Advertisement

Being “Out” in the Field: Who Is Responsible for Health and Safety?

  • Susan M. CheyneEmail author
Commentary

Any fieldwork requires planning both with your home institution and when carrying out the work in situ. Many universities and institutions require a risk assessment to be approved before any staff or students depart for the field. However, few, if any, universities and institutions actively include sexual orientation or gender presentation safety advice in their fieldwork planning information.

To ensure equality and best practice for everyone, universities, institutions, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) should work to safeguard the health and safety of all people working at field sites or projects that they manage. LGBTQ+ primatologists often carry out their fieldwork in countries where it is illegal to be LGBTQ+ or where anyone who is not cisgender heterosexual is subject to intolerance. LGBTQ+ primatologists can face discrimination, harassment, bullying, or even violence because of their sexuality or how they present themselves. Even if none of the above occurs, social attitudes to LGBTQ+ people can create an uncomfortable atmosphere in which LGBTQ+ people feel they need to hide their sexuality from coworkers. This can apply to local as well as foreign researchers.

Primatologists from Europe, North America, and Australia can expect to receive support from their home institutions, be legally protected against discrimination, and be able to live openly in a (mostly) tolerant society. I argue that excluding sexual orientation from field work planning or from field site and project policies is an oversight. Universities, institutions, and NGOs have a responsibility to ensure staff and students are fully cognizant of the potential risks which LGBTQ+ people may face in some countries. A quick search turned up specific advice for LGBTQ+ travelers who are UK and US citizens (UK: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/lesbian-gay-bisexual-and-transgender-foreign-travel-advice and USA: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/international-travel/before-you-go/travelers-with-special-considerations/lgbti.html) but these relate predominantly to those traveling for short periods, rather than people away for long periods to carry out research.

Countries where we work to study and conserve nonhuman primates do not necessarily offer legal protection for LGBTQ+ people; however, a learned society like IPS cannot realistically become involved with national laws. Nor do home institutions and universities have any influence over the laws of the countries where their staff and students conduct fieldwork. Nevertheless, universities, institutions, and NGOs can take practical actions to safeguard LGBTQ+ primatologists, both foreign and local. In addition to other health and safety guidelines, these policies should include, but are not limited to:
  1. 1.

    Bullying and Harassment Guidelines, i.e., a good practice guide for how all members of the field site or project are expected to behave toward each other

     
  2. 2.

    Equal Opportunities Guidelines for recruitment of all members of the field site or project

     
  3. 3.

    Confidentiality Guidelines so all members are aware of how their data and personal situations are dealt with

     
  4. 4.

    Cultural Awareness Guidelines so all new members to the field site or project are aware of what is and is not locally acceptable behavior

     
  5. 5.

    A clear reporting structure for anyone who feels they have a grievance or issue where they need advice, help, or intervention from someone senior in the organization

     

In addition to a clear procedure for reporting incidents, a clear strategy for managing these is essential. Many field sites are managed by students or staff who have limited management and human resources experience, thus compounding the possible issues surrounding inappropriate behavior. The onus is on the senior managers, researchers, and directors of the field site or project to ensure that managers have access to appropriate resources and training. In the UK, guidance already exists in the form of BS 8848, the British Standard for organizing and managing visits, fieldwork, expeditions, and adventurous activities outside the UK (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/safer-adventure-travel-and-volunteering-overseas) but compliance is currently voluntary, and organizations may not be aware of these standards, and (of course) it applies only to UK organizations, although the content may be useful for all organizations. Your country may provide similar advice. Ultimately, it is crucial to identify who is responsible for the well-being and welfare of organization members (staff, students, visitors, etc.) and to have clear policies in place to safeguard everyone. Only by proactively working to ensure equality for all and by having guidelines and proper training for people can we ensure a safe working environment when carrying out primatological fieldwork.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxford Brookes UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations