Advertisement

Interchange

pp 1–20 | Cite as

Managerial Decisions to Enhance Student/Customer Retention: The Case of Ontario’s Academic Institutions

  • Bayan Yousef FarhanEmail author
Article

Abstract

Academic institutions invest significant sums of money to serve their students and to influence their decisions to stay. This study sheds light on the challenge for academic institutions to allocate their investments to keep students and enhance their retention rates. This study aims to investigate whether or not providing academic services has affected the retention rate in Ontario’s higher education market. The variable of academic services is measured through an examination of the effect of providing student services, technology and library acquisition, and scholarships and bursaries. The retention rate variable reflects students returning to an institution for the second year. The results of this study were reported based on examining the responsiveness; first, for all universities together (the whole market), and then for each university in Ontario’s higher education market.

Keywords

Higher education institutions Academic leaders Academic Services Retention 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Belanger, C., Mount, J., & Wilson, M. (2002). Institutional image and retention. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(3), 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braxton, J. M., Doyle, W. R., & Jones, W. A. (2013). Rethinking college student retention. New York: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand.Google Scholar
  3. Breier, M. (2010). From ‘financial considerations’ to ‘poverty’: Towards a reconceptualisation of the role of finances in higher education student drop out. Higher Education, 60(6), 657–670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9343-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter, S., & Yeo, A. C. (2016). Students-as-customers’ satisfaction, predictive retention with marketing implications. The International Journal of Educational Management, 30(5), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cox, P. L., Elizabeth, D. S., Bobrowski, P. E., & Graham, G. (2005). Enhancing the first-year experience for business students: Student retention and academic success. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7(1), 40–68.Google Scholar
  6. Cruise, S., & Wade, R. (2016). Practical suggestions from the literature for student retention in nonprofit programs. The Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 6(2), 144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis, M. J. (2012). Anticipatory enrollment management: Another level of enrollment management. College and University, 88(1), 10–16.Google Scholar
  8. DeShields, Oscar W., Jr., Ali, K., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. The International Journal of Educational Management, 19(2), 128–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2002). Simulating the longitudinal effects of changes in financial aid on student departure from college. The Journal of Human Resources, 37(3), 653–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farhan, B. Y. (2017). Examining competition in Ontario’s higher education market. Interchange, Springer, 48(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges. Test, 16(1), 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-007-0046-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jamelske, E. (2009). Measuring the impact of a university first-year experience program on student GPA and retention. Higher Education, 57(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Khoo, S., Ha, H., & McGregor, S. L. T. (2017). Service quality and student/customer satisfaction in the private tertiary education sector in Singapore. The International Journal of Educational Management, 31(4), 430–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mohammad, A. A., & Mouakket, S. (2010). The influence of technology acceptance model (TAM) factors on students’ e-satisfaction and e-retention within the context of UAE e-learning. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 3(4), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nora, A., Barlow, L., & Crisp, G. (2006). Examining the tangible and psychosocial benefits of financial aid with student access, engagement, and degree attainment. The American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1636–1651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pigini, C., & Staffolani, S. (2016). Beyond participation: Do the cost and quality of higher education shape the enrollment composition? the case of italy. Higher Education, 71(1), 119–142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9892-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rowley, J. (2003). Retention: Rhetoric or realistic agendas for the future of higher education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(6), 248–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson, L. V. E., Coulter, B., Lunnen, K., Mallory, J., & Williams, M. (1999). Improving undergraduate student retention. Proceedings of the Allied Academies International Conference. Academy of Educational Leadership., 4(2), 36–42.Google Scholar
  19. Wong, P., Ng, P. M., Mak, C. K., & Chan, J. K. (2016). Students’ choice of sub-degree programmes in self-financing higher education institutions in hong kong. Higher Education, 71(4), 455–472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9915-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wright, R. E. (2012). Marketing orientations and higher education: Applications and implications. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 13(5), 53–57.Google Scholar
  21. Yorke, M. (1998). Undergraduate non-completion in England: Some implications for the higher education system and its institutions. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationAl Ain University of Science and TechnologyAl AinUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations