Advertisement

Integrating storytelling and quantitative career assessment

  • Mary McMahonEmail author
  • Jenny Bimrose
  • Mark Watson
  • Peyman Abkhezr
Article

Abstract

Combining quantitative career assessment with narrative career counselling is a career counselling challenge. The Integrative Structured Interview (ISI) facilitates this integration through the narration of career stories based on quantitative scores, such as those of the Self-Directed Search. The aims of this single case research were to: (a) examine the process of an Integrative Structured Interview with a participant, and (b) explore it from the participant and interviewer perspectives using an interpersonal process recall interview. The results suggest the benefits of the ISI process and a need for further research with a range of client groups.

Keywords

Integrative Structured Interview Quantitative career assessment Narrative career counselling 

Résumé

Intégration du récit narratif et de l’évaluation quantitative de carrière.

Combiner l’évaluation quantitative de carrière avec l’orientation professionnelle narrative est un défi de l’orientation professionnelle. L’entretien Structuré Intégratif (Integrative Structured Interview, ISI) facilite cette intégration à travers des récits de carrière basés sur des scores quantitatifs, tels que ceux de la Recherche auto-dirigée (Self-Directed Search). Les objectifs de cette étude de cas étaient les suivants : (a) examiner le processus d’un entretien Structuré Intégratif avec un participant, et (b) l’étudier du point de vue du participant et de l’enquêteur en utilisant un Entretien de Rappel du Processus Interpersonnel (Interpersonal Process Recall interview). Les résultats suggèrent les avantages du processus ISI et la nécessité de recherches ultérieures avec des groupes de clients divers.

Zusammenfassung

Integration von Storytelling und quantitativer Laufbahndiagnostik.

Die Kombination von quantitativer Laufbahndiagnostik und narrativer Laufbahnberatung ist eine beraterische Herausforderung. Das Integrative Structured Interview (ISI) vereinfacht diese Integration durch das Erzählen von Laufbahnstories auf der Grundlage von quantitativen Angaben, wie sie beispielsweise der Self-Directed Search liefert. Die Ziele der vorliegenden Einzelfalluntersuchung waren: (a) die Durchführung eines Integrative Structured Interviews zu betrachten, und (b) dieses mit Hilfe eines Interpersonal Process Recall Interviews aus der Sicht des Teilnehmers und aus der Sicht des Interviewers zu durchleuchten. Die Ergebnisse sprechen für den Nutzen des Integrative Structured Interviews, bedürfen aber noch weiterer Forschung mit unterschiedlichen Klientengruppen.

Resumen

Integrar la narración de cuentos y la evaluación cuantitativa de la carrera.

Combinar la evaluación profesional cuantitativa con el asesoramiento profesional narrativo es un desafío de asesoramiento profesional. La Entrevista Estructurada Integrativa (ISI) facilita esta integración a través de la narración de historias de carrera basadas en puntajes cuantitativos, tales como la Búsqueda Autodirigida. Los objetivos de esta investigación de caso único fueron: (a) examinar el proceso de una Entrevista Estructurada Integrativa con un participante, y (b) explorarlo desde las perspectivas del participante y el entrevistador utilizando una entrevista de Recuperación de Proceso Interpersonal. Los resultados sugieren los beneficios del proceso ISI y la necesidad de realizar más investigaciones con una variedad de grupos de asesorados/clientes.

Notes

References

  1. Abkhezr, P., McMahon, M., Campbell, M., & Glasheen, K. (In press). Exploring the boundary between narrative research and narrative intervention: Implications of participating in narrative inquiry for young people with refugee backgrounds. Narrative Inquiry.Google Scholar
  2. Babbie, E. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report,13, 544–559.Google Scholar
  4. Bimrose, J., Barnes, S -A., & Hughes, D. (2008). Adult career progression and advancement: A five year study of the effectiveness of guidance. Report to Government. London: Warwick Institute for Employment Research, Department for Education & Skills. Retrieved from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/publications/2008/eg_report_4_years_on_final.pdf
  5. Cardoso, P., Goncalves, M. M., Duarte, M. E., Silva, J. R., & Alves, D. (2016). Life design counseling outcome and process: A case study with an adolescent. Journal of Vocational Behavior,93, 58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2006). Blurring boundaries in qualitative health research on sensitive topics. Qualitative Health Research,16, 853–871.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliott, R. (1986). Interpersonal process recall (IPR) as a psychotherapy process research method. In W. M. Pinsof & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 503–528). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing,62, 107–115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2003). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today,24, 105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal,29, 75–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartung, P. J., & Vess, L. (2016). Critical moments in career construction counseling. Journal of Vocational Behavior,97, 31–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heppner, M. J., & Heppner, P. P. (2003). Identifying process variables in career counseling: A research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior,62(3), 429–452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00053-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holland, J. L. (1985). The Self-Directed Search: A guide to educational and vocational planning. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  14. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  15. Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research,15, 1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kagan, N. (1980). Influencing human interaction: Eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 262–283). Toronto, ON: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Kagan, N. (1984). Interpersonal process recall: Basic methods and recent research. In D. Larson (Ed.), Teaching psychological skills: Models for giving psychology away (pp. 229–244). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  18. Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Qualitative Social Research,7, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-7.1.75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Larsen, D., Flesaker, K., & Stege, R. (2008). Qualitative interviewing using interpersonal process recall: Investigating internal experiences during professional-client conversations. The International Journal of Qualitative Methods,7(1), 18–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690800700102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leech, N. A., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly,22, 557–584.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Social Research,1, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
  23. McMahon, M. (2005). Career counseling: Applying the systems theory framework of career development. Journal of Employment Counseling,42(1), 29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2005.tb00896.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2010). Storytelling: Moving from thin stories to thick and rich stories. In K. Maree (Ed.), Career counselling: Methods that work (pp. 53–63). Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  25. McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2012a). Story crafting: Strategies for facilitating narrative career counselling. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance,12(3), 211–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-012-9228-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2012b). Telling stories of career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment,20(40), 440–451.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712448999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McMahon, M., & Watson, M. (2015). Career assessment: Qualitative approaches. Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McMahon, M., Watson, M., Chetty, C., & Hoelson, C. N. (2012). Examining process constructs of narrative career counselling: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,40(2), 127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2011.646949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McMahon, M., Watson, M., & Lee, M. C. Y. (2018a). Qualitative career assessment: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior,110(Part B), 420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMahon, M., Watson, M., & Zietsman, L. (2018b). Adults changing careers through university education: Making meaning of quantitative career assessment scores through an Integrative Structured Interview. South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 44, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v44i0.1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Patton, W., & McMahon, M. (2014). Career development and systems theory: Connecting theory and practice (3rd ed.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid, H., & Bassot, B. (2011). Reflection: A constructive space for career development. In M. McMahon & M. Watson (Eds.), Career counselling and constructivism: Elaboration of constructs (pp. 101–115). New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, M. S. (2005). Implications of the paradigms of constructivism and social constructionism: A challenge to traditional boundaries between research and intervention. Paper presented at a symposium on Constructivism and Vocational Psychology at the Society for Vocational Psychology’s 7th Biennial Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, June 2.Google Scholar
  35. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., McNaughton Nicholls, C., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Sampson, J. P., Jr. (2009). Modern and postmodern career theories: The unnecessary divorce. The Career Development Quarterly,58, 91–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2009.tb00178.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sampson, J. P., Jr., Peterson, G. W., Osborn, D. S., & Hayden, S. C. (2015). Using career theory to integrate qualitative and quantitative career assessment. In M. McMahon & M. Watson (Eds.), Career assessment: Qualitative approaches (pp. 181–190). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health,23, 334–340.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3c334:AID-NUR9%3e3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schultheiss, D. E. (2017). Integrating theory, research, and practice in vocational psychology: Perspectives of a Journal of Vocational Behavior editorial board member. In J. P. Sampson, E. Bullock-Yowell, V. C. Dozier, D. S. Osborn, & J. G. Lenz (Eds.), Integrating theory, research, and practice in vocational psychology: Current status and future directions (p. 166–174). Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.  https://doi.org/10.17125/svp2016.ch17 Google Scholar
  40. Shears, M., & Harvey-Beavis, A. (2012). The Self-Directed Search: A guide to educational and vocational planning (Australian Edition). Melbourne: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  41. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information,22, 63–75.  https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  43. Viney, L. L., & Nagy, S. (2012). Qualitative methods in personal construct research: A set of possible criteria. In P. Caputi, L. L. Viney, B. M. Walker, & N. Crittenden (Eds.), Personal construct methodology (pp. 53–68). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. Watson, M. (2016). Career development in changing world contexts: Reconstructing the wheels of theory and practice. CEAV (Career Education Association of Victoria) e-Journal,43(13), 18.Google Scholar
  45. Watson, M. (2017). Bridging quantitative and qualitative career assessment: The integrative structured interview process. In M. McMahon (Ed.), Career counselling: Constructivist approaches (2nd ed., pp. 260–269). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2014). Making meaning of quantitative assessment in career counseling through a storytelling approach. In G. Arulmani, A. J. Bakshi, F. T. L. Leong, & A. G. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of career development: International perspectives (pp. 631–644). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2015a). An introduction to career assessment. In M. McMahon & M. Watson (Eds.), Career assessment: Qualitative approaches (pp. 3–11). Rotterdam: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2015b). Integrative structured interview process. In M. McMahon & M. Watson (Eds.), Career assessment: Qualitative approaches (pp. 199–205). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, M., & McMahon, M. (2018). Career assessment and creativity: Potential complementarity or a contradiction in terms? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1476835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  51. Zytowski, D. G. (2006). Super’s work value inventory revised. Technical manual. Adel, IA: Kuder.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Employment ResearchThe University of WarwickCoventryUK
  3. 3.School of Behavioural and Lifestyle Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesNelson Mandela UniversityPort ElizabethSouth Africa
  4. 4.School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversityGold CoastAustralia

Personalised recommendations