Advertisement

How Learning Spaces Can Collaborate with Student Engagement and Enhance Student-Faculty Interaction in Higher Education

  • Gustavo Severo de BorbaEmail author
  • Isa Mara Alves
  • Paula Dal Bó Campagnolo
Article

Abstract

This article explains the relationship between learning spaces and the furtherance of student engagement and enhancement of student-faculty interaction. Following a design-driven methodology and considering flexibility, interaction, and connectivity as core elements to classroom design, we have prototyped spaces and implemented them in 96 classrooms. After doing so, we evaluated how the classrooms were used through a mixed-methods study that involved more than a thousand students. The results of this study highlight the importance of the physical space as a factor that contributes to student engagement and connects both students and professors in an active learning process.

Keywords

Designing learning spaces Student engagement Student-faculty interaction Strategic design 

Notes

References

  1. Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Henke, J. N., & Burgess, W. D. (2017). Student perceptions of a 21st century learning space. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6, 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Alves, I., & Borba, G. (2016). Um olhar sobre a experiência da sala de aula: Na perspectiva do design estratégico [the classroom experience from the perspective of strategic design]. São Leopoldo, Brazil: Unisinos Publisher.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15, 307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beichner, R. J., Saul, J. M., Abbott, D. S., Morse, J., Deardorff, D., Allain, R. J., et al. (2007). Student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project. Research-based Reform of University Physics, 1, 2–39.Google Scholar
  7. Brazil Ministry of Education (2017). Higher education census. Statistical Notes 2017. Brasília, Federal District. Retrieved from http://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_superior/censo_superior/documentos/2018/censo_da_educacao_superior_2017-notas_estatisticas2.pdf
  8. Cain, J. (1998). Experience-based design: Toward a science of artful business innovation. DMI Review, 9, 10–16.Google Scholar
  9. Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornell, P. (2002). The impact of changes in teaching and learning on furniture and the learning environment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(92), 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  13. Dey, E., Burn, H. E., & Gerdes, D. (2009). Bringing the classroom to the web: Effects of using new technologies to capture and deliver lectures. Research in Higher Education, 50, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia do Oprimido [Pedagogy of the oppressed] (42nd ed.). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
  15. Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students' satisfaction on their learning process in active learning and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29, 108–118.Google Scholar
  16. Kember, D. (2001). Beliefs about knowledge and the process of teaching and learning as a factor in adjusting to study in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirk, C. M., Lewis, R. K., Brown, K., Karibo, B., & Park, E. (2016). The power of student empowerment: Measuring classroom predictors and individual indicators. The Journal of Educational Research, 109, 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Masika, R., & Jones, J. (2016). Building student belonging and engagement: Insights into higher education students' experiences of participating and learning together. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mau, B., Pigozzi, O., & Peterson. (2010). The third teacher: 79 ways you can use design to transform teaching & learning (Kindle edition). Brownstown, MI: Motor City Books.Google Scholar
  22. McArthur, J. A. (2015). Matching instructors and spaces of learning: The impact of space on behavioral, affective and cognitive learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. National Survey of Student Engagement (2017). National survey of student engagement annual results. Education Engagement Insights. Retrieved from: http://nsse.indiana.edu/NSSE_2017_Results/pdf/NSSE_2017_Annual_Results.pdf
  24. Neil, S., & Etheridge, R. (2008). Flexible learning spaces: The integration of pedagogy, physical design, and instructional technology. Marketing Education Review, 18, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nguyen, T. D., Cannataa, M., & Miller, J. (2016). Understanding student behavioral engagement: Importance of student interaction with peers and teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 111, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rands, M. L., & Gansemer-Topf, A. M. (2017). The room itself is active: How classroom design impacts student engagement. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6, 25–33.Google Scholar
  27. Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from check & connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas, L. (2012). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change. London, UK: Higher Education Academy Retrieved from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/building-studentengagement-and-belonging-higher-education-time-change-final-report Google Scholar
  29. Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustavo Severo de Borba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isa Mara Alves
    • 2
  • Paula Dal Bó Campagnolo
    • 2
  1. 1.Design Graduate ProgramUnisinos UniversityPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Higher EducationUnisinos UniversityPort AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations