Advertisement

Academic hindrances in the integration of employability skills development in teaching and assessment practice

  • Valeria Stella Cotronei-Baird
Article

Abstract

The development of employability skills is an important graduate outcome of most contemporary university degrees. Given the critical role of academics in teaching and assessing curriculum, they are held responsible for furthering the employability skills development of university graduates; yet little is known about the factors that hinder academics in integrating employability skills into the university curriculum. Based on the Theories of Action Framework, this research compared academics’ espoused understanding of employability skills and reported practice against their actual practices to identify the hindrances. Their understandings of employability skills and of their espoused practice were collected through interviews with academics and content analysis of curriculum documents. The data, drawn from direct observation of teaching and assessment practices and follow-up interviews, were analysed to investigate actual teaching and assessment practices. The findings indicate a disjuncture between espoused practice and actual practice. The disjuncture can be explained by the individual nature of teaching and assessment practice that is influenced by academic experience, position, and disciplinary boundaries. As such, academics face a number of competing challenges, constraints, and demands within the scope of their practice that impede the consistent and systematic integration of employability skills in the university curriculum.

Keywords

Employability skills Generic skills Academic development Higher education Curriculum Teaching practice Assessment practice Curriculum design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Dr. Chi Baik and Ron Baird for helpful comments on drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Argyris, S. E., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in ‘close-up’ research on teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 151–158.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, R., Gareth, P., & Coate, K. (2001). Conceptualising curriculum change. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(4), 435–449.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, A., Dunne, E., & Carre, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 37, 71–93.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, D., Richardson, S., & McKinnon, P. (2016). Enacting strategies for graduate employability: How universities can best support students to develop generic skills. Office for Learning and Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/.
  6. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A32134.Google Scholar
  7. Christie, F. (2002). Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Clanchy, J., & Ballard, B. (1995). Generic skills in the context of higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 14(2), 156–166.Google Scholar
  9. Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basic qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California, USA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Cranmer, S. (2006). Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 169–181.Google Scholar
  11. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thoussand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. CSfW. (2013). Core Skills for Work Development Framework. edited by Innovation Department of Industry, Climate Change,Science, Research and Tertiary Education and Department of Educaton, Employment and Workplace Relations. Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis, D., and P. McKenzie. 2001. Employability skills for Australian industry: Literature review and framework development: Report to the Business Council of Australia. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Curtis6/publication/
  14. de la Harpe, B., & David, C. (2012). Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(4), 493–510.Google Scholar
  15. de la Harpe, B., Radloff, A., & Wyber, J. (2000). Quality and generic (professional) skills. Quality in Higher Education, 6(3), 231–243.Google Scholar
  16. DEEWR. (2012). Employability skills framework stage 1: Final report. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  17. DEST. (2002). Employability skills for the future. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  18. Ferns, S., & Lilly, L. (2015). Driving institutional engagement in WIL: Enhancing graduate employability. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1), 116–133.Google Scholar
  19. Finch, D. J., Leah, K. H., Baldwin, R., & Zehner, M. (2013). An exploratory study of factors affecting undergraduate employability. Education & Training, 55(7), 681–704.Google Scholar
  20. Freudenberg, B., Brimble, M., & Cameron, C. (2011). WIL and generic skill development: The development of business students’ generic skills through work-integrated learning. Asia-Pacific journal of Cooperative Education, 12(2), 79–83.Google Scholar
  21. GCA. (2016). Graduate outlook 2015: The report of the 2015 Graduate Outlook Survey: Perspectives on graduate recruitment. Graduate Careers Australia Ltd http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Graduate-Outlook-Report-2015-FINAL1.pdf.
  22. Gregory, J., & Jones, R. (2009). ‘Maintaining Competence’: A grounded theory typology of approaches to teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 57(6), 769–785.Google Scholar
  23. Harris-Reeves, B., & Mahoney, J. (2017). Brief work-integrated learning opportunities and first-year university students’ perceptions of employability and academic performance. Australian Journal of Career Development, 26(2), 32–37.Google Scholar
  24. Holmes, L. (2013). Competing perspectives on graduate employability: Possession, position or process? Studies in Higher Education, 38(4), 538–554.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, D. (2009). An international profile of industry-relevant competencies and skill gaps in modern graduates. International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 29–58.Google Scholar
  26. Jackson, D. (2012). Business undergraduates’ perceptions of their capabilities in employability skills: Implications for industry and higher education. Industry & Higher Education, 26(5), 345–356.Google Scholar
  27. Jackson, D. (2013). Business graduate employability - where are we going wrong? Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 776–790.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012a). Non-technical competencies in undergraduate business degree programs: Australian and UK perspectives. Studies in Higher Education, 37(5), 541–567.Google Scholar
  29. Jackson, D., & Chapman, E. (2012b). Non-technical skill gaps in Australian business graduates. Education & Training, 54(2/3), 95–113.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, A. (2010). Generic attributes in accounting: The significance of the disciplinary context. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 19(1–2), 5–21.Google Scholar
  31. Kerr, P. (2009). Espoused theories and theories-in-use of information literacy: A model for reflection and evaluation. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Google Scholar
  32. Kerr, P. (2010). "Conceptions and practice of information literacy n academic libraries: Espoused theories and theories in use." Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Communication, Information and Library Studies, Graduate School - New Brunswick, Rugers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  33. Kinash, S., Crane, L., Judd, M., & Knight, C. (2016). Discrepant stakeholder perspectives on graduate employability strategies. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 951–967.Google Scholar
  34. KPMG. (2014). War for talent: Time to change direction. https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2014/07/war-for-talent.pdf
  35. Leong, R., & Kavanagh, M. (2013). A work-integrated learning (WIL) framework to develop graduate skills and attributes in an Australian university’s accounting program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 14(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  36. Mayer, E. (1992). Key competencies: Report of the committee to advise the Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment on employment-related key competencies for post compulsory education and training. Canberra: Australian Education Council and Ministers of Vocational Education, Employment and Training.Google Scholar
  37. McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C., Clement, M., & Light, G. (2009). Rethinking our underlying assumptions about what we do and why we do it: Academic development as a case. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(3), 261–280.Google Scholar
  38. McMurray, S., Dutton, M., McQuaid, R., & Richard, A. (2016). Employer demands from business graduates. Education & Training, 58(1), 112–132.Google Scholar
  39. Messum, D., Wilkes, L., Peters, K., & Jackson, D. (2016). Content analysis of vacancy advertisements for employability skills: Challenges and opportunities for informing curriculum development. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 6(1).Google Scholar
  40. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.Google Scholar
  41. Oliver, B. (2015). Assuring graduate capabilities: Evidencing levels of achievement for graduate employability. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.Google Scholar
  42. Oliver, B., & Whelan, B. (2011). Designing an e-portfolio for assurance of learning focusing on adoptability and learning analytics. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 1026–1041.Google Scholar
  43. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  44. Radloff, A., de la Harpe, B., Dalton, H., Thomas, J., & Lawson, A. (2008). Assessing graduate attributes: Engaging academic staff and their students. ATN Assessment, 1(1).Google Scholar
  45. Suleman, F. (2016). Employability skills of higher education graduates: Little consensus on a much-discussed subject. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 169–174.Google Scholar
  46. Suleman, F. (2018). The employability skills of higher education graduates: Insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education, 76(2), 263–278.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0. Google Scholar
  47. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: California: SAGE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Williams Centre for Learning Advancement, Faculty of Business & EconomicsUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.MelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations