologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations