Advertisement

Etymologies of What Can(not) be Said: Candrakīrti on Conventions and Elaborations

  • Mattia SalviniEmail author
Article

Abstract

Madhyamaka philosophers, like most Buddhist authors writing in Sanskrit and Pāli, often express their philosophical positions through the etymological expansion and interpretation of specific key terms. Their format and style reflect an attitude towards language that, while being largely shared by the entire Sanskrit tradition, is also attuned to uniquely Buddhist concerns. I shall here reconstruct and discuss some Sanskrit and Pāli etymologies, offering a possible context for the understanding of Madhyamaka thought in India. As it would be unfeasible to analyze a large amount of terms, I focus on a few expressions that bear upon the question of how Mādhyamikas understand language, both as actual linguistic expression and, more broadly/figuratively, as the activity of conceptualization. I will propose a specific reading of the Sanskrit sources in terms of linguistic, lexical, and philosophical analysis. In particular, I interpret Candrakīrti as advocating a layered view of conventional truths. He restricts the perceptions and thoughts that may qualify as conventionally valid, so as to exclude impaired perception or distorting philosophical stances. These restrictions are embedded in his etymological explanation of key philosophical terms. In brief, when Candrakīrti discusses ‘worldly conventions’ (lokasaṁvr̥ti) or refers to ‘what is established in the world’ (lokaprasiddhi), not everyone fits in his ‘world’. (In my footnotes, I leave untranslated those passages meant simply to offer textual support to my claims about specific terms, whenever they do not affect the main line of argumentation.)

Keywords

Madhyamaka Buddhist philosophy Etymology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Abbreviations and References

  1. All Pāli references as per: Chaṭṭa Saṅgāyana Tipiṭaka 4.0, Version 4.0.0.15. (1995). Igatpuri: Vipassana Research Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Almogi, O. (2009). Rong-zom-pa’s Discourses on Buddhology: A Study of Various Conceptions of Buddhahood in Indian Sources with Special Reference to the Controversy Surrounding the Existence of Gnosis (jñāna: ye shes) as Presented by the Eleventh-Century Tibetan Scholar Rong-zom Chos-kyi-bzang-po. Studia Philologica Buddhica Monograph Series 24. Tokyo: International Institute for Buddhist Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, D. (2003). Candrakīrti on Dignāga on Svalakṣaṇas. JIABS, 26, 139–174.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, D. (2005). Materials for a Mādhyamika critique of foundationalism: An annotated translation of Prasannapadā 55.11 to 75.13. JIABS, 28, 411–467.Google Scholar
  5. De Jong, J. W. (1978). Textcritical Notes on the Prasannapadā. IIJ, 20(25–59), 217–252.Google Scholar
  6. De Jong, J. W. (1949). Cinq chapitres de la Prasannapadā (= Buddhica. Documents et Travaux pour l’étude du Bouddhisme. Collection fondée par Jean Przyluski, publiée sous la direction de Marcelle Lalou, première série: Mémoires, tome IX). Paris: Paul Geuthner.Google Scholar
  7. de La Vallée Poussin, L. (1901–1914). Bodhicaryāvatārapañjikā: Prajñākaramati’s Commentary on the Bodhicaryāvatāra of Çāntideva, Edited with Indices (Vols. 983, 1031, 1090, 1126, 1139, 1305 and 1399 of Bibliotheca Indica). Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
  8. de La Vallée Poussin, L. (1903–1913). Mūlamadhyamakakārikās (Mādhyamikasūtras) de Nāgārjuna avec la Prasannapadā Commentaire de Candrakīrti. St. Petersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences.Google Scholar
  9. de La Vallée Poussin, L. (1912). Madhyamakāvatāra par Candrakīrti. Traduction tibétaine. Bibliotheca Buddhica 9. St.-Pétersbourg: Académie impériale des sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Garfield, J. L. (1995). The fundamental wisdom of the middle way. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jaini, P. S. (1979). Āryāṣṭasāhasrikāyāḥ-Prajñāpāramitāyāḥ Sāratamākhyā-Pañjikā. Patna: Kashi Prasad Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Jamchen Namdol, Ā. (1997). Ācāryanāgārjunapraṇīta Pratītyasamutpādahṛdaya evaṁ Āryadharmadhātugarbhavivaraṇa. Sarnath: Central Institute for Higher Tibetan Studies.Google Scholar
  13. Kalupahana, D. J. (1986). Nāgārjuna: The Philosophy of the Middle Way: The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā of Nagarjuna. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kern, H., & Nanjio, B. (1908). Saddharmapuṇḍarīka. St. Petersbourg: Académie Impériale des Sciences.Google Scholar
  15. Kimura, T. (1992). Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā V. Tokyo: Sankibo Busshorin.Google Scholar
  16. Koppl, H. I. (2008). Establishing appearances as divine: Rongzom Chokyi Zangpo on reasoning, Madhyamaka, and purity. Ithaca: Snow Lion.Google Scholar
  17. Kramer, J. (2014). Sthiramati‘s Pañcaskandhakavibhāṣā. 2 vols. Sanskrit Texts from the Tibetan Autonomous Region 16. Beijing/Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House/Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kurumiya, Y. (1978). Ratnaketuparivarta. Sanskrit text. Kyoto: Heirakuji-Shoten.Google Scholar
  19. Li, X. (2015). Madhyamakāvatāra-kārikā: Chapter 6. Journal of Indian Philosophy 43, 1–30.Google Scholar
  20. Li, X., & Kanō, K. (2015). Critical Edition of the Sanskrit text of the Munimatālaṁkāra, chapter 1 (fol. 48r4-58r5): Explanation of skandha, dhātu, and āyatana based on Candrakīrti’s Pancaskandhaka, The Mikkyo Bunka, Vol. 234, Spring 2015.Google Scholar
  21. MacDonald, A. (2015). In clear words: The Prasannapadā, chapter one. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Madhyamakāvatāraṭīkā (Tib.). See the Madhyamaka section of http://www.asianclassics.org/
  23. Mahāvyutpatti with sGra sbyor bam po gñis pa (Tib.). See: https://www2.hf.uio.no/poly glotta/index.php?page=volume&bid=2&vid=78&entity=78&kid=78
  24. Mitra, R. (1888). Aṣṭasāhasrikā: a collection of discourses on the metaphysics of the Mahāyāna School of the Buddhists. Calcutta: G.H. Rouse, Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
  25. MMK: Mūlamadhyamakakārikā as it appears in Candrakīrti’s Prasannapadā. See MacDonald [2015] and de La Vallée Poussin [1903-1913].Google Scholar
  26. Oka, K. G. (1913). The Nāmaliṅgānuśānaṁ (Amarakośa) of Amarasiṁha. With the commentary (Amarakośodghāṭana) of Kṣīrasvāmin. Poona: Law Printing Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pradhan, P. 1967 Abhidharmakośabhāṣya of Vasubandhu. TSWS 8. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  28. Saito, A. (1984). A study of the Buddhapālitamūlamadhyamakavṛtti. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
  29. Salvini, M. (2009). Convention and agency in the philosophies of the Mahāyāna. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, SOAS, London.Google Scholar
  30. Salvini, M. (2014). Dependent arising, non-arising, and the mind: MMK1 and the Abhidharma. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 42(4), 471–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seyfort Ruegg, D. (2002). Two Prolegomena to Madhyamaka Philosophy: Candrakīrti’s Prasannapadā Madhyamakavṛttiḥ on Madhyamakakārikā I.1, and Tson kha pa blo bzan grags pa / rGyal tshab dar ma rin chen’s dKa’ gnad / gnas brgyad kyi zin bris: Annotated Translations. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde, Heft 54. Wien: Arbeitskreis für tibetische und buddhistische Studien, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
  32. Siderits, M., & Katsura, S. (2013). Nāgārjuna’s middle way. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  33. Śivadatta, P. (1929). The Nāmaliṅgānuśānaṁ (Amarakośa) of Amarasiṁha. With the Commentary Vyākhyāsudhā (or Ramāśramī) of Bhānujī Dīkṣita. Bombay: Nirṇaya Sāgar.Google Scholar
  34. Skilling, P. (1994). Mahāsūtras: Great discourses of the Buddha (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pali Text Society.Google Scholar
  35. Study Group on Buddhist Sanskrit Literature. (2004). Jñānālokālaṃkāra: Transliterated Sanskrit Text Collated with Tibetan and Chinese Translations. The Institute for Comprehensive Studies of Buddhism, Taisho University. Tokyo: Taisho University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Tatia, N. (1976). Abhidharmasamuccayabhāṣyam. TSWS 17. Patna: K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  37. Thatte, C. S. (1882). Amarakośa, with the commentary of Maheśvara. Bombay: Nirṇaya Sāgar.Google Scholar
  38. Tillemans, T. J. F. (2011). How far can a Mādhyamika Buddhist reform conventional truth? Dismal relativism, fictionalism, easy–easy truth, and the alternatives. The cowherds, moonshadows: Conventional truths in Madhyamaka philosophy (pp. 151–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tillemans, T. J. F. (2018). Mādhyamikas playing bad hands: The case of customary truth. Journal of Indian Philosophy (Online First: August 2018).Google Scholar
  40. Wogihara, U. (1932). Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā: Abhisamayālaṃkārālokā Prajñāpāramitāvyākhyā, The Work of Haribhadra. Tokyo: Toyo Bunko.Google Scholar
  41. Wogihara, U. (1936). Sphuṭārthā Abhidharmakośavyākhyā. Tokyo: Sankibo.Google Scholar
  42. Xuezhu, L., & Steinkellner, E. (2008). Vasubandhu’s Pancaskandhaka. Sanskrit Texts from the Tibetan Autonomous Region 4. Beijing/Vienna: China Tibetology Publishing House / Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mahidol UniversityNakhon PathomThailand

Personalised recommendations