Advertisement

The Question of Violence Between the Transcendental and the Empirical Field: The Case of Husserl’s Philosophy

  • Remus BreazuEmail author
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Abstract

In this article, I address the question of violence with respect to the phenomenological difference between the transcendental and the empirical field. In the first part, I phenomenologically address the notion of violence, developing a concept required for an account of the phenomenon of violence. Thus, I correlate it with the notion of vulnerability, arguing that violence cannot be understood irrespective of vulnerability. However, a proper phenomenological account has to indicate the subjective conditions of possibility of a phenomenon as it is given in experience. Therefore, we should ask: what is the status of violence when we are talking about the transcendental field? This question leads to the second part of my article, where I address the notion of violence from the perspective of the difference between the pure and the empirical ego, as it has been traced out by Husserl. If from the point of view of an empirical ego the concept of violence is meaningful, from the point of view of the transcendental ego it seems to be absurd. This is particularly significant, because Husserl is talking about the transcendental ego as being immortal. The pure ego is thus invulnerable and this means that violence—understood from the point of view of both the violating subject and the violated one—is something that cannot be linked to the transcendental field. The question that arises—how is violence possible on the empirical level, since it is impossible on the transcendental level?—is a question to which Husserl cannot respond.

Keywords

Violence Vulnerability Death Pure ego Transcendental Edmund Husserl 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is part of the project The Structures of Conflict: A Phenomenological Approach to Violence (PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0273), funded by UEFISCDI.

References

  1. Cairns, D. (1976). Conversations with Husserl and Fink. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, D. (1977). Kant, Husserl, and the nonempirical ego. The Journal of Philosophy,74(11), 682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ciocan, C. (2018). Violence, animality, and territoriality. Research in Phenomenology,48(1), 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobb-Stevens R. (1990) Husserl’s transcendental turn. In: Husserl and analytic philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1978). Violence and metaphysics. An essay on the thought of Emmanuel Levinas (A. Bass, Trans.). In Writing and difference (pp. 79–153). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dodd, J. (2009). Violence and phenomenology. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodd, J. (2010). Death and time in Husserl’s C-Manuscripts. In D. Lohmar & I. Yamaguchi (Eds.), On time—New contributions to the Husserlian phenomenology of time (pp. 51–70). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd, J. (2017). Phenomenological reflections on violence: A skeptical approach. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dostoevsky, F. (2017). Crime and punishment (M.R. Katz, Trans.). New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Geniusas, S. (2010). On birth, death, and sleep in Husserl’s late manuscripts on time. In D. Lohmar & I. Yamaguchi (Eds.), On time—New contributions to the Husserlian phenomenology of time (pp. 71–89). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gérard, V. (2016). «L’ego hors de soi»: sur la naissance, le sommeil et la mort. De l’Anthropologie du point de vue pragmatique aux Textes tardifs sur la constitution du temps [“The Ego Beyond Itself:” on Birth, Sleep, and Death. From Anthropology from the Pragmatic Point of View to the Late Texts on the Constitution of Time]. Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy,8(2), 571–595.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, E. (1956). Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Erster Teil: Kritische Ideengeschichte [First Philosophy (1923/24). First Volume: Critical History of Ideas]. In R. Boehm (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil: 19211928 [Concerning the Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity. Texts from Literary Remains. The Second Volume: 19211928]. In I. Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, E. (1973b). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 19291935 [Concerning the Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity. Texts from Literary Remains. The Third Volume: 19291935]. In I. Kern (Ed.). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian meditations. An introduction to phenomenology (D. Cairns, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Trans.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, E. (1997). Psychological and transcendental phenomenology and the confrontation with Heidegger (19271931): The Encyclopaedia Britannica Article, The Amsterdam Lectures, “Phenomenology and Anthropology” and Husserl’s Marginal Notes in Being and Time and Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (T. Sheehan and R.E. Palmer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (2000). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (2001a). Logical investigations. Volume II (J.N. Findley, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (2001b). Analyses concerning passive and active synthesis. lectures on transcendental logic (A.J. Steinbock, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Husserl, E. (2001c). Die Bernauer Manuskripte über das Zeitbewusstsein (1917/18) [The Bernau Time-Consciousness Manuscripts (1917/18)]. In D. Lohmar (Ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  22. Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, image consciousness, and memory (18981925) (J.B. Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Husserl, E. (2006). Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (19291934). Die C-Manuskripte [Late Texts on the Constitution of Time (19291934). The C-Manuscripts]. In D. Lohmar (Ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Husserl, E. (2013). Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie. Analysen des Unbewusstseins und der Instinkte. Metaphysik. Späte Ethik. Texte aus dem Nachlass (19081937) [Limit-problems of Phenomenology. Analyses of the Unconsciousness and the Instincts. Metaphysics. Late Ethics. Texts from the Literary Remains (19081937)]. In R. Sowa und T. Vongehr (Eds.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Kern, I. (1964). Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung über Husserls Verhältnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus [Husserl and Kant. A Research on Husserl’s Relationship with Kant and Neokantianism]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquense University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Liebsch, B. (2013). What does (not) count as violence: On the state of recent debates about the inner connection between language and violence. Human Studies,36(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lohmar, D. (2012). Ego and arch-ego in Husserlian phenomenology. In R. Breeur & U. Melle (Eds.), Phaenomenologica: Life, subjectivity & art (pp. 277–302). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacDonald, P. (2007). Husserl, the monad and immortality. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology,7(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marbach, E. (1974). Das Problem des Ich in der Phänomenologie Husserls [The Problem of the Ego in Husserl’s Phenomenology]. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marbach, E. (2000). The place for an ego in current research. In D. Zahavi (Ed.), Exploring the self. Philosophical and psychopthological perspectives on self-experience (pp. 75–94). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mensch, J. (1997). What is a self. In B. C. Hopkins (Ed.), Husserl in contemporary context (pp. 61–77). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mensch, J. (2008). Violence and embodiment. Symposium,12(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mensch, J. (2009). The phenomenological status of the ego. Idealistic Studies,39(1/3), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mensch, J. (2013). Violence and selfhood. Human Studies,36(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mensch, J. (2017). Senseless violence: Liminality and intertwining. The European Legacy,22(6), 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mohanty, J. N. (1996). Kant and Husserl. Husserl Studies,13(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nenon, T. (1997). Two models of foundation in the Logical Investigations. In B. C. Hopkins (Ed.), Husserl in contemporary context (pp. 97–114). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pradelle, D. (2012). Par-delà la révolution copernicienne: sujet transcendantal et facultés chez Kant et Husserl [Beyond the Copernican Revolution: Transcendental Subject and Faculties at Kant and Husserl]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  40. Ricœur, P. (1955). Kant et Husserl [Kant and Husserl]. Kant-Studien,46(1–4), 44–67.Google Scholar
  41. Serban, C. (2016). L’ego a-t-il un eidos comme les autres? [Does the ego have an eidos like the others?]. Revue roumaine de philosophie,60(1), 103–117.Google Scholar
  42. Sigrist, M. (2012). Death in Transcendental Phenomenology. In 43rd annual meeting. Husserl Circle. Boston College. Proceedings (pp. 127–136).Google Scholar
  43. Staudigl, M. (2006). The vulnerable body: Towards a phenomenological theory of violence. In A.-T. Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta Husserliana (Vol. LXXXIV, pp. 259–272)., Logos of phenomenology and phenomenology of the logos. Book two Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Staudigl, M. (2007a). Towards a phenomenological theory of violence: Reflections following Merleau-Ponty and Schutz. Human Studies,30(3), 233–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Staudigl, M. (2007b). The many faces of violence a phenomenological inquiry. In I. Copoeru & H. R. Sepp (Eds.), Phenomenology 2005. Selected essays from Northern Europe, Part 2 (pp. 685–716). Bucharest: Zeta Books.Google Scholar
  46. Staudigl, M. (2011). Esquisse d’une phénoménologie de la violence [Outline for a Phenomenology of Violence]. Revue germanique internationale,13, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staudigl, M. (2013). Towards a relational phenomenology of violence. Human Studies,36(1), 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Staudigl, M. (2015). Phänomenologie der Gewalt [Phenomenology of Violence]. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in the Humanities (ICUB)University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations