Advertisement

Beyond Postphenomenolgy: Ihde’s Heidegger and the Problem of Authenticity

  • Wessel ReijersEmail author
Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Abstract

The quickening pace of technological development on a global scale and its increasing impact on the relation between human beings and their lifeworld has led to a surge in philosophical discussions concerning technology. Philosophy of technology after the “empirical turn” has been dominated by three approaches: actor-network theory, critical theory of technology and postphenomenology. Recently, scholars have started to question the philosophical roots of these approaches. This paper critically questions Ihde’s early adoption of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology in postphenomenology. First, the paper clarifies the central contributions of Heidegger’s philosophy of technology to postphenomenology. It then uses Heidegger’s early work on Aristotle to argue that Ihde’s notion of “use context” is based on a distorted account of Heidegger’s notion of the “totality of relevance”. Correspondingly, it contends that this has led to a misinterpretation of Heidegger’s technology critique. Second, an alternative reading of Heidegger’s ideas concerning technology is offered. This reading traces Heidegger’s use of the concept of telos in the totality of relevance to his discussion of Aristotelian virtue. It is subsequently shown how the question of the temporality of the mode of being of virtue is related to the notion of authenticity, which lies at the heart of Heidegger’s philosophy. Finally, the paper argues that postphenomenology could gain from philosophers who targeted Heidegger’s central notion of authenticity, notably Arendt and Ricoeur.

Keywords

Ihde Heidegger Postphenomenology Technology Authenticity 

Notes

References

  1. Achterhuis, H. (2001). American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2089589.Google Scholar
  3. Bartky, S. L. (1979). Heidegger and the modes of world-disclosure. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 40(2), 212–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beetz, J. (2016). Materiality and subject in marxism, (post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. Materiality and subject in marxism, (post-)structuralism, and material semiotics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59837-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boer, B. De, Molder, H. Te, & Verbeek, P. (2018). The perspective of the instruments: Mediating collectivity. Foundations of Science, 23(4), 739–755.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-018-9545-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brogan, W. (2005). Heidegger and Aristotle: The twofoldness of being (Vol. 5). New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coeckelbergh, M., & Reijers, W. (2016). Narrative Technologies: A philosophical investigation of the narrative capacities of technologies. Human Studies, 39(3), 325–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9383-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dottori, R. (2009). The concept of phronesis by aristotle and the beginning of hermeneutic philosophy. Ethics & Politics, 1, 301–310.Google Scholar
  9. Feenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gransche, B. (2017). The art of staging simulations: Mise-en-scene, social impact and simulation literacy. The science and art of simulation I: Exploring-understanding-knowing (pp. 33–50). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Graland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M. (1996). In J. Stambaugh (Ed.), Being and time. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (2009). Basic concepts of Aristotelian philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hemming, L. P. (1998). Speaking out of turn: Martin Heidegger and die Kehre. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 6(3), 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and Praxis (Vol. 33). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental realism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Inwood, M. (1997). Heidegger, A very short introduction. A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Latour, B., & Porter, C. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory (3rd ed.). Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  23. Pezze, B. D. (2006). Heidegger on Gelassenheit. Minerva-An Internet Journal of Philosophy, 10, 94–122.Google Scholar
  24. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Romele, A. (2017). Imaginative machines. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 22(1), 98–125.Google Scholar
  27. Rosales, A. (1984). Zum Problem der Kehre im Denken Heideggers. Zeitschrift Für Philosophische Forschung, 38(2), 241–262.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenberger, R. (2012). Embodied technology and the dangers of using the phone while driving. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 79–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9230-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Selinger, E. (2006). Postphenomenology: A critical companion to Ihde. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sinclair, M. (2005). On Heidegger’s account of equipment in being and time as metaphysics in its repetition. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 36(3), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Thomson, I. (2005). Heidegger on ontotheology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Den Eede, Y. (2010). In between us: On the transparency and opacity of technological mediation. Foundations of Science, 16(2–3), 139–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9190-y.Google Scholar
  34. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do; Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Verbeek, P.-P. (2006). Materializing morality. Science, Technology and Human Values, 31, 361–380.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Villa, D. R. (1996). Arendt and Heidegger: The fate of the political. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400821846.Google Scholar
  37. Zwier, J., Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2016). Phenomenology and the empirical turn: A phenomenological analysis of postphenomenology. Philosophy & Technology, 29(4), 313–333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0221-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European University InstituteSan Domenico di FiesoleItaly

Personalised recommendations