A Solar Volumetric Receiver: Influence of Absorbing Cells Configuration on Device Thermal Performance

  • B. S. YilbasEmail author
  • S. Z. Shuja


Thermal performance of a solar volumetric receiver incorporating the different cell geometric configurations is investigated. Triangular, hexagonal, and rectangular absorbing cells are incorporated in the analysis. The fluid volume fraction, which is the ratio of the volume of the working fluid over the total volume of solar volumetric receiver, is introduced to assess the effect of cell size on the heat transfer rates in the receiver. In this case, reducing the fluid volume fraction corresponds to increasing cell size in the receiver. SiC is considered as the cell material, and air is used as the working fluid in the receiver. The Lambert’s Beer law is incorporated to account for the solar absorption in the receiver. A finite element method is used to solve the governing equation of flow and heat transfer. It is found that the fluid volume fraction has significant effect on the flow field in the solar volumetric receiver, which also modifies thermal field in the working fluid. The triangular absorbing cell gives rise to improved effectiveness of the receiver and then follows the hexagonal and rectangular cells. The second law efficiency of the receiver remains high when hexagonal cells are used. This occurs for the fluid volume fraction ratio of 0.5.


Absorbing cells Solar volumetric receiver Thermal performance 



The authors acknowledge the funded NSTIP project 13-ENE271-04-R via support of KACST and the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, for this work.


  1. 1.
    S.-H. Lee, S.P. Jang, Efficiency of a volumetric receiver using aqueous suspensions of multi-walled carbon nanotubes for absorbing solar thermal energy. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 80, 58–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Veeraragavan, A. Lenert, B. Yilbas, S. Al-Dini, E.N. Wang, Analytical model for the design of volumetric solar flow receivers. Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 55, 556–564 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.S. Yilbas, O.S. Kaleem, Performance characteristics of a volumetric solar receiver: presence of an absorber plate with a selective surface. Numer. Heat Transf. Part A-Appl. 67, 992–1009 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.I. Roldán, O. Smirnova, T. Fend, J.L. Casas, E. Zarza, Thermal analysis and design of a volumetric solar absorber depending on the porosity. Renew. Energ. 62, 116–128 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Palero, M. Romero, J.L. Castillo, Comparison of experimental and numerical air temperature distributions behind a cylindrical volumetric solar absorber module. J. Sol. Energy-Trans ASME 130, 011011 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Kribus, Y. Gray, M. Grijnevich, G. Mittelman, S. Mey-Cloutier, C. Caliot, The promise and challenge of solar volumetric absorbers. Sol. Energy 110, 463–481 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    X. Chen, X. Xia, X. Dong, G. Dai, Integrated analysis on the volumetric absorption characteristics and optical performance for a porous media receiver. Energy Convers. Manag. 105, 562–569 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Khullar, H. Tyagi, N. Hordy, T.P. Otanicar, Y. Hewakuruppu, P. Modi, R.A. Taylor, Harvesting solar thermal energy through nanofluid-based volumetric absorption systems. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 77, 377–384 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H.-J. Lee, J.-K. Kim, S.-N. Lee, Y.-H. Kang, Consistent heat transfer analysis for performance evaluation of multichannel solar absorbers. Sol. Energy 86, 1576–1585 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.L. Avila-Marin, Volumetric receivers in solar thermal power plants with central receiver system technology: a review. Sol. Energy 85, 891–910 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Z. Wu, C. Caliot, G. Flamant, Z. Wang, Coupled radiation and flow modeling in ceramic foam volumetric solar air receivers. Sol. Energy 85, 2374–2385 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    O.K. Siddiqui, B.S. Yilbas, Thermal characteristics of a volumetric solar absorption system. Int. J. Energy Res. 38, 581–591 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Lenert, E.N. Wang, Optimization of nanofluid volumetric receivers for solar thermal energy conversion. Sol. Energy 86, 253–265 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.I. Roldán, R. Monterreal, Heat flux and temperature prediction on a volumetric receiver installed in a solar furnace. Appl. Energy 120, 65–74 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Wang, V.P. Sivan, A. Mitchell, G. Rosengarten, P. Phelan, L. Wang, Highly efficient selective metamaterial absorber for high-temperature solar thermal energy harvesting. Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C. 137, 235–242 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.L. Hewakuruppu, R.A. Taylor, H. Tyagi, V. Khullar, T. Otanicar, S. Coulombe, N. Hordy, Limits of selectivity of direct volumetric solar absorption. Sol. Energy 114, 206–216 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Wu, Z. Wang, Fully coupled transient modeling of ceramic foam volumetric solar air receiver. Sol. Energy 89, 122–133 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G.L. Harris, Harris properties of silicon carbide (INSPEC (Institution of Electrical Engineering), London, 1995), pp. 15–20Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Kitamura, L. Pilon, M. Jonasz, Optical constants of silica glass from extreme. Appl. Optics 46, 8118–8133 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ME DepartmentKFUPMDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations