The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project
- 854 Downloads
The Bermuda Principles for DNA sequence data sharing are an enduring legacy of the Human Genome Project (HGP). They were adopted by the HGP at a strategy meeting in Bermuda in February of 1996 and implemented in formal policies by early 1998, mandating daily release of HGP-funded DNA sequences into the public domain. The idea of daily sharing, we argue, emanated directly from strategies for large, goal-directed molecular biology projects first tested within the “community” of C. elegans researchers, and were introduced and defended for the HGP by the nematode biologists John Sulston and Robert Waterston. In the C. elegans community, and subsequently in the HGP, daily sharing served the pragmatic goals of quality control and project coordination. Yet in the HGP human genome, we also argue, the Bermuda Principles addressed concerns about gene patents impeding scientific advancement, and were aspirational and flexible in implementation and justification. They endured as an archetype for how rapid data sharing could be realized and rationalized, and permitted adaptation to the needs of various scientific communities. Yet in addition to the support of Sulston and Waterston, their adoption also depended on the clout of administrators at the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the UK nonprofit charity the Wellcome Trust, which together funded 90% of the HGP human sequencing effort. The other nations wishing to remain in the HGP consortium had to accommodate to the Bermuda Principles, requiring exceptions from incompatible existing or pending data access policies for publicly funded research in Germany, Japan, and France. We begin this story in 1963, with the biologist Sydney Brenner’s proposal for a nematode research program at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology (LMB) at the University of Cambridge. We continue through 2003, with the completion of the HGP human reference genome, and conclude with observations about policy and the historiography of molecular biology.
KeywordsBayh-Dole Act Bermuda Principles Big science Bioinformatics Biotechnology C. elegans Celera Genomics Co-production Community resource projects Data hoarding Data release Data sharing Databases DNA Databank of Japan (DDBJ) Department of Energy (DOE) DNA sequencing Ethical Legal and Social Implications (ELSI) European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) GenBank Gene patenting Genetics Genetic mapping Genome commons Genomics Human Genome Project (HGP) Intellectual property Medical genetics Model organisms Molecular biology Moral economy of science National Center for Human Genome Research (NCHGR) National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) National Institutes of Health (NIH) Nematode worm Open science Patents Physical mapping Post-genomics Public domain Reference sequence Science policy Wellcome Trust
List of Acronyms
A C. elegans Data Base
Association Française contre les Myopathies (French Muscular Dystrophy Association)
Bacterial artificial chromosome
Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
Because It’s There NETwork, or Because It’s Time NETwork
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (German Federal Ministry of Education and Research)
Centre d’Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (Center for the Study of Human Polymorphisms, now Foundation Jean-Dausset-CEPH)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (French basic research agency)
Contiguous DNA sequence
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
DNA Databank of Japan
Declaration of Exceptional Circumstances
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German basic research agency)
German Human Genome Project
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (the German Aerospace Centre)
Deoxyribose nucleic acid
US Department of Energy
European Bioinformatics Institute
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (of genomics)
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Energy Research and Development Administration
Expressed sequence tag
File transfer protocol
Free and Open Source Software
The five largest HGP sequencing centers after 1999 (the Sanger Centre, Washington University in St. Louis, the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, the DOE Joint Genome Institute, and the Baylor College of Medicine)
German Research Centre for Biotechnology (in Braunschweig)
Genome Database (at Johns Hopkins University)
NIH Genome Science and Technology centers
Human Genome Initiative (of the US DOE)
Human Genome Mapping Programme (of the UK MRC)
Human Genome Mapping Workshop
Human Genome Project
Human Genome Sciences
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
HyperText Markup Language
Human Leukocyte Antigen
Human Genome Organization
Imperial Cancer Research Fund (in London)
International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium
Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (in Jena)
Joint Genome Institute (of the DOE)
Japan Science and Technology Agency (also STA)
Kilobase (or Kb, kb)
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Laboratory of Molecular Biology (University of Cambridge)
Megabase (or Mb, mb)
Marine Biological Laboratory (in Woods Hole, MA)
Mendelian Inheritance in Man
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Max Planck Institut für Molekulare Genetik (in Berlin)
UK Medical Research Council
US National Center for Biotechnology Information
US National Center for Human Genome Research
US National Cancer Institute
US National Human Genome Research Institute
US National Institutes of Health
US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
US National Library of Medicine
US National Research Council (of the National Academy of Sciences)
US National Science Foundation
Office of Biological and Environmental Research (of the DOE)
Office of Health and Environmental Research (of the DOE)
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Office of Scientific Research and Development
Office of Technology Assessment (of the US Congress)
Polymerase chain reaction
Protein Data Bank (at the Brookhaven National Laboratory)
Phil’s revised assembly program
Phil’s revised editor
Polycystic kidney disease
Japanese Institute of Physical and Chemical Research
German genomic Resource Center (at the MPI in Berlin)
Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Single Chromosome Workshop
Single nucleotide polymorphism
Japan Science and Technology Agency (also JST)
Science and technology studies OR sequence-tagged site (meaning apparent with context)
The Institute for Genomic Research
University of California at San Francisco
Unpublished in Journals and Available in Databases (Stephen Hilgartner’s term)
The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization
United States Patent and Trademark Office
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
Worm Community System
Yeast artificial chromosome
For reading countless drafts, providing insights, ideas, criticisms, primary sources, and moral support, and saving us from many embarrassing errors, the authors would like to thank: Misha Angrist, Nonie Arora, A. Lane Baldwin, Jenny Bangham, Elbert Branscomb, Christian Burks, Graham Cameron, Eli Casdin, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Simon Chaplin, Stephanie Chen, Jae Cheon, Francis Collins, Nathaniel Comfort, Jorge Contreras, Angela Creager, Soraya de Chadarevian, Lauren Dame, Katherine W. Darling, Kevin Davies, Sonia Dermer, Michael Dietrich, Christopher Donohue, Michele Easter, Sean Eddy, Asao Fujiyama, Miguel García-Sancho, Eric Green, Phil Green, Christopher Heaney, Stephen Hilgartner, LaDeana Hillier, Ursula Hurtenbach, Sheila Jasanoff, Cristina Kapustij, Daniel Kevles, Frank Laplace, Sabina Leonelli, Susan Lindee, Jane Maienschein, Mollie Minear, Michael Morgan, Richard Myers, Annie Niehaus, Maynard Olson, Aristides Patrinos, Mila Pollock, Gregory Radick, Arti Rai, Ramya Rajagopalan, Jenny Reardon, Karen Rader, Marsha Richmond, Laura Rodriguez, Jane Rogers, Alex Roland, Alex Rosenberg, Jennifer Shaw, Hallam Stevens, John Sulston, Gert-Jan van Ommen, Jennifer K. Wagner, Robert Waterston, Iain Watts, Jean Weissenbach, Andreas Weller, Kris Wetterstrand, Huntington Willard, Heidi Williams, and Jenny Zhao. Out of this extensive list of friends and colleagues, several individuals deserve special mention. Robert Waterston, and the now late John Sulston, both deserve extraordinary thanks for the patience, eagerness, meticulousness, and good humor with which they helped to guide us through this intricate narrative. Over the years, they read numerous drafts, answered dozens of questions, and edited our writing for accuracy, clarity, and style. These were tasks that occupied many more hours of their valuable time than we ever had a right to expect; yet they saved us from countless errors, and made this manuscript a better final product by far. Furthermore, Eric Green, the current director of the NHGRI, and Christopher Donohue, of the NHGRI and the institute’s History of Genomics Program, have provided us with unending support, flexibility, encouragement, understanding, and enthusiasm for a project which turned out to be much more complicated, and to take much longer to complete—literally, years longer—than the authors initially anticipated. Angela Creager has always understood the importance and pride that her student, KMJ, placed in this project, and is to be thanked for her patience and trust that, despite all the time KMJ was spending on this manuscript, her dissertation would still get written in a (more or less) timely fashion. Alex Roland has supported this work from the beginning, reading nearly every iteration and never hesitating to note when a turn of phrase failed to make sense, a sentence did not parse, or a comma seemed out of place. The students and faculty of the 2014 STS Summer School at Harvard University, which was focused on “Science and Governance at the Frontiers of Life” and organized by Sheila Jasanoff (Harvard Kennedy School), created a scintillating space for dialogue and provided crucial suggestions for literature. “Interactional co-production” has been an indispensable analytical frame for this manuscript, and Sheila Jasanoff and Stephen Hilgartner in particular have remained interested in and supportive of this project for a long time. So has Sabina Leonelli, who read through a mature draft with a critical eye, suggested many references, and offered moral and scholarly support over countless meals (KMJ) and collaborative writing stints (RAA) in Exeter and elsewhere. Finally, the intrepid editors of the Journal of the History of Biology, first Michael Dietrich and then Karen Rader and Marsha Richmond, have shepherded this manuscript through each of its many stages with kindness and productive criticism, never doubting that it was possible to turn it into a publishable product and often providing much-needed advice and encouragement on very short notice. Thank you to everyone for never giving up on us. It is our pleasure to acknowledge you here. An additional cadre of librarians, archivists, and scholars also provided superb writing, research, and editorial assistance. We owe great debts of thanks to the staff and archivists at the Bioethics Research Library at Georgetown University (especially Martina Darragh, Patty Martin, and Nat Norton), the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) Library and Archives (especially Mila Pollock and Stephanie Satalino), the Duke University Libraries (especially Susan Ivey and Jim Tuttle), the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) office at NHGRI (especially Suzanne A. Freeman and Christy Cecil), and the Wellcome Library in London (especially Simon Demissie, Will Greenacre, and most especially, Jennifer Shaw). Two anonymous reviewers for the Journal of the History of Biology gave trenchant feedback and critiques, improving the manuscript enormously, and we hope to have done justice to their considerable dedication of time and energy. With the assistance of Patty Martin, in the final copy-editing stages, Sonia Dermer checked the majority of the manuscript’s quotations and references in the Bioethics Research Library at Georgetown. She caught many errors, and we are in her debt. Jim Tuttle and Susan Ivey at the Duke University Libraries, with other members of the Duke Libraries staff, provided invaluable technological assistance as we built the online repository of research materials for this project, now available in the Archival Collections for the Center for Public Genomics on DukeSpace. Finally, several individuals at the Wellcome Library worked very hard, with the Wellcome Trust, to make the Bermuda meeting transcripts from all 3 years (1996–1998) available to KMJ and RC-D on a restricted basis in their Rare Materials Room in London, alongside facilitating access to further valuable materials from their rich collections in the history of genetics. History, like genomics, is a collaborative undertaking, and for all of this assistance over 8 years we are eternally grateful. We presented numerous versions of this work in progress at scholarly venues, and for their critiques and commentaries we are indebted to the participants in, and organizers of, our panels and presentations at: the 2011 ELSI Congress, NHGRI, “Exploring the ELSI Universe,” in Chapel Hill, NC (“Examining the History and Implications of the ‘Bermuda Principles’ for Data Sharing”); the 3rd biennial meeting of the Society for the Philosophy of Science in Practice, in Exeter, UK (“Examining the History and Implications of the ‘Bermuda Principles’ for Data Sharing”); the 2011 annual meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science (4S), in Cleveland, OH (“Exploring the Impacts of the ‘Bermuda Principles’ on Collaborative Health Research,” in “Collaboration from Life Sciences to Health Sciences and Care,” organized by Bart Penders, Radboud University Nijmegen, John Parker, University of California at Santa Barbara, and Niki Vermeulen, University of Vienna); the 2012 Gordon Research Conference and Seminar on Science and Technology Policy (“Science and Technology in Global Context”), in Waterville Valley, NH (poster entitled, “‘They worked without resting’: Building the policy of international prepublication data sharing during the Human Genome Project”); the 2012 KLI/Altenberg Symposium in Vienna, Austria (“Free and Unfettered? Scientific Communities Meet the Internet through the Bermuda Principles”); a 2012 Egenis seminar, at the University of Exeter, UK (“The Bermuda Triangle: Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics in Genomic Data Sharing”); a 2012 seminar at the Lyman Briggs College, in the Department of Philosophy, at Michigan State University in East Lansing, MI (“The Bermuda Triangle: Principles, Practices, and Pragmatics in Genomic Data Sharing”); the 2013 biennial meeting of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB) in Montpellier, France (“Patenting Life: Genes and Generations,” organized by Berris Charnley, Griffiths University and St. Anne’s College, University of Oxford); the 2014 Joint Atlantic Seminar for the History of Biology (JAS-Bio) at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD (“‘They gave it away’: International data sharing in the Human Genome Project”); the March 23rd, 2015 History of Science Seminar, Program in History of Science, at Princeton University in Princeton, NJ; the 2015 “The Genomic Open: Then and Now” workshop at the University of California, Santa Cruz (organized by Jenny Reardon, UC Santa Cruz; talk entitled “The Bermuda Triangle: Pragmatics, Principles, and Policies”); and the 2015 annual meeting of the History of Science Society (HSS) in San Francisco, CA (“‘They gave it away’: Building an International Policy for Data Sharing in the Human Genome Project,” in “Scientific Openness and Its Discontents in the History of Scientific Information,” organized by Iain Watts, Princeton University). This research would not have been possible without the enormous generosity and cooperation of our numerous interviewees, whose names are listed in the References section. These individuals, who agreed to interview with us in person, over the phone, and/or through email correspondence, read and edited lengthy interview transcripts, answered our persistent follow-up questions, furnished historical documents from their personal files, and supported our construction of a digital archive for this project. Throughout, we have done our best to reciprocate their enthusiasm and encouragement. Kathleen Slover, of Accent on Words in Charlotte, NC, transcribed our interviews with great accountability and care. Finally, for moral, administrative, and all other kinds of support over the past 8 years, in addition to those listed above, we owe bottomless debts of gratitude to Susan Brooks, who kept the Center for Public Genomics running, and to Kathryn Cook-Deegan, Glenn Hawke, and T. Cole Jones, who kept us running. All remaining errors are our own.
Sir John Sulston, June 2001
Kathryn Maxson Jones led the conduct of this research from 2010 to 2013, and the writing of the manuscript from 2013–2018. From 2010–2013, she worked as a Research Aide at the Center for Public Genomics at Duke University, a Center of Excellence in Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Research co-funded by the US Department of Energy and the US National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) under the NIH Grant Number P50-HG-003391. In September 2018, while maintaining her PhD candidacy at Princeton University, Kathryn Maxson Jones will begin her tenure as a McDonnell Foundation Scholar at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, MA, which will last through June 2019. From 2002–2016, Robert Cook-Deegan was a Research Professor of Public Policy, Internal Medicine, and Biology at Duke University, and from 2004–2016 he served as the director of the Center for Public Genomics. He is also a senior fellow at FasterCures, a center of the nonprofit Milken Institute. Other funding included grants from the NIH (R01-HG-008918), the United States Studies Centre (USSC) of the University of Sydney, Australia (“The Ethos and Effects of Data-Sharing Rules: Examining the History of the ‘Bermuda Principles’ and Their Impact on US 21st Century Science,” Rachel A. Ankeny and Robert M. Cook-Deegan, 2011), and the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors, and do not reflect the views of their funders or employers. The charges associated with making this article open access were funded by an award from the Wellcome Library Open Access Fund.
Interviews: First-Person Interviews
- Adams interview 2012: Mark Adams, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 1 Feb 2012.Google Scholar
- Ashburner interview 2011: Michael Ashburner, by KMJ and RC-D, Cambridge, UK, 2 Jul 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7690.
- Branscomb interview 2011: Elbert Branscomb, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 17 Oct 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7693.
- Cameron interview 2012: Graham Cameron, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 16 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7706.
- Caskey interview 2012: C. Thomas Caskey, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 2 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7696.
- Collins interview 2012: Francis Collins, by KMJ and RC-D, Rockville, MD, 12 Apr 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7704.
- Cox interview 2011: David Cox, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 11 Oct 2011.Google Scholar
- Durbin interview 2012: Richard Durbin, by KMJ, by telephone, 9 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7702.
- Eddy interview 2012: Sean Eddy, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 15 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7705.
- Green interview 2011: Eric Green, by KMJ and RC-D, Rockville, MD, 8 Dec 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7691 (will become available on 27 Feb 2022).
- Green interview 2012: Phil Green, by KMJ, by telephone, 18 Apr 2012.Google Scholar
- Guyer and Peterson interview 2011: Mark Guyer and Jane Peterson, by KMJ and RC-D, Rockville, MD, 18 Aug 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/12722.
- Hillier interview 2012: LaDeana Hillier, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 5 Apr 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7701.
- Hubbard interview 2011: Tim Hubbard, by KMJ, RA, and RC-D, by telephone, 15 Nov 2011.Google Scholar
- Lander interview 2012: Eric Lander, by KMJ, Cambridge, MA, 23 Apr 2012.Google Scholar
- Lehrach interview 2012: Hans Lehrach, by KMJ, by telephone, 10 Apr 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7703.
- Marshall interview 2012: Eliot Marshall, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 22 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7707.
- McCombie interview 2012: Richard McCombie, by KMJ, by telephone, 3 May 2012.Google Scholar
- Morgan and Wallace interview 2012: Michael Morgan and Susan Wallace, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 4 Apr 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7700.
- Myers interview 2011: Richard Myers, by KMJ, RA, and RC-D, by telephone, 29 Nov 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7694.
- Olson interview 2012: Maynard Olson, by KMJ, RA (via Skype), and RC-D, Durham, NC, 28 Feb 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7709.
- Patrinos interview 2011: Aristides Patrinos, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 1 Sept 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7689.
- Roe interview 2012: Bruce Roe, by KMJ, via Skype, 30 Mar 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7710.
- Rogers interview 2012: Jane Rogers, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 29 Mar 2012.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal interview 2011: André Rosenthal, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 12 Dec 2011.Google Scholar
- Sakaki interview 2011: Yoshiyuki Sakaki, by KMJ, RA, and RC-D, by telephone, 1 Dec 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7688.
- Van Ommen interview 2012: Gert-Jan van Ommen, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 2 Feb 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7695.
- Venter interview 2012: J. Craig Venter, by KMJ, RA, and RC-D, by telephone, 27 Jul 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7697.
- Waterston and Sulston interview 2011: Robert Waterston and John Sulston, by KMJ, RA, and RC-D, Durham, NC, 15 Nov 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7692.
- Weissenbach interview 2012: Jean Weissenbach, by KMJ and RC-D, by telephone, 9 Feb 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/12721.
Email Interviews and Other Electronic Correspondence
- BMBF to KMJ, 2012 and 2013. Andreas Weller, Frank Laplace, and Ursula Hurtenbach, on formal behalf of BMBF, by KMJ, 7 Nov 2012, and follow-up email, Weller to KMJ, 5 Jul 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7761.
- Contreras to authors 2017: Jorge Contreras, email communication to authors, 20 Apr 2017.Google Scholar
- Green to KMJ 2018: Phil Green, email communication to KMJ, 21 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
- Hattori to KMJ 2012: Masahira Hattori, email communication to KMJ, 26 Jul 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7708.
- Waterston to KMJ 2017: Robert Waterston, personal communication in the form of manuscript edits in a Microsoft Word document, on 15 Feb 2017.Google Scholar
- Waterston to KMJ 2018: Robert Waterston, personal communication in the form of manuscript edits in a Microsoft Word document, on 5 Jun 2018.Google Scholar
- Weissenbach to KMJ 2017: Jean Weissenbach, email communication to KMJ, 5 Jan 2017.Google Scholar
Archival Sources: Bioethics Research Library, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
- Cook-Deegan Archive: “The Robert Cook-Deegan Human Genome Archive,” containing the full scope of archival materials for Cook-Deegan’s The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome (1994), created with partial support from the Duke University Center for Public Genomics (2004-2016), a Center of Excellence in ELSI Research co-funded by the NHGRI and the DOE (P50-HG-003391). https://bioethics.georgetown.edu/library-materials/digital-collections/robert-cook-deegan-human-genome-archive/.
Clinton Digital Library, William J. Clinton Presidential Library and Museum, Little Rock, AR
- Lane 1999: Neal Lane, “Human Genome,” Memorandum for the President on the subject of “Genome Patenting,” 1 Oct 1999, Domestic Policy Council, Bruce Reed, and Subject Files. Clinton Presidential Records: White House Staff and Office Files. https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/31391.
- Joint Statement on the Human Genome 2000: “Joint Statement on the Human Genome, Questions and Answers,” unpublished draft 8 Mar 2000, Heather Hurlburt Collection, Office of Speechwriting, Office of Communications, OA/Box Number 19909, Folder “Binder: Briefing Materials for MOS/MOT Event Access to Information on the Human Genome March 14, 2000,” Clinton Presidential Records: White House Staff and Office Files. https://clinton.presidentiallibraries.us/items/show/32399.
The Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Library and Archives, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
- 4th International Strategy Meeting 1999: “4th International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, CSHL (19 May 1999),” facsimile from Jilly Steward (The Wellcome Trust) to James D. Watson, 30 Jul 1999, unpublished meeting summary Jul 1999, James D. Watson Collection, JDW/2/9/1/117. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/53724.
- CSHL International History 2009: “International History of the Human Genome Project: Catalog of Original Materials,” descriptive online catalog initiated by CSHL and The Wellcome Trust, 2009. http://genomelegacy.org/.
- Davies 2016: Kevin Davies, ed., The Human Genome Project: An Annotated & Interactive Scholarly Guide to the Project in the United States, e-book maintained by CSHL, 2016. https://libwiki.cshl.edu/confluence/display/HGP/Home;jsessionid=C69CC57FC488E28A1B20CE888087370B.
- Ferry 2009: Georgina Ferry, “John Sulston – Biography,” Cold Spring Harbor Oral History Collection, CSHL Digital Archives, 2009. http://library.cshl.edu/oralhistory/speaker/john-sulston/.
- MRC Review 1992: UK Medical Research Council, MRC Review of the UK Human Genome Mapping Project, Project Manager’s Report September 1992, James D. Watson Collection, JDW/2/9/2/16. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/53763.
- NCHGR Genome Report Card 1992: “NCHGR Genome Report Card,” overview of progress on the five-year stated HGP goals, Mar 1992, James D. Watson Collection, JDW/2/9/2/13. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/53760.
The Duke University Libraries, DukeSpace Archival Collections, Center for Public Genomics Research Files, Landmark Genomics Technologies, Unpublished Manuscripts, Durham, NC
- Crossman and Rai 2005: Colin Crossman and Arti Rai, “A Brief History of BioPerl,” unpublished manuscript, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/11699.
The Duke University Libraries, DukeSpace Archival Collections, Center for Public Genomics Research Files, The Bermuda Principles, Research Email Correspondence, Durham, NC
- Collins to sequencers and data 2000: Francis S. Collins, Director of the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), email message to the Directors of all HGP sequencing centers, 25 May 2000, and corresponding aggregate funding data, unpublished, compiled by Kris Wetterstrand (NHGRI) and courtesy of NHGRI. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/12719.
- Waterston to authors Jan 2017: Robert Waterston, email communications to authors, 4 and 9 Jan 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/10161/16507.
- Waterston to authors Feb 2017: Robert Waterston, email communications to authors, 17 Feb 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/10161/16508.
The Duke University Libraries, DukeSpace Archival Collections, Center for Public Genomics Research Files, The Bermuda Principles, The Bermuda Meetings, Durham, NC
- 1995 French HGP Planning Report; 1996 French HGP Planning Report: Jean Marc Egly, CNRS Large Sequencing Committee, and Francis Galibert (Committee president), “Expert report on the creation of a sequencing facility,” unpublished manuscript, 1995; PDF also contains Monique Meugnier (on behalf of Jean Weissenbach), facsimile containing 1996 French HGP planning report to Gérard Tobelem, 15 Apr 1996; both courtesy of Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Jean Weissenbach (Genoscope). https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/handle/10161/7711.
- 1996 NIH Bermuda Meeting Report; Guyer to Collins 1996: A summary version of “Report of the International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing held at the Princess Hotel, Southampton, Bermuda, on 25th–28th February 1996”; PDF also contains Mark Guyer, email to Francis Collins, 12 Mar 1996; both unpublished manuscripts, Feb–Mar 1996, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), FOIA Case Number: 12-FOI-00224-NHGRI-39937. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7715.
- 1996 Bermuda Programme and Participants List: “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, Revised Programme” (as opposed to 1996 Wellcome Trust Programme, below); and “Participants List,” unpublished manuscripts, Feb 1996, courtesy of Laura Rodriguez, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7716.
- 1997 Bermuda Revised Delegates List; 1997 Bermuda Meeting Report: “SECOND INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY MEETING ON HUMAN GENOME SEQUENCING Revised Delegates List”; PDF also contains “CONFIDENTIAL Report of the Second International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing held at the Hamilton Princess Hotel, Bermuda, on 27th February–2nd March 1997”; both unpublished manuscripts, Feb-Mar 1997, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), FOIA Case Number: 11-FOI-00056-NHGRI-38310. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7733.
- 1998 Bermuda Meeting Photographs: Photographs of the 1998 International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, courtesy of Eric Green, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7746.
- 1998 Bermuda “Optimism Factor” Photographs: Photographs showing ratios of promised to actual sequences produced from the major HGP sequencing centers from 1997 to 1998, courtesy of Richard Myers, HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7739.
- 1998 Bermuda Meeting Report: “Third International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, Hamilton Princess Hotel, Bermuda, 27th February–1st March 1998, Sponsored by The Wellcome Trust, US National Institutes of Health, US Department of Energy, 164th Genome Technology Committee, Japan Society for Promotion of Science, UK Medical Research Council,” unpublished manuscript, Feb 1998, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), FOIA Case Number: 12-FOI-00224-NHGRI-39937. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7745.
- 1998 Bermuda Programme and Provisional Delegates List: “THIRD INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY MEETING ON HUMAN GENOME SEQUENCING Programme” and “Provisional Delegates List as at 22nd January 1998,” unpublished manuscripts, Jan-Feb 1998, courtesy of Eric Green, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7750.
- Collins 1996 Notes; Resources Available Handouts 1996 (“Resources Available” handouts also appear in the folder, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 1/3,” John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, The Wellcome Library Archives and Manuscripts, London, UK): Francis Collins, NHGRI, handwritten notes from “Wellcome Sequencing mtg. –Bermuda,” 25-28 Feb 1996; PDF also contains “Resources Available” handouts, completed by the heads of the attending laboratories and indicating mapping and sequencing facilities and other resources available at each laboratory, and a copy of Guyer to Collins, 12 Mar 1996 (see above); all unpublished manuscripts, Feb-Mar 1996, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). FOIA Case Number: U-FOI-00165-NHGRI-38639. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7718.
- Collins, Patrinos, and Morgan to Matsubara 1998: Francis Collins, NHGRI, Aristides Patrinos, DOE, and Michael Morgan, the Wellcome Trust, letter to Kenichi Matsubara, Osaka University, 9 Mar 1998, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), FOIA Case Number: 12-FOI-00224-NHGRI-39937. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7737.
- Collins and Patrinos to Laplace 1997: Francis Collins, NHGRI, and Aristides Patrinos, DOE, to Frank Laplace, BMBF, 21 Mar 1997, obtained via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), FOIA Case Number: 12-FOI-00224-NHGRI-39937. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7727.
- Hillier 1996 Notes: LaDeana Hillier, typewritten notes from “HUMAN ANALYSIS,” January 28-30, 1996, Sanger Centre, UK, courtesy of LaDeana Hillier, Washington University School of Medicine. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7723.
- Olson to Waterston 1996: Maynard Olson, email to Robert Waterston, 3 May 1996, courtesy of Maynard Olson, University of Washington, and Robert Waterston, University of Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/7724.
Archival and Digitized Materials, National Human Genome Research Institute Archive, National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Rockville, MD
- 1997 Meeting Report Summary: “Summary of the Second International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing,” unpublished manuscript, Feb-Mar 1997, with handwritten annotations by Francis Collins, sent to Collins by facsimile from Jill Kent (Scientific Officer-Genetics, Wellcome Trust), 4 Apr 1997, 7108-31.Google Scholar
- Kent to Collins 1997: Jill Kent, email communication to Francis Collins, re: “Bermuda report 1,” including summary of Session II of 1997 Bermuda meeting, 4 Apr 1997, 7108-31.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal to Morgan 1997: André Rosenthal, email communication to Michael Morgan, 7 Mar 1997, 7108-31.Google Scholar
- Waterston to Collins 1997: Robert Waterston, email to Francis Collins, 9 Mar 1997, 7108-31.Google Scholar
Wellcome Collection, London, UK1
- 1995 Interim NCHGR Policy: “Interim NCHGR Policy on Human Genomic DNA Sequence for Grants Under RFA HG-95-005,” later updated to “NHGRI Policy Regarding Intellectual Property of Human Genomic Sequence: Policy on Availability and Patenting of Human Genomic DNA Sequence Produced by NHGRI Pilot Projects (Funded Under RFA HG-95-005)” (listed under Websites), included in facsimile from Barbara Skene (Programme Manager-Genetics, Wellcome Trust) to John Sulston, 9 Apr 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- 1996 Bermuda Meeting Transcript: “First meeting of the ‘Bermuda Talks’ held over three days from the 25th to the 27th February 1996,” First international strategy meeting on human genome sequencing. Parts 1–12. Moving image and sound collections 1755AM (1–12) (transcript, Restricted).Google Scholar
- 1997 Bermuda Meeting Transcript: “Second meeting of the ‘Bermuda Talks’ held over three days from the 28th February to the 1st March 1997,” Second international strategy meeting on human genome sequencing. Parts 1–10. Moving image and sound collections 1756AM (transcript, Restricted).Google Scholar
- 1998 Bermuda Meeting Transcript: “Third and final meeting of the ‘Bermuda Talks’ held over three days from the 26th to 28th February 1998,” Third international strategy meeting on human genome sequencing. Parts 1–10. Moving image and sound collections 1757AM (1–10) (transcript, Restricted).Google Scholar
- 1996 NCHGR Pilot Study Press Release: “Pilot Study Explores Feasibility of Sequencing Human DNA,” included in facsimile from Robert Waterston to John Sulston, 11 Apr 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 2/3.”Google Scholar
- 1996 Wellcome Trust Bermuda Meeting Report: “Report of the International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing held at the Princess Hotel, Southampton, Bermuda, on 25th–28th February 1996,” full version of unpublished document (as opposed to 1996 NIH Bermuda Meeting Report, above), included in packet from Barbara Skene to John Sulston, 5 Jun 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- 1996 Wellcome Trust Bermuda Provisional Participants List: “Provisional Participants List” for “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing, 25th February 1996-28th February 1996,” undated manuscript, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- 1996 Wellcome Trust Programme: “Sequencing the Human Genome: International Strategy Meeting,” with Sulston’s handwritten annotations, included in facsimile from John Sulston to “Genome Seq Ctr” (presumably Waterston’s St. Louis Center), 1 Dec 1995; together with “International Strategy Meeting to Progress Large-Scale Human Genome Sequencing, Provisional Programme,” also with Sulston’s handwritten annotations, undated manuscript; both in John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- 1996 Wellcome Trust Press Release: The Wellcome Trust, “International Strategy Meeting Agrees Principles of Early Data Release for Human Genomic Sequencing,” 17 Apr 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, digital image previously available via Wellcome Images, now available in “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 1/3.”Google Scholar
- Bentley to Sulston 1996: Email message from “drb” to “jes” (presumably, David Bentley, Sanger Centre, to John Sulston), 4 May 1996, re: “Datarelease,” with heavily penciled annotations in Sulston’s handwriting, including discussions about daily data release and the Sanger Centre’s policy, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 1/3.”Google Scholar
- Skene to Sulston 1996: Cover letter, packet from Barbara Skene, including 1996 Wellcome Trust Bermuda Meeting Report (above), to John Sulston, 5 Jun 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- Steward to Bentley 1996: David Bentley, comments on “Summary of Principles agreed at the International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing in Bermuda,” handwritten on facsimile from Jilly Steward, Wellcome Trust, 12 Mar 1996, which also included a letter from Barbara Skene and the draft Bermuda Principles to be published by HUGO, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 2/3.”Google Scholar
- Sulston 1996 Notes: John Sulston, handwritten notes from 1996 Bermuda Meeting, unpublished manuscripts, Feb 1996, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 3/3.”Google Scholar
- Sulston to Waterston c. 1996: John Sulston, facsimile to Robert Waterston on Sanger Centre stationery, undated, unpublished manuscript, John Sulston Archives and Manuscripts, PP/SUL/B/2/4/1/1, “International Strategy Meeting on Human Genome Sequencing File 1/3.”Google Scholar
- “About JST.” 2009. Japan Science and Technology Agency, https://www.jst.go.jp/EN/about/index.html, accessed 24 May 2018.
- “About Us.” 2018. JGI Joint Genome Institute, A DOE Office of Science User Facility, https://jgi.doe.gov/about-us/, accessed 27 May 2018.
- Begley, Sharon. 2017. “Psst, the human genome was never completely sequenced. Some scientists say it should be,” STAT News, https://www.statnews.com/2017/06/20/human-genome-not-fully-sequenced/, accessed 21 May 2018.
- “Bermuda Principles Foundation Fund.” 2017. The Foundation Fund, https://www.bermudaprinciples.org/, accessed 3 Jun 2018.
- “Cancer Moonshot.” 2017. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative, accessed 23 May 2018.
- “Data Release and Access Principles and Policy.” 2012. Institute Policies and Guidelines, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/10001801/data-release-and-access-principles-and-policy/, accessed 28 May 2018.
- Gitlin, Jonathan Max. 2013. “Calculating the economic impact of the Human Genome Project,” News Features from the Office of the Director, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/27544383/calculating-the-economic-impact-of-the-human-genome-project/, accessed 2 Jun 2018.
- Giles, Chrissie. 2010. “‘From then on, it was daggers drawn…’: Michael Morgan on a decade of the Human Genome Project,” The Wellcome Trust Blog, The Wellcome Trust, https://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2010/06/24/michael-morgan-on-a-decade-of-the-human-genome/, accessed 21 May 2018.
- “International Consortium Completes Human Genome Project: All Goals Achieved; New Vision for Genome Research Unveiled.” 2003. News Release Archives 2003, Newsroom, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/11006929/, accessed 2 Jun 2018.
- “NHGRI History of Genomics Program.” 2018. About NHGRI, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/27557501/the-nhgri-history-of-genomics-program-an-archival-and-scholarly-initiative/, accessed 3 Jun 2018.
- “NHGRI Policy for Release and Database Deposition of Sequence Data.” 2000. Institute Policies and Guidelines, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/10000910/policy-on-release-of-human-genomic-sequence-data-2000/, accessed 1 Jun 2018.
- “NHGRI Policy Regarding Intellectual Property of Human Genomic Sequence: Policy on Availability and Patenting of Human Genomic DNA Sequence Produced by NHGRI Pilot Projects (Funded Under RFA HG-95-005).” 1996. Institute Policies and Guidelines, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/10000926/, accessed 24 May 2018.
- “NIH Initiative to Obtain Clones and the Full-Length Sequence for cDNAs Representing Each Human Gene, as well as for Genes of the Mouse, and Possibly Other Mammals.” 1999. Expired Grant Application Solicitations and Notices, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/10001047/fulllength-cdna-initiative/, accessed 28 May 2018.
- “Phred, Phrap, Consed.” Laboratory of Phil Green, Genome Science Department, University of Washington, http://www.phrap.org/phredphrapconsed.html, accessed 22 May 2018.
- “Project Information, 1P01HG000956-01.” 1993. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_details.cfm?aid=3779457&icde=32496603, accessed 21 May 2018.
- “Project Information, 5P50HG001458-02.” 1997. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT), National Institutes of Health, US Department of Health & Human Services, https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=2392522&icde=40192209, accessed 6 Jul 2018.
- “The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) Research Program.” 2018. Division of Genomics and Society, Research Funding Divisions, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, https://www.genome.gov/elsi/, accessed 23 May 2018.
Legal Cases, Legal Codes, and Public Policies
- Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. 133 S. Ct. 2107 (June 13, 2013).Google Scholar
- D’Arcy v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.  HCA 35 (7 Oct).Google Scholar
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty 447 U.S. 303 (1980).Google Scholar
- Univ. of Utah Res. Foundation et al. v. Ambry Genetics Corp. No. 2014-1361 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2014).Google Scholar
- 35 U.S.C. Patentability of Inventions and Grant of Patents. §§100-103.Google Scholar
- 35 U.S.C. Patentability of Inventions and Grant of Patents. §§ 104.Google Scholar
- The Atomic Energy Act of 1946, Pub. L. No. 79-585.Google Scholar
- Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Pub. L. No. 83-703.Google Scholar
- Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-438.Google Scholar
- Federal Nonnuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-577.Google Scholar
- Department of Energy Organization Act (1977), Pub. L. No. 95-91.Google Scholar
- Patent and Trademark Law Amendments Act, or Bayh-Dole Act (1980), Pub. L. No. 99-517.Google Scholar
- Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-29.Google Scholar
- Abbate, Janet. 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Allen, Garland E. 1978. Thomas Hunt Morgan: The Man and His Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Anderson, C. 1991. US Patent Application Stirs Up Gene Hunters. Nature 353 (6344): 485–486.Google Scholar
- Angrist, Misha. 2010. Here is a Human Being at the Dawn of Personal Genomics. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
- Ankeny, Rachel A. 1997. The Conqueror Worm: An Historical and Philosophical Examination of the Use of the Nematode C. Elegans as a model organism. PhD diss., University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
- Ankeny, Rachel A. 2000. Model Organisms as Models: Understanding the “Lingua Franca” of the Human Genome Project. Philosophy of Science 68 (3): S251–S261.Google Scholar
- Ankeny, Rachel A. 2007. Wormy Logic: Model Organisms as Case-Based Reasoning. In Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives, eds. Angela N.H. Creager, Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise, 46–58. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Ankeny, Rachel A., and Sabina Leonelli. 2015. Valuing Data in Postgenomic Biology: How Data Donation and Curation Practices Challenge the Scientific Publication System. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology After the Genome, eds. Sarah S. Richardson, and Hallam Stevens, 126–149. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Aronova, Elena, Karen Baker, and Naomi Oreskes. 2010. Big Science and Big Data in Biology: From the International Geophysical Year Through the International Biological Program to the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) Network, 1957–present. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 40 (2): 183–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Baldwin, A. Lane, and Robert Cook-Deegan. 2013. Constructing Narratives of Heroism and Villainy: Case Study of Myriad’s BRACAnalysis Compared to Genentech’s Herceptin. Genome Medicine 5 (8): 1–14.Google Scholar
- Balmer, Brian. 1996b. The Political Cartography of the Human Genome Project. Perspectives on Science 4 (3): 249–282.Google Scholar
- Balmer, Brian. 1998. Transitional Science and the Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Center. In Genetic Imaginations: Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Human Genome Research, eds. P. Glasner, and H. Rothman, 7–19. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Balmer, B., R. Davidson, and N. Morris. 1998. Funding Research Through Directed Programmes: AIDS and the Human Genome Project in the UK. Science & Public Policy 25 (3): 185–194.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, Andrew. 2008. Accomplishing Sequencing the Human Genome. PhD diss., Cardiff University.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, Charles. 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- Berenson, Alex and Nicholas Wade. 2000. Clinton-Blair Statement on Genome Leads to Big Sell-Off. The New York Times, 15 March 2000.Google Scholar
- Berners-Lee, Tim, and Mark Fischetti. 1999. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Berol, David Nathaniel. 2001. Living Materials and the Structural Ideal: The Development of the Protein Crystallography Community in the 20th Century. PhD diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
- Bowker, Geoffrey C, Star, Susan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Boyle, James. 2010. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Brandt, Kerryn A. 1993. The GDB Human Genome Data Base: A Source of Integrated Genetic Mapping and Disease Data. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 81 (3): 285–292.Google Scholar
- Brenner, Sydney. 1974a. The Genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77 (1): 71–94.Google Scholar
- Brown, Andrew. 2003. In the Beginning was the Worm: Finding the Secrets of Life in a Tiny Hermaphrodite. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Burks, Christian. 1989. Sources of Data in the GenBank Database. In Biomolecular Data: A Resource in Transition, ed. Rita R. Colwell, 327–333. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Burks, Christian and Linda K. Wood. 2003. “GenBank-From Idea to Worldwide Indispensability.” Theory in Action: Highlights in the Theoretical Division at Los Alamos, 1943–2003. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory, pp. 95–102.Google Scholar
- Carbon, John. 1993. Genes, Replicators, and Centromeres: The First Artificial Chromosomes. In The Early Days of Yeast Genetics, eds. Michael N. Hall and Patrick Linder, 375–390. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
- Chumakov, I., et al. 1995. A YAC Contig Map of the Human Genome. Nature 377 (6547): 175.Google Scholar
- Cinkosky, Michael J., James W. Fickett, Paul Gilna, and Christian Burks. 1992. Electronic Data Publishing in GenBank. Los Alamos Science 20: 270–272.Google Scholar
- Cohen, Stanley N. and Herbert W. Boyer. 1980. Process for Producing Biologically Functional Molecular Chimers. US Patent 4,237,224, filed Jan 4, 1979, and issued Dec. 2, 1980.Google Scholar
- Collins, Francis S. 2007. The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Colwell, Rita R. 1989. Biomolecular Data: A Resource in Transition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Commercial Biotechnology: An International Analysis. 1984. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress (OTA-BA-218). http://ota.fas.org/reports/8407.pdf.
- Contreras, Jorge L. 2011. Bermuda’s Legacy: Policy, Patents, and the Design of the Genome Commons. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science, & Technology 12 (1): 61–125.Google Scholar
- Contreras, Jorge L. 2016. Genetic Property. Georgetown Law Journal 105 (1): 1–54.Google Scholar
- Cook-Deegan, Robert. 1994. The Gene Wars: Science, Politics, and the Human Genome. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Creager, Angela N.H. 2001. The Life of a Virus: Tobacco Mosaic Virus as an Experimental Model, 1930–1965. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Creager, Angela N.H., Elizabeth Lunbeck, and M. Norton Wise, eds. 2007. Science Without Laws: Model Systems, Cases, Exemplary Narratives. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Dayhoff, Margaret O., E.R. Lippincott, Richard V. Eck. Marie A. Chang, and Minnie R. Sochard. 1965. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. Silver Spring, MD: National Biomedical Research Foundation.Google Scholar
- Davies, Kevin. 2001. Cracking the Genome: Inside the Race to Unlock Human DNA. Baltimore, MD and London, UK: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, Kevin. 2010. The $1,000 Genome: The Revolution in DNA Sequencing and the New Era of Personalized Medicine. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Davies, Kevin, and Michael White. 1996. Breakthrough: The Race to Find the Breast Cancer Gene. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- De Chadarevian, Soraya. 1998. Of Worms and Programmes: Caenorhabditis elegans and the Study of Development. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 29 (1): 81–105.Google Scholar
- De Chadarevian, Soraya. 2002. Designs for Life: Molecular Biology After WWII. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- De Chadarevian, Soraya. 2004. Mapping the Worm's Genome. In From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics, eds. Jean-Paul Gaudillière, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, 95–110. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
- De Solla Price, Derek. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Deichmann, Ute. 1996. Biologists Under Hitler. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- DeLisi, Charles. 1988. The Human Genome Project. American Scientist 76 (5): 488–493.Google Scholar
- Deverka, Patricia A., Mary A. Majumder, Angela G. Villanueva, Margaret Anderson, Annette C. Bakker, Jessica Bardill, Eric Boerwinke, et al. 2017. Creating a Data Resource: What will It Take to Build a Medical Information Commons?’ Genome Medicine 9 (84): 1–5.Google Scholar
- Dickson, D., and M. Wadman. 1998. Genome Effort “Still in Need of Support”. Nature 393 (6682): 201.Google Scholar
- Doggett, Norman A. 1992. The Polymerase Chain Reaction and Sequence-Tagged Sites. Los Alamos Science 20: 128–134.Google Scholar
- Dove, E.S. 2015. Biobanks, Data Sharing, and the Drive for a Global Privacy Governance Framework. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4): 675–689.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, Rebecca S., and Robert P. Merges. 1995. Opinion Letter as to the Patentability of Certain Inventions Associated with the Identification of Partial cDNA Sequences. AIPLA Quarterly Journal 23 (1): 1–52.Google Scholar
- Feder, Toni. 1995. Future Brightens for Genomics in Germany. Nature 375 (6528): 259–260.Google Scholar
- Fortun, Michael. 2008. Promising Genomics: Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Galison, Peter, and Bruce Hevly, eds. 1992. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Galloway, J. 1990. Britain and the Human Genome. New Science 127 (1727): 41–46.Google Scholar
- García-Sancho, Miguel. 2015 . Biology, Computing, and the History of Molecular Sequencing: From Proteins to DNA, 1945–2000. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Gaudillière, Jean-Paul, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, eds. 2004. From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ghosh, Pallab. 2001. Cracking the Code. BBC News World Edition (Science/Nature), February 12, 2001.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, Richard A. and The International HapMap Consortium. 2003. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426 (6968): 789–796.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay. 1984. Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hackett, Edward J. 2013. Foreword. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, eds. John N. Parker, Niki Vermeulen, and Bart Penders, xvii–xix. Surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Hagstrom, Warren. 1982. Gift giving as an organizing principle in science. In Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, eds. Barry Barnes, and David O. Edge, 21–34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Halliday, Lyndal. 2010. The Rice Sequence Collaborations: Globalisation, Innovation Networks and the Burgeoning Life Sciences in Asia. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, eds. John N. Parker, Niki Vermeulen, and Bart Penders. Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Hamosh, Ada, Alan F. Scott, Joanna S. Amberger, Carol A. Bocchini, and Victor A. McKusick. 2005. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), A Knowledgebase of Human Genes and Genetic Disorders. Nucleic Acids Research 33 (S1): D514–D517.Google Scholar
- Helmreich, Stefan. 2000. Silicon Second Nature: Culturing Artificial Life in a Digital World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Hencke, David, Rob Evans, and Tim Radford. 1999. Blair and Clinton Push to Stop Gene Patents. The Guardian, 19 Sept 1999.Google Scholar
- Hess, Charlotte, and Elinor Ostrom, eds. 2007. Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 1995b. The Human Genome Project. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, eds. Sheila Jasanoff, G.E. Markle, J.C. Petersen, and Trevor J. Pinch, 302–316. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 1997. Access to Data and Intellectual Property: Scientific Exchange in Genome Research. In Intellectual Property and Research Tools in Molecular Biology: Report of a Workshop, ed. National Academy of Sciences, 28–39. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 1998. Data Access Policy in Genome Research. In Private Science: Biotechnology and the Rise of the Molecular Sciences, ed. Arnold Thackray, 202-218. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 2000. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 2004a. Making Maps and Making Social Order: Governing American Genome Centers, 1988–93. In From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics, eds. Jean-Paul Gaudillière, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, 113–128. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hilgartner, Stephen. 2004b. Mapping Systems and Moral Order: Constituting Property in Genome Laboratories. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, 131–141. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hirakawa, Mika, Junko Shimada, Masahiko Suzuki, Kensaku Imai, Kazuo Takehana, Fumihiko Kikuchi, Hiroko Yamaguchi, and Itaru Suzuki. 1997. ALIS Sequencing Database for Large Scale Human Genome Project, ed. Advanced Databases Department Bioinformatics Division. Genome Informatics 8: 278–279.Google Scholar
- How Private Sector Developments Affect the Government Program: The Human Genome Project: How Private Sector Developments Affect the Government Program. Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment of the Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, 105th Congress, Second Session, June 17, 1998 [No. 66]. 1998. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office. https://archive.org/details/humangenomeproje00unit.
- How to get ahead: The success of the $1,000 genome programme offers lessons for fostering innovation. 2014. Nature 507 (7492): 273–274.Google Scholar
- Human Genome Program Report: Human Genome Program Report, Part 1, Overview and Progress. 1997. Germantown, MD.: US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DOE/ER-0713, Part 1). https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/97pr/index.shtml.
- Horvitz, H. Robert, and John E. Sulston. 2000. “Joy of the Worm” (October 1990). In Perspectives on Genetics: Anecdotal, Historical, and Critical Commentaries, eds. James F. Crow, and William F. Dove, 176–181. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
- HUGO Calls for Patent Policy Changes. 1997. Human Genome News 3 (4): 8. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/hgn/v8n3/08hugo.shtml.
- International Large-Scale Sequencing Meeting. 1996. Human Genome News 7 (6): 19. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/hgn/v7n6/19intern.shtml.
- Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2011. Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jasanoff, Sheila, and San-Hyun Kim, eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Joly, P.B., and V. Mangematin. 1998. How Long is Co-operation in Genomics Sustainable? In The Social Management of Genetic Engineering, eds. P. Wheale, and R. Von Schomberg, 77–90. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Judson, Horace Freeland. 1992. A History of the Science and Technology Behind Gene Mapping and Sequencing. In The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project, eds. Daniel J. Kevles, and Leroy Hood, 37–80. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Judson, Horace Freeland. 1996. The Eighth Day of Creation: Makers of the Revolution in Biology, 25th Anniversary ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
- Kaufmann, Alain. 2004. Mapping the Human Genome at Généthon Laboratory: The French Muscular Dystrophy Association and the Politics of the Gene. In From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth-Century Genetics, eds. Jean-Paul Gaudillière and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, 129–157. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kay, Lily E. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kayton, I. 1982. Copyright in Living Genetically Engineered Works. George Washington Law Review 50 (2): 191–218.Google Scholar
- Kevles, Daniel J. 1995 . The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kevles, Daniel J., and Leroy Hood, eds. 1992. The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kiley, Thomas D. 1982. Speculations on Proprietary Rights and Biotechnology. In Banbury Report 10: Patenting of Life Forms, eds. David W. Plant, Niels Reimers, and Norton D. Zinder, 191–209. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
- Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the Endless Frontier: Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Knoppers, Bartha Maria, Jennifer R. Harris, Anne Marie Tasse, Isabelle Budin-Ljosne, Jane Kaye, Mylene Deschenes, and Ma'n H. Zawati. 2011. Towards a Data Sharing Code of Conduct for International Genomic Research. Genome Medicine 3 (46): 4.Google Scholar
- Knorr Cetina, Karin D. 1998. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Lemke, Amy A., Maureen E. Smith, Wendy A. Wolf, Susan Brown Trinidad, and the GRRIP Consortium. 2011. Broad Data Sharing in Genetic Research: Views of Institutional Review Board professionals. IRB Ethics & Human Research 33 (3): 1–5.Google Scholar
- Lenoir, Timothy. 1999. Shaping Biomedicine as an Information Science. In Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems, eds. Mary E. Bowden, Trudi B. Hahn, and Robert V. Williams, 27–45. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.Google Scholar
- Leonelli, Sabina. 2007. Growing Weed, Producing Knowledge: An Epistemological History of Arabidopsis thaliana. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (2): 193–223.Google Scholar
- Leonelli, Sabina. 2011. Packaging Small Facts for Re-Use: Databases in Model Organism Biology. In How Well Do Facts Travel? The Dissemination of Reliable Knowledge, eds. Peter Howlett, and Mary S. Morgan, 325–348. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lewin, Roger. 1990. A Worm at the Heart of the Genome Project. New Scientist 127 (1731): 38–42.Google Scholar
- Lindee, M. Susan. 2005. Moments of Truth in Genetic Medicine. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Litt, M., and J. A. Luty. 1989. A Hypervariable Microsatellite Revealed by In Vitro Amplification of a Dinucleotide Repeat Within the Cardiac Muscle Actin Gene. American Journal of Human Genetics 44 (3): 397–401.Google Scholar
- Loots, Eli A. 2002. The 2001 USPTO Written Description Guidelines and Gene Claims. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17 (1): 117–137.Google Scholar
- Macilwain, Colin. 1995. Gene Patent Study Drowned as OTA Sinks. Nature 376 (6541): 541.Google Scholar
- Macilwain, Colin. 1996. $60 Million for Genome Sequencing. Nature 380 (6574): 471.Google Scholar
- Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome: National Research Council. 1988. Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Mapping Our Genes, Transcript of Workshop: Mapping Our Genes: Federal Genome Projects: How Vast? How Fast? Transcript of Workshop, “Costs of Human Genome Projects,” August 7, 1987. 1987. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc97415/.
- Mapping Our Genes: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Mapping Our Genes—Genome Projects: How Big, How Fast? OTA-BA-373 (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, April 1988). https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/OTAreport.pdf.
- McElheny, Victor K. 2010. Drawing the Map of Life: Inside the Human Genome Project. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- McKusick, Victor A. 1966. Mendelian Inheritance in Man; Catalogs of Autosomal Dominant, Autosomal Recessive, and X-Linked Phenotypes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Normative Structure of Science (1942). In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer, 267–280. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Morange, Michel. 1997. The Transformation of Molecular Biology on Contact with Higher Organisms, 1960–1980. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 19 (3): 369–393.Google Scholar
- Morange, Michel. 2000. A History of Molecular Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Morange, Michel. 2008. The Death of Molecular Biology?’ History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 30 (1): 31–42.Google Scholar
- National Bioeconomy Blueprint. 2012. Washington, D.C.: The White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/national_bioeconomy_blueprint_april_2012.pdf.
- National Research Council. 2006. Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health, eds. Stephen A. Merrill and Anne-Marie Mazza. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NCHGR becomes NIH institute. 1997. Human Genome News 3 (4): 8. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/hgn/v8n3/08nchgr.shtml.
- Nelson, Nicole. 2017. Model Behavior: Animal Experiments, Complexity, and the Genetics of Psychiatric Disorders. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- New Developments in Biotechnology: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. New Developments in Biotechnology: Patenting Life--Special Report, OTA-BA-370 (Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, April 1989). http://ota.fas.org/reports/8924.pdf.
- NIH, DOE Guidelines Encourage Sharing of Data, Resources. 1993. Human Genome News 4 (5): 4. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/hgn/v4n5/04share.shtml.
- November, Joseph. 2012. Biomedical Computing: Digitizing Life in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Nummedal, Tara, and Paula Findlen. 2000. Words of Nature: Scientific Books in the Seventeenth Century. In Thornton and Tully's Scientific Books, Libraries, and Collectors: A Study of Bibliography and the Book Trade in Relation to the History of Science, ed. Andrew Hunter, 164–215. Brookfield, WI: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Office of the White House Press Secretary. 2000. President Clinton Announces the Completion of the First Survey of the Entire Human Genome; Hails Public and Private Efforts Leading to This Historic Achievement. Washington, D.C.: The White House. https://clintonwhitehouse3.archives.gov/WH/New/html/20000626.html.
- Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework and the Commons. Cornell Law Review 95 (4): 807–816.Google Scholar
- Parker, John N., Niki Vermeulen, and Bart Penders, eds. 2010. Collaboration in the New Life Sciences. Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Pickvance, Chris, Richard Pickvance, and Debby Pickvance. 2012. Simon Pickvance obituary. The Guardian, 20 December 2012.Google Scholar
- Pickvance, Simon. 1976. “Life” in a Biology Lab. Radical Science Journal 4: 11–28.Google Scholar
- Powledge, Tabitha M. 2003. Revisiting Bermuda. Genome Biology 4 (1): 2.Google Scholar
- Private-sector sequencing planned. 1998. Human Genome News 9 (3): 1–4. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/publicat/hgn/v9n3/01venter.shtml
- Rabeharisoa, Vololona, and Michel Callon. 2004. Patients and Scientists in French Muscular Dystrophy Research. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, 142–160. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rasmussen, Nicholas. 2014. Gene Jockeys: Life Science and the Rise of the Biotech Enterprise. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Reardon, Jenny. 2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in an Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Reardon, Jenny, Rachel A. Ankeny, Jenny Bangham, Katherine W. Darling, Stephen Hilgartner, Kathryn Maxson Jones, Beth Shapiro, Hallam Stevens, and the Genomic Open Workshop Group. 2016. Bermuda 2.0: Reflections from Santa Cruz. Gigascience 5 (1): 1–4.Google Scholar
- Richardson, Sarah S., and Hallam Stevens, eds. 2015. Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology After the Genome. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, Henry, Mike Snyder, Mathias Uhlen, Phil Andrews, Ronald Beavis, Christoph Borchers, Robert J. Chalkley, et al. 2009. Recommendations from the 2008 International Summit on Proteomics Data Release and Sharing Policy: The Amsterdam Principles. Journal of Proteome Research 8 (7): 3689–3692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Roland, Alex, and Philip Shiman. 2002. Strategic Computing: DARPA and the Quest for Machine Intelligence, 1983–1993. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Royal Society. 2012. Science as an Open Enterprise. London, UK: Royal Society Science Policy Centre (June 2012). https://royalsociety.org/∼/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf.
- Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sharing Data from Large-Scale Biological Research Projects: Sharing Data from Large-Scale Biological Research Projects: A System of Tripartite Responsibility. Report of a meeting organized by the Wellcome Trust and held on 14-15 January 2003 at Fort Lauderdale, USA. 2003. London, UK: Wellcome Trust.. https://www.genome.gov/pages/research/wellcomereport0303.pdf.
- Shreeve, James. 2004. The Genome War: How Craig Venter Tried to Capture the Code of Life and Save the World. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Smith, L.M., S. Fung, M.W. Hunkapiller, T.J. Hunkapiller, and L.E. Hood. 1985. The Synthesis of Oligonucleotides Containing an Aliphatic Amino Group at the 5′ Terminus: Synthesis of Fluorescent DNA Primers for Use in DNA Sequence Analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 13 (7): 2399–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stemerding, Dirk, and Stephen Hilgartner. 1998. Means of Co-ordination in the Making of Biological Science: On the Mapping of Plants, Animals, and Genes. In Getting New Technologies Together: Studies in Making Sociotechnical Order, eds. Cornelius Disco, and Barend van der Meulen, 39–69. Boston, MA: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
- Stokes, Donald E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Strandburg, Katherine J., Brett M. Frischmann, and Michael J. Madison, eds. 2017. Governing Medical Knowledge Commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Strasser, Bruno J. 2005. Collecting and Experimenting: The Moral Economy of Biological Research, 1960s–1980s. In History and Epistemology of Molecular Biology and Beyond: Problems and Perspectives, eds. Soraya de Chadarevian and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, 105–122. Berlin, DE: Max Planck-Institut fur Wissenschaftsgeschichte.Google Scholar
- Strasser, Bruno J. 2006. La Fabrique d’une Nouvelle Science: La Biologie Moléculaire a l’âge Atomique (1945–1964). Florence, IT: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar
- Sulston, John, and Georgina Ferry. 2002. The Common Thread: A Story of Science, Politics, Ethics, and the Human Genome. Washington, D.C.: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
- Sulston, John E., and Sydney Brenner. 1974. The DNA of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77 (1): 95–104.Google Scholar
- Swinbanks, David. 1990. No Special Treatment for HUGO. Nature 343 (6255): 195.Google Scholar
- Technologies for Detecting Heritable Mutations in Human Beings: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1986. OTA-H-298 Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, September 1986. https://www.princeton.edu/∼ota/disk2/1986/8629/8629.PDF.
- Teegarden, Henry D., ed. 2015. Patents Throughout the World, 4th ed. Deerfield, IL: Clark Boardman Callaghan.Google Scholar
- The C. elegans Genome Consortium, Genome Sequencing Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, and Sanger Centre, Hinxton Hall, Cambridge, UK. The C. elegans Genome Sequencing Project: A Progress Report. Worm Breeder’s Gazette 13 (2, February 1, 1994): 14. http://wbg.wormbook.org/wli/wbg13.2p14/.
- The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. 1998. Genome Sequence of the Nematode C. elegans: A Platform for Investigating Biology. Science 282 (5396): 2012–2018.Google Scholar
- The Human Genome Project and Patenting: The Human Genome Project and Patenting DNA Sequences April 1994. 1994. Unpublished draft. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/526449.
- Thompson, Larry. 1993. Healy and Collins Strike a Deal. Science 259 (5091): 22–23.Google Scholar
- Tripp, Simon, and Martin Grueber. 2011. Economic Impact of the Human Genome Project. 2011. Columbus, OH: Technology Partnership Practice, Battelle Memorial Institute. https://www.battelle.org/docs/default-source/misc/battelle-2011-misc-economic-impact-human-genome-project.pdf.
- Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance: Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance. The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years, FY 1991–1995. 1990. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Center for Human Genome Research; US Department of Energy, Office of Energy Research, Office of Health and Environmental Research, Human Genome Program. DOE/ER-0452P. https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/project/5yrplan/firstfiveyears.pdf.
- Venter, J. Craig. 2007. A Life Decoded: My Genome: My Life. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Vermeulen, Niki. 2009. Supersizing Science: On Building Large-Scale Research Projects in Biology. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.Google Scholar
- Vermeulen, Niki, and Bart Penders. 2013. Collecting Collaborations: Understanding Life Together. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, eds. John N. Parker, Niki Vermeulen, and Bart Penders, 3–13. Surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Von Borstel, Robert, C. 1993. The International Yeast Community. In The Early Days of Yeast Genetics, eds. Michael N. Hall, and Patrick Linder, 453–460. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
- Wade, Nicholas. 1998a. International Genome Project Gets Lift. The New York Times, May 17, 1998.Google Scholar
- Wade, Nicholas. 1998b. It’s a Three-Legged Race to Decipher the Human Genome. The New York Times, June 23, 1998.Google Scholar
- Wade, Nicholas. 1998c. Scientist’s Plan: Map All DNA Within 3 Years. The New York Times, May 10, 1998.Google Scholar
- Wade, Nicholas. 2014. A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History. New York, NY: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Wailoo, Keith, and Stephen Pemberton. 2006. The Troubled Dream of Genetic Medicine: Ethnicity and Innovation in Tay-Sachs, Cystic Fibrosis, and Sickle Cell Disease. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Watson, James D., with Andrew Berry and Kevin Davies. 2017. DNA: The Story of the Genetic Revolution, Revised and Updated. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Weber, J.L., and P.E. May. 1989. Abundant Class of Human DNA Polymorphisms Which can be Typed Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction. American Journal of Human Genetics 44 (3): 388–396.Google Scholar
- Weinberg, Alvin M. 1967. Reflections on Big Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Weinberg, Robert A. 1993. Reflections on the Current State of Data and Reagent Exchange Among Biomedical Researchers. In Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume II: Background Papers and Resource Documents, ed. National Academy of Sciences Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 66–79. https://www.nap.edu/read/2091/chapter/1.
- Wilson, Richard, et al. 1994. 2.2 Mb of Contiguous Nucleotide Sequence from Chromosome III of C. elegans. Nature 368 (6466): 32–38.Google Scholar
- Wood, William B., and the Community of C. elegans Researchers. 1988. The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.