Female Secondary Students’ and Their Teachers’ Perceptions of Science Learning Environments Within the Context of Science Education Reform in Saudi Arabia

  • Sun Young KimEmail author
  • Amani K. Hamdan Alghamdi


This mixed methods study explored how Saudi Arabia’s science education reform is functioning in 2 public girls’ secondary schools located in Dammam, 1 of the main cities in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia recently launched a new initiative to promote science education innovation by providing science curriculum change, professional development for science teachers, and progress towards a new educational system. This study examined Saudi secondary girls’ perceptions regarding science learning environments and the metacognitive science learning orientation within the context of science education reform in Saudi Arabia (N  =  202). Further, 3 science teacher participants were interviewed in order to ascertain their perceptions of their current science teaching environments and their science teaching. Particular emphasis was placed on examining differences between the Course System, which is a new system designed to facilitate science experiments and constructivist teaching and learning, and the regular system in terms of students’ perceptions about science learning environments and their metacognitive science learning orientation. Results and findings indicate that teachers supported the constructivist pedagogy, and science education reform efforts may gradually change Saudi science education environments and improve Saudi girls’ science metacognitive learning orientation.


Female secondary students Saudi Arabia Science education reform Science learning environment Metacognitive orientation 


Funding Information

This study was supported by the research fund from Chosun University, 2017.


  1. Albadi, N., O’Toole, J., & Harkins, J. (2017). A preliminary study of the technical use of Arabic in Saudi secondary physics classes. Issues in Educational Research, 27(4), 639–657.Google Scholar
  2. Aldridge, J. M., Laugksch, R. C., Seopa, M. A., & Frase, B. J. (2006). Development and validation of an instrument to monitor the implementation of outcomes-based learning environments in science classrooms in South Africa. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AlGhamdi, R. (2017). Science and physics for Saudi girls: Their perceptions, motivations and career perspectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Curtin University, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  4. Alhammad, K. (2015). A conceptual framework for re-shaping science education in Saudi Arabia. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab gulf states (pp. 121–136). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  5. Alhareth, Y., Al Dighrir, I., & Al Alhareth, Y. (2015). Review of women’s higher education in Saudi Arabia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 10–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alrushaid, W. (2010). Strengthening of national capacities for national development strategies and their management: An evaluation of UNDP’s contribution. Riyadh: UNDP.Google Scholar
  7. Alshmemri, M. S. (2014). Job satisfaction of Saudi nurses working in Saudi Arabian public hospitals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Australia..Google Scholar
  8. Alsuwaida, N. (2016). Women’s education in Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Education Research, 12(4), 111–118.Google Scholar
  9. Alturki, N. (2016). Inquiry and teacher education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  10. Alzahrani, S. (2012). Identifying the attributes of success of Saudi female entrepreneurs in garment production: An exploratory study conducted in Saudi Arabia. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kansas State University, Manhattan, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Cavacini, A. (2016). Recent trends in Middle Eastern scientific production. Scientometrics, 109(1), 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., & Alshamrani, S. (2015). Science teachers’ typology of CBD activities: A socio-constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1539–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In J. Stel’fe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Faiz, M. (2002). Theoretical background proposed for educational research in teaching mathematics. Proceedings of the 2002 Conference of the Assembly of Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 15–22). Cairo: Ain Shams University.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (2003). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Hamdan, A. (2005). Women and education in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and achievements. International Education Journal, 6(1), 42–64.Google Scholar
  17. Hamdan, A. (2006). Arab women's education and gender perceptions: An insider analysis. Journal of International Women's Studies, 8(1), 52–64.Google Scholar
  18. Hamdan, A., & Al-Salouli, M. (2013). Saudi elementary school science teachers' beliefs about teaching science in the new millennium. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 501–525.Google Scholar
  19. Hamdan, A. (2014). Factors influencing Saudi female students studying science and working in science fields. Bort Said Education Journal, 15(1), 24–50 [In Arabic].Google Scholar
  20. Hamdan, A., & Hassan, N. (In Press). Course system impact on the development of metacognitive thinking skills among high school students in Dammam. Journal of Alquds Open University for Psychological and Educational Studies [In Arabic].Google Scholar
  21. Honebein, P. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments (pp. 11–24). Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  22. Jamjoom, F. B., & Kelly, P. (2013). Higher education for women in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In P. Maassen & J. Muller (Eds.), Higher education in Saudi Arabia: Achievements, challenges and opportunities (pp. 117–125). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (2018). Vision and mission. Retrieved from Accessed 18 Jan 2018.
  24. Mansour, N., & Al-Shamrani, S. (2015). The context of science education in the Arab Gulf States. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab gulf states (pp. xiii–xxxi). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  25. Mansour, N., Alshamrani, S., Aldahmash, A., & Alqudah, B. (2013). Saudi Arabian science teachers and supervisors’ views of professional development needs. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 51(1), 1–27.Google Scholar
  26. Mills, A. (2009). Reforms to women’s education make slow progress in Saudi Arabia. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(43), 11–15.Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Education (2018). Guide to secondary education. Retrieved from Accessed 22 Jan 2018.
  28. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.Google Scholar
  29. National Center for Education Statistics (n.d.). Trends in international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Retrieved on March 5, 2017, from
  30. Pamuk, S., Sungur, S., & Oztekin, C. (2016). A multilevel analysis of students’ science achievements in relation to their self-regulation, epistemological beliefs, learning environment perceptions, and teachers’ personal characteristics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pasha-Zaidi, N., & Afari, E. (2016). Gender in STEM education: An exploratory study of student perceptions of math and science instructors in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Science and Mathematical Education, 14(7), 1215–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, L., & Abouammoh, A. (Eds.). (2013). Higher education in Saudi Arabia: Achievement, challenges and opportunities. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Tatweer (2014a). T4EDU math and science teacher development programme expected to have positive impact on math and science education in Saudi Arabia [Pearson’s press release]. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Aug 2015.
  34. Tatweer. (2014b). Preliminary scope of work: Project to manage the teacher professional learning abroad program. Riyadh: Tatweer for Educational Services.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, C., & Albasri, W. (2014). The impact of Saudi Arabia king Abdullah’s scholarship program in the US. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 2(10), 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, G., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an instrument designed to investigate elements of science students’ metacognition, self-efficacy and learning processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1701–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. UNESCO. (2013). Education for all global monitoring report. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  38. Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yizraeli, S. (2012). Politics and society in Saudi Arabia. The crucial years of development, 1960-1982. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology Education, College of EducationChosun UniversityGwangjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of EducationImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityDammamSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations