Advertisement

Changing Classroom Practice: Elementary Teacher Experiences of a Professional Development Program

  • Jeffrey J. Puhala
Original research
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

K-12 teachers participate in formal professional development programs to improve the art of teaching and learning. This qualitative study explored the experiences of elementary educators as they implemented their newly acquired blended learning skills in the classroom. Analysis of the results revealed how teachers understand and make meaning of a professional development training program experience. After formal professional development programs, district level administrators failed to support K-6 professionals who desired change at the classroom level, therefore undermining their efforts to grow. Findings point to recommendations for improving district-wide professional development programs.

Keywords

Professional development Blended learning Meaning making Educational change Elementary education Technology integration 

References

  1. Author. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Oxford, OH: Learning Forward. https://learningforward.org/standards-for-professional-learning.Google Scholar
  2. Bruce, C. D., & Ross, J. A. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(2), 346–370.Google Scholar
  3. Bryk, A., Kruse, S., & Louis, K. (1995). Building professional learning in schools. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.Google Scholar
  4. Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria: ASCD.Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Kappan, 92(6), 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desimone, L. (2011). A primer on effective professional development. Kappan, 92(6), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drago-Severson, E. (2009). Leading adult learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  10. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gallucci, C. (2008). Districtwide instructional reform: Using sociocultural theory to link professional learning to organizational support. American Journal of Education, 114, 541–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaytan, J. A., & McEwen, B. C. (2010). Instructional technology professional development evaluation: Developing a high quality model. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 52(2), 77–94.Google Scholar
  13. Heck, R., Brandon, P., & Wang, J. (2001). Implementing site-managed educational changes: Examining levels of implementation and effect. Educational Policy, 15(2), 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirsch, S. (2005). Professional development and closingthe achievement gap. Theory Into Practice, 44(1), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hochberg, E., & Desimone, L. (2010). Professional development in the accountability context: Building capacity to achieve standards. Educational Psychologist, 45(2), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huston, T., & Weaver, C. L. (2008). Peer coaching: Professional development for experienced faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hutchins, K., Arbaugh, F., Abell, S., Marra, R., & Lee, M. (2008). A consumer guide to professional development. Science Scope, 31, 16–19.Google Scholar
  18. Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes, & efficacy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(10), 1–28.Google Scholar
  19. Kent, A. (2004). Improving teacher quality through professional development. Education, 124(3), 427–435.Google Scholar
  20. Ko, B., Wallhead, T., & Ward, P. (2006). Chapter 4: Professional development workshops-What do teachers learn and use? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, (25), 397–412.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.4.397.Google Scholar
  21. Lu, R., & Overbaugh, R. C. (2009). School environment and technology implementation in K-12 classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 26, 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  23. Morewood, A. L., Ankrum, J. W., & Bean, R. M. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the influence of professional development on their knowledge of content, pedagogy, and curriculum. In Mentoring literacy professionals: continuing the spirit of CRA/ALER after 50 years. The thirty-first yearbook: A doubled peer reviewed publication of the college reading association (Vol. 31, pp. 201–219). Florida: Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.Google Scholar
  24. Mouza, C. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1195–1241.Google Scholar
  25. National Governors Association for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  26. No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001., § No. 107-110, 155, stat. 1425 (2002).Google Scholar
  27. Papastamatis, A., Panitsidou, E., Giavrimis, P., & Papanis, E. (2009). Facilitating teachers’ & educators effective professional development. Review of European Studies, 1(2), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2013, January). Pennsylvania common core standards. Pennsylvania Department of Education. Retrieved from http://static.pdesas.org/content/documents/PACCSS%20Mathematics%20PreK%20HS%20January%202013.pdf.
  29. Prensky, M. (2011, January). The reformers are leaving our schools in the 20th century: Why most U.S. school reformers are on the wrong track, and how to get our kids’ education right for the future. SNS Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/+Prensky-The_Reformers_Are_Leaving_Our_Schools_in_the_20th_Century-please_distribute_freely.pdf.
  30. Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tohill, A. (2009). Developing effective professional development. The International Journal of Learning, 16(7), 593–605.Google Scholar
  34. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the top program executive summary. United States Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf
  35. Waddell, D. L., & Dunn, N. (2005). Peer coaching: The next step in staff development. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 36(2), 84–89.Google Scholar
  36. Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad. Dallas: National Staff Development Council.Google Scholar
  37. Wilhelm, R. (2013, February 13). Igniting the hope of knowing. Keynote Speaker presented at the Pennsylvania Educational Technology Exposition and Conference, Hershey, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  38. Wlodkowski, R. (2003). Fostering motivation in professional development programs. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 98, 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Penn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations