Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 3–43 | Cite as

Lamarckism by Other Means: Interpreting Pavlov’s Conditioned Reflexes in Twentieth-Century Britain

  • Oliver Hill-AndrewsEmail author
Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

This essay examines the reception of Ivan Pavlov’s work on conditioned reflexes in early to mid-twentieth century Britain. Recent work on the political interpretation of biology has shown that the nineteenth-century strategy of “making socialists” was undermined by August Weismann’s attacks on the inheritance of acquired characters. I argue that Pavlov’s research reinvigorated socialist hopes of transforming society and the people in it. I highlight the work of Pavlov’s interpreters, notably the scientific journalist J. G. Crowther, the biologist Lancelot Hogben, and the science writer H. G. Wells, who made Pavlov’s work accessible to a British audience and embraced the socialist implications of his research – especially the idea that people could be persuaded to become socialists through science writing for a nonspecialist audience and through use of a simplified language such as Basic English. They saw, in the followers of National Socialism, how Pavlovian conditioning could create a national movement, and believed that this could be used for their own more democratic form of socialism. In the final part of the essay, I suggest that this broad socio-cultural movement to reshape humanity proved controversial, especially in the post-war period and in light of Soviet use of brainwashing. The likes of Aldous Huxley and F. A. Hayek feared that conditioning could only lead to totalitarianism, while the historian E. P. Thompson put forward a socialist humanism that left room for human agency.

Keywords

Pavlov Lamarckism H. G. Wells Lancelot Hogben J. G. Crowther Aldous Huxley William Sargant Evolution Twentieth-century Inheritance of acquired characters Great Britain Socialism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I presented a version of this paper at the British Society for the History of Science Annual Conference in 2015. My thanks to Jim Endersby for supervising the doctoral research on which the article’s based, and to Piers Hale for inspiring the topic and for his insightful comments on an earlier draft. I’d also like to thank the anonymous referees and the editors, whose comments and care over the manuscript made this a better essay. Finally, I’m grateful to University of Sussex Special Collections, University of Exeter Special Collections and McMaster University Archives & Research Collections for permission to quote from their papers. The original doctoral research was funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (award reference AH/J500458/1).

References

  1. Anker, Peder. 2005. “The Bauhaus of Nature.” Modernism/Modernity 12: 229–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. “Anti-Bolshevik Hero of U.S.S.R.” 1936. Action, 26 March: 16.Google Scholar
  3. Bowler, Peter. 1984. “E. W. MacBride’s Lamarckian Eugenics and its Implications for the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.” Annals of Science 41: 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowler, Peter. 2009. Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Churchill, Frederick. 2015. August Weismann: Development, Heredity, and Evolution. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colls, Robert. 2013. George Orwell: English Rebel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crook, Paul. 1994. Darwinism, War and History: The Debate over the Biology of War from the “Origin of Species” to the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowther, J. G. [C-Three, pseud.]. 1927. “Pavlov’s Study of ‘Conditioned Reflexes’.” Plebs Magazine, September: 297–301.Google Scholar
  9. Crowther, J. G. [Scientific Correspondent, pseud.]. 1929a. “One of Modern Thought’s Chief Landmarks: Researches of a Great Russian Scientist Which Support Materialism.” Sunday Worker, 30 June.Google Scholar
  10. Crowther, J. G. [Scientific Correspondent, pseud.]. 1929b. “A Russian Genius: The Work of Professor Pavlov.” Manchester Guardian, 10 May: 11.Google Scholar
  11. Crowther, J. G. [Scientific Correspondent, pseud.]. 1930. “Architecture and Science.” Manchester Guardian, 13 June: 9.Google Scholar
  12. Crowther, J. G. [Scientific Correspondent, pseud.]. 1931a. “Basic English: A World Language of 850 Words.” Manchester Guardian, 14 July: 7.Google Scholar
  13. Crowther, J. G. 1931b. An Outline of the Universe. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
  14. Crowther, J. G. [J. G. C., pseud.]. 1939. “Biologist’s View.” Manchester Guardian, 19 May: 7.Google Scholar
  15. Crowther, J. G. 1941. The Social Relations of Science. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  16. Crowther, J. G. 1957. Six Great Doctors. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  17. Dally, Ann. 2004. “Sargant, William Walters (1907–1988), psychiatrist.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/40195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Denny-Brown, D. 1928. “Conditioned Reflexes: An Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex.” Nature 121: 662–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desmond, Adrian. 1989. The Politics of Evolution: Morphology, Medicine and Reform in Radical London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Endersby, Jim. 2013. “Mutant Utopias: Evening Primroses and Imagined Futures in Early Twentieth-Century America.” Isis 104: 471–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Endersby, Jim. 2018. “A Visit to Biotopia: Genre, Genetics and Gardening in the Early Twentieth Century.” The British Journal for the History of Science 1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s000708741800047x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Erlingsson, Steindór J. 2016. “‘Enfant Terrible’: Lancelot Hogben’s Life and Work in the 1920s.” Journal of the History of Biology 49: 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 2015. “Going Native.” London Review of Books 37: 27–30.Google Scholar
  24. Forrester, John. 2010. “The Psychoanalytic Passion of J.D. Bernal in 1920s Cambridge.” British Journal of Psychotherapy 26: 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forrester, John, Cameron, Laura. 2017. Freud in Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fülöp-Miller, René. 1927. The Mind and Face of Bolshevism. London: Chiswick Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gamble, Sarah. 2004. “Gender and Science in Charlotte Haldane’s Man’s World.” Journal of Gender Studies 13: 3–13.Google Scholar
  28. Gliboff, Sander. 2011. “The Golden Age of Lamarckism, 1866-1926.” Snait B. Gissis, Eva Jablonka (eds.), Transformations of Lamarckism: from Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA and London, England: The MIT Press, pp. 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Graubard, Mark. 1939. Man the Slave and Master. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
  30. Griffin, Nicholas (ed.). 2001. The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell: The Public Years, 1914–1970. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Haldane, J. B. S. 1943. “Pathways to Learning.” Daily Worker, 3 August: 2.Google Scholar
  32. Hale, Piers J. 2006. “The Search for Purpose in a Post-Darwinian Universe: George Bernard Shaw, ‘Creative Evolution’, and Shavian Eugenics: ‘The Dark Side of the Force’.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 28: 191–214.Google Scholar
  33. Hale, Piers J. 2010. “Of Mice and Men: Evolution and the Socialist Utopia. William Morris, H.G. Wells, and George Bernard Shaw.” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 17–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hale, Piers J. 2014. Political Descent: Malthus, Mutualism, and the Politics of Evolution in Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, Roy (ed.). 1988. Linguistic Thought in England, 1914–1945. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  36. Hayek, F. A. 1941. “Scientia Militans.” The Spectator, 16 May: 531.Google Scholar
  37. Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
  38. H. C. B. 1927. “The Nature of Brain Processes.” Labour Monthly 9: 766.Google Scholar
  39. Hill-Andrews, Oliver. 2016. “Interpreting Science: J. G. Crowther and the Making of Interwar British Culture.” PhD thesis, University of Sussex (http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/61526/).
  40. Hinshelwood, R. D. 1995. “Psychoanalysis in Britain: Points of Cultural Access, 1893–1918.” International Journal of Psychoanalysis 76: 135–151.Google Scholar
  41. Hobsbawm, Eric. 2006. “Red Science.” London Review of Books 28: 21–23.Google Scholar
  42. Hogben, Lancelot. 1919a. “Modern Heredity and Social Science.” Socialist Review, April–June: 147–156.Google Scholar
  43. Hogben, Lancelot. 1919b. “Review of Animal Life and Human Progress.Socialist Review, October–December: 398–400.Google Scholar
  44. Hogben, Lancelot. 1930. The Nature of Living Matter. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
  45. Hogben, Lancelot. 1931a. “The Foundation of Social Biology.” Economica 31: 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hogben, Lancelot. 1931b. “Review of Human Heredity.” Economica 34: 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hogben, Lancelot. 1936. The Retreat from Reason. London: Watts & Co.Google Scholar
  48. Hogben, Lancelot. 1940. Author in Transit. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  49. Hooper, Judith. 2002. Of Moths and Men: An Evolutionary Tale: The Untold Story of Science and the Peppered Moth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  50. Huxley, Aldous. (1931) 2007. Brave New World. London: Folio Society.Google Scholar
  51. Huxley, Aldous. (1958) 2004. Brave New World Revisited. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  52. Huxley, Aldous. (1962) 2005. Island. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  53. Jardine, Boris. 2012. “Scientific Moderns.” Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  54. Kuznick, Peter. 1987. Beyond the Laboratory: Scientists as Political Activists in 1930s America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Maĭskiĭ, I. M. 2015. The Maisky Diaries: Red Ambassador to the Court of St James’s, 19321943. Edited by Gabriel Gorodetsky. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Meloni, Maurizio. 2016a. Political Biology: Science and Social Values in Human Heredity from Eugenics to Epigenetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Meloni, Maurizio. 2016b. “The Transcendence of the Social: Durkheim, Weismann, and the Purification of Sociology.” Frontiers in Sociology 1: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitman, Gregg. 1992. The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Müller, Jan-Werner. 2011. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Needham, Joseph. 1943. Time: The Refreshing River. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
  61. Ogden, C. K. 1930. The ABC of Psychology. London: Kegan Paul & Co.Google Scholar
  62. Overy, Richard. 2009. The Morbid Age: Britain and the Crisis of Civilization, 1919–1939. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  63. Pandora, Katherine. 2001. “Knowledge Held in Common: Tales of Luther Burbank and Science in the American Vernacular.” Isis 92: 484–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Paul, Diane B. 1984. “Eugenics and the Left.” Journal of the History of Ideas 45: 567–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Paul, Diane B. 1991. “The Rockefeller Foundation and the Origins of Behavior Genetics.” Keith R. Benson, Jane Maienschein, Ronald Rainger (eds.), The Expansion of American Biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, pp. 262–283.Google Scholar
  66. Paul, Diane B. 1998. The Politics of Heredity: Essays on Eugenics, Biomedicine, and the Nature-Nurture Debate. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  67. Pavlov, I. P. 1927. Conditioned Reflexes: an Investigation of the Physiological Activity of the Cerebral Cortex. Translated and edited by G. V. Anrep. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Pick, Daniel. 2003. “The Id Comes to Bloomsbury.” Guardian, 16 August.Google Scholar
  69. Porter, Roy. 1999. The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History of Humanity. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  70. Rapp, Dean. 1990. “The Early Discovery of Freud by the British General Educated Public, 1912–1919.” Social History of Medicine 3: 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Renwick, Chris. 2012. British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Renwick, Chris. 2014. “Completing the Circle of the Social Sciences? William Beveridge and Social Biology at London School of Economics during the 1930s.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44: 478–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Richards, Graham. 2000. “Britain on the Couch: The Popularization of Psychoanalysis in Britain 1918–1940.” Science in Context 13: 183–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sargant, William. 1957. Battle for the Mind: A Physiology of Conversion and Brain-Washing. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  75. Sargant, William. 1960. “A Lesson from Pavlov.” The Times, 18 May: 15.Google Scholar
  76. Shaw, George Bernard. 1942. “Bernard Shaw as Biologist.” The Listener, 3 December: 725.Google Scholar
  77. Shenk, Timothy. 2013. Maurice Dobb: Political Economist. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith, Roger. 1992. Inhibition: History and Meaning in the Sciences of Mind and Brain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, Roger. 1997. The Fontana History of the Human Sciences. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  80. Stack, David. 2003. The First Darwinian Left: Socialism and Darwinism 1859–1914. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press.Google Scholar
  81. Swanson, Gillian. 2014. “Collectivity, Human Fulfilment and the ‘Force of Life’: Wilfred Trotter’s Concept of the Herd Instinct in Early 20th-Century Britain.” History of the Human Sciences 27: 21–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thompson, E. P. 1957. “Socialist Humanism: An Epistle to the Philistines.” The New Reasoner 1: 105–143.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson, E. P. (1963) 2013. The Making of The English Working Class. London: Penguin Books, 2013.Google Scholar
  84. Thomson, Mathew. 2006. Psychological Subjects: Identity, Culture, and Health in Twentieth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Todes, Daniel P. 2014. Ivan Pavlov: A Russian Life in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Turbil, Cristiano. 2018. “Making Heredity Matter: Samuel Butler’s Idea of Unconscious Memory.” Journal of the History of Biology 51: 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wells, H. G. 1921. Russia in the Shadows. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  88. Wells, H. G. 1928a. The Way the World Is Going: Guesses & Forecasts of the Years Ahead. London: Ernest Benn Limited.Google Scholar
  89. Wells, H. G. 1928b. The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution. London: C. A. Watt & Co.Google Scholar
  90. Wells, H. G., Wells, G. P., Huxley, Julian. 1929. The Science of Life. London: The Amalgamated Press.Google Scholar
  91. Werskey, Gary. 1988. The Visible College: A Collective Biography of British Scientists and Socialists of the 1930s. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  92. Wolf, George. 1988. “C.K. Ogden.” Roy Harris (ed.), Linguistic Thought in England, 1914–1945. London: Duckworth, pp. 85–105.Google Scholar
  93. Yeo, Stephen. 1977. “A New Life: The Religion of Socialism in Britain, 1883–1896.” History Workshop Journal 4: 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Young, Charles S. 2014. Name, Rank, and Serial Number: Exploiting Korean War POWs at Home and Abroad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BathUK

Personalised recommendations