Advertisement

Archaeologies of Working-Class Culture and Collective Action

  • Charlotte K. SunseriEmail author
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The nineteenth-century emergence of an American working class is studied by historians as an abstract awareness of shared experiences grounded in material conditions and concrete reality (Oestreicher 1986). Historical archaeology is appropriate to track the rise in class consciousness through: (1) shared material culture in workers’ domestic lives; (2) archaeological or archival evidence for class distinctions and hierarchical dissent; and (3) material evidence, archival and oral histories of working-class efforts to affect change through labor organizing or political action. These markers of class consciousness are compared among historical sites of labor contestation, and used to understand experiences of workers in the company town of Mono Mills, California. Identification of a working-class culture contributes to theorizing how class structures crosscut differences (e.g., ethnic, gendered, and racial) as well as built solidarity in opposition to other tiers of the labor hierarchy.

Keywords

Social identities Working class Collective action Labor 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Archaeological data for this paper is the product of the 2012 SJSU field project conducted in collaboration with the Mono Lake Kutzadika’a Paiute Indian Community; special thanks to Leroy Williams, Charlotte Lange, Jerry Andrews and Teri Jenkins, Augie Hess. Archival study was supported by several staff of historical archives, including Jessica Maddox and Jacquelyn Sundstrand at UN Reno special collections (Reno, NV), Craig Castleton at California State Railroad Museum Library and Archives (Sacramento, CA), Roberta Harlan at Eastern California Museum (Independence, CA), and Sheryln Hayes-Zorn at Nevada Historical Society (Reno, NV). Special thanks to Charles Orser and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on previous versions of this manuscript that greatly improved this article.

References

  1. Bauer, W. (2009). We Were All Like Migrant Workers Here. University of North Carolina Press. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  2. Baxter, J. E. (2012). The paradox of a capitalist utopia: visionary ideals and lived experience in the Pullman community 1880-1900. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 16: 651–665.Google Scholar
  3. Billeb, E. W. (1968). Mining Camp Days. Howell-North Books, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Billeb, Emil Collection. (n.d.) HL-3276. Nevada Historical Society, Reno, Nevada. [Billeb, NHS].Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britt, K. (2007). Archaeology: the "missing link" to civic engagement? an introspective look at the tools of re-invention and re-engagement in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. In Little, B. and Shackel, P. (eds.), Archaeology as a Tool of Civic Engagement. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
  7. Burnham, W. D. (1955). Presidential Ballots 1836–1892. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. Calhoun, M. (1984). Pioneers of the Mono Basin. Artemisia Press, Lee Vining, CA.Google Scholar
  9. Canton, W. and Canton, R. (2011). Bodie Railroad & Lumber Company: Railroad in the Sky, 1881–1917. Nevada Publications, Reno.Google Scholar
  10. Carsten, O. (1988). Ethnic particularism and class solidarity: the experience of two Connecticut cities. Theory and Society 17(3): 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chicone, S. J. (2011). Respectable rags: working-class poverty and the 1913-14 southern Colorado coal strike. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 15: 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Congressional Quarterly (1995). Presidential Elections, 1789–1992. Congressional Quarterly Inc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Cornford, D. A. (1987). Workers and Dissent in the Redwood Empire. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. Cowie, S. (2011). The Plurality of Power: An Archaeology of Industrial Capitalism. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Deetz, J. (1996). In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. 2nd ed. Anchor Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1969). Black Reconstruction in America: An Essay toward a History of the Part Which Black Folk Played in the Attempt to Reconstruct Democracy in America, 1860-1880. Atheneum, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Farnsworth, P. and C. Sunseri. (2010). Mono Mills Cultural Resource Assessment, Mono County, California, Report on file with the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.Google Scholar
  18. Fletcher, T. C. (1987). Paiute, Prospector, Pioneer. In A History of the Bodie-Mono Lake Area in the Nineteenth Century. Artemesia Press, Lee Vining, CA, p 123.Google Scholar
  19. Gadsby, D. A. and Chidester, R. C. (2011). Heritage and “those people”: representing working-class interests through Hampden’s archaeology. Historical Archaeology 45(1): 101–113.Google Scholar
  20. Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harding, S. (1991). Representing fundamentalism: the problem of the repugnant cultural other. Social Research 58(2): 373–393.Google Scholar
  22. Hsu, M. Y. (2000). Dreaming of Home: Dreaming of Gold. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Leone, M. P. and Shackel, P. A. (1987). Forks, clocks, and power. In Mirror and Metaphor: Material and Social Constructions of Reality, Ingersoll, D. W. and Bronitsky, G. (eds.). University Press of America, pp. 46–61.Google Scholar
  24. Lightfoot, K. (2006). Indians, Missionaries, and Merchants: The Legacy of Colonial Encounters on the California Frontiers. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  25. Lightfoot, K. G., Martinez, A., and Schiff, A. M. (1998). Daily practice and material culture in pluralistic social settings: an archaeological study of culture change and persistence from Fort Ross, California. American Antiquity 63: 199–222.Google Scholar
  26. Matthews, C. N. (2010). The Archaeology of American Capitalism. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  27. McGuire, R. H. and Reckner, P. (2002). The unromantic west: labor, capital, and struggle. Historical Archaeology 36(3): 44–58.Google Scholar
  28. McIntosh, F W. (1908). Mono County California: The Land of Promise For The Man Of Industry.  <https://books.google.com.ph/books?id=bvXESmuAc8QC&redir_esc=y>. Accessed 6 Aug 2012
  29. Mejer, J. (1987). Marxist and neo-Marxist interpretations of ethnicity. Sociological Focus 20(4): 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Metheny, K. B. (2006). From the Miners’ Doublehouse: Archaeology and Landscape in a Pennsylvania Coal Company Town. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
  31. Metheny, K. B. (2010). Engendering the corporate landscape: a view from the miners’ doublehouse. In Baugher, S. and Spencer-Wood, S. M. (eds.), Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes, Springer, New York, pp. 313–340.Google Scholar
  32. Mono County Historical Society. (2008). Law & Order. Mono County Historical Society Newsletter. Bridgeport, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Mrozowski, S. A. (2006). The Archaeology of Class in Urban America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Mullins, P. R. (1999). Race and the genteel consumer: class and African-American consumption, 1850-1930. Historical Archaeology 33(1): 22–38.Google Scholar
  35. Mullins, P. R. (2009). Consuming individuality: collective identity along the color line. In White, C. L. (ed.), The Materiality of Individuality: Archaeological Studies of Individual Lives. Springer, New York, pp. 207–219.Google Scholar
  36. Oestreicher, R. J. (1986). Solidarity and Fragmentation: Working People and Class Consciousness in Detroit, 1875–1900. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  37. Piatt, M. H. (2003). Bodie: “The Mines Are Looking Well…”. Hi Marketing, El Sobrante, CA.Google Scholar
  38. Robinson, E. E. (1934). The Presidential Vote 1896–1932. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  39. Roediger, D. R. (1994). Towards the Abolition of Whiteness: Essays on Race, Politics, and Working Class History. Verso, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Roediger, D. R. (2007). The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class. Verso, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Roediger, D. R. and Foner, P. S. (1989). Our Own Time: A History of American Labor and the Working Day. Greenwood Press, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Roller, M. P. (2018). Late modernity and community change in Lattimer no. 2: the American twentieth century as seen through the archaeology of a Pennsylvania anthracite town. Historical Archaeology 52(1): 70–84.Google Scholar
  43. Saitta, D. J. (2007). The Archaeology of Collective Action. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  44. Sawyer, W. A. (1988). A History and Evaluation of the Mono Mills Railroad Logging District, Inyo National Forest, California. On file at the Eastern Information Center, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  45. Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  46. Shackel, P. A. (2009). The Archaeology of American Labor and Working-Class Life. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  47. Silliman, S. W. (2006). Struggling with labor, working with identities. In Hall, M. and Silliman, S. (eds.), Historical Archaeology. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 147–166.Google Scholar
  48. Singleton, T. A. (1996). The archaeology of slave life. In Orser, C. E. (ed.), Images of the Recent Past: Readings in Historical Archaeology. Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp. 141–165.Google Scholar
  49. Spencer-Wood, S. M., and Baugher, S. (2010). Introduction: the archaeology and preservation of North American gendered landscapes. In Baugher, S. and Spencer-Wood, S. M. (eds.), Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes. Springer, New York, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  50. Sprague, M. (2003). Bodie’s Gold. University of Nevada Press, Reno.Google Scholar
  51. Sunseri, C. K. (2015a). Alliance strategies in the racialized railroad economies of the mining frontier. Historical Archaeology 49(1).Google Scholar
  52. Sunseri, C. K. (2015b). Food politics of alliance in a California frontier Chinatown. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 19(2).Google Scholar
  53. Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  54. Wall, D. (1999). Examining gender, class, and ethnicity in nineteenth-century New York City. Historical Archaeology 33(1): 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walley, C. J. (2017). Trump’s election and the “white working class”: what we missed. American Ethnologist 44(2): 231–236.Google Scholar
  56. Watson, J. and Brodie, D. (2000). Big Bad Bodie: High Sierra Ghost Town. Robert Reed, Bandon, CA.Google Scholar
  57. Wedertz, F. S. (1969). Bodie 1859–1900. Sierra Media, Bishop, CA.Google Scholar
  58. White, C. L. (2009). Introduction: objects, scale, and identity entangled. In White, C. L. (ed.), The Materiality of Individuality: Archaeological Studies of Individual Lives. Springer, New York, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
  59. Wurst, L. (2006). A class all its own: explorations of class formation and conflict. In Hall, M. and Silliman, S. (eds.), Historical Archaeology. Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 190–208.Google Scholar
  60. Wurst, L. (2015). The historical archaeology of capitalist dispossession. Capital & Class 39(1): 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yerington and Company Records. (n.d.) NC738, box 1. Business ledger. Special Collections, University of Nevada, Reno, Libraries.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologySan José State UniversitySan JoséUSA

Personalised recommendations