Advertisement

Interchange

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Rationale for Moral Education: A Reading in Plato’s Republic

  • Arik SegevEmail author
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

While the reality of human existence may appear to be an unfair and unreasonable arena, we humans are nevertheless called on to live fairly, justly, and morally. If a just and moral action and life includes elements of self-restraint, of waiving of what would seem to be in one’s interests, a question may very reasonably be asked regarding the motivation (not in terms of the general social realm, i.e. fear of social punishment or interest in gaining a social advantage) for acting and living justly and morally in such an unfair and unreasonable reality. From a moral education point of view, it may seem that, as teachers and parents, we have every reason, and even a duty and responsibility, to advise our students and children (face-to-face and behind closed doors—far from the general social realm) that, if they have an option to increase their relative advantage without risk to themselves or of being caught (let alone risking themselves for a big moral idea), they should do so without hesitation. Would you advise your children, students or yourself otherwise? If so, why? What is the rationale for moral education in our prima facie unfair and unreasonable world? After showing the limitations of another recently proposed answer to the question, one based on Meillassoux’s ethic of immortality, I suggest an alternative based on a reading of Plato’s Republic. In my reading I focus on Plato’s idea of the soul and suggest an interpretation of the allegory of the cave.

Keywords

Allegory of the cave Plato’s idea of the soul Moral education Reality 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Banerji, C. R. S., Mansour, T., & Severini, S. (2012). Every conceivable harm: A further defence of anti-natalism. Journal of Physics A.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/3/035101.Google Scholar
  2. Benatar, D. (2012). Every conceivable harm: A further defence of anti-natalism. South African Journal of Philosophy, 31(1), 128–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benatar, D. (2013). Still better never have been: a reply to (more of) my critics. Journal of Ethics, 17(1/2), 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedictus, L. (2012). “The day I found £250000 in my bank account”, The Guardian, January 9. Retrieve on 1 March 2017 from: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2012/jan/09/bank-account-250000-error.
  5. Bøyum, S. (2010). The concept of philosophical education. Educational Theory, 60(5), 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gadamer, H. G. (1986). The idea of the good in platonic-aristotelian philosophy. (P. C. Smith, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Irwin, T. (1995). Plato’s ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kraut, R. (1999). The defence of justice in Plato’s Republic. In R. Kraut, (Ed.), pp. 311–337. The Cambridge Companion to Plato. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lorenz, H. (2009). Ancient theories of soul, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/ancient-soul/.
  10. Macintyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: The University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  11. Mangham, L. L. (1995). MacIntyre and the manager. Organization, 2(2), 181–204.  https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849522002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meillassoux, Q. (2010). The immanence of the world beyond. (Peter M. Candler, Jr., A. Pabst and A. Riches Trans.). In C. Cunningham & P. M. Candler Jr (Eds.), The Grandeur of reason (pp. 444–478). Norwich: SCM.Google Scholar
  13. Nietzsche, F. (2009). The gay science. (J. Nauckhoff, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Oral, S. B. (2017). The question concerning the aims of moral education: Meillassoux’s Ethic of immortality. Interchange, 48, 39–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-016-9284-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plato. (1925). Symposium in Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol. 9 (Harold N. Fowler Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Retrieved from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0059.tlg011.perseus-eng1:210e.
  16. Plato. (1969). Republic. In Plato in Twelve Volumes, Vols. 5 & 6. (P. Shorey, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press; London, William Heinemann. Retrieved from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0168%3Abook%3D1%3Asection%3D327a.
  17. Rist, J. M. (2012). Plato’s Moral realism: The discovery of the presupposition of ethics. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vlastos, G. (1973). Degrees of reality. In G. Vlastos (Ed.), Platonic Studies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1965). Lecture on ethics. The Philosophical Review, Vol. 74, No. 1, pp. 3–12. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2183526.pdf.
  20. Wivestad, S. M. (2013). On becoming better human beings: Six stories to live by. Studies in Philosophy of Education, 32, 55–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9321-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kaye Academic College of Education; Sapir Academic CollegeBe’er ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations