Advertisement

Soft power as a policy rationale for international education in the UK: a critical analysis

Abstract

This article presents the results of a textual analysis conducted on policy discourses on international students in the UK between 1999 and 2013. A number of rationales for and against increasing their numbers have been made, which have largely remained consistent over changing political administrations. One key rationale is that international students enhance the UK’s global political influence through its soft power. Critical analysis indicates that a number of unsubstantiated assumptions are made, representing international higher education and students in an outdated power relation predicated on Cold War politics. Key assumptions are that international students change their political attitudes and identify with the host country as a result of positive experiences. Later they are supposed to return home and reach positions of influence, which they exert in favour of the UK. They are represented to feel the same whether on scholarship or self-funded; and behave in predictable, similar ways. These representations of students as social subjects have disciplinary implications, which should be a topic for critical debate and potentially resistance in pedagogical contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Anholt, S. (2006). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  2. Asquith, C. (1945). Report of the commission on higher education in the Colonies. London: HM Stationery Office.

  3. Atkinson, C. (2010). Does soft power matter? A comparative analysis of student exchange programs 1980–2006. Foreign Policy Analysis, 6(1), 1–22.

  4. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Higher Education.

  5. Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. The Australian Journal of Education Studies, 13(2), 10–17.

  6. BIS. (2009). Higher ambitions: The future of universities in a knowledge economy. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

  7. BIS. (2013a). International education: Global growth and prosperity. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

  8. BIS. (2013b). International education—Global growth and prosperity: an accompanying analytical narrative. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

  9. Blair, T. (1999). Attracting More International Students. (Speech to London School of Economics launching Prime Minister’s Initiative). London. 18 June. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20060130194436/http://number10.gov.uk/page3369. Accessed on 11 August 2013.

  10. Blair, T. (2006). Why we must attract more students from overseas. The Guardian, 18 April. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2006/apr/18/internationalstudents.politics/print. Accessed on 10 November 2013.

  11. British Council. (1999). Building a world class brand for British education: The brand report. Manchester: British Council Education Counselling Service.

  12. British Council. (2003). Education UK: Positioning for success. London: British Council.

  13. British Council. (2012). Trust pays: How international cultural relationships build trust in the UK and underpin the success of the UK economy. London: British Council.

  14. British Council. (2013). Influence and attraction: Culture and the race for soft power in the 21st century. London: British Council.

  15. Brown, L. (2009). The transformative power of the international sojourn: An ethnographic study of the international student experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(3), 502–521.

  16. Cameron, D. (2011). Immigration (Speech to the Institute for Government). London. 10 October. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-speech-on-immigration. Accessed on 20 December 2013.

  17. Caruana, V., & Montgomery, C. (2016). Researching the transnational higher education policy landscape: Exploring network power and dissensus in a globalizing system. London Review of Education, 14(1), 56–69.

  18. Choudaha, R., de Wit, H. (2014). Challenges and opportunities for global student mobility in the future: A comparative and critical analysis. In: Internationalization of higher education and global mobility. Oxford Studies in Comparative Education Series. Oxford: Symposium Books.

  19. Conlon, G., Litchfield, A., and Sadlier, G. (2011). Estimating the value to the UK of education exports. BIS Research Paper Number 46. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

  20. DfES. (2003). The future of higher education. London: Department for Education and Skills (CM 5735).

  21. DFES. (2004). Putting the world into world-class education: An international strategy for education, skills and children’s services. London: HMSO.

  22. DfES. (2006). Prime Minister Blair launches strategy to make UK leader in international education (press release). Department for Education and Skills. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080524111138/http://www.britainusa.com/sections/articles_show_nt1.asp?d=0&i=41075&L1=41075&L2=41009&a=41689&pv=1. Accessed on 19 November 2013.

  23. Dodds, A. (2009). Liberalization and the public sector: The pre-eminent role of governments in the ‘sale’ of higher education abroad. Public Administration, 87(2), 397–411.

  24. DTZ. (2011). Prime Minister’s initiative for international education phase 2 (PMI2). London: DTZ.

  25. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Pearson.

  26. FCO. (2014a). Government response to the house of lords select committee on soft power and the UK’s influence: Report of session 2013–2014 (HL 150), persuasion and power in the modern world. London: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

  27. FCO. (2014b). Triennial review of the British Council. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

  28. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Translated by A.M. Sheridan Smith. Abingdon: Routledge.

  29. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. London: Penguin.

  30. Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin (Ed.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock.

  31. Gibbs, G. R. (2008). Analysing qualitative data. London: Sage Publications.

  32. Higher Education Statistics Authority. (1998). Students in Higher Education Institutions: 1997/98. Cheltenham: HESA. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/content/view/801/250/. Accessed on 22 June 2013.

  33. Higher Education Statistics Authority. (2016). Students in Higher Education Institutions: 2014-15. Cheltenham: HESA. http://www.hesa.ac.uk/stats. Accessed on 02 February 2016.

  34. Home Office. (2006). A points-based system: making migration work for Britain. London: HMSO. http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm67/6741/6741.pdf. Accessed on 01 December 2013.

  35. Home Office. (2011). Reform of the points based student (PBS) immigration system: Impact assessment. London: Home Office.

  36. House of Lords. (2014). Persuasion and power in the modern world: Select committee on soft power and the UK’s influence report of session 2013–14. London: TSO.

  37. Humfrey, C. (2011). The long and winding road: a review of the policy, practice and development of the internationalisation of higher education in the UK. Teachers and Teaching, 17(6), 649–661.

  38. Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of studies in international education, 8(1), 5–31.

  39. Kramer, P. A. (2009). Is the world our campus? International students and US global power in the long twentieth century. Diplomatic History, 33(5), 775–806.

  40. Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  41. Madge, C., Raghuram, P., & Noxolo, P. (2009). Engaged pedagogy and responsibility: A postcolonial analysis of international students. Geoforum, 40(1), 34–45.

  42. Marginson, S. (2014). Student self-formation in international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(1), 6–22.

  43. Marginson, S., Nyland, C., Sawir, E., & Forbes-Mewett, H. (2010). International student security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  44. Mattern, J. B. (2005). Why soft power’isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583–612.

  45. Mazzarol, T., & Soutar, G. N. (2002). “Push-pull” factors influencing international student destination choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 82–90.

  46. Mellors-Bourne, R., Humfrey, C., Kemp, N., & Woodfield, S. (2013). The wider benefits of international higher education in the UK. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills.

  47. Montgomery, C. (2010). Understanding the international student experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  48. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.

  49. O’Mara, M. (2012). The uses of the foreign student. Social Science History, 36(4), 583–615.

  50. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/edu/education-at-a-glance-19991487.htm. Accessed April 16, 2016.

  51. Papatsiba, V. (2005). Political and individual rationales of student mobility: A case-study of ERASMUS and a French regional scheme for studies abroad. European Journal of Education, 40(2), 173–188.

  52. Papatsiba, V. (2006). Study abroad and experiences of cultural distance and proximity: French erasmus students. In M. Byram & A. Feng (Eds.), Living and studying abroad: Research and practice (pp. 108–133). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

  53. Perraton, H. D. (2014). A history of foreign students in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  54. QAA. (2009). Thematic enquiries into concerns about academic quality and standards in higher education in England. Gloucester: The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

  55. Rhee, J. E. (2009). International education, the new imperialism, and technologies of the self: Branding the globally educated elite. Multicultural Education Review, 1(1), 55–82.

  56. Rhee, J. E., & Sagaria, M. A. D. (2004). International students: Constructions of imperialism in the Chronicle of Higher Education. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 77–96.

  57. Rizvi, F. (2011). Theorizing student mobility in an era of globalization. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 17(6), 693–701.

  58. Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Abingdon: Routledge.

  59. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  60. Saarinen, T. (2008). Persuasive presuppositions in OECD and EU higher education policy documents. Discourse Studies, 10(3), 341–359.

  61. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage Publications.

  62. Scott-Smith, G. (2003). ‘Her rather ambitious washington program’: ‘Margaret Thatcher’s international visitor program visit to the United States in 1967. Contemporary British History, 17(4), 65–86.

  63. Sidhu, R. K. (2006). Universities and globalization: To market, to market. London: Routledge.

  64. Sovic, S. (2009). Hi-bye friends and the herd instinct: International and home students in the creative arts. Higher Education, 58(6), 747–761.

  65. Tannock, S. (2013). When the demand for educational equality stops at the border: Wealthy students, international students and the restructuring of higher education in the UK. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 449–464.

  66. Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in “New Times”: Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451.

  67. Tikly, L. (2004). Education and the new imperialism. Comparative education, 40(2), 173–198.

  68. Trilokekar, R. D. (2010). International education as soft power? The contributions and challenges of Canadian foreign policy to the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education, 59(2), 131–147.

  69. UKBA. (2008). Students under the points based system—(Tier 4) statement of intent. London: UK Border Agency, Home Office.

  70. Universities, U. K. (2014). International students in higher education: The UK and its competition. London: Universities UK.

  71. Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 32–70). Abingdon: Routledge.

  72. Van Mol, C. (2013). Intra-European student mobility and European identity: A successful marriage? Population, Space and Place, 19(2), 209–222.

  73. Walker, P. (2014). International student policies in UK higher education from colonialism to the coalition developments and consequences. Journal of Studies in International Education, 18(4), 325–344.

  74. Waters, J. L. (2006). Emergent geographies of international education and social exclusion. Antipode, 38(5), 1046–1068.

  75. Wilson, I. (2014). International education programs and political influence: Manufacturing sympathy?. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

  76. Xiang, B., & Shen, W. (2009). International student migration and social stratification in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(5), 513–522.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Sylvie Lomer.

Additional information

The recent comments by the Home Secretary Amber Rudd at the 2016 Conservative Party Conference appear to constitute a significant rupture with the rationale presented in this article. In light of these comments, the author would like to clarify that the criticisms here should not be understood as arguing against the presence of international students in the UK. Rather, it is argued that international students are not under a moral obligation to confer political influence on the UK or to support its policies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lomer, S. Soft power as a policy rationale for international education in the UK: a critical analysis. High Educ 74, 581–598 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0060-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Policy
  • Discourse
  • International education
  • Soft power
  • International students