Advertisement

Reforms in technical education sector: evidence from World Bank-assisted Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme in India

  • Amlendu DubeyEmail author
  • Amit Mehndiratta
  • Mahim Sagar
  • Smita Kashiramka
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we identify factors which improve the quality of technical education using the data from World Bank’s Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme (TEQIP) in India. We evaluate the success of TEQIP in improving the quality of technical education in the country. Our findings show significant impact of this intervention on the quality of the technical education. The design, strategy, and implementation of TEQIP have crucial lessons for developing countries who want to build their technical education sector for rapid economic growth.

Keywords

Technical education Difference-in-differences Propensity score matching Quality improvement Proportional odds model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is based on a research study funded by Govt. of India for Impact Evaluation of World Bank-assisted “Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme” Phase II (TEQIP-II) in India. Authors are grateful to Mr. R. Subrahmanyam and Ms. Tripti Gurha of Ministry of Human Resource Development, Govt. of India and to Ms. Tara Béteille and Mr. Francisco Marmolejo of the World Bank for all their comments and inputs at various stages of the study. We also thank to two anonymous referees of the paper whose comments significantly improved the quality of the paper. Usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Agarwal, P. (2007). Higher education in India: growth, concerns and change agenda. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrist Joshua, D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics. An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5, Part 2), 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benhabib, J., & Spiegel, M. M. (1994). The role of human capital in economic development evidence from aggregate cross-country data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), 143–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro, R. J. (1992). Human capital and economic growth (pp. 199–230). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City: Proceedings.Google Scholar
  7. Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben-Porath, Y. (1967). The production of human capital and the life cycle of earnings. Journal of Political Economy, 75(4, Part 1), 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borooah, V. K. (2002). Logit and probit: ordered and multinomial models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Blom, A., & Saeki, H. (2011). Employability and skill set of newly graduated engineers in India (English). Policy Research working paper; no. WPS 5640. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  11. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B., & Vermeersch, C. M. (2016). Impact evaluation in practice. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Pearson Education India.Google Scholar
  14. Heck, R. H., Tabata, L., & Thomas, S. L. (2013). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling with IBM SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998a). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998b). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosmer Jr, D. W., Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd edition). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Kapur, D., & Mehta, P. B. (2004). Indian higher education reform: from half-baked socialism to half-baked capitalism. Center for International Development Working Paper, 103.Google Scholar
  20. Khandker, S. R., Koolwal, G. B., & Samad, H. A. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, X. (2016). Applied ordinal logistic regression using Stata: from single-level to multilevel modeling. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Loeb, S., Kalogrides, D., & Béteille, T. (2012). Effective schools: teacher hiring, assignment, development, and retention. Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucas Jr., R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, W. W. (1999). Education and development: measuring the social benefits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McMahon, W. W., & Oketch, M. (2013). Education’s effects on individual life chances and on development: an overview. British Journal of Educational Studies, 61(1), 79–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: a classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mincer, J. (1984). Human capital and economic growth. Economics of Education Review, 3(3), 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD). (2009). Annual Report. India: New Delhi.Google Scholar
  30. Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) (2016). 2015–16, New Delhi. http://aishe.nic.in/aishe/viewDocument.action?documentId=227. Accessed 17 July 2018.
  31. National Sample Survey Office (2016). Education in India (NSSO 71st Round, January–June 2014, Report No. 575(71/25.2/1)), New Delhi.Google Scholar
  32. O’Connell, A. A. (2006). Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Puukka, J., & Marmolejo, F. (2008). Higher education institutions and regional mission: lessons learnt from the OECD Review Project. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 217–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rockoff, J. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations (UN), Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015). World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241.Google Scholar
  38. U. R. Rao Committee (2003). Revitalizing technical education, report of the review committee on AICTE, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, September, 2003.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies: a capabilities approach. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google Scholar
  40. World Bank (2008). Indian road construction industry, capacity issues, constraints & recommendations. World Bank, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank (2009). Implementation completion and results report (IDA-37180) on a credit for a Technical/Engineering Education Quality Improvement Project. World Bank, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations