Integrating Academic and Everyday Learning Through Technology: Issues and Challenges for Researchers, Policy Makers and Practitioners
This paper builds on work undertaken over a number of years by a group of international researchers with an interest in the potential of connecting academic and everyday practices and knowledge. Drawing extensively on literature and our own work, we first discuss the challenges around defining informal learning, concluding that learning is multidimensional and has varying combinations of formal and informal attributes. We then highlight the potential of technology for integrating formal and informal learning attributes and briefly provide some exemplars of good practice. We then discuss in depth the challenges and issues of this approach to supporting learning from the perspective of pedagogy, research, policy and technology. We also provide some recommendations of how these issues may be addressed. We argue that for the learner, integration of formal and informal learning attributes should be an empowering process, enabling the learner to be self-directed, creative and innovative, taking learning to a deeper level. Given the complexity of the learning ecosystem, this demands support from the teacher but also awareness and understanding from others such as parents, family, friends and community members. We present a conceptual model of such an ecosystem to help develop further discussions within and between communities of researchers, policy makers and practitioners.
KeywordsEveryday learning Informal learning Academic learning Formal learning School Technology Pedagogy
The contributions of ideas to this paper from other TWG 2 members, Hiroaki Ogata and Ferial Khaddage, are gratefully acknowledged. We are also grateful to the two anonymous reviewers who provided us with some helpful feedback on the original draft of this paper.
- Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K. D., et al. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: LIFE Center and Center for Multicultural Education (University of Washington).Google Scholar
- Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(2). http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/issue/view/146. Accessed 19 January 2018.
- Becker, S. A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN horizon report: 2016 K (12th ed.). Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Birdwell, J., Scott, R., & Koninckx, D. (2015). Non-formal learning could help to build character and close attainment gap: Learning by doing. London: DEMOS.Google Scholar
- Calvani, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2009). Assessing digital in secondary education. Issues, models and instruments. In M. Leaning (Ed.), Issues in information and media literacy: Education, practice and pedagogy (pp. 153–172). Santa Rosa, CA: Informing Science Press.Google Scholar
- Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, J. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the learning and skills research centre. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.Google Scholar
- Davies, C., & Eynon, R. (2013). Studies of the internet in learning and education: Broadening the disciplinary landscape of research. In W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of internet studies (pp. 328–349). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, E. C., & Shafer, S. (2004). From unequal access to differentiated use: A literature review and agenda for research on digital inequality. Report prepared for the Russell Sage Foundation. http://socinfogroup2.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/41364119/fromunequalaccesstodifferentiateduse.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.
- Erstad, O., Kumpulainen, K., Mäkitalo, Å., Schrøder, K. C., Pruulmann-Vegerfeldt, P., & Jóhannsdóttir, T. (2016). Tracing learning experiences within and across contexts: A Nordic approach. In O. Erstad, K. Kumpulainen, Å. Mäkitalo, K. C. Schrøder, P. Pruulmann-Vegerfeldt, & T. Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Learning across contexts in the knowledge society (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greene, R. (2009). Human behavior theory and social work practice (3rd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gudmundsdottir, G. B. (2010). From digital divide to digital equity: Learners’ ICT competence in four primary schools in Cape Town, South Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 6(2), 84–105.Google Scholar
- Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.Google Scholar
- Khaddage, F., Müller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how? Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 16–26.Google Scholar
- King, H., Kersh, N., Potter, J., & Pitts, S. (2015). Learner-led and boundary free: Learning across contexts. In J. Hohenstein, & H. King (Eds.), Learning beyond the classroom (pp. 39–50). British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II (11). http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/32ehl5.
- Kluge, A. (2016). I am connected, therefore I am: Polycontextual bridging in education. In E. Elstad (Ed.), Educational technology and polycontextual bridging (pp. 129–148). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Knowles, M. S. (1950). Informal adult education. New York: Association Press.Google Scholar
- Lai, K. W. (2018). Learners and the digital learning processes: Research and practice in technology-enhanced learning. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lai, K. W., & Smith, L. A. (2017). Tertiary students’ understandings and practices of informal learning: A New Zealand case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 115–128.Google Scholar
- Laru, J., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L.-H. Wong, M. Specht, & M. Milrad (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 471–484). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lemke, J. L., Lecusay, R., Cole, M., & Michalchik, V. (2015). Documenting and assessing learning in informal and media-rich environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lewin, C., & Charania, A. (2018). Bridging formal and informal learning through technology in the 21st century: Issues and challenges. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lewin, C., Lai, K. W., van Bergen, H., Charania, A., Ntebutse, J. G., & Sherman, R. (2017). Informal learning with technology. EDUsummIT summary report. In K. W. Lai, J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), Rethinking learning in a digital age: EDUsummIT 2017 summary report (pp. 27–32). http://unesco.unibit.bg/en/EDUsummIT17. Accessed 19 January 2018.
- Mouri, K., Ogata, H., & Uosaki, N. (2017). Learning analytics in a seamless learning environment. In 7th International learning analytics and knowledge (LAK) conference.Google Scholar
- Mouri, K., Ogata, H., Uosaki, N., & Lkhagvasuren, E. (2016). Context-aware and personalization method based on ubiquitous learning analytics. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 22(10), 1380–1397.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). (2015). Identifying and supporting productive STEM programs in out-of-school settings. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Ntebutse, J. G. (2015). Former pour le développement de la compétence numérique à l’ère des technologies numériques de type web 2.0: enjeux, défis et perspectives de changement. In L. Thomas & M. Hirschkorn (Eds.), Change and progress in Canadian teacher education: Research on recent innovations in teacher preparation in Canada (pp. 80–107). Ottowa, ON: Canadian Association for Teacher Education.Google Scholar
- Ntebutse, J. G., & Collin, S. (2018). A socio-critical perspective on the integration of digital technology in education. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Ogata, H., Li, M., Bin, H., Uosaki, N., El-Bishoutly, M., & Yano, Y. (2011). SCROLL: Supporting to share and reuse ubiquitous learning logs in the context of language learning. Research and Practice on Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(3), 69–82.Google Scholar
- Pruitt-Mentle, D. (2008). 2008 National cybersafety, cybersecurity, cyberethics baseline study. http://filecache.drivetheweb.com/mr4enh_ncsa/98/NationalC3BaselineSurvey_11_14_08_Final_w_forward+%283%29.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.
- Rajala, A., Kumpulainen, K., Hilppö, J., Paananen, A., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Connecting learning across school and out-of-school contexts: A review of pedagogical approaches. In O. Erstad, K. Kumpulainen, Å. Mäkitalo, K. C. Schrøder, P. Pruulmann-Vegerfeldt, & T. Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Learning across contexts in the knowledge society (pp. 15–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sefton-Green, J. (2004). Report 7: Literature review in informal learning with technology outside school. Bristol: Futurelab.Google Scholar
- Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory, and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sharples, M. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 41–55). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- The New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2009). One-to-one computing: Literature review. http://www.dec.nsw.gov.au/detresources/about-us/how-we-operate/national-partnerships/digital-education-revolution/rrql/support/lit_review.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.
- van Bergen, H., Blauw, I., van den Bogaart, T., van de Kant, H., & Zitter, I. (2016). Education design: A didactic concept. The Netherlands: Utrecht University of Applied Sciences.Google Scholar
- Werquin, P. (2010). Recognising non-formal and informal learning: Outcomes, policies and practices. Paris: OECD publishing.Google Scholar
- Yang, J. (2015). Recognition, validation and accreditation of non-formal and non-formal learning in UNESCO member states. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.Google Scholar