Power Technology and Engineering

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 159–166 | Cite as

State of the Art in Protection of Bottom Against Scour Caused by Marine Propulsors

  • N. D. BelyaevEmail author
  • V. I. Klimovich

The state of the art in the protection of the bottom near and the foundations of hydraulic structures from scour caused by marine propulsors is analyzed. The need to formulate recommendations on determining the parameters of the scouring action and engineering measures to protect the bottom against scour is identified.


scour hydraulic structure marine propulsors berthing structure scour protection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Guidelines for Protecting Berthing Structures from Scour Caused by Ships, PIANC Report No. 180, Maritime Navigation Commission, PIANC (2015).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Hawkswood, M. King, and R. De Haan, Propeller Action and Berth Scour Protection, PIANC-COPEDEC IX, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil (2016).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. G. Hawkswood, F. H. Lafeber, and G. M. Hawkswood, “Berth scour protection for modern vessels,” in: Proc. PIANC World Congr., San Francisco, USA (2014), pp. 98 – 117.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. Stoschek, E. Precht, O. Larsen, et al., “Sediment resuspension and seabed scour induced by ship-propeller wash,” in: Proc. PIANC World Congr., San Francisco, USA (2014), pp. 1337 – 1354.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. I. Al’khimenko (ed.), N. D. Belyaev, and Yu. N. Fomin, Safety of Maritime Hydraulic Structures: A manual [in Russian], Lan’, St. Petersburg (2003).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. D. Belyaev, Engineering Methods for Preventing the Scour of Bottom by Marine Propulsors. Author’s Abstract of PhD Thesis [in Russian], SPbETU (1999).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Robakiewicz, “Bottom erosion as an effect of ship propeller action near the harbour quays,” Bull. PIANC, 58 (1987).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Robakiewicz, “The influence of the action of the jet behind the screw on the bottom. Example of model and field measurements with trawler B-20,” Rozprawy Hydrotechniczne, 19, 177 – 214 (1966).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Fuehrer, H. Pohl, and K. Romisch, “Propeller jet erosion & stability criteria for bottom protection of various structures,” Bull. PIANC, 58 (1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Fuehrer and K. Romisch, “Effect of modern ship traffic on inland- and ocean-waterways and their structures,” in: Proc. PIANC’s 24th Int. Navigation Congr. Sec. I, Vol. 3, Leningrad (1977).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Romisch, “Systems for protection against propeller jet erosion in harbours,” in: Proc. 3rd Int. Seminar on Renovation and Improvements to Existing Quay Structures, Gdansk (1993), pp. 31.V – 2.VI.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. G. Blaauw and E. van de Kaa, “Erosion of bottom and sloping banks caused by the screw race of manoeuvring ships,” in: Proc. 7th Int. Harbour Congr., Antwerp (1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. G. Blaauw, F. C. M. van der Knaap, M. T. de Groot, and K. W. Pilarczyk, “Design of bank protection of inland navigation fairways,” DHL Publication, No. 320 (1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. J. Verhey, “The stability of bottom and banks subjected to the velocities in the propeller jet behind ships,” DHL Publication, No. 303 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. J. Verhey, T. Blokland, M. P. Bogaerts, D. Volger, and R. W. Weyde, “Experience in the Netherlands with quay structures subjected to velocities created by bow thrusters & main propellers of mooring and unmooring ships,” Bull. PIANC, 58 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. W. van der Weyde, P. J. M. Heijnijk, A. C. Noordijk, and J. T. Kleijheeg, “Scouring by ships’ propellers. Tracing, repair, prevention,” in: 10th Int. Harbour Congr., June 15 – 19 Antwerp (1992).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Bergh and K. Cederwall, “Propeller erosion in harbours,” in: Proc. PIANC’s 25th Int. Navigation Congr. Sec. I, Vol. 1, Edinburgh (1981).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Bergh and N. Magnusson, “Propeller erosion and protection methods used in ferry terminals in the port of Stockholm,” Bull. PIANC, 58 (1987).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. A. Hamill, “The scouring action of the propeller jet produced by a slowly manoeuvring ship,” Bull. PIANC, 62 (1988).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. J. Prosser, Propeller Induced Scour, BHRAproject report for the British Port Association, BHRA & BPA (1986).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Hamill, C. Kee, and D. Ryan, “Three-dimension efflux velocity characteristics of marine propeller jets,” ICE Maritime Eng., 168(1), 62 – 75 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Roubos, T. Blockland, and T. Van Der Plas, “Field tests propeller scour along quay wall,” in: Proc. PIANC World Congr., San Francisco, USA (2014), pp. 118 – 137.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferry Developments and Their Consequences for Ports. Recommendations for the Design and Operation of Port Facilities, Report of working group 11 of PTC II, PIANC, Supplement to Bulletin 87 (1995).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guidelines for Design of Armoured Slopes under Open Piled Quay Walls, Report of working group 22 of PTC II, PIANC, Supplement to Bulletin 96 (1997).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    BAW. Principles for the Design of Bank and Bottom Protection for Inland Waterways, Mitteilungen 88, Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute, Karlsruhe (2005).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    CIRIA, CUR, CETMEF, The Rock Manual. The Use of Rock in Hydraulic Engineering, C683, CIRIA, London (2007).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    CUR. Handbook Quay Walls, CUR 211E, Taylor and Francis Group (2005).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    EAU. Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures-Harbours and Waterways, Digitised and updated edition (2009).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Coastal Engineering Manual (2012).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ROM. Recommendations for Maritime Works, Ministry of Public Works, Spain (2000).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    V. Balanin, L. Bykov, D. Zernov, et al., “Means of protecting waterway slopes and beds from streams and waves, including ship effect,” in: Proc. PIANC’s 25th Int. Navigation Congr., Sec. I, Vol. 1, Edinburgh (1981).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    N. Beliaev, “Review of protection methods against propeller erosion,” in: Proc. of the 4th Int. Seminar on Renovation and Improvements to Existing Quay Structures. Vol. 1, Techn. Univ. of Gdansk, Poland (1997), pp. 5 – 12.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    SO 34.21.204–2005. Recommendations on Predicting the Channel Transformation Downstream of Hydraulic Projects [in Russian], St. Petersburg (2006).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    N. D. Belyaev, V. V. Lebedev, I. S. Nudner, K. K. Semenov, and D. I. Shchemelinin, “Selection of measures to protect offshore gravity platforms against scour,” Inzh.-Stroit. Zh., No. 3(55), 79 – 88 (2015).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    K. N. Makarov and A. G. Chebotarev, “Wave protection ripraps at the root of seawalls,” Inzh.-Stroit. Zh., No. 3(55), 67 – 78 (2015).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    V. I. Klimovich and K. V. Par’ev, “Reliability of scour protection design near the Prirazlomnaja platform,” Inzh.-Stroit. Zh., No. 7(75), 52 – 65 (2017).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    P 56–90. Recommendations on Designing of Reverse Filters for Hydraulic Structures [in Russian], St. Petersburg (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.B. E. Vedeneev All Russia Institute of Hydraulic EngineeringSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations