# Following the Traces of Teachers’ Talk-Moves in Their Students’ Verbal and Written Responses

## Abstract

We focus on teachers’ ways of leading whole class discussions (WCDs) in mathematics, with the goal of uncovering their traces (if any) in their students’ responses (a) while participating in the WCDs and (b) in the written responses in a final test. For this purpose, two 8th-grade probability classes learning a 10-lesson unit with different teachers were observed. Our data sources include (1) video-recordings of the WCDs and (2) the responses of students to final test items. We analyzed the teachers’ talk-moves, students’ accountable participation, and students’ reasoning in the final test items. Interweaving the findings from all analyses we found differences between the classes in students’ ways of participation in WCDs and in their corresponding final test responses. The teachers’ ways of leading the WCDs contribute to the explanation of these differences.

## Keywords

Classroom study Students’ participation Students’ written responses Teachers’ talk-moves## Notes

### Funding Information

This study was partially supported by the Israeli Scientific Foundation (ISF) under Grant Nos. 1057/12 and 438/15.

## References

- Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue.
*Cognitive Science, 33*, 374–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Azmon, S. (2010).
*The uniqueness of teachers’ discourse—Patterns from an argumentative perspective*(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The Hebrew University, Jerusalem. [In Hebrew].Google Scholar - Bauersfeld, H. (1988). Interaction, construction, and knowledge: Alternative perspectives for mathematics education. In T. Cooney & D. Grouws (Eds.),
*Effective mathematics teaching*(pp. 27–46). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Hillsdale’ NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar - Boston, M. D., & Smith, M. S. (2009). Transforming secondary mathematics teaching: Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers’ classrooms.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40*, 119–156.Google Scholar - Cazden, C. (2001).
*Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning*(2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar - Chapin, S., & O’Connor, C. (2007). Academically productive talk: Supporting student learning in mathematics. In W. G. Martin, M. Strutchens, & P. Elliot (Eds.),
*The learning of mathematics: 69*^{th}*NCTM yearbook*(pp. 113–128). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar - Cobb, P., & Bauersfeld, H. (Eds.). (1995).
*The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures*. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar - Conner, A. M., Singletary, M. M., Smith, R. C., Wagner, P. A., & Francisco, R. T. (2014). Teacher support for collective argumentation: A framework for examining how teachers support students’ engagement in mathematical activities.
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86*, 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Eisenmann, T., & Even, R. (2011). Enacted types of algebraic activity in different classes taught by the same teacher.
*International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9*, 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Even, R., & Kvatinsky, T. (2010). What mathematics do teachers with contrasting teaching approaches address in probability lessons?
*Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74*, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (1999). Reflective processes in a technology-based mathematics classroom.
*Cognition and Instruction, 17*, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hershkowitz, R., Hadas, N., Dreyfus, T., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). Processes of abstraction, from the diversity of individuals’ constructing of knowledge to a group’s “shared knowledge”.
*Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19*(2), 41–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., Rasmussen, C., & Dreyfus, T. (2014). Knowledge shifts in a probability classroom: A case study coordinating two methodologies.
*ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46*, 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Smith, M. S., Bill, V. L., & Resnick, L. B. (2016). Change in teachers’ practices towards explorative instruction. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 40*^{th}*Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education*(Vol. 2, pp. 393–400). Szeged, Hungary: PME.Google Scholar - Hufferd-Ackles, K., Fuson, K. C., & Sherin, M. G. (2004). Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community.
*Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35*, 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Mercer, N. (1995).
*The guided construction of knowledge—Talk amongst teachers and learners*. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar - Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006). Teaching children how to use language to solve maths problems.
*Language and Education, 20*, 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., Hall, M., & Resnick, L. (2002).
*Talk: Classroom conversation that works (CD-ROM set)*. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar - O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). “Scaling down” to explore the role of talk in learning: From district intervention to controlled classroom study. In L. B. Resnick, C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.),
*Socializing intelligence through talk and dialogue*(pp. 111–126). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Ozruso-Haggiag, S. G., & Tabach, M. (2018). Between the implemented and the attained curriculum: The case of strategies for solving linear equations.
*International Journal of Educational Research, 92*, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Pinto, A. (2013). Variability in university mathematics teaching: A tale of two instructors. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8)*(pp. 2416–2425). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University and ERME.Google Scholar - Pontecorvo, C., & Girardet, H. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics.
*Cognition and Instruction, 11*, 365–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Schwarz, B. B., & Linchevski, L. (2007). The role of task design and of argumentation in cognitive development during peer interaction: The case of proportional reasoning.
*Learning and Instruction, 17*, 310–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sharma, A., & Anderson, C. W. (2006).
*Developing classroom learning environments and teaching strategies: The student agency perspective*. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TX, April, 2005.Google Scholar - Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., O’Connor, M. C., & Resnick, L. (2009). Guided construction of knowledge in the classroom: The troika of talk, task and tools. In B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.),
*Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction*(pp. 105–129). London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar - Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell.
*Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10*, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Tabach, M., Hershkowitz, R., Rasmussen, C., & Dreyfus, T. (2014). Knowledge shifts in the classroom—A case study.
*Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33*, 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking.
*Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6*, 227–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wood, T. (1994). Patterns of interaction and the culture of mathematics classrooms. In S. Lerman (Ed.),
*The culture of the mathematics classroom*(pp. 149–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar