Students’ university aspirations and attainment grouping in secondary schools
International evidence shows that students from more disadvantaged backgrounds are less likely to attend university. We examine the potential link between university aspiration and secondary schools’ attainment grouping practices (tracking/setting). Modelling of longitudinal student questionnaires (N = 6680) completed in England suggests that there is a slight cumulative association between students’ university aspirations and their set placement. Interestingly, we find that students’ self-confidence predicts university aspirations over and above both prior aspirations and attainment. Our findings suggest that to improve our understanding of students’ university aspirations it is crucial to take account of factors other than just prior attainment. The concept of capacity to aspire emphasises the multiplicity of factors involved in enabling or hindering aspirations for university, and their interaction over time. We argue that universities have an important role in realising more socially just patterns in higher education participation through outreach work that can enhance students’ capacity to aspire to university.
KeywordsUniversity aspirations Capacity to aspire Setting Tracking Student characteristics Social inequality
The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of the wider Best Practice in Grouping Students team and Dr. Richard Sheldrake.
We would also like to thank the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments.
This work was supported by a grant from the Education Endowment Foundation.
Compliance with ethical standards
There are no conflicts of interest relating to the research reported in this article.
- Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education. In Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: Unesco.Google Scholar
- Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: culture and terms of recognition. In R. Vijayendra & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Archer, L., Francis, B., Miller, S., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., Connolly, P., et al. (2018). The symbolic violence of setting: a Bourdieusian analysis of mixed methods data on secondary students’ views about setting. British Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 119–140.Google Scholar
- Dunne, M., Humphreys, S., Sebba, J., Dyson, A., Gallannaugh, F., & Muijs, D. (2007). Effective teaching and learning for pupils in low attaining groups. London: DCSF.Google Scholar
- Francis, B., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Pepper, D., Taylor, B., & Travers, M.-C. (2017a). Exploring the relative lack of impact of research on ‘ability grouping’ in England: a discourse analytic account. Cambridge Journal of Education, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Francis, B., Connelly, P., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Taylor, B., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2017b). Attainment grouping as self-fulfilling prophesy? A mixed methods exploration of self-confidence and set level among year 7 students. International Journal of Educational Research, 86, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). Rationing education: policy, practice, reform and equity. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Gorard, S., See, B., & Davies, P. (2012). The impact of attitudes and aspirations on educational attainment and participation. York: Joseph Rowntree.Google Scholar
- Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M., & McIntyre, D. (2004). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Kintrea, K., St Clair, R. & Houston, M. (2011). The influence of parents, places and poverty on educational attitudes and aspirations. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/young-people-education-attitudes-full.pdf Accessed 10 May 2018.
- Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M., Thorp, J., MacIntyre, H., & Berdondini, L. (2005). The effects of pupil grouping: literature review. London: DfES.Google Scholar
- Mazenod, A., Miller, S., Francis B., Archer L., Hodgen, J., Taylor, B. & Tereshchenko, A. (forthcoming). Liking, loving or loathing? Attainment grouping and student liking for school.Google Scholar
- Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: what makes schools successful? Resources, policies and practices (Volume IV), PISA, OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-IV.pdf Accessed 1 March 2018.
- Perna, L. & Titus, M. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: an examination of racial/ethnic group differences. Retrieved from hp://repository.upenn.edu/gse_pubs/14.Google Scholar
- Santelices, M., Horn, C., & Catalán, X. (2017). Institution-level admissions initiatives in Chile: enhancing equity in higher education? Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1398722.
- Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (2012). Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Taylor, B., Francis, B., Craig, N., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2018). Why is it difficult for schools to establish equitable practices in allocating students to attainment ‘sets’? British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1424317.