Teachers’ Change Readiness for the Adoption of Smartphone Technology: Personal Concerns and Technological Competency
The current study investigated change readiness for smartphone technology among 610 secondary school teachers in Kuwait. We assessed teachers’ readiness to adopt smartphones as instructional tools, with respect to their personal concerns, technological competency and personal characteristics. We implemented a quantitative survey design, administering two questionnaires to all participants: the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ), based on the concerns-based adoption model, and a newly developed SmartPhone Competency Scale. The findings indicated that teachers’ perceptions of the adoption of smartphone technology were associated with their stages of concern and smartphone competency level. Scores on the six stages of concern were compared. Concerns were greatest at the personal stage and lowest at the management stage. In addition, teachers with moderate levels of teaching experience (5–10 years) and teachers who specialized in the sciences reported stronger management concerns than teachers specializing in the arts. The five stages of concern with the highest scores (informational, personal, consequences, collaboration, and refocusing) were positively and significantly correlated with the four smartphone competencies. These results suggest that the SoCQ is a practical tool with predictive value for assessing teachers’ change readiness for the adoption of smartphone technology.
KeywordsSmartphone Change readiness Teaching Secondary school Technological competency Stages of concern
- Al-Furaih, S. A. A. (2015). Investigating the intentions of student teachers to adopt Web 2.0 applications in their teaching in the future using decomposed theory of planned behavior (DTPB). Journal of Educational Studies, 27(1), 323–347 (in Arabic).Google Scholar
- AlHajri, R., Al-Sharhan, S., & Al-Hunaiyyan, A. (2017). Students’ perceptions of mobile learning: Case study of Kuwait. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(2), 323–326. https://waset.org/publications/10006342/students-perceptions-of-mobile-learning-case-study-of-kuwait. Accessed 20 July 2017.
- Al-Rawajfih, K., Fong, S. F., & Idros, S. N. (2010). Stages of concern in integrating e-Learning in discovery schools. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 54–63.Google Scholar
- Alshammari, B. S. (2000). The developmental stages of concern of teachers toward the implementation of the information technology curriculum in Kuwait (pp. 1–150). (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Texas).Google Scholar
- Alshaya, H., & Oyaid, A. (2017). Mobile learning in Gulf cooperation council countries: Theory and practice. In K. Alshahrani & M. Ally (Eds.), Transforming education in the Gulf region (pp. 83–97). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Baran, E. (2014). A review of research on mobile learning in teacher education. Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 17–32.Google Scholar
- Brooks. D. C. (2016). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2016. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. https://ccit.clemson.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/ERS1605_ECAR_STUDENT_SUMMARY_2016.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2018.
- Cardoza, Y. (2013). An exploration of teachers’ adoption of the bring your own technology program. (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Texas).Google Scholar
- Çetinkaya, B. (2012). Understanding teachers in the midst of reform: Teachers’ concerns about reformed sixth grade mathematics curriculum in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(3), 155–166.Google Scholar
- Cicchelli, T., & Baecher, R. (1989). Microcomputers in the classroom: Focusing on teacher concerns. Educational Research Quarterly, 13(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
- Clayton, K. E., & Murphy, A. (2016). Smartphone apps in education: Students create videos to teach smartphone use as tool for learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 8(2), 99–109.Google Scholar
- Desjardins, F., Davidson, A. L., Blayone, T., VanOostveen, R., & Childs. E. (2015). General technology competency and use framework. Institute of Technology, University of Ontario. https://eilab.ca/general-technology-competency-use/. Accessed 15 Nov 2016.
- Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., & DeWaard, J. (2015). Research methods in the social sciences (8th ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
- Fullan, M. (2011). Change leader: Learning to do what matters most. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2013). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. http://www.sedl.org/cbam/socq_manual_201410.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2016.
- Green, S., & Salkind, N. (2013). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Gudyanga, R., & Jita, L. (2018). Mapping physical sciences teachers’ concerns regarding the new curriculum in South Africa. Issues in Educational Research., 28(2), 405–421.Google Scholar
- Hall, G. E., George, A. A., & Rutherford, W. C. (1977). Measuring stages of concern about the innovation: A manual for use of the SoC Questionnaire. University of Texas: Austin Research and Development Center for Teacher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED147342).Google Scholar
- Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2014). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., & Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. University of Texas: Austin Research and Development Center for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
- Hamm, S., Drysdale, J., & Moor, D. (2013). Towards a mobile learning pedagogy. In D. McConatha, C. Penny, J. Schugar, & D. Bolton (Eds.), Mobile pedagogy and perspectives on teaching and learning (1st ed., pp. 1–18). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
- Hao, Y. (2013). Exploring middle school teachers’concerns about Web 2.0 technology integration in instruction. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013–society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 5139–5141). New Orleans, Louisiana: AACE.Google Scholar
- Hitt, A., & Lee, C. Y. (2018). College students beliefs about and actual perceptions of the in-class texting of instructors. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 1494–1502). Washington, D.C: AACE.Google Scholar
- Hope, W. C. (1995). Microcomputer technology: Its impact on teachers in an elementary school (pp. 1–203). (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Florida).Google Scholar
- Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., Huling-Austin, L., & Hall, G. H. (2006). Taking charge of change. Austin, TX: SEDL.Google Scholar
- Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 19(1), 263–276.Google Scholar
- International Society for Technology in Education—ISTE. (2018). ISTE standards for teachers. https://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2018.
- Kilis, S. (2013). Impacts of mobile learning in motivation, engagement and achievement of learners: Review of literature. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 12(2), 375–383.Google Scholar
- Knezek, G. A., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 321–331). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matar, N. (2015). Evaluating E-Learning system use by CBAM-Stages of Concern methodology in Jordanian universities. World of Computer Science and Information Technology Journal, 5(5), 75–81.Google Scholar
- McKissic, S. C. (2012). Examining transformative faculty development factors to advance technology adoption and diffusion at a campus-based institution (pp. 1–120). (Doctoral dissertation, Drexel University, PA).Google Scholar
- Middleton, A. (2015). Thinking about smart learning. In A. Middleton (Ed.), Smart learning (pp. 13–44). Sheffield, UK: MELSIG.Google Scholar
- Miglani, A., & Awadhiya, A. K. (2017). Mobile learning: Readiness and perceptions of teachers of open universities of Commonwealth Asia. Journal of Learning for Development-JL4D, 4(1), 58–71.Google Scholar
- Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the concerns-based adoption model to research on computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Ozdamli, F. (2012). Pedagogical framework of m-learning. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 927–931.Google Scholar
- Peralta, H., & Costa, F. A. (2007). Teachers’ competence and confidence regarding the use of ICT. Sísifo: Educational Sciences Journal, 3, 75–84. https://docs.di.fc.ul.pt/bitstream/10451/7008/1/(2007)PERALTA,H%26COSTA,F(ICTCompetenceConfidence)S%C3%8DSIFO3eng.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2016.
- Rakes, G., & Casey, H. (2002). An analysis of teacher concerns toward instructional technology. International Journal of Educational Technology, 3(1). http://ascilite.org/archived-journals/ijet/v3n1/rakes/. Accessed 30 June 2016.
- Rikala, J., Hiltunen, L., & Vesisenaho, M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes, competencies, and readiness to adopt mobile learning approaches. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/45305. Accessed 15 March 2016.
- Seifert, T. (2018). Smartphone implementation from lecturers, teachers, students and pupils’ perspectives. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference (pp. 795–801). Washington, D.C: United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Smith, H. E. (2017). Assessing the effects of the smartphone as a learning tool on the academic achievement and motivation of high school agriculture students in Louisiana. LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 4222.Google Scholar
- Sultana, N. (2015). Application of concerned based adoption model (CBAM) for launching the information technology based teacher education programme at AIOU. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 153–166.Google Scholar
- Summers, J. A. (2015). Apples on! Exploring mobile device learning in schools. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 111–121.Google Scholar
- Thomas, K., & O’Bannon, B. (2015). Looking across the new digital divide: A comparison of inservice and preservice teacher perceptions of mobile phone integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(4), 561–581.Google Scholar
- Vandonick, S., Nouwen, M., & Zaman, B. (2018). Smartphones in the classroom: Current practices and future visions. In J. Vincent & L. Haddon (Eds.), Smartphone cultures (pp. 136–148). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Vasant, S. (2015). Bring your own device: Policy and practice in higher education. In A. Middleton (Ed.), Smart learning (pp. 64–71). Sheffield: MELSIG.Google Scholar
- Vaughan, W. (2002). Professional development and the adoption and implementation of new innovations: Do teacher concerns matter? IEJLL: International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 6(5), 2–11. http://iejll.journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/iejll/index.php/ijll/article/view/435. Accessed 12 Mar 2018.
- Vincent, J., & Haddon, L. (2018). Introducing smartphone cultures. In J. Vincent & L. Haddon (Eds.), Smartphone cultures (pp. 11–17). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ward, J. R., West, L. S., & Isaak, T. J. (2002). Mentoring: A strategy for change in teacher technology education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 553–570.Google Scholar