International Journal of Historical Archaeology

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 639–661 | Cite as

Predicting the Past — Materiality of Nazi and Post-Nazi Camps: A Norwegian Perspective

  • Marek E. JasinskiEmail author


Archaeological investigations at sites of genocides, oppressions, and imprisonment have, during the last few decades, become a growing field within studies of the contemporary past. This research includes surveys and excavations of Nazi camps, including the iconic sites of the Holocaust, concentration camps as well as POW camps and prisons of the Nazi regime in Germany and in occupied Europe. The present paper evaluates theoretical frameworks for approaches to materiality, social memories, and dissimilation aspects of such sites and relates diverse theoretical approaches to the results of archaeological investigations of Falstad Camp in central Norway.


Materiality Conflict archaeology Social memories Nazi and post-Nazi camps Falstad camps Norway 


  1. Abzug, R. H. (1985). Americans and the Liberation of Nazi Concentration Camps, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Abzug, R. H. (1999). America Views the Holocaust 1933–1945. A Brief Documentary History, the Bedford Series in History and Culture, Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  3. Alcock, S. E. (2002). Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscapes, Monument and Memories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Alonso, A. M. (1988). The effects of truth: re-presentations of the past in the imagining community. Journal of Historical Sociology 1: 33–57.Google Scholar
  5. Bisgaard, A. B. (2011). Enige og tro til Dovre faller? Morgenbladet 5(11): 8–9.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, G., and Jasinski, M. E. (2013). Sites of Memory, Sites of Oblivion: The Archaeology of Twentieth Century Conflict in Europe. In Bassanelli, M., and Postiglionem, G. (eds.), Re-Enacting the Past, Museography for Conflict Heritage, Lettera Ventidue, pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, E. H. (2011). Educational dark tourism at an in-populo site: The holocaust Museum in Jerusalem. Annals of Tourism Research 38(1): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen, A. (1995). Det var noe annet under krigen. 2. verdenskrig i norsk kollektivtradisjon. Oslo.Google Scholar
  9. Gerritsen, A., and Riello, G. (2015). Introduction. In Gerritsen, A., and Riello, G. (eds.), Writing Material Culture History, Bloomsbury Academic, London, p. 336.Google Scholar
  10. Gonzáles-Ruibal, A. (2008). Time to destroy: an archaeology of supermodernity. Current Anthropology 49: 247–279.Google Scholar
  11. Greenblat, S. (1991). Resonance and Wonder. In Lavine, S. D., and Karp, I., eds., The Poetics and Politics in Museum Display, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp. 42–56.Google Scholar
  12. Hancock, I. (2002). We are the Romani People. Ame sam e Rromane džene, University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hancock, I. (2011). The Neglected Memory of the Romanies in the Holocaust/Porrajmos. In Friedman, J. C., ed., The Routledge History of the Holocaust, Routledge, London, pp. 375–384.Google Scholar
  14. Hell, J. (2003). Eyes wide shut: German post-holocaust authorship. New German Critique 88: 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herman, E. S., and Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Pantheon, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hodder, I. (1982). Symbols in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Hodder, I. (1985). Post-processual archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 8: 1–26.Google Scholar
  18. Hodder, I. (2001). Epilogue. In Buchli, V. and Lucas, G., eds., Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, Routledge, London, pp. 189–191.Google Scholar
  19. Jasinski, M. E. (2013). Reinforced concrete, steel and slaves. Archaeological studies of prisoners of world war II in Norway. The case of Romsdal peninsula. In Mytum, H. And Carr, G., eds., Prisoners of War: Archaeology, Memory, and Heritage of 19th- and 20th-Century Mass Internment, Springer, New York, pp. 145-165.Google Scholar
  20. Jasinski, M. E. (2014). Archaeology, recall and re-enacting the painful past of Europe. In Bassanelli, M., Gravano, V., Grechi, G. And Postiglione, G., eds., Beyond Memorialisation: Design for Conflict Heritage, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, pp. 32-50.Google Scholar
  21. Jasinski, M. E. (2015). Memories of war and wars on memories: painful heritage of WWII in Norway - archaeological surveys 2007–2012. In Sem, L. and Jasinski, M. E., eds., Painful Heritage: Studies in the Cultural Landscape of the Second World War, DKVNS, Trondheim, pp. 17–44.Google Scholar
  22. Jasinski, M. E., and Stenvik, L. F. (2010). Landscapes of evil – archaeology and Nazi POW camps in Norway: a new approach. In Soleim, M. N., ed., Prisoners of War and Forced Labour, Histories of War and Occupation, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 205–223.Google Scholar
  23. Jasinski, M. E., Sem, L., and Soleim, M. N. (2013). Painful heritage: cultural landscapes of the Second World War in Norway: a new approach. In Berge, R., Jasinski, M. E. and Sognnes, K.,eds., NTAG TEN: Proceedings of the 10th Nordic TAG conference at Stiklestad, Norway 2009, British Archaeological Reports, International Series S2399, Oxford, pp. 263–273.Google Scholar
  24. Jasinski, M. E., Berge, R., Vennatrø, R. and Carr, G. (2015). Archaeology of the Falstad Camp - Rescue Excavations 2014, Unpublished report, NTNU.Google Scholar
  25. Jasinski, M. E., Berge, R., Vennatrø, R. and Carr, G. (2017). Archaeology of the Falstad Camp. Survey of the Stone Quarry 2015, Unpublished report, NTNU.Google Scholar
  26. Jørstad, T. (2004). Falstad leir – en vond historie vendes. Aftenposten March 6.Google Scholar
  27. Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Legg, S. (2005). Sites of counter-memory: the refusal to forget and the nationalist struggle in colonial Delhi. Historical Geography 33: 180–201.Google Scholar
  29. Leone, M. (2007). Beginning for a postmodern archaeology. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17(2): 203–2007.Google Scholar
  30. Lowenthal, D. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, D. (1998). Introduction. In Miller, D., ed., Material Cultures, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  32. Nilssen, T. R., and Reitan, J. (2008). Falstad – Nazileir og landssvikfengse, Tapir akademisk forlag, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  33. Nora, P. (1989). Between memory and history: les lieux de mémoire. Representations 26: 7-24.Google Scholar
  34. Olsen, B. (2003). Material culture after text: remembering things. Norwegian Archaeological Review 36(2): 87–104.Google Scholar
  35. Olsen, B. (2006). Scenes from a troubled engagement: post-structuralism and material culture studies. In Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuechler, S.,Rowlands, M. and Spyer, P., eds., Handbook of Material Culture, Sage, London, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
  36. Ossowski, A, Kuś, M., Kupiec, T., Bykowska, M., Zielińska, G., Jasinski, M. E. and March, A. L. (2016). The Polish genetic database of victims of totalitarianisms. Forensic Science International 258: 41–49.Google Scholar
  37. Pelegram, A. (1998). The message in paper. In Miller, D., ed., Material Cultures, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
  38. Piper, F. (1994). The number of victims. In Gutman, Y. and Berenbaum, M. Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 61–76.Google Scholar
  39. Rakkenes, Ø. (2010). Brødre i Krig, Pax Forlag, Oslo.Google Scholar
  40. Rieff, D. (2016). In Praise of Forgetting: Historical Memory and Its Ironies. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  41. Sand, B. 1988). Falstad – mot en historieformidling, Diplomavhandling, Institutt for arkitekturhistorie, NTH, Norges Tekniske Høyskole, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  42. Sem, L. (2009). For oss er Falstad det norske holocaust – Ein diskursanalytisk studie av debatten om krigsminnestaden Falstad i 2003–2004, Doktorgradsavhandling, Institutt for kulturstudier og orientalske språk, UiO, universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
  43. Sem, L. (2015). The Eastern Front revisited: the SS-Volunteers in Norwegian WW2 discourse. In Sem, L., and Jasinski, M. E., eds., Painful Heritage: Studies in the Cultural Landscape of the Second World War, DKVNS, Trondheim, pp. 109–118.Google Scholar
  44. Shanks, M. (2007). Symmetrical archaeology. World Archaeology 39: 589–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Soleim, M. N. (2004). Sovjetiske krigsfanger i Norge 1941–1945. Antall, organisering og repatriering, Doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  46. Stamnes, A. (2012). Geophysical Survey at the Second World War Prison Camp at Falstad, Ekne in Levanger Municipality, Norway. Revised March 2012, Geological Survey Report, Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Section of Archaeology and Cultural History, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.Google Scholar
  47. Turkle, S., ed. (2011). Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  48. van der Laarse, R. (2015). Fatal attraction: Nazi landscapes, modernism and Holocaust memory. In Kolen, J., Renes, J. and Hermans, R., eds., Landscape Biographies. Geographical; Historical and Archaeological Perspectives on the Production and Transmission of Landscapes, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp. 345–375.Google Scholar
  49. Van Dyke, R.M., and Alcock, S. E. (2003). Archaeologies of memory: an introduction. In Van Dyke, R. M. and Alcock, S. E., eds., Archaeologies of Memory, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  50. Wilkie, L. (2001). Black sharecroppers and white frat boys. In Buchli, V. and Lucas, G., eds., Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, Routledge, London, pp. 108–118.Google Scholar
  51. Witmore, C. (2004). On multiple fields: between the material world and media: two cases from the Peloponnesus, Greece. Archaeological Dialogues 11(2): 133–164.Google Scholar
  52. Witmore, C. (2007). Symmetrical archaeology: excerpts from a manifesto. World Archaeology 39: 546–562.Google Scholar
  53. Wood, N. (1999). Vectors of Memory: Legacies of Trauma in Postwar Europe. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
  54. Woodward, I. (2007). Understanding Material Culture. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  55. Yair, G. (2014). Neutrality, objectivity, and dissociation: Culturat trauma and educational messages in German holocaust memorial sites and documentation centers. Holocaust and Genocide Studies 28(3): 482–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Young, J. E. (1993). The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  57. Zelizer, B. (1998). Remembering to Forget: Holocaust Memory through the Camera’s Eye. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  58. Zubrzycki, G. (2006). The Crosses of Auschwitz: Nationalism and Religion in Post-Communist Poland. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Historical StudiesNTNU Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations