Pop-cultural Mobilization: Deploying Game of Thrones to Shift US Climate Change Politics

  • Manjana MilkoreitEmail author


Over the last two decades, scholars have developed an increasingly sophisticated range of approaches to studying the complex relationship between popular culture and politics. This article addresses three major weakness in this expanding body of research: (1) the analytic focus on the pop-cultural artifact itself rather than political actors and scholars doing the causal-political or pedagogical work, (2) a lack of attention to the question whether different culture consumers’ interpretations and experiences of a pop-cultural artifact match those of scholars, and (3) the dearth of empirical studies verifying theoretical claims. I address these weaknesses by introducing the concept of pop-cultural mobilization to capture the active and deliberate appropriation of pop-cultural resources for a specific political purpose by political actors. I support my conceptual argument with empirical data for a case study on the TV show Game of Thrones (GOT): a qualitative content analysis of 55 political commentaries published between 2013 and 2016. The authors of these political commentaries purposefully contributed to a process of meaning-making among the American public by publishing their own interpretations of the TV show, especially what they perceived as strong parallels between the GOT narratives and climate change politics in the real world. The analysis demonstrates the interpretive openness of the pop-cultural artifact GOT, challenging the often-assumed interpretive authority of scholars’ readings of a cultural narrative. There is even the potential for political opponents to make use of the same pop-cultural material to advance different policy agendas.


Climate change Pop-cultural mobilization Political communication Emotion 



Charli Carpenter and Daniel Drezner inspired this research project when they invited me to contribute to a themed panel on Game of Thrones and International Relations at the 2015 Annual Convention of the International Studies Association. I would also like to acknowledge the important role of two anonymous reviewers in shaping this manuscript. I am very grateful for the the extremely thoughtful and constructive comments they provided.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed for this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of Arizona State University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10767_2017_9273_MOESM1_ESM.docx (40 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 40 kb)


  1. Atwood, M. (1985). The Handmaid’s Tale (1st ed.). Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
  2. Beattie, G., Sale, L., & Mcguire, L. (2011). An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change? Semiotica, 2011(187), 105–125. Scholar
  3. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu Rev Sociol, 26, 611–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action. In: The logic of connective action. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from
  5. Bernard, H. R., Wutich, A. Y., & Ryan, G. W. (2016). Analyzing qualitative data: systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Carpenter, C. (2012). Game of thrones as theory. Foreign Affairs. March 29. Available online at
  7. Carpenter, C. (2016). Rethinking the political / -science- / fiction nexus: global policy making and the campaign to stop killer robots. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), 53–69. Scholar
  8. Clapton, W., & Shepherd, L. J. (2017). Lessons from Westeros: gender and power in Game of Thrones. Politics, 37(1), 5–18. Scholar
  9. Drezner, D. W. (2011). Theories of international politics and zombies (unknown edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dyson, S. B. (2015). Otherworldly politics: the international relations of Star Trek, Game of Thrones, and Battlestar Galactica. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  11. Feldman, S., & Sigelman, L. (1985). The political impact of prime-time television: “The Day After”. The Journal of Politics, 47(2), 556–578. Scholar
  12. Gierzynski, A., & Eddy, K. (2013). Harry Potter and the Millennials: research methods and the politics of the Muggle generation. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol, 66(4), 290–302. Scholar
  14. Glaser, B. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanne, M. (1996). The power of the story: fiction and political change. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hart, P. S., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2009). Finding the teachable moment: an analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related websites during the release of The Day After Tomorrow. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 3(3), 355–366. Scholar
  17. Hassler, D. M., & Wilcox, C. (2008). New boundaries in political science fiction. Columbia: Univ of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hauser, C. (2017). A handmaid’s tale of protest. The New York Times. Retrieved from
  19. Holland, J. (2016). Visual literacy in international relations: teaching critical evaluative skills through fictional television. Int Stud Perspect, 17(2), 173–186. Scholar
  20. Kahan, D., Jenkins-Smith, H., & Braman, D. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 147–174. Scholar
  21. Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2006). Cultural cognition and public policy. Yale Law & Policy Review, 24(1), 149–172.Google Scholar
  22. Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: the case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248–267. Scholar
  23. Kiersey, N. J., & Neumann, I. B. (2013). Battlestar Galactica and international relations. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, T. M., Markowitz, E. M., Howe, P. D., Ko, C.-Y., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Chang, 5(11), 1014–1020. Scholar
  25. Leiserowitz, A. A. (2004). Day after tomorrow: study of climate change risk perception. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 46(9), 22–39. Scholar
  26. Maldonado, A. (2017). Women dressed as “handmaids” protest Trump during his Poland visit. Retrieved September 9, 2017, from
  27. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGeer, V. (2004). The art of good hope. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 592(1), 100–127. Scholar
  29. McKenna, L., Pole, A. (2007) What do bloggers do: an average day on an average political blog. Public Choice, 134(1–2):97–108.Google Scholar
  30. Meister, M., & Japp, P. M. (2002). Enviropop: studies in environmental rhetoric and popular Culture. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  31. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2007). Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nardi, B. A., Schiano, D. J., Gumbrecht, M., & Swartz, L. (2004). Why we blog. Commun ACM, 47(12), 41–46. Scholar
  33. Newton, K. (2006). May the weak force be with you: the power of the mass media in modern politics. Eur J Polit Res, 45(2), 209–234. Scholar
  34. Nexon, D. H., & Neumann, I. B. (2006). Introduction: Harry Potter and the study of world politics. In D. H. Nexon & I. B. Neumann (Eds.), Harry Potter and international relations (pp. 1–23). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Retrieved from . Google Scholar
  35. Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life (1st ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Neill, S., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2009). “Fear Won’t Do It”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Sci Commun, 30(3), 355–379. Scholar
  37. Pendergast. (2017). Harry Potter and the millennial mind. The Spectator. Retrieved from
  38. Ruane, A. E., & James, P. (2012). The international relations of middle-earth: learning from The Lord of the Rings. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saideman, S. (2013). The Game of Thrones and popular understandings of international relations. Retrieved July 21, 2017, from
  40. Salvador, M., & Norton, T. (2011). The flood myth in the age of global climate change. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 5(1), 45–61. Scholar
  41. Schofield, J. W., & Pavelchak, M. A. (1989). Fallout from The Day After. The impact of a TV film on attitudes related to nuclear war. J Appl Soc Psychol, 19(5), 433–448. Scholar
  42. Scott, P. (2017). Corbyn is a Gryffindor while Theresa May is a Slytherin, according to Harry Potter fans. The Telegraph. Retrieved from
  43. Snyder, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: rainbows in the mind. Psychol Inq, 13(4), 249–275. Scholar
  44. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal, 32(6), 957–972. Scholar
  45. Stern, P. C. (2012). Fear and hope in climate messages. Nat Clim Chang, 2(8), 572–573. Scholar
  46. Street, J. (1997). Politics and Popular Culture. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  47. The Economist. (2013). Terminator or Robocop? May 31. Available online at
  48. van Zoonen, L. (2005). Entertaining the citizen: when politics and popular culture converge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  49. Weldes, J. (1999). Going cultural: Star Trek, state action, and popular culture. Millennium, 28(1), 117–134. Scholar
  50. Weldes, J. (2003). To seek out new worlds: exploring links between science fiction and world politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weldes, J., & Rowley, C. (2015). So, how does popular culture relate to world politics? Retrieved September 5, 2017, from
  52. Whitmarsh, L., & Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Behaviour, perceptions, and communication of climate change. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang.
  53. Wolf, J., & Moser, S. C. (2011). Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: insights from in-depth studies across the world. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang, 2(4), 547–569. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political SciencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations