Advertisement

Interchange

pp 1–19 | Cite as

Second Language Reading from an Hegelian Perspective

  • Manfred Man-fat WuEmail author
Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Second language research has traditionally been characterized by the cognitive perspective which focuses on how the individual processes language. There has been an emerging trend over the past few decades on taking into consideration the social influences on second language learning based on diverse theoretical frameworks. Research on second language reading is no exception. Hegel points out the unique features of publicity, persistence over time, resistance to negation, universality and objectivity of the written form. These features enable the written form to perform some social and collective functions such as cultural preservation and enforcement of contracts that cannot be replaced by the spoken form. Hegel’s philosophy also suggests that reading in a second language is qualitatively different from reading in a first language, and second language reading is an enculturation process. Hegel’s accounts on these three aspects of second language reading provide new insights to both theories and practice of the teaching of second language reading.

Keywords

Hegel Second language acquisition L2 reading Critical literacy Enculturation Universalization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to the final version of the paper and the editors for the support during the review process.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

I declare that I am the only author of this manuscript and I have no potential conflicts of interest to declare. This manuscript is my original work and it is not being considered for publication elsewhere.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

This research did not involve human participants and/or animals.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply to this research.

References

  1. Altman, C., Goldstein, T., & Armon-Lotem, S. (2018). Vocabulary, metalinguistic awareness and language dominance among bilingual preschool children. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1953.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01953.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. J. (2009). ACTIVE reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. In Z. Han & N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 117–143). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2009). Memory. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E., Peets, K. F., & Moreno, S. (2014). Producing bilinguals through immersion education: Development of metalinguistic awareness. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 177–191.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000288.Google Scholar
  5. Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 63–83.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.63.Google Scholar
  6. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  7. Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and language learning: Teaching, research and scholarship. Language Teaching, 37(3), 149–168.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002289.Google Scholar
  8. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2012). Reading comprehension development from seven to fourteen Years: Implications for assessment. In J. P. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how to assess reading abilities (pp. 59–76). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  9. Center for Adult English Language Acquisition. (2007). The CAELA guide for adult ESL trainers. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, Xi, Dronjic, V., & Helms-Park, R. (Eds.). (2016). Reading in a second language: Cognitive and psycholinguistic issues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Cheung, H., Chung, K. K. H., Wong, S. W. L., McBride-Chang, C., Penney, T. B., & Ho, C. S.-H. (2010). Speech perception, metalinguistic awareness, reading, and vocabulary in Chinese-English bilingual children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 367–380.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017850.Google Scholar
  12. Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanič, R., & Martin-Jones, M. (1987). Critical language awareness. Centre for Language in Social Life Working Paper. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  13. Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanič, R., & Martin-Jones, M. (1990). Critical language awareness. Part I: A critical review of three current approaches to language awareness. Language and Education, 4(4), 249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789009541291.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanič, R., & Martin-Jones, M. (1991). Critical language awareness. Part II: Towards critical alternatives. Language and Education, 5(1), 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789109541298.Google Scholar
  15. Cowley, S. J. (Ed.). (2011). Distributed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  16. Cowley, S. J., & Fester, M-T. (2017). Voices in human agency: The power of presence. Reti Saperi Linguaggi, 2017(2), 303-320. http://doi.org/10.12832/88787.Google Scholar
  17. Cowley, S. J., & Markoš, A. (2018). Evolution, lineages and human language. Language Sciences, 71, 8–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.03.005.Google Scholar
  18. Derrida, J. (1978). Speech and writing according to Hegel. Man and World: An International Philosophical Review, 11(1–2), 107–130.Google Scholar
  19. Derrida, J. (1982). The pit and the pyramid. Margins of philosophy (pp. 69–108). Sussex: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dressler, C., & Kamil, M. L. (2006). First- and second language literacy. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners (pp. 197–238). Mahwah: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the teaching of L2 reading. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 5–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00060.x.Google Scholar
  22. Eskey, D. E. (2005). Reading in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 563–579). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  24. Fester, T.-M., & Cowley, S. J. (2018). Breathing life into social presence: The case of texting between friends. Pragmatics and Society, 9(2), 274–296.  https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.15067.fes.Google Scholar
  25. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285–300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x.Google Scholar
  26. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/Foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00670.x.Google Scholar
  27. García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism and translanguaging in the 21st century. In A. Mohanty, M. Panda, R. Phillipson, & T. Skunabb-Kangas (Eds.), Multilingual education for social justice: Globalising the local (pp. 128–145). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  28. Gass, S., Lee, J., & Roots, R. (2007). Firth and Wagner: New ideas or a new articulation? Modern Language Journal, 91, 786–797.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00669.x.Google Scholar
  29. Gaux, C., & Gombert, J. E. (1999). Implicit and explicit syntactic knowledge and reading in pre-adolescents. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 169–188.Google Scholar
  30. Goodman, K. (1986). What’s whole in whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  31. Goodman, K. (1996). On reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  32. Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–406.Google Scholar
  33. Grabe, W. (2002). Dilemmas for the development of second language reading abilities. In J. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 276–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Grabe, W. (2009a). Epilogue: Reflections on second language reading research and instruction. In Z. Han & N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 192–205). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  35. Grabe, W. (2009b). Teaching and testing reading. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 441–462). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405154895.2009.x.Google Scholar
  36. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2014). Teaching reading for academic purposes. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 189–205). Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
  38. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoire of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13520289.Google Scholar
  39. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  40. Han, Z., Anderson, N. J., & Freeman, D. (2009). Introduction: Crossing the boundaries. In Z. Han & N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 1–13). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Werke. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  42. Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Hegel’s philosophy of mind: Being part three of the encyclopaedia of philosophical sciences (W. Wallace, Trans). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1894).Google Scholar
  43. Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of the spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1807).Google Scholar
  44. Hegel, G. W. F. (1979) System of ethical life and first philosophy of spirit (H. S. Harris & T. M. Knox, Trans.). New York: State University of New York Press. (Original work published 1802–1803).Google Scholar
  45. Hodges, B. H. (2009). Ecological pragmatics: Values, dialogical arrays, complexity, and caring. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(3), 628–652.  https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.3.08hod.Google Scholar
  46. Hodges, B. H., & Fowler, C. A. (2010). New affordances for language: Distributed, dynamical, and dialogical resources. Ecological Psychology, 22(4), 239–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2010.517086.Google Scholar
  47. Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799.Google Scholar
  48. Järvilehto, T., Nurkkala, V. M., & Koskela, K. (2011). The role of anticipation in reading. In S. J. Cowley (Ed.), Distributed language (pp. 15–32). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  49. Jiménez, R. T., David, S., Fagan, K., Risko, V. J., Pacheco, M., Pray, L., et al. (2015). Using translation to drive conceptual development for students becoming literate in English as an additional language. Research in the Teaching of English, 49, 248–271.Google Scholar
  50. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x.Google Scholar
  51. Klauda, S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 310–321.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310.Google Scholar
  52. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kojève, A., & Queneau, R. (1969). Introduction to the reading of Hegel (J. H. Nichols, Jr., Trans.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1947).Google Scholar
  54. Lafford, B. A. (2007). Second Language Acquisition Recnceptualized? The impact of Firth and Wagner (1997) (2007). Modern Language Journal, 91, 735–756.Google Scholar
  55. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural Theory and second language learning. In B. Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 201–224). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 141–165.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141.Google Scholar
  57. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complexity theory. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 73–87). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Levinas, E. (2007). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Li, L., & Wu, X. (2015). Effects of Metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from Grades 2 to 4. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0114417.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114417.Google Scholar
  60. Linell, P. (2013). Distributed language theory, with or without dialogue. Language Sciences, 40, 168–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.04.001.Google Scholar
  61. MacDonald, M. N., & O’Regan, J. P. (2013). The ethics of intercultural communication. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(10), 1005–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00833.x.Google Scholar
  62. Malakoff, M. (1992). Translation ability: A natural bilingual and metalinguistic skill. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 515–530). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  63. Moore, P. (2018). Task-based language teaching. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0175.Google Scholar
  64. Nassaji, H. (2011). Issues in second-language reading: Implications for acquisition and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(2), 173–184.  https://doi.org/10.2307/41203420.Google Scholar
  65. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  66. O’Regan, J. P. (2006). The text as a critical object: On theorising exegetic procedure in classroom-based critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 3(2), 179–209.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900600908111.Google Scholar
  67. Orellana, M. F., & Reynolds, J. F. (2008). Cultural modeling: Leveraging bilingual skills for school paraphrasing tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 48–65.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.1.4.Google Scholar
  68. Orellana, M. F., Reynolds, J. F., Dorner, L., & Meza, M. (2003). In other words: Translating or “para-phrasing” as a family literacy practice in immigrant households. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 12–34.  https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.1.2.Google Scholar
  69. Pacheco, M., & Gutierrez, K. D. (2009). Cultural-historical approaches to literacy teaching and learning. In C. Compton-Lilly (Ed.), Breaking the silence: Recognizing the social and cultural resources students bring to the classroom (pp. 60–80). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  70. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  71. Perfetti, C., & Adolf, S. M. (2012). Reading comprehension: A conceptual framework from word meaning to text meaning. In J. Sabatini, E. Albro, & T. O’Reilly (Eds.), Measuring up: Advances in how we assess reading ability (pp. 3–20). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  72. Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  74. Ramirez, G., Walton, P., & Roberts, W. (2013). Morphological awareness and vocabulary development among kindergarteners with different ability levels. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 54–64.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509970.Google Scholar
  75. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). The psychology of reading (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  76. Reid, J. (1993). Teaching ESL writing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.Google Scholar
  77. Reid, J. (2007). Real words: Language and system in Hegel. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.  https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442684744.Google Scholar
  78. Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it? In J. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 295–302). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Richards, J., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Teaching reading. In J. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 273–275). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Sadoski, M. (2009). Dual coding theory: Reading comprehension and beyond. In C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 38–49). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  81. Samuels, S. J. (2006). Toward a model reading fluency. In S. J. Samuels & A. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about fluency instruction (pp. 24–46). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  82. Seidenberg, M., & McClelland, J. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523.Google Scholar
  83. Sheen, R. (2003). Focus on form—A myth in the making? ELT Journal, 57(3), 225–233.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.225.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, F. (1994). Understanding reading (5th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & Rossata de Almeida, C. (2017). Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across modes and languages. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 6–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.001.Google Scholar
  86. Snow, C. E., & Sweet, A. P. (2003). Reading for comprehension. In A. P. Sweet & C. E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 1–11). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  87. Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271–288). New York, NY: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_20.Google Scholar
  88. Stähler, T. (2003). Does Hegel privilege speech over writing? A critique of Jacques Derrida. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 11(2), 191–204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0967255032000074181.Google Scholar
  89. Stanovich, K. E. (1984). The interactive-compensatory model of reading. Remedial and Special Education, 5(3), 11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258400500306.Google Scholar
  90. Surber, J. (Ed.). (2006). Hegel and language. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  91. Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 210–245.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2011.591274.Google Scholar
  92. Tunmer, W. E., & Bowey, J. A. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In W. E. Tunmer, C. Pratt, & M. L. Herriman (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children (pp. 144–168). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  93. UNESCO (n.d.). Literacy. Retrieved May 2018, from https://en.unesco.org/themes/literacy.
  94. van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction and language Learning. Language Awareness, 7(2–3), 128–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667105.Google Scholar
  95. van Lier, L. (2010). The ecology of language learning: Practice to theory, theory to practice. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 2–6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.005
  96. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.). (2011a). Special issue: Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross-linguistics perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 457–466.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000154
  97. Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (Eds.). (2011b). Special issue: Vocabulary growth and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536124.
  98. Vernon, J. (2007). Hegel’s philosophy of language. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  99. Wallace, C. (1992). Critical literacy awareness in the EFL classroom. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 59–92). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  100. Wallace, C. (1999). Critical language awareness: Key principles for a course in critical reading. Language Awareness, 8(3), 98–110.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419908667121.Google Scholar
  101. Wallace, C. (2003). Critical reading in language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  102. Wei, L. (2017). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039.Google Scholar
  103. Williams, R. (1986). Top ten principles for teaching reading. English Language Teaching Journal, 40(1), 42–45.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/40.1.42.Google Scholar
  104. Woll, N. (2018). Investigating dimensions of metalinguistic awareness: what think-aloud protocols revealed about the cognitive processes involved in positive transfer from L2 to L3. Language Awareness, 27(1–2), 167–185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1432057.Google Scholar
  105. Wu, M. M. (2016). Implications of Hegel’s theories of language on second language teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 346–366.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1151081.Google Scholar
  106. Zheng, D., Schmidt, M., Hu, Y., Liu, M., & Hsu, M. (2017). Eco-dialogical learning and translanguaging in open-ended 3D virtual learning environments: Where place, time, and objects matter. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 107–122.  https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2909.Google Scholar
  107. Zipke, M. (2007). The role of metalinguistic awareness in the reading comprehension of Sixth and Seventh Graders. Reading Psychology, 28(4), 375–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701260615.Google Scholar
  108. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situational models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research OfficeThe Open University of Hong KongHo Man TinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations