An intensive approach for course repeating students at a Chilean University

  • Noel McGinnEmail author
  • Ernesto Schiefelbein
  • J. Enrique Froemel
  • Alberto Lecaros
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Hemostasis after Trauma
  2. Topical Collection on Hemostasis after Trauma


Improved access to higher education can reduce social and economic inequality only if universities achieve equality in graduation rates of different groups of students. Concerned about first year failures among first-generation students, a university in Chile devised a between-semesters course intended to allow failed students to remain with their entering class. The course had three major elements: compression of a semester’s course work into 2 weeks; use of incentives to motivate students to prepare for classes; and “flipped class” participation. In 2014, this intensive course was offered in the break between the first and second semesters. Some 310 students in Health Sciences who had failed at least one of three required courses were invited to enroll; 140 signed up. At the end of the course, more than 90% of the students taking the intensive course passed the regular final examination they had previously failed and continued with their entering class. With no additional intervention, over the next seven semesters, students who had taken the intensive course performed as well in their courses as those who had not and were less likely to drop out. In 2017, more than 75% were still with their class, compared with 53% of those who had not taken the course.


Flipped class Reading before class Intensive instruction Accelerated instruction Retention rate Chile 



  1. Arango, M., Evans, S., & Quadri, Z. (2016). Education reform in Chile: designing a fairer, better higher education sytem. Graduate Policy Workshop Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, Princeton University. Retrieved from
  2. Bahr, P. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work? A comparative analysis of academic attainment among community college students. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 420–450. Scholar
  3. Bahr, P. R. (2013). The aftermath of remedial math:investigating the low rate of certificate completion among remedial math students. Research in Higher Education, 54(2), 171–200 Retrieved from Scholar
  4. Bassi, M., Busso, M., & Muñoz, J. S. (2015). Enrollment, graduation, and dropout rates in Latin America: is the glass half empty or half full? Economía. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  5. Bates, T. (2010). New challenges for universities: why they must change. In Changing Cultures in Higher Education (pp. 15–25). Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Scholar
  6. Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2009). Addressing the needs of underprepared students in higher education: Does college remediation work? The Journal of Human Resources, 44(3), 736–771.Google Scholar
  7. Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Proccedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Atlanta.
  8. Bloom, B. (1982). All our children learning. a primer for parents, teachers, and other educators. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2018). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brunner, J. J., & Ferrada Hurtado, R. (2011). Educación superior en iberoamérica informe 2011. (J. J. Brunner & R. Ferrada Hurtado, Eds.). Santiago Chile.Google Scholar
  11. Calhoon, S., & Becker, A. (2008). How students use the course syllabus. International Journal for the Scholarship of Learning and Teaching, 2(1), Article 6.Google Scholar
  12. Castillo, J., & Cabezas, G. (2010). Caracterización de jóvenes primera generación en educación superior. Nuevas trayectorias hacia la equidad educativa. Calidad En La Educación, 32, 44–76 Retrieved from Scholar
  13. Centro de Estudios. (2012). Deserción en la educación superior en Chile. Santiago: Ministerio de Educaciòn.Google Scholar
  14. Centro de Estudios. (2013). Serie evidencias: sistemas universitarios modernos: diversidad y calidad institucional. Santiago. Retrieved from
  15. Clark, M. H., & Cundiff, N. L. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of a college freshman seminar using propensity score. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 616–639 Retrieved from Scholar
  16. Collier, P. J., & Morgan, D. L. (2008). “Is that paper really due today?” Differences in first- generation and traditional college students’ understandings of faculty expectations. Higher Education, 55(4), 425–446. Scholar
  17. Comisión de Financiamiento Estudiantil. (2012). Análisis y recomendaciones par el sistema de finaciamiento estudiantil. Santiago: Ministerio de Educaciòn.Google Scholar
  18. Corkin, D. M., Horn, C., & Pattison, D. (2017). The effects of an active learning intervention in biology on college students’ classroom motivational climate perceptions, motivation, and achievement. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1106–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cox, C. (2011). Currículo escolar de Chile: génesis, implementación y desarrollo. Revue International de Education de Sevres, 56, 1–9. Scholar
  20. Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: the third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425–453 Retrieved from Scholar
  21. Czworkowski, J., & Seethaler, S. (2013). Content-intensive courses in an undergraduate science education minor and impacts on participating students. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(1), 48–53 Retrieved from Scholar
  22. Deroma, V. M., Bell, N. L., Zaremba, B. A., & Abee, J. C. (2005). Evaluation of a college transition program for students at-risk for academic failure. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 21(2), 20–33 Retrieved from Scholar
  23. Dexter, K. M., Tai, R. H., & Sadler, P. M. (2006). Report different high school scheduling plans. The High School Journal, 89(4), 22–33 Retrieved from Scholar
  24. Engle, J., & Tinto, V. (2015). Moving beyond access: college success for low-income, first- generation students. Washington DC: Pell Institute Retrieved from Scholar
  25. Engle, J., Bermeo, A., & O’Brien, C. (2006). Straight from the source: what works for first-generation college students. Washington DC: Perll Institute Retrieved from Scholar
  26. Flanagan-Borquez, A. (2017). Experiencias de estudiantes de primera generación en universidades chilenas: realidades y desafíos. Revista de La Educación Superior, 46(183), 87–104. Scholar
  27. Flechsig, K.-H., & Schiefelbein, E. (2003). 20 Modelos Didácticos para América Latina. (K. H. Flechsig & E. Schiefelbein, Eds.). Washington DC: Organización de los Estados Americanos. Retrieved from
  28. Friesen, S., & Scott, D. (2013). Inquiry-based learning: a review of the research literature. Calgary. Retrieved from
  29. Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100. Scholar
  30. Guskey, T. R. (2007). Clasing the achievement gap: revisiting Benjamin S. Bloom’s learning for mastery. Journal of Adanced Academics, 19(1), 8–31 Retrieved from Scholar
  31. Heckman, J. J. (2008). Schools, skills and synapses. Economic Inquiry, 46(3), 289–324. Scholar
  32. Heiner, C. E., Banet, A. I., & Wieman, C. (2014). Preparing students for class: how to get 80% of students reading the textbook before class. American Journal of Physics, 82(10), 989–996. Scholar
  33. Henderson, C., & Rosenthal, A. (2006). Reading questions: encouraging students to read the text before coming to class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(7), 46–50 Retrieved from Scholar
  34. Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2017). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411. Scholar
  35. Kember, D. (2009). Promoting student-centred forms of learning across an entire university. Higher Education, 58(1), 1–13. Scholar
  36. Kidron, Y., & Lindsay, J. (2014). The effects of increased learning time on student academic and nonacademic outcomes: findings from a meta-analytic review. Washington DC: American Institutes of Research Retrieved from Scholar
  37. Koontz, T. M., & Plank, K. M. (2011). Can reading questions foster active learning_: a study of six college courses. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 22(23–46).Google Scholar
  38. Kucsera, J. V., & Zimmaro, D. M. (2010). Comparing the effectiveness of intensive and traditional courses. College Teaching, 58(58), 62–68 Retrieved from Scholar
  39. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: a review of the literature. In Commissioned Report for the National Symposium on Postsecondary Student Success: Spearheading a Dialog on Student Success. Washingtn DC: Ñ Natinal Postsecondary Education Cooperative Retrieved from,July2006).pdf.Google Scholar
  40. Landry, T. K. (2016). Block scheduling for the 21st century: a change leadership plan. St.Louis: National Louis University Retrieved from Scholar
  41. Lesik, S. A. (2007). Do developmental mathematics programs have a causal impact on student retention? An application of discrete-time survival and regression-discontinuity analysis. Research in Higher Education, 48(5), 583–608. Scholar
  42. Martorell, P., & McFarlin, I. (2011). Help or hindrance? The effects of college remediation on academic and labor outcomes. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(2), 436–454 Retrieved from Scholar
  43. Mccallum, S., Schultz, J., Sellke, K., & Spartz, J. (2015). An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college student Academic Involvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(1), 42–55 Retrieved from Scholar
  44. McGinn, N. F., & Schiefelbein, F. E. (2015). Getting students to read before class: innovation in a university in Chile. Prospects, 45(4), 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: not just surface gains. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 47–55. Scholar
  46. McNally, B., Chipperfield, J., Dorsett, P., Del Fabbro, L., Frommolt, V., Goetz, S., et al. (2017). Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Education, 73(2), 281–298. Scholar
  47. Michel, N. (2009). Active versus passive teacing styles: An emirical study of student learning outcomes. Small Business Institute National Proceedings, 33(1), 55–67. Retrieved from
  48. Mizala, A., & Torche, F. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: the stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore, C., & Shulock, N. (2009). Student progress toward degree completion: lessons from the research literature. Sacramento: California State University, Sacramento Retrieved from Scholar
  50. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. Scholar
  51. Mortensen, C. J., & Nicholson, A. M. (2015). The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today’s undergraduates. Journal of Animal Science, 93(7), 3722–3731. Scholar
  52. O’Shea, S. (2016). Avoiding the manufacture of ‘sameness’: first-in-family students, cultural capital and the higher education environment. Higher Education, 72(1), 59–78. Scholar
  53. OECD. (2016). Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery. Income Inequality Update. Paris. Retrieved from
  54. Opdecam, E., Everaert, P., Van Keer, H., & Buysschaert, F. (2014). Preferences for team learning and lecture-based learning among first-year undergraduate accounting students. Research in Higher Education, 55(4), 400–432. Scholar
  55. Parkes, J., & Harris, M. B. (2002). The purposes of a syllabus. College Teaching. 50(2), 55–61.Google Scholar
  56. Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: a comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 276–300 Retrieved from Scholar
  57. Portales, J., & Vasquez Heilig, J. (2014). Understanding how universal vouchers have impacted urban school districts’ enrollment in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(70–72), 1–39. Scholar
  58. Porter, S. R., & Swing, R. L. (2006). Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence on JSTOR. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 89–109 Retrieved from Scholar
  59. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231 Retrieved from Scholar
  60. Puga, I. (2011). School and social stratification in Chile: what is the role of “muncipalización” and subsidized private education in the reproduction of social inequalities. Estudios Pedagógicos, 37(2), 213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rodríguez, P., Brum, L., Correa, A., Laporta, P., Cantieri, R., et al. (2014). La desvinculación en la primera generación de estudiantes en un programa innovador de la Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay. Revista de la Educación Superior, XLIII(170), 113–134 Retrieved from Scholar
  62. Schendel, R., & Mccowan, T. (2016). Expanding higher education systems in low-and middle- income countries: the challenges of equity and quality. Higher Education, 72(4), 407–411. Scholar
  63. Schiefelbein, E., & Zuñiga, R. (2002). El syllabus: viviendo un aprendizaje autónomo. Santiago: Universidad Santo Tomàs, Unpublished.Google Scholar
  64. Soria, K. M., Nackerud, S., & Peterson, K. (2015). Socioeconomic indicators associated with first- year college students’ use of academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 636–643. Scholar
  65. Starcher, K., & Proffitt, D. (2011). Encouraging students to read: what professor are (and aren’t ) doing about it. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 396–407 Retrieved from Scholar
  66. Toledo, R. G., Valenzuela, J. P., & Valenzuela, J. P. (2015). Over-estimating the effects of teacher attributes on school performance in the Chilean education system. Estudios de Economía (Vol. 42). Retrieved from
  67. Zainuddin, Z. (2017). First-year college students’ experiences in the EFL flipped classroom: a case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 1694–1609 Retrieved from Scholar
  68. Zepeda, S. J., & Mayers, R. S. (2006). An analysis of research on block scheduling. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 137–170 Retrieved from Scholar
  69. Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard University Graduate School of EducationSwampscottUSA
  2. 2.Universidad Autónoma de ChileSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Universidad Autónoma de ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la EducaciónSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations