Advertisement

Strategies Applied by Pre-service Elementary School Mathematics Teachers for Coping with Tasks that Require a Mental Rotation

  • Dorit PatkinEmail author
  • Atara Shriki
  • Ruthi Barkai
Article

Abstract

Despite the plethora of research in the field of mental rotation, researchers are still divided over a range of related issues, particularly the processes involved in coping with mental rotation tasks. This field of research, for the most part, is descriptive rather than interpretative, leading to the absence of a theoretical framework to enable the development of a coherent dedicated training program. Against this background, the present study is underpinned by the assumption that identifying relations between strategies that potentially lead to a successful coping with mental rotation tasks and those that do not lead to success might help us in designing a dedicated training program for pre-service teachers. The study involved 122 pre-service elementary school mathematics teachers. They responded to a questionnaire that included, among others, two tasks that required performing mental rotation. In line with other studies, the results of the present study indicate that there is an advantage to implementing a holistic strategy over an analytic one. However, the mere implementation of a certain strategy does not guarantee that one would draw a correct conclusion, as the same strategy might lead to either correct or incorrect conclusion. Based on these results, we inferred that there is a mechanism that mediates between the strategy employed and the conclusion reached. Apparently, in the context of mental rotation, the study of strategies does not allow understanding the essence of this mechanism, and in order to construct an interpretative theory, an alternative course of inquiry is needed.

Keywords

Analytic strategy Holistic strategy Mental rotation Spatial ability STEM education 

References

  1. Alqahtani, A. S., Daghestani, L. F., & Ibrahim, L. F. (2017). Semi-immersive virtual reality for improving the mental rotation skill for engineering students: An experimental study. Journal of Computer Engineering & Information Technology, 6(4), 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. Barratt, E. S. (1953). An analysis of verbal reports of solving spatial problems as an aid in defining spatial factors. Journal of Psychology, 36, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bodner, G. M., & Guay, R. B. (1997). The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2(4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce, C. D., & Hawes, Z. (2015). The role of 2D and 3D mental rotation in mathematics for young children: What is it? Why does it matter? And what can we do about it? ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 47(3), 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1997). Crafting mixed-method evaluation designs. In J. C. Greene & V. J. Caracelli (Eds.), Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms (pp. 19–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Christou, C., Jones, K., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Pittalis, M., Mousoulides, N., Matos, J. F., Boytchev, P. (2007). Developing student spatial ability with 3D software applications. Paper presented at the 5th congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME), Larnaca, Cyprus. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279653012_Developing_student_spatial_ability_with_3D_software_applications. Accessed 19 October 2017.
  7. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2006). Separating “rotators” from “nonrotators” in the Mental Rotations Test: A multigroup latent class analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(3), 261–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ho, C. H., Eastman, C., & Catrambone, R. (2006). An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities. Design Studies, 27(4), 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jansen, P., Schmelter, A., Quaiser-Pohl, C., Neuburger, S., & Heil, M. (2013). Mental rotation performance in primary school age children: Are there gender differences in chronometric tests? Cognitive Development, 28, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2017). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approach (6th ed). SAGE Publication, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Jordan, N., & Levine, S. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khooshabeh, P., & Hegarty, M. (2010). Representations of shape during mental rotation. AAAI spring symposium: cognitive shape processing. Technical Report SS-10-02.Google Scholar
  15. Kozhevnikov, M., Kosslyn, S., & Shephard, J. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 710–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Y., & O’Boyle, M. (2013). How sex and college major relate to mental rotation accuracy and preferred strategy: An electroencephalographic (EEG) investigation. The Psychological Record, 63, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lohman, D. F. (1996). Spatial ability and g. In I. Dennis & P. Tapsfield (Eds.), Human abilities: Their nature and measurement (pp. 97–116). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. Y. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25(1), 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marmor, G. S. (1975). Development of kinetic images: When does the child first represent movement in mental images? Cognitive Psychology, 1, 548–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazoyer, B., Mellet, E., & Tzourio, N. (2002). Visual and language area interactions during mental imagery. In A. Galaburda, S. M. Kosslyn, & Y. Christen (Eds.), The languages of the brain (pp. 179–201). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London, Englsnd: McKinsey & Company Retrieved from https://www.afn.ca/uploads/files/education2/how_the_world_most_improved_school_system. Accessed 21 October 2017.
  24. Oats, J., Kwiatkowski, R., & Coulthard, L. M. (2014). Code of human research ethic. The British Psychological Society Retrieved from http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/atoms/files/bps_code_of_human_research_ethics.pdf. Accessed 28 November 2017.
  25. Peters, M., Laeng, B., Lathan, K., & Jackson, M. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Rotation Test: Different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and Cognition, 28, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1967). The child’s conception of space. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Schultz, K. (1991). The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shepard, S., & Metzler, D. (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 3–11.Google Scholar
  30. Shriki, A., Barkai, R., & Patkin, D. (2017). Developing mental rotation ability through engagement in assignments that involve solids of revolution. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1), 541–562.Google Scholar
  31. Shriki, A., Patkin, D., & Barkai, R. (2018). Are there ‘good strategies’ and ‘bad strategies’? Female pre-service teachers’ coping with spatial assignments requiring performance of mental rotation. In. A. Shriki & N. Adin (Eds.), Proceeding of the sixth Jerusalem Conference on Research in Mathematics Education-6JCRME (pp.101–103). Jerusalem, Israel: JCRME. [Hebrew]Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stieff, M., & Uttal, D. (2015). How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tenison, C., Fincham, J. M., & Anderson, J. R. (2014). Detecting math problem solving strategies: An investigation into the use of retrospective self-reports, latency and fMRI data. Neuropsychologia, 54, 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three dimensional spatial visualisation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Velez, M., Silver, D., & Tremaine, M. (2005). Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences. Proceedings of visualization conference. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4188137_Understanding_visualization_through_spatial_ability_differences
  39. Walker, C. M., Winner, E., Hetland, L., Simmons, S., & Goldsmith, L. (2011). Visual thinking: Art students have an advantage in geometric reasoning. Creative Education, 2(1), 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Widder, M., Berman, A., & Koichu, B. (2018). Action strategies in spatial geometry problem solving supported by dynamic geometry software. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 435–442). Umeå: PME.Google Scholar
  41. Widder, M., & Gorsky, P. (2013). How students solve problems in spatial geometry while using a software application for visualizing 3D geometric objects. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32(1), 89–120.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ScienceKibbutzim College of Education, Technology and the ArtsTel-AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Oranim Academic College of EducationTivonIsrael

Personalised recommendations