Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 136–142 | Cite as

Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Quantum Computing

  • Koji NagataEmail author
  • Tadao Nakamura
  • Ahmed Farouk
  • Do Ngoc Diep
Article

Abstract

A necessary and sufficient condition for quantum computing performed with, for example, the Deutsch-Jozsa algorithm or the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, has theoretically been investigated. Assume a 2N qubit-quantum computing which starts with the state \(|\overbrace {0,0,...,0,1}^{N}\rangle |\overbrace {1,1,...,1}^{N}\rangle \) as follows: Uf|0,0,...,0,1〉|1,1,...,1〉 = |0,0,...,0,1〉 \( |\overline {f(0,0,...,0,1)}\rangle . \) Surprisingly the relation f(x) = f(−x) is the necessary and sufficient condition of holding this fundamental relation if local unitary operations can be used.

Keywords

Quantum algorithms Quantum computation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Han Geurdes, Professor Shahrokh Heidari, Professor Hamed Daei Kasmaei, and Professor Mark Behzad Doost for valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Rennie, R. (ed.): Oxford dictionary of physics, 7th. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deutsch, D.: Soc, Proc. Roy. London Ser. A 400, 97 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutsch, D., Jozsa, R.: Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 439, 553 (1992)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cleve, R., Ekert, A., Macchiavello, C., Mosca, M.: Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 454, 339 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones, J.A., Mosca, M.: J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1648 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gulde, S., Riebe, M., Lancaster, G.P.T., Becher, C., Eschner, J., Häffner, H., Schmidt-Kaler, F., Chuang, I.L., Blatt, R.: Nat. (London) 421, 48 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Oliveira, A.N., Walborn, S.P., Monken, C.H.: J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 7, 288–292 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, Y.-H.: Rev, Phys. A 67(R), 040301 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohseni, M., Lundeen, J.S., Resch, K.J., Steinberg, A.M.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 187903 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tame, M.S., Prevedel, R., Paternostro, M., Böhi, P., Kim, M.S., Zeilinger, A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140501 (2007)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernstein, E., Vazirani, U.: . In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’93), pp 11–20 (1993)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernstein, E., Vazirani, U.: SIAM J. Comput. 26-5, 1411–1473 (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagata, K., Resconi, G., Nakamura, T., Batle, J., Abdalla, S., Farouk, A.: MOJ Ecol Environ Sci 2(1), 00010 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon, D.R.: Foundations of computer science. In: Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on: 116-123, retrieved 2011-06-06 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shor, P.W.: . In: Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of computer science, p 124 (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grover, L.K.: . In: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on theory of computing, p 212 (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Du, J., Shi, M., Zhou, X., Fan, Y., Ye, B.J., Han, R., Wu, J.: Phys. Rev. A 64, 042306 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brainis, E., Lamoureux, L.-P., Cerf, N.J., Emplit, P.h., Haelterman, M., Massar, S.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 157902 (2003)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cross, A.W., Smith, G., Smolin, J.A.: Phys. Rev. A 92, 012327 (2015)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, H., Yang, L.: Quantum Inf. Process. 14, 1787 (2015)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Adcock, M.R.A., Hoyer, P., Sanders, B.C.: Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 1361 (2016)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fallek, S.D., Herold, C.D., McMahon, B.J., Maller, K.M., Brown, K.R., Amini, J.M.: New J. Phys. 18, 083030 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Diep, D.N., Giang, D.H., Van Minh, N.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 1948 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin, W.: Quantum Inf. Process. 15, 65 (2016)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nagata, K., Resconi, G., Nakamura, T., Batle, J., Abdalla, S., Farouk, A., Geurdes, H.: Asian J. Math. Phys. 1(1), 1–4 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Geurdes, H., Batle, J., Abdalla, S., Farouk, A., Diep, D.N.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 973 (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Geurdes, H., Batle, J., Abdalla, S., Farouk, A.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 1605 (2018)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T.: J Sci Eng Res 5(3), 326–328 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Batle, J., Farouk, A.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 3098 (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T.: Open Access Library J. 2, e1798 (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 2086 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Farouk, A.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 2887 (2017)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Diep, D.N., Giang, D.H.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 56, 2797 (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Diep, D.N., Giang, D.H., Phu, P.H.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 841 (2018)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Resconi, G., Nagata, K.: Intern. J. Gen. Eng. Technol. 7(1), 1–20 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T., Geurdes, H., Batle, J., Farouk, A., Diep, D.N., Patro, S.K.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 57, 2546 (2018)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nagata, K., Nakamura, T.: Quantum algorithm for the root-finding problem, Quantum Stud.: Math. Found.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-018-0171-0 (2018)
  38. 38.
    Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Devitt, S.J., Munro, W.J., Nemoto, K.: Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 076001 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea
  2. 2.Department of Information and Computer ScienceKeio UniversityKohoku-ku, YokohamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Physics and Computer Science, Faculty of ScienceWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  4. 4.TIMASThang Long UniversityHanoiVietnam
  5. 5.Institute of Mathematics, VASTHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations