Advertisement

Dynamic In-band Self-backhauling for 5G Systems with Inter-cell Resource Coordination

  • Anna ŁukowaEmail author
  • Venkatkumar Venkatasubramanian
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

5G systems are expected to utilize frequency bands above 6 GHz in the so-called millimeter-wave (mmWave) spectrum because of large bandwidths. It is well know that higher carrier frequency bands suffer from higher path loss attenuation. It addition, dynamic blockages can be a challenge for achieving good coverage. Therefore, millimeter-wave deployments require cell densification to achieve high data rates. However, densification further leads to challenges in the system design because of the need for low cost backhaul. The concept of wireless self-backhauling (sBH) aims to provide a provide a backhaul solution at reduced cost. Self-backhaul solution makes use of integrated access and backhaul (IAB) at each base station to realize on-demand flexible backhaul and access. In this paper, we investigate the performance of in-band self-backhauling with integrated access and backhaul in a real-life street canyon scenario. We consider centralized scheduling which can effectively allocate radio resources for backhaul and access on a time slot basis with half duplex constraint. The centralized scheduler further mitigates cross-interference between backhaul and access using a beam coordination and interference cancellation. Our results show that the proposed relaying concept offers good user throughput gains for cell edge users and is also robust to offloading of users to relay cells. Results also show that interference cancellation receivers can improve the uplink and backhaul spectral efficiency in IAB deployment by around 10%.

Keywords

Self-backhaul 5G Time division duplex Radio resource management Interference coordination 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP TR 38.874 V16.0.0, NR; Study on Integrated Access and Backhaul, 2018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP, Overview of 3GPP Release 10 V0.2.1, 2014.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Saleh, O. Bulakci, S. Redana, B. Raaf, J. Hämäläinen, Enhancing LTE-advanced relay deployments via biasing in cell selection and handover decision, IEEE PIMRC, 2010.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Pabst, et al., Relay-based deployment concepts for wireless and mobile broadband radio, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 42, pp. 80–89, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Saleh et al. Resource sharing in relay-enhanced 4G networks. In European Wireless Conference, 2011.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Gora, S. Redana In-band and out-band relaying configurations for dual-carrier LTE-advanced system. In IEEE PIMRC, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. Venkatkumar, T. Wirth, T. Haustein, E. Schulz, Relaying in Long Term Evolution: indoor full frequency reuse. In European Wireless Conference, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Gupta, S. Kalyanasundaram, Resource allocation for self-backhauled networks with half-duplex small cells. In IEEE ICC Workshops, 2017.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Gora, K. Safjan, Design and optimization aspects of wireless backhaul operated in the millimeter wave spectrum. In IEEE PIMRC, 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Lukowa, V. Venkatasubramanian and P. Marsch, Dynamic self-backhauling in 5G networks. In IEEE PIMRC, 2018.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Sun, T. S. Rappaport, R. W. Heath, A. Nix and S. Rangan, MIMO for millimeter-wave wireless communications: beamforming, spatial multiplexing, or both?, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 52, p. 12, 2014.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. A. Thomas, B. Mondal, F. W. Vook, Methods for switching between long term and short term transmit beamforming in OFDM. In IEEE VTC Spring, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Tavares, G. Berardinelli, N. Mahmood, T. Sorensen, P. Mogensen, On the potential of interference rejection combining in B4G networks. In IEEE VTC Fall 2013, 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Lukowa, V. Venkatasubramanian, On the performance of 5G flexible TDD systems with coordinated beamforming. In IEEE WiMob, pp. 175–180, 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Lukowa, V. Venkatasubramanian, Performance of strong interference cancellation in flexible UL/DL TDD systems using coordinated muting, scheduling and rate allocation. In IEEE WCNC 2016, 2016.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Lukowa and V. Venkatasubramanian, On the Value of MIMO rank coordination for interference cancellation-based 5G flexible TDD systems, IEEE CSCN, Vol. 2016, pp. 1–7, 2016.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A.C. Eska, G. Hendrantoro, Preliminary study on the effect of building-induced diffraction upon millimeter wave mobile communications systems with macrodiversity. In TSSA, 2012.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    3GPP TR 38.901 V14.0.0, 5G Study on channel model for frequencies from 0.5 to 100 GHz, 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    3GPP TS 38.213 V15.2.0, NR; Physical layer procedures for data, 2018.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NokiaWrocławPoland
  2. 2.Poznań University of TechnologyPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations