Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 830, Issue 1, pp 1–16 | Cite as

Canals as ecological corridors and hybridization zones for two cyprinid species

  • Emmanuel GuivierEmail author
  • André Gilles
  • Nicolas Pech
  • Nicolas Duflot
  • Laurence Tissot
  • Rémi Chappaz
Primary Research Paper

Abstract

Predicted increases in the human population, in a context of climatic change and limiting freshwater resources, have raised awareness of the need to preserve aquatic ecosystems, their functions, and the biodiversity they harbor. The ecological reconciliation approach proposes the long-term co-existence of biodiversity preservation and the development of human activities. We investigated the ecological and evolutionary contributions of irrigation and hydroelectric canals in the highly fragmented and regulated Durance River (Rhône basin, Southern France), to the genetic diversity patterns of two interbreeding cyprinid species, the native Parachondrostoma toxostoma, and the introduced Chondrostoma nasus species. We observed a high degree of genetic homogeneity along the length of the river. The maintenance of gene flow despite the presence of dams, and the detection of admixed populations and hybridization events in canals suggest that these canals may act as ecological corridors and hybrid zones with the potential to influence genetic resources for the native and introduced species. These anthropogenic structures vary considerably in terms of their spatial organization, size, and overall management, increasing habitat diversity in the urbanized section of river. Together with the restoration of natural habitats, canals can be considered as important structures for biodiversity dynamic in such urban conditions.

Keywords

Genetic diversity Anthropogenic structures Ecological reconciliation Cyprinid species 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to the following persons who supported this study: Jeanne Lambert (DDARD) for help concerning the Alpilles septentrionales canal; Claire Boyer & Sandrine Pignard for ASA of Carpentras canal; Frédérick Jacob & Norbert Schaltenbrand from Electricité de France, Chantal Aspe & Marie Jaque (IRD, LPED UMR D 151, Aix-Marseille Université) for their help concerning the Pertuis Cadenet canal; Christophe Garrone from Maison Régionale de l’Eau, Vincent Duru (Fédération Départementale de Pêche des Alpes de Haute Provence) for help concerning the EDF canal; Rémi Grenier & Vincent Dubut (IMBE) for their participation to molecular data acquirement. We also thank Agnès Barillier, Julie Mosseri, and Frédérick Jacob (EDF) for their suggestions and comments that improved the manuscript quality.

Supplementary material

10750_2018_3843_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (134 kb)
Supplementary Figure S1. Genetic diversity of A) P. toxostoma and B) C. nasus populations in sampled sites in 2013. The figures presents 1) observed heterozygosity (H0, blue dots) and averaged number of private alleles (PA, black triangle) and 2) the haplotype richness (nrH, black32triangle), gene diversity estimators (H, blue dot; θπ, red dots) in sampled sites in 2013. Error bars represents +/- standard error estimated for each value. The labels of sites corresponding to canals are highlighted in red (PDF 134 kb)
10750_2018_3843_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 16 kb)
10750_2018_3843_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (974 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 973 kb)

References

  1. Abbott, R., D. Albach, S. Ansell, J. W. Arntzen, S. J. E. Baird, N. Bierne, J. Boughman, A. Brelsford, C. A. Buerkle, R. Buggs, R. K. Butlin, U. Dieckmann, F. Eroukhmanoff, A. Grill, S. H. Cahan, J. S. Hermansen, G. Hewitt, A. G. Hudson, C. Jiggins, J. Jones, B. Keller, T. Marczewski, J. Mallet, P. Martinez-Rodriguez, M. Möst, S. Mullen, R. Nichols, A. W. Nolte, C. Parisod, K. Pfennig, A. M. Rice, M. G. Ritchie, B. Seifert, C. M. Smadja, R. Stelkens, J. M. Szymura, R. Väinölä, J. B. W. Wolf & D. Zinner, 2013. Hybridization and speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti, M., 2015. Eco-evolutionary dynamics in an urbanizing planet. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30: 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander, T. J., P. Vonlanthen & O. Seehausen, 2017. Does eutrophication-driven evolution change aquatic ecosystems? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372: 20160041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allendorf, F. W., R. F. Leary, P. Spruell & J. K. Wenburg, 2001. The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in ecology & evolution 16: 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aspe, C., A. Gilles & M. Jacqué, 2016. Irrigation canals as tools for climate change adaptation and fish biodiversity management in Southern France. Regional Environmental Change 16: 1975–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balon, E. K., 1992. How dams on the River Danube might have caused hybridization and influenced the appearance of a new cyprinid taxon. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33: 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belkhir, K., P. Borsa, L. Chikhi, N. Raufaste, & F. Bonhomme, 1996. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpelier (France).Google Scholar
  8. Benjamini, Y. & Y. Hochberg, 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Methodological 57: 289–300.Google Scholar
  9. Carrel, G., 2002. Prospecting for historical fish data from the Rhône River basin: a contribution to the assessment of reference conditions. 155: 273–290.Google Scholar
  10. Cattell, R. B., 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1: 245–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterji, S. & L. Pachter, 2006. Reference based annotation with GeneMapper. Genome biology 7: R29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chester, E. T. & B. J. Robson, 2013. Anthropogenic refuges for freshwater biodiversity: their ecological characteristics and management. Biological Conservation 166: 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chhatre, V. E., L. M. Evans, S. P. DiFazio, & S. R. Keller, 2018. Adaptive introgression and maintenance of a trispecies hybrid complex in range-edge populations of Populus. Molecular Ecology, http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/mec.14820.
  14. Clark, K., I. Karsch-Mizrachi, D. J. Lipman, J. Ostell & E. W. Sayers, 2016. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 44: 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colvin, R., G. R. Giannico, J. Li, K. L. Boyer & W. J. Gerth, 2009. Fish use of intermittent watercourses draining agricultural lands in the upper Willamette River Valley, Oregon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 1302–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corse, E., N. Pech, M. Sinama, C. Costedoat, R. Chappaz & A. Gilles, 2015. When anthropogenic river disturbance decreases hybridization between non-native and endemic Cyprinids and drives an ecomorphological displacement towards juvenile state in both species. Plos One 10: e0142592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costedoat, C., N. Pech, M.-D. Salducci, R. Chappaz & A. Gilles, 2005. Evolution of mosaic hybrid zone between invasive and endemic species of Cyprinidae through space and time. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Costedoat, C., N. Pech, R. Chappaz & A. Gilles, 2007. Novelties in hybrid zones: crossroads between population genomic and ecological approaches. PLoS ONE 2: e357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dehais, C., R. Eudeline, P. Berrebi & C. Argillier, 2010. Microgeographic genetic isolation in chub (Cyprinidae: Squalius cephalus) population of the Durance River: estimating fragmentation by dams: Genetic isolation in chub. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 19: 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dubut, V., M. Sinama, J.-F. Martin, E. Meglécz, J. Fernandez, R. Chappaz, A. Gilles, & C. Costedoat, 2010. Cross-species amplification of 41 microsatellites in European cyprinids: A tool for evolutionary, population genetics and hybridization studies. BMC Research Notes 3: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dubut, V., A. Fouquet, A. Voisin, C. Costedoat, R. Chappaz & A. Gilles, 2012. From Late Miocene to Holocene: Processes of Differentiation within the Telestes Genus (Actinopterygii: Cyprinidae). PLoS ONE 7: e34423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durand, J.-D., 2003. Insight into the origin of endemic mediterranean ichthyofauna: phylogeography of Chondrostoma genus (Teleostei, Cyprinidae). Journal of Heredity 94: 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elmqvist, T., C. Folke, M. Nyström, G. Peterson, J. Bengtsson, B. Walker & J. Norberg, 2003. Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 488–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ewens, W. J., 1972. The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology 3: 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Excoffier, L. & H. E. L. Lischer, 2010. Arlequin ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Falush, D., M. Stephens & J. K. Pritchard, 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567–1587.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Fausch, K. D., B. E. Rieman, J. B. Dunham, M. K. Young & D. P. Peterson, 2009. Invasion versus isolation: Trade-offs in managing native salmonids with barriers to upstream movement. Conservation Biology 23: 859–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Filipe, A. F., J. E. Lawrence & N. Bonada, 2013. Vulnerability of stream biota to climate change in mediterranean climate regions: a synthesis of ecological responses and conservation challenges. Hydrobiologia 719: 331–351.Google Scholar
  29. Freyhof, J., D. Lieckfeldt, C. Pitra & A. Ludwig, 2005. Molecules and morphology: Evidence for introgression of mitochondrial DNA in Dalmatian cyprinids. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 347–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fullerton, A. H., K. M. Burnett, E. A. Steel, R. L. Flitcroft, G. R. Pess, B. E. Feist, C. E. Torgersen, D. J. Miller & B. L. Sanderson, 2010. Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities. Freshwater Biology 55: 2215–2237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gilles, A., 1998. Etude du complexe polyspécifique des Cyprinidae européens: systématique, spéciation et zones hybrides. Université Aix-Marseille I, Thèse.Google Scholar
  32. Goudet, J., 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-Statistics. Journal of Heredity 86: 485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gouskov, A., M. Reyes, L. Wirthner-Bitterlin & C. Vorburger, 2016. Fish population genetic structure shaped by hydroelectric power plants in the upper Rhine catchment. Evolutionary Applications 9: 394–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gozlan, R. E. & G. H. Copp, 2005. Early ontogenetic ecology of sofie Chondrostoma toxostoma: an integrated approach to organism-environment relationships. Journal of fish biology 67: 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grant, P. R. & B. R. Grant, 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256: 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Halliday, B. T., T. G. Matthews, D. Iervasi, D. T. Dodemaide, P. J. Pickett, M. M. Linn, A. Burns, I. Bail & R. E. Lester, 2015. Potential for water-resource infrastructure to act as refuge habitat. Ecological Engineering 84: 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harbicht, A., C. C. Wilson & D. J. Fraser, 2014. Does human-induced hybridization have long-term genetic effects? Empirical testing with domesticated, wild and hybridized fish populations. Evolutionary Applications 7: 1180–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hasselman, D. J., E. E. Argo, M. C. McBride, P. Bentzen, T. F. Schultz, A. A. Perez-Umphrey & E. P. Palkovacs, 2014. Human disturbance causes the formation of a hybrid swarm between two naturally sympatric fish species. Molecular Ecology 23: 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hedrick, P. W., 2013. Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Molecular Ecology 22: 4606–4618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffmann, A. A. & C. M. Sgrò, 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470: 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hohenlohe, P. A., M. D. Day, S. J. Amish, M. R. Miller, N. Kamps-Hughes, M. C. Boyer, C. C. Muhlfeld, F. W. Allendorf, E. A. Johnson & G. Luikart, 2013. Genomic patterns of introgression in rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout illuminated by overlapping paired-end RAD sequencing. Molecular Ecology 22: 3002–3013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hubisz, M. J., D. Falush, M. Stephens & J. K. Pritchard, 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Molecular Ecology Resources 9: 1322–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. IUCN, 2018. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1., http://www.iucnredlist.org.
  44. Jakobsson, M. & N. A. Rosenberg, 2007. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801–1806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Josse, J., & F. Husson, 2016. missMDA: A package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 70:, http://www.jstatsoft.org/v70/i01/.
  46. Josse, J., F. Husson, J. Pagès, 2009. Gestion des données manquantes en Analyse en Composantes Principales. Journal de la société française de statistique 150: 28–51.Google Scholar
  47. Kalinowski, S. T., 2005. hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lowe, W. H. & F. W. Allendorf, 2010. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity? genetic and demographic connectivity. Molecular Ecology 19: 3038–3051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lundholm, J. T. & P. J. Richardson, 2010. Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 966–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McElroy, T. C., K. L. Kandl, J. Garcia & J. C. Trexler, 2003. Extinction-colonization dynamics structure genetic variation of spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus) in the Florida Everglades. Molecular Ecology 12: 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meraner, A., A. Venturi, G. F. Ficetola, S. Rossi, A. Candiotto & A. Gandolfi, 2013. Massive invasion of exotic Barbus barbus and introgressive hybridization with endemic Barbus plebejus in Northern Italy: where, how and why? Molecular Ecology 22: 5295–5312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nelva-Pasqual, A., 1985. Biogéographie, démographie et écologie de Chondrostoma nasus nasus (L., 1758) Hotu (Poisson, Téléostéen, Cyprinidé). Thèse. Université Claude-Bernard-Lyon I.Google Scholar
  53. Nice, C. C., Z. Gompert, J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, L. K. Lucas & C. A. Buerkle, 2013. Hybrid speciation and independent evolution in lineages of alpine butterflies. Evolution 67: 1055–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nolte, A. W. & D. Tautz, 2010. Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. Trends in Genetics 26: 54–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oksanen, J., G. Blanchet, R. Friendly, P. Legendre, D. McGlinn, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, E. Szoecs, & H. Wagner, 2016. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-1. .Google Scholar
  56. Palmer, M. A., D. P. Lettenmaier, N. L. Poff, S. L. Postel, B. Richter & R. Warner, 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environmental Management 44: 1053–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Porras-Hurtado, L., Y. Ruiz, C. Santos, C. Phillips, Á. Carracedo & M. V. Lareu, 2013. An overview of STRUCTURE: applications, parameter settings, and supporting software. Frontiers in Genetics 4: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pracheil, B. M., P. B. McIntyre & J. D. Lyons, 2013. Enhancing conservation of large-river biodiversity by accounting for tributaries. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 124–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens & P. Donnelly, 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Rahel, F. J., 2002. Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33: 291–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rhymer, J. M. & D. Simberloff, 1996. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rieseberg, L. H., 2003. Major Ecological Transitions in Wild Sunflowers Facilitated by Hybridization. Science 301: 1211–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosenberg, N. A., 2003. distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 137–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosenzweig, M. L., 2003. Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37: 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rousset, F., 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145: 1219–1228.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Schiemer, F., H. Keckeis & E. Kamler, 2002. The early life history stages of riverine fish: ecophysiological and environmental bottlenecks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, Molecular & Integrative Physiology 133: 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schumer, M., D. L. Powell, P. J. Delclós, M. Squire, R. Cui, P. Andolfatto & G. G. Rosenthal, 2017. Assortative mating and persistent reproductive isolation in hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 10936–10941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schumer, M., C. Xu, D. L. Powell, A. Durvasula, L. Skov, C. Holland, J. C. Blazier, S. Sankararaman, P. Andolfatto, G. G. Rosenthal & M. Przeworski, 2018. Natural selection interacts with recombination to shape the evolution of hybrid genomes. Science 360: 656–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Seehausen, O., 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology Evolution 19: 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Seehausen, O., G. Takimoto, D. Roy, & J. Jokela, 2008. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Molecular Ecology 17: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sinama, M., A. Gilles, C. Costedoat, E. Corse, J.-M. Olivier, R. Chappaz & N. Pech, 2013. Non-homogeneous combination of two porous genomes induces complex body shape trajectories in cyprinid hybrids. Frontiers in Zoology 10: 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tajima, F., 1983. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105: 437–460.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Vallot, J. N., 1837. Ichtyologie française, ou Histoire naturelle des poissons douce de la France. E. Frantin.Google Scholar
  74. Watterson, G. A., 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theoretical Population Biology 7: 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weir, B. S. & C. C. Cockerham, 1984. Estimating F Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, Université Avignon, IMBE-UMR 7263, Evolution Génome Environnement, Centre Saint-CharlesMarseille Cedex 3France
  2. 2.Génétique et Immunologie des Maladies Parasitaires, INSERM, UMR 906, Faculté de Médecine TimoneMarseille Cedex 5France
  3. 3.EDF- R&D, Laboratoire National d’Hydraulique et EnvironnementChatouFrance

Personalised recommendations