Advertisement

Human Studies

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 661–676 | Cite as

Time and Matter: Historicity, Facticity and the Question of Phenomenological Realism

  • Ádám TakácsEmail author
Theoretical/Philosophical Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of historical facticity in the phenomenological tradition. I argue that taking historicity into consideration in its factical constitution means transgressing the realm of the primordial or existential temporality. Following Ricoeur’s discussion of the idea of the “referential status of the past,” the question of the material foundation of historical meaning-formation, i.e., relation between temporality and materiality will be brought into the forefront of phenomenological investigations. It is with this context in mind that I argue that exploring the conditions of historicity with regard to its factical and material determinations should assume a realist position in phenomenology.

Keywords

Phenomenology Historicity Facticity Materiality Realism 

References

  1. Bambach, C. R. (1995). Heidegger, Dilthey and the crisis of historicity. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beauvoir, S. (1972). The coming of age (A. Deutsch, Trans.). New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, H. (1994). Matter and memory (N. M. Paul & W. S. Palmer, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, D. (1974). Phenomenology and the problem of history: A Study of Husserl’s transcendental philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, D. (2014). Experience and history: Phenomenological perspectives on the historical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlstrom, D. O. (2002). Scheler’s critique of Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. In S. Schneck (Ed.), Max Scheler’s acting persons: New perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1989). Edmund Husserl’s origin of geometry: An introduction (J. P. Leavey, Trans.). Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (2003). The problem of genesis in Husserl’s philosophy (M. Hobson, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, J. (2013). Heidegger: la question de l’Être et l’histoire: Cours de l’ENS-Ulm (1964–1965) [Heidegger and the question of being and history]. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  10. Dodd, J. (1997). Ideality and corporeality: An essay on the problem of the body in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Franck, D. (2014). Flesh and body: On the phenomenology of Husserl (J. Rivera & S. Davidson, Trans.). London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Harman, G. (2005). Guerilla metaphysics: Phenomenology and the carpentry of things. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1988). Basic problems of phenomenology (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heidegger, M. (1998). Comments on Karl Jaspers’s Psychology of Worldviews (J. van Buren, Trans.). In M. Heidegger & W. McNeil (Eds.), Pathmarks. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (2001). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Henry, M. (1983). Marx: A philosophy of human reality (K. McLaughlin, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Henry, M. (2008). Material phenomenology (S. Davidson, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  19. Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Towards a philosophical biology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Lembeck, K.-H. (1988). Gegenstand Geschichte: Geschichtswissenschaftstheorie in Husserls Phänomenologie [Object history: Theory of history in Husserl’s phenomenology]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Lucas, G. (2005). The archaeology of time. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1965). Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Olivier, P. (2008). Le sombre abîme du temps. Mémoire et archéologie [The dark abyss of time. Memory and archeology]. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  24. Patočka, J. (1996). Heretical essays in the philosophy of history (E. Kohák, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  25. Patočka, J. (2002). Plato and Europe (P. Lom, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Richir, M. (1991). Le sublime en politique [The sublime in politics]. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative (Vol. 3). (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ricoeur, P. (2007a). History and truth (C. A. Kelbley, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ricoeur, P. (2007b). Memory, history, forgetting (K. Blamey & D. Pellauer, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sartre, J.-P. (2004). Critique of dialectical reason (Vol. 1). (A. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  31. Scheler, M. (1957). Schriften aus dem Nachlass. Band. I: Zur Ethik und Erkenntnistheorie [Posthumous Works. Vol. I: On Ethics and Theory ofKnowledge]. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
  32. Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and beyond: Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwesten University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Thao, T. D. (1986). Phenomenology and dialectical materialism (D. J. Herman & D. V. Morano, Trans.). Dordrecht: D. Riedel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations