Advertisement

The soybean cinnamate 4-hydroxylase gene GmC4H1 contributes positively to plant defense via increasing lignin content

  • Qiang Yan
  • Jierui Si
  • Xiaoxia Cui
  • Hao Peng
  • Xin Chen
  • Han Xing
  • Daolong DouEmail author
Original paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Lignification is a key event in plant defense against pathogens. In the plant lignin biosynthetic pathway, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) catalyzes the conversion of trans-cinnamic acid to p-coumaric acid. However, the potential role of C4H in plant defense remains elusive. In this research, a soybean C4H gene, GmC4H1, was identified via microarray-based comparative transcriptome analysis of genes responsive to Phytophthora sojae infection. The accumulation of GmC4H1 transcripts increased significantly upon P. sojae infection. Nicotiana benthamiana plants overexpressing GmC4H1 demonstrated enhanced lignin accumulation and elevated resistance to both Phytophthora parasitica and Verticillium dahliae. The silencing of GmC4H1 in soybean hairy roots resulted in decreased resistance to P. sojae. These results together suggest that GmC4H1 contributes positively to plant defense against various pathogens, possibly by enhancing lignin biosynthesis.

Keywords

Soybean Lignin C4H1 Phytophthora sojae Disease defense 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31625023, 31721004 and 31672008) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503112).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10725_2019_494_MOESM1_ESM.tif (736 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 736 kb) Fig. S1 Alignment of C4H1 amino acid sequences from five plant species. Amino acid sequences used in the alignment are from Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_180607.1), Gossypium hirsutum (ACH56520), Medicago truncatula (XP_003616037.1), Nicotiana tabacum (NP_001312254.1) and Oryza sativa (EAZ35606.1). Identical amino acids are marked in black. Conserved amino acids are showed in gray. Sequences were aligned using CLUSTALW and viewed in GeneDoc.
10725_2019_494_MOESM2_ESM.tif (279 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 278 kb) Fig. S2 Molecular verification of transgenicN. benthamianalines. Genomic DNA (a) and cDNA (b) PCR amplification of GmC4H1 (upper panel) from wild-type (WT), empty vector (EV) transformant and threeT2 transgenic lines expressing GmC4H1 (12-3, 14-4 and 18–4). NbEF1a (lower panel) was used as an internal control. c Seed germination rates of transgenic N. benthamiana plants.
10725_2019_494_MOESM3_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 13 kb) Table S1: Primers used in the study

References

  1. Anterola AM, Lewis NG (2002) Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry 361:221–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhuiyan NH, Selvaraj G, Wei YD, King J (2009) Gene expression profiling and silencing reveal that monolignol biosynthesis plays a critical role in penetration defence in wheat against powdery mildew invasion. J Exp Bot 60(2):509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blee K, Choi JW, O’Connell AP, Jupe SC, Schuch W, Lewis NG, Bolwell GP (2001) Antisense and sense expression of cDNA coding for CYP73A15, a class II cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, leads to a delayed and reduced production of lignin in tobacco. Phytochemistry 57:1159–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:519–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonawitz ND, Chapple C (2010) The genetics of lignin biosynthesis: connecting genotype to phenotype. Annu Rev Genet 44:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen XP, Jing LY, Wang J, Jian HJ, Mei JQ, Xu XF, Li JN, Liu LZ (2017) Correlation analysis of Sclerotinia resistance with lignin content and monomer G/S and its QTL mapping in Brassica napus L. Acta Agron Sin 43(9):1280–1289 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clemente TE, Cahoon EB (2009) Soybean oil: genetic approaches for modification of functionality and total content. Plant Physiol 151:1030–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Do CT, Pollet B, Thevenin J, Sibout R, Denoue D, Barriere Y, Lapierre C, Jouanin L (2007) Both caffeoyl Coenzyme A 3-O-methyltransferase 1 and caffeic acid O-methyltransferase 1 are involved in redundant functions for lignin, flavonoids and sinapoyl malate biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Planta 226:1117–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster CE, Martin TM, Pauly M (2010) Comprehensive compositional analysis of plant cell walls (lignocellulosic biomass) Part I: Lignin. JoVE 37:e1745Google Scholar
  10. Fu C et al (2011) Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3803–3808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukushima RS, Kerley MS (2011) Use of lignin extracted from different plant sources as standards in the spectrophotometric acetyl bromide lignin method. J Agric Food Chem 59:3505–3509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gan SP, Yan Q, Cui XX, Xue D, Zhao JM, Guo N, Wang HT, Xing H (2016) Lignin content and expression of key biosynthetic genes in soybean upon infection by P. sojae. Soybean Sci 35:789–794 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  13. Gao F, Zhou BJ, Li GY, Jia PS, Li H, Zhao YL, Zhao P, Xia GX, Guo HS (2010) A glutamic acid-rich protein identified in Verticillium dahliae from an insertional mutagenesis affects microsclerotial formation and pathogenicity. PLoS ONE 5.0(12):e15319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. García JR, Anderson N, Lefeuvre R, Iturra C, Elissetche J, Chapple C, Valenzuela S (2014) Rescue of syringyl lignin and sinapate ester biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by a coniferaldehyde 5-hydroxylase from Eucalyptus globulus. Plant Cell Rep 33:1263–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gayoso C, Pomar F, Novo-Uzal E, Merino F, Ilárduya ÓMd (2010) The Ve-mediated resistance response of the tomato to Verticillium dahliae involves H2O2, peroxidase and lignins and drives PAL gene expression. BMC Plant Biol 10:232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabber JH, Ralph J, Hatfield RD (1998) Severe inhibition of maize wall degradation by synthetic lignins formed with conifer aldehyde. J Sci Food Agric 78:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guo WF, Jin L, Miao YH, He X, Hu Q, Guo K, Zhu LF, Zhang XL (2016) An ethylene response-related factor, GbERF1-like, from Gossypium barbadense improves resistance to Verticillium dahliae via activating lignin synthesis. Plant Mol Biol 91:305–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung JH, Fouad WM, Vermerris W, Gallo M, Altpeter F (2012) RNAi suppression of lignin biosynthesis in sugarcane reduces recalcitrance for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass. Plant Biotechnol J 10:1067–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kang Z, Buchenauer H (2000) Ultrastructural and immunocytochemical investigation of pathogen development and host responses in resistant and susceptible wheat spikes infected by Fusarium culmorum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kawasaki T, Koita H, Nakatsubo T, Hasegawa K, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi H, Umemura K, Umezawa T, Shimamoto K (2006) Cinnamoyl-CoA reductase, a key enzyme in lignin biosynthesis, is an effector of small GTPase Rac in defense signaling in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(1):230–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kumar R, Vashisth D, Misra A, Akhtar MQ, Jalil SU, Shanker K, Gupta MM, Rout PK, Gupta AK, Shasany AK (2016) RNAi down-regulation of cinnamate-4-hydroxylase increases artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. Sci Rep 6:26458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Kim JI, Pysh L, Chapple C (2015) Four isoforms of Arabidopsis thaliana 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL) have overlapping yet distinct roles in phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Physiol 169:2409Google Scholar
  23. Libault M, Thibivilliers S, Bilgin DD, Radwan O, Benitez M, Clough SJ, Stacey G (2008) Identification of four soybean reference genes for gene expression normalization. Plant Genome 1:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. López-Gresa MP, Torres C, Campos L, Lisón P, Rodrigo I, Bellés JM, Conejero V (2011) Identification of defence metabolites in tomato plants infected by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae. Environ Exp Bot 74:216–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Millar DJ, Long M, Donovan G, Fraser PD, Boudet AM, Danoun S, Bramley PM, Bolwell GP (2007) Introduction of sense constructs of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (CYP73A24) in transgenic tomato plants shows opposite effects on flux into stem lignin and fruit flavonoids. Phytochemistry 68:1497–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pinçon G, Maury S, Hoffmann L, Geoffroy P, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Legrand M (2001) Repression of O-methyltransferase genes in transgenic tobacco affects lignin synthesis and plant growth. Phytochemistry 57:1167–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qin Y, He YJ, Kabahuma M, Chaya T, Kelly A, Borrego E, Yang B, Kasmi FE, Li Y, Teixeira P (2017) A gene encoding maize caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase confers quantitative resistance to multiple pathogens. Nat Genet 49:1364–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy MS, Chen FG, Jackson L, Aljoe H, Dixon RA (2005) Targeted down-regulation of cytochrome P450 enzymes for forage quality improvement in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saathoff AJ, Sarath G, Chow EK, Dien BS, Tobias CM (2011) Downregulation of cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase in switchgrass by RNA silencing results in enhanced glucose release after cellulase treatment. PLoS ONE 6:e16416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sewalt V, Ni W, Blount JW, Jung HG, Masoud SA, Howles PA, Lamb C, Dixon RA (1997) Reduced lignin content and altered lignin composition in transgenic tobacco down-regulated in expression of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase or cinnamate 4-hydroxylase. Plant Physiol 115:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shafrin F, Das SS, Sanan-Mishra N, Khan H (2015) Artificial miRNA-mediated down-regulation of two monolignoid biosynthetic genes (C3H and F5H) cause reduction in lignin content in jute. Plant Mol Biol 89:511–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun J, Li L, Zhao J, Huang J, Yan Q, Xing H, Guo N (2014) Genetic analysis and fine mapping of RpsJS, a novel resistance gene to Phytophthora sojae in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. Theor Appl Genet 127:913–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sykes RW, Gjersing EL, Foutz K, Rottmann WH, Kuhn SA, Foster CE, Ziebell A, Turner GB, Decker SR, Hinchee MA, Davis MF (2015) Down-regulation of p-coumaroyl quinate/shikimate 3′-hydroxylase (C3′H) and cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) genes in the lignin biosynthetic pathway of Eucalyptus urophylla x E. grandis leads to improved sugar release. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Takuma S, Masayasu K, Shinya Y, Isao M, Tamotsu K, Akito K, Makita H, Ryo Y, Kazuhiko W, Masataka A (2012) Pathogenic diversity of Phytophthora sojae and breeding strategies to develop Phytophthora-resistant soybeans. Breed Sci 61:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyler BM (2007) Phytophthora sojae: root rot pathogen of soybean and model oomycete. Mol Plant Pathol 8:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang GF, Balintkurti PJ (2016) Maize homologs of CCoAOMT and HCT, two key enzymes in lignin biosynthesis, form complexes with the NLR Rp1 protein to modulate the defense response. Plant Physiol 171(3):2166–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang MX, Zhu XL, Wang K, Lu CG, Luo MY, Shan TL, Zhang ZY (2018) A wheat caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase TaCOMT-3D positively contributes to both resistance to sharp eyespot disease and stem mechanical strength. Sci Rep 8:6543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiong Q, Ye WW, Choi D, Wong J, Qiao YL, Tao K, Wang YC, Ma WB (2014) Phytophthora suppressor of RNA silencing 2 is a conserved RxLR effector that promotes infection in soybean and Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27:1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu B, Escamilla-Treviño LL, Sathitsuksanoh N, Shen ZX, Shen H, Zhang YHP, Dixon RA, Zhao BY (2011) Silencing of 4-coumarate: coenzyme A ligase in switchgrass leads to reduced lignin content and improved fermentable sugar yields for biofuel production. New Phytol 192:611–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yan Q, Cui XX, Su LM, Xu N, Guo N, Xing H, Dou DL (2014) GmSGT1 is differently required for soybean Rps genes-mediated and basal resistance to Phytophthora sojae. Plant Cell Rep 33:1275–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yan Q, Cui XX, Lin S, Gan SP, Xing H, Dou DL (2016) GmCYP82A3, a soybean cytochrome p450 family gene involved in the jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathway, enhances plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE 11:e0162253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhong R, Richardson EA, Ye ZH (2007) The MYB46 transcription factor is a direct target of SND1 and regulates secondary wall biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19:2776–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial CropsJiangsu Academy of Agricultural SciencesNanjingChina
  3. 3.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  4. 4.National Center for Soybean ImprovementNanjing Agricultural UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations