Advertisement

Rural Cuzco before and after Inka Imperial Conquest: Foodways, Status, and Identity (Maras, Peru)

  • Kylie E. Quave
  • Sarah A. Kennedy
  • R. Alan Covey
Article

Abstract

State expansion brings cultural change or persistence, and foodways reveal how status and identity result from these events. We examine diet choices and food service at two large villages in the Inka imperial heartland (Cuzco, Peru). Yunkaray was occupied during the time of early Inka expansion (eleventh to fifteenth centuries), whereas Cheqoq housed a late imperial (fifteenth to sixteenth centuries) multiethnic retainer population serving the Inka nobility. We use faunal remains and ceramic assemblages to reveal the uneven process of “Inkanization” and find that migrated retainer laborers had greater affinities with Inka practices than early Inka marriage partners.

Keywords

Inka empire Acculturation Identity Foodways Ceramic analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Regional survey work of the Maras area and nearby Urubamba Valley were funded by grants to the third author by the National Science Foundation (BCS-0342381) and the Heinz Grant for Latin American archaeology. The collaboration of co-directors Wilfredo Yépez, Miriam Aráoz Silva, and Brian Bauer is gratefully acknowledged. Excavations by the first author at Cheqoq were supported by the National Science Foundation (Dissertation Improvement Grant BCS-938453), the National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration (Young Explorers Grant 8691-09), the Fulbright Institute for International Education, and Southern Methodist University. Excavations were permitted by the Instituto Nacional de Cultura-Cusco (Resolución Nacional 1579/INC, 2010). We thank Cheqoq co-directors René Pilco Vargas and Stephanie Pierce Terry. Dartmouth College provided support for the preliminary mapping of Yunkaray, while funding for the 2015 excavation season came in the form of grants to the first author from the National Geographic Society (9500-14) and the Curtiss T. & Mary G. Brennan Foundation. Beloit College, the Manger Family Fund, and the Anthropology Department Student Enrichment Fund supported the excavation and laboratory analysis. The University of Texas at Austin supported fieldwork and laboratory analysis, as well as radiocarbon dating excavation contexts. We thank co-director Karen Durand Cáceres and members of the community of Maras. Excavations were conducted under Resolución Directoral (permit number) 623-2015-DDC-CUS/MC and export of AMS samples was possible thanks to Resolución Viceministerial No. 006-2016-VIMPCIC-MC. We also thank Sarah Kennedy and Scotti Norman for their editorial work on this issue, and express appreciation for helpful reviewer comments from Tamara Bray and Carla Hernández Garavito.

References

  1. Bauer, B. (1992). The Development of the Inca State. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, B. (2004). Ancient Cuzco: Heartland of the Inca. University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  3. Brian, S., Bauer, R. and Covey A. (2002). Processes of State Formation in the Inca Heartland (Cuzco, Peru). American Anthropologist 104(3): 846–864.Google Scholar
  4. Belotti López de Medina, C., López Geronazzo, L., and Otero, C. (2016). At the feet of the fortress: Analysis of Inka period (ca. AD 1430-1536) Archaeofaunal assemblages from residential unit 1 (RU1), Pucara de Tilcara (Jujuy, Argentina). PLoS ONE 11(10): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Betanzos, J. D. (1996[1557]). Narrative of the Incas. Hamilton, R. and Buchanan, D, (trans.), University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  6. Binford, L. (1978). Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Bowser, B. (2000). From pottery to politics: an ethnoarchaeological study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Anthropological Method and Theory 7(3): 219–248.Google Scholar
  8. Bray, T. (2003a). Inka pottery as culinary equipment: food, feasting, and gender in Imperial state design. Latin American Antiquity 14(1): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, T. (2003b). To dine spendidly: imperial pottery, commensal politics, and the Inca state. In Bray, T. (ed.), The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 93–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. and Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond "identity". Theory and Society 29: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cieza de León, Pedro de. (1864[1553]). The Travels of Pedro de Cieza de León Contained in the First Part of his Chronicle of Peru. Markham, C. (trans. and ed.). Burt Franklin, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Cobo, B. (1979 [1653]). History of the Inca Empire: An Account of the Indians' Customs and their Origin, Together with a Treatise on Inca Legends, History, and Social Institutions. Hamilton, R. (trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  13. Cobo, B. (1990 [1653]). Inca Religion and Customs. Hamilton, R. (trans.). University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  14. Covey, R. (2006). How the Incas Built their Heartland: State Formation and the Innovation of Imperial Strategies in the Sacred Valley, Peru. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Covey, R. ed. (2014a). Regional Archaeology in the Inca Heartland: The Hanan Cuzco Surveys. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  16. Covey, R. (2014b). Local populations, royal lineages, and state entities in the Inca occupation of the Xaquixaguana Plain. In Covey, R. (ed.), Regional Archaeology in the Inca Heartland: The Hanan Cuzco Surveys. University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Ann Arbor, pp. 153–174.Google Scholar
  17. Covey, R. (2015). Kinship and the Inca imperial core: multiscalar archaeological patterns in the Sacred Valley (Cuzco, Peru). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 40: 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Covey, R. (2018). The spread of Inca power in the Cuzco region. In Alconini, S. and Covey, R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Incas. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
  19. Covey, R. and Amado González, D. (2008). Imperial Transformations in Sixteenth-Century Yucay, Peru, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  20. Covey, R. and Elson, C. (2007). Ethnicity, demography, and Estate management in sixteenth-century Yucay. Ethnohistory 54(2): 303–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Covey, R., Aráoz Silva, M., and Bauer, B. (2008). Settlement patterns in the Yucay Valley and neighboring areas. In Covey, R. and Amado González, D. (eds.), Imperial Transformations in Sixteenth-Century Yucay, Peru. Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  22. Covey, R. A., Quave, K. E., and Covey, C. E. (2016). Inca storage systems in the imperial heartland (Cuzco, Peru): risk management, economic growth, and political economy. In Manzanilla, L. R. and Rothman, M. S. (eds.), Storage in Ancient Complex Societies: Administration, Organization, and Control. Routledge, New York, pp. 167–188.Google Scholar
  23. Curet, L., and Pestle, W. (2010). Identifying high-status foods in the archeological record. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 29: 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cusick, J. (1998). Historiography of acculturation: an evaluation of concepts and their application in archaeology. In Cusick, J. G. (ed.), Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change, and Archaeology. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 126–145.Google Scholar
  25. Davis, A. (2012). Yuthu: Society and Ritual in an Early Andean Village, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  26. de France, S. (2005). Late Pleistocene marine birds from southern Peru: distinguishing human capture from El Niño-induced windfall. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(8): 1131–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. de France, S. (2009). Zooarchaeology in complex societies: political economy, status, and ideology. Journal of Archaeological Research 17: 105–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. de France, S., and Hanson, C. (2008). Labor, population movement, and food in sixteenth-century Ek Balam, Yucatán. Latin American Antiquity 19(3): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Gamboa, Sarmiento P. (1907[1572]). History of the Incas. Markham, C. (trans., ed.). Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Deagan, K. (2013). Hybridity, identity, and archaeological practice. In Card, J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Hybrid Material Culture. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 260–276.Google Scholar
  31. Dietler, M. (2010). Archaeologies of Colonialism: Consumption, Entanglement, and Violence in Ancient Mediterranean France. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Espinoza Soriano, W. (1973). Colonias de mitmas multiples en Abancay, siglos XV y XVI: Una información inédita de 1575 para la etnohistoria andina. Revista del Museo Nacional XXXIX: 225–299.Google Scholar
  33. Espinoza Soriano, W. (1983). Los mitmas plateros de Ishma en el país de los Ayarmaca, siglos XV-XIX. Boletín de Lima 30(5): 38–52.Google Scholar
  34. Franklin, M. (2001). The archaeological and symbolic dimensions of soul food: race, culture, and Afro-Virginian identity. In Orser, C. E. Jr. (ed.), Race and the Archaeology of Identity. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar
  35. Getty, R. (1975). Sisson and Grossman's the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals, Volume 1, Fifth Edition. WB Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  36. Ghisleni, L. (2018). Contingent persistence: continuity, change, and identity in the Romanization debate. Current Anthropology 59(2): 138–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Guevara Carazas, L. (2004). Informe Final de Investigación Arqueológica 2004: Conjunto Arqueológico Qolqas de Cheqoq-Maras. Instituto Nacional de Cultura, Cusco.Google Scholar
  38. Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In Rutherford, J. (ed.), Identity: Community, Culture, Difference. Lawrence and Wishart, London, pp. 222–237.Google Scholar
  39. Hastorf, C. (2003). Andean luxury foods: Special food for the ancestors, deities and the élite. Antiquity 77: 545–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hastorf, C. A. (2016). The Social Archaeology of Food: Thinking about Eating from Prehistory to the Present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  41. Hubert, E. (2016). Figuring identity in everyday life. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 44(Part A): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jaffe, Y., Wei, Q., and Zhao, Y. (2018). Foodways and the archaeology of colonial contact: rethinking the Western Zhou expansion in Shandong. American Anthropologist 120(1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jennings, J. and Duke, G. (2018). Making the typical exceptional: the elevation of Inca cuisine. In Alconini, S. and Covey, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Incas. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 303–322.Google Scholar
  44. Jones, S. (1997). The Archaeology of Ethnicity: Constructing Identities in the Past and Present. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Kent, J. (1982). The Domestication and Exploitation of the South American Camelids: Methods of Analysis and their Application to Circum-Lacustrine Archaeological Sites in Bolivia and Peru. Doctoral dissertation, Washington University, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  46. Klein, R. (1978). Stone age predation on large African Bovids. Journal of Archaeological Science 5: 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klein, R. and Cruz-Uribe, K. (1984). The Analysis of Animal Bones from Archeological Sites. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Kosiba, S. (2010). Becoming Inka: The Transformation of Political Place and Practice during Inka State Formation (Cusco, Peru). Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  49. Kosiba, S. (2011). The politics of locality: pre-Inka social landscapes in the Cusco region, Peru. In Johansen, P. and Bauer, A. (eds.), The Archaeology of Politics: The Materiality of Political Practice and Action in the Past. Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 114–150.Google Scholar
  50. Kosiba, S. (2012). Emplacing value, cultivating order: places of conversion and practices of subordination throughout early Inka State Formation (Cuzco, Peru). In Papadopoulos, J. and Urton, G. (eds.), The Construction of Value in the Ancient World. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology. University of California, Los Angeles, pp. 97–127.Google Scholar
  51. Kosiba, S. (2018). Cultivating empire: Inca intensive agricultural strategies. In Alconini, S. and Covey, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Incas. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 227–246.Google Scholar
  52. La Lone, M., and La Lone, D. (1987). The Inka state in the Southern highlands: state administrative and production enclaves. Ethnohistory 34(1): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liebmann, M. (2013). Parsing hybridity: archaeologies of amalgamation in seventeenth century New Mexico. In Card, J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Hybrid Material Culture. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
  54. Miller, G. (2003). Food for the dead, tools for the afterlife: zooarchaeology at Machu Picchu. In Burger, R. and Salazar, L. (eds.), The 1912 Yale Peruvian Scientific Expedition Collections from Machu Picchu: Human and Animal Remains. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
  55. Nair, S. (2015). At Home with the Sapa Inca: Architecture, Space, and Legacy at Chinchero. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  56. Niles, S. (1999). The Shape of Inca History: Narrative and Architecture in an Andean Empire. University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  57. Pitts, M. (2007). The Emperor's new clothes? the utility of identity in Roman archaeology. American Journal of Archaeology 111(4): 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Price, M., Wolfhagen, J., and Otárola-Castillo, E. (2016). Confidence intervals in the analysis of mortality and survivorship curves in zooarchaeology. American Antiquity 81(1): 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Quave, K. (2012). Labor and Domestic Economy on the Royal Estate in the Inka Imperial Heartland (Maras, Cuzco, Peru). Doctoral dissertation. Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  60. Quave, K. (2017). Imperial-style ceramic production on a royal estate in the Inka heartland (Cuzco, Peru). Latin American Antiquity 28(4): 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Quave, K. (2018). Royal estates and imperial centers in the Cuzco region. In Alconini, S. and Covey, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Incas. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 101–118.Google Scholar
  62. Quave, K. and Covey, R. (2015). The material remains of Inka power among Imperial heartland communities. Tribus [Stuttgart], pp. 110–127.Google Scholar
  63. Quave, K., Pilco Vargas, R., and Pierce Terry, S. (2013). Las tierras reales del inca como economía noble: viviendas y obras de Cheqoq (Maras, Cuzco). In Kurin, D. and Gómez Choque, E. (eds.), Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Antropológicas en Los Andes Sud-Centrales: Historia, Cultura y Sociedad. Fondo Editorial de la Dirección de Investigación, Creación Intelectual y Artística Universidad Nacional José María Arguedas, Andahuaylas, Apurímac, Peru, pp. 110-145.Google Scholar
  64. Quave, K., Covey, R., and Durand Cáceres, K. (2018). Archaeological investigations at Yunkaray (Cuzco, Peru): reconstructing the rise and fall of an early Inca rival (A.D. 1050-1450). Journal of Field Archaeology 43(4): 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reitz, E. (1988). Faunal remains from Paloma, an archaic site in Peru. American Anthropologist 90(2): 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reitz, E. and Wing, E. (2008). Zooarchaeology. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rivera Dorado, M. (1971). La Cerámica Killke y La Arqueología de Cuzco (Peru). Revista Española de Antropología Americana 6: 85–124.Google Scholar
  68. Robin, C. (2013). Everyday Life Matters: Maya Farmers at Chan. University of Florida Press, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rostworowski, M. (1970). Los Ayarmaca. Revista del Museo Nacional 36: 58–101.Google Scholar
  70. Rowe, J. (1944). An introduction to the archaeology of Cuzco. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Anthropology and Ethnology 27(2)1: 69.Google Scholar
  71. Russell, N. (2012). Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Salas Carreño, G. (2016). Places are kin: food, cohabitation, and sociality in the southern Peruvian Andes. Anthropological Quarterly 89(3): 813–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sandefur, E. (2001). Animal Husbandry and Meat Consumption. In D'Altroy, T. and Hastorf, C. (eds.), Empire and Domestic Economy. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
  74. Schortman, E. and Urban, P. (1998). Culture contact: structure and process. In Cusick, J. (ed.), Studies in Culture Contact: Interaction, Culture Change, and Archaeology. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 102–125.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, M. (1987). Household possessions and wealth in agrarian states: implications for archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6: 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Superior Gobierno (1586), Legajo 1, Cuaderno 10, f. 3v-4. Archivo General de la Nación del Perú (AGN), Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
  77. Titulos de Propiedad (1557), Legajo 1, Cuaderno 3, f. 11–13v. Archivo General de la Nación del Perú (AGN), Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
  78. Valcárcel, L. (1934). Los trabajos arqueológicos del Cusco, Sajsawaman redescubierto, I-II. Revista del Museo Nacional 3(3–36): 211–233.Google Scholar
  79. Valcárcel, L. (1935). Los trabajos arqueológicos en el Departamento del Cusco, Sajsawaman redescubierto, III-IV. Revista del Museo Nacional 4(1–24): 161–203.Google Scholar
  80. VanDerwarker, A., Bardolph, D., Hoppa, K., Thakar, H., Martin, L., Jaqua, A., Biwer, M., and Gill, K. (2016). New world paleoethnobotany in the new millennium (2000-2013). Journal of Archaeological Research 24: 125–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Villanueva Urteaga, H. (1970). Documentos sobre Yucay, siglo XVI. Revista del Archivo Histórico del Cuzco 13: 1–148.Google Scholar
  82. Voss, B. L. (2015). What’s new? rethinking ethnogenesis in the archaeology of colonialism. American Antiquity 80(4): 655–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wheeler, J. (1982). Aging llamas and alpacas by their teeth. Llama World 1(1): 12–17.Google Scholar
  84. Woolf, G. (1997). Beyond romans and natives. World Archaeology 28(3): 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zuck, T. (1938). Age order of epiphyseal union in the Guinea pig. The Anatomical Record 70(4): 389–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kylie E. Quave
    • 1
  • Sarah A. Kennedy
    • 2
  • R. Alan Covey
    • 3
  1. 1.University Writing Program and Department of AnthropologyThe George Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology, University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnthropologyThe University of TexasAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations