Supporting Key Aspects of Practice in Making Mathematics Explicit in Science Lessons
STEM integration has often been recommended as a way to support students to develop twenty-first century skills needed to function in the complex modern world. In order for students to experience integration, however, their teachers need support in designing, developing and implementing integrated curricular instruction, which is often at odds with a very subject-focused educational system. This paper reports on the second year of a research study conducted with five secondary science and mathematics teachers, concerned with supporting them to teach explicitly the mathematics components within science lessons, mediated via technology. It outlines how the teachers collaborated with the support of science and mathematics education researchers within a community of practice, named a Teaching and Learning Network (TLN). The network was intended to promote and enhance teacher capacity for the interdisciplinary teaching of mathematics in science in the face of various contextual and other obstacles observed in the first year of the study. This study found that the opportunity to work in a Teaching and Learning Network supported the teachers’ ownership of the design of the integrated learning unit, enhanced their content knowledge of mathematics, their use of the data logging technology and their understanding of an inquiry-based pedagogical approach. Participation in the TLN provided teachers with the mechanism to cross the boundaries of the subject disciplines and thereby promoted change in their attitudes, professional knowledge and to some extent, practice.
KeywordsCommunity of practice Cross-curricular In-service teachers Interdisciplinary teaching STEM integration
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of EPI-STEM, The National Centre for STEM Education, at the University of Limerick, and Texas Instruments, who supplied the technology equipment, in carrying out this research project. The authors would also like to thank the teachers and schools who participated in this research project.
- Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Baxter, J. A., Ruzicka, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Livelybrooks, D. (2014). Professional development strategically connecting mathematics and science: The impact on teachers’ confidence and practice. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12060.doi:10.1111/ssm.12060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berlin, D. F., & Lee, H. (2005). Integrating science and mathematics education: Historical analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18032.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burghardt, M. D., Lauckhardt, J., Kennedy, M., Hecht, D., & McHugh, L. (2015). The effects of a mathematics infusion curriculum on middle school student mathematics achievement. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12123.doi:10.1111/ssm.12123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Czerniak, C. M., & Johnson, C. C. (2014). Interdisciplinary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 395–411). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- den Braber, N., Krüger, J., Mazereeuw, M., & Kuiper, W. (2019). Mathematics in an interdisciplinary STEM course (NLT) in the Netherlands. In B. Doig, J. Williams, D. Swanson, R. Borromeo Ferri, & P. Drake (Eds.), Interdisciplinary mathematics education (pp. 167–183). ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Department of Education and Skills (DES). (2015). Framework for junior cycle. Dublin. Retrieved from https://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/Framework-for-Junior-Cycle-2015.pdf.
- Frykholm, J., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gleeson, J. (2010). Curriculum in context: Partnership, power and praxis in Ireland. Oxford: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, L., & Corbett-Whittier, C. (2012). Using case study in education research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (2010). Introduction: Ten years of change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. xi–xxi). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Howes, A., Kaneva, D., Swanson, D., & Williams, J. (2013). Re-envisioning STEM education: Curriculum, assessment and integrated, interdisciplinary studies, a report for the Royal Society. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/education/policy/vision/reports/ev-2-vision-research-report-20140624.pdf.
- Lee, M. M., Chauvot, J. B., Vowell, J., Culpepper, S. M., & Plankis, B. J. (2013). Stepping into iSMART: Understanding science–mathematics integration for middle school science and mathematics teachers. School Science and Mathematics,113(4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Loughran, J. J. (2014). Developing understandings of practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (2nd ed., pp. 811–829). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). London and New Delhli: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). (2019). Framework for junior cycle. Retrieved from https://www.ncca.ie/en/junior-cycle/framework-for-junior-cycle.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
- Offer, J., & Vasquez-Mireles, S. (2009). Mix it up: Teachers’ beliefs on mixing mathematics and science. School Science and Mathematics,109(3), 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17950.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and characterizations. School Science and Mathematics,109(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb17951.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Venville, G., Sheffield, R., Rennie, L. J., & Wallace, J. (2008). The writing on the wall: Classroom context, curriculum implementation, and student learning in integrated, community-based science projects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 857–880. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walshe, G., Johnston, J., & McClelland, G. (2017). Integrating mathematics into science: Design, development and evaluation of a curriculum model. In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, J. Lavonen, & A. Uitto (Eds.), Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from ESERA 2015 conference (pp. 309-321). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar