Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 341–356 | Cite as

OsMND1 regulates early meiosis and improves the seed set rate in polyploid rice

  • Yuguo Xiong
  • Lu Gan
  • Yaping Hu
  • Wenchao Sun
  • Xue Zhou
  • Zhaojian Song
  • Xianhua Zhang
  • Yang Li
  • Zhifan Yang
  • Weifeng Xu
  • Jianhua Zhang
  • Yuchi HeEmail author
  • Detian CaiEmail author
Open Access
Original Paper


The meiotic processes of most polyploid rice (Oryza sativa) are genetically abnormal, leading to low pollen fertility, which results in low seed set rates. Some polyploid meiosis stability (PMeS) lines with high seed set rates have been bred but their meiotic mechanisms remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the function of OsMND1 regulated polyploid rice meiosis. OsMND1 localized in the nucleus, and its expression level in panicles of PMeS line HN2026-4x was higher than in HN2026-2x and the other lines without the PMeS background. OsMND1’s overexpression improved pollen fertility and viability, early normal embryo development and the seed set rate in Balilla-4x. However, OsMND1 RNAi in PMeS line HN2026-4x impeded pollen and embryo development significantly. The results of chromosome behavior analyses indicated that OsMND1 participates in stabilizing meiosis by maintaining the balance of pairing, synapsis and recombination during early meiosis. Many univalent, trivalent, and even multivalent systems appeared in the OsMND1 RNAi line, resulting in the presence of many lagging chromosomes. The outcome indicated that OsMND1 plays a critical role in stabilizing meiosis, improving pollen fertility and reducing early embryo abortions, ultimately increasing the seed set rate. Additionally, OsMND1 affected some key meiosis-related gene expression levels. These results raise interesting issues in polyploid breeding theory and application, which require integrated solutions in the future.


Polyploid rice Meiosis OsMND1 Pollen fertility Seed set rate. 



Polyploid meiosis stability


Meiotic nuclear divisions 1


Meiosis, a crucial process in the life cycle, encompasses a single round of DNA replication and two successive nuclear divisions. These events allow the requisite segregation of homologous chromosomes, and generate both genetic conservation and diversity in the progeny, which are crucial to gamete formation and sexual reproduction (Nishizawa-Yokoi et al. 2012). Plants, especially Arabidopsis thaliana, provide an outstanding system for the characterization of molecular mechanisms of major events that occur in meiosis (Mercier and Grelon 2008; Osman et al. 2011). Rice (Oryza sativa) is a significant crop with a 430 Mb genome size, which is smaller than those of other cereal crops (Eckardt 2000; Luo et al. 2014). The small chromosomal sizes and their moderate number are advantageous for making pachytene chromosome preparations in rice. Thus, rice is also considered a good model organism for investigating the molecular mechanism of meiosis in higher plants (Cheng 2013). Some rice meiotic genes have been characterized using different technologies (Nonomura et al. 2004; Cheng 2013). All of these genes were identified in diploid rice, and PAIR1, PAIR2, PAIR3, OsDMC1, OsREC8, OsCOM1, OsRAD51 and MEICA 1 were especially carefully probed (Nonomura et al. 2004; Tian et al. 2010; Cheng 2013; Hu et al. 2017). Polyploidy is an important manifestation of evolution in species. However, meiotic irregularities in polyploid rice include multivalent associations and unbalanced chromosome segregation, leading to aneuploid gametes. Little is known about the molecular mechanism maintaining meiotic stability in polyploid rice. The evidence suggests that whole genome duplication events and abiotic environments are two especially potent challenges to meiotic chromosomal segregation and probably necessitate adaptive evolutionary responses (Storme and Geelen 2013; Bomblies et al. 2015). The seed set rate of most polyploid rice lines is less than 40% and yields are low. There have been no breakthroughs for a long time in polyploid rice breeding because of abnormal meiosis (He et al. 2010; Li et al. 2016a). Ph was discovered 50 years ago in wheat (Triticum aestivum); it has been characterized at the molecular level and is considered the main regulator of recombination in allopolyploid species (Griffiths et al. 2006). The polyploid meiosis stability (PMeS) line HN2026-4x, was selected through hybridization because its especially stable meiotic behavior is similar to its diploid. It is sub-autopolyploid and may represent a Ph-like genetic material (Cai et al. 2007; He et al. 2010). Balilla-4x is autopolyploid, has disorganized meiotic behaviors and a low seed set rate, without the PMeS background. However, the regulation of meiosis in polyploid rice is very complicated and ambiguous. Some PMeS lines, which have stable meiotic behaviors and high seed set rates, have been bred successfully. Therefore, materials for meiotic mechanism research are available.

The molecular basis of meiotic recombination has been well studied in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and other organisms. It is initiated by programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs), catalyzed by a topoisomerase-like protein known as Spo11 (Keeney 2001; Yu et al. 2010). The immediate and proper repair of DSBs is crucial for maintaining the integrity and function of the genome (Li and Heyer 2008). Homologous recombination (HR) plays a critical role in repairing programmed DNA DSBs during meiosis. HOP2 (homologous-pairing protein 2) and MND1 (meiotic nuclear division protein 1) were determined to take part in homologous chromosome pairing and meiotic DSB repair. MND1 and HOP2 formed a complex, which may be an essential member in meiotic HR (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002; Zhao and Sung 2015). The initiating event of meiotic recombination is the formation of the DSB. The location and numbers of DSBs formed are controlled by some factors and define the locations of recombination events. These DSBs must subsequently be repaired to form either crossovers or noncrossovers (Gray and Cohen 2016). Two recombinases, the RecA homologs Rad51 and Dmc1, form presynaptic nucleoprotein filaments with single-stranded DNA during meiosis, and DMC1 and RAD51 cooperate with MND1 (Ogawa et al. 1993; Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002; Schommer et al. 2003; Cloud et al. 2012). The MND1 protein localizes to chromatin throughout meiotic prophase in wild type, and Mnd1 localization requires Hop2 (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002). The HOP2/MND1 heterodimeric complex, which acted during the formation of meiotic DSBs, was especially important for meiotic recombination in yeast (Pezza et al. 2007; Uanschou et al. 2013). HOP2/MND1 cooperated to form DMC1-mediated D-loops during DNA repair in Arabidopsis meiosis. The loss of the HOP2/MND1 complex function results in the suboptimal support of DMC1, and failure to repair meiotic DSBs using homologous chromosomes, but it allows RAD51-mediated IS-repair activation (Schommer et al. 2003; Uanschou et al. 2013). The major interaction site of HOP2–MND1 was identified in the central coiled-coil domains, and an open collinear parallel arrangement of HOP2 and MND1 within the complex has been predicted (Rampler et al. 2015). The identification of HOP2 and MND1 homologs in other organisms suggests that the functions of this complex are conserved among eukaryotes (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002; Petukhova et al. 2005; Chi et al. 2007; Pezza et al. 2007; Bugreev et al. 2014; Zhao and Sung 2015).

MND1 plays a critical role in meiosis in yeast and Arabidopsis, but in rice, no research has reported on the function of MND1. Additionally, the regulatory mechanism of MND1 in meiosis was important in polyploid rice. We isolated a novel meiotic gene, MND1, in polyploid rice (4x), encoding a putative coiled-coil protein that is similar to PAIR1 in rice. In this research, the function of MND1 in the regulation of polyploid rice meiosis was carefully investigated. We showed that OsMND1 played a critical role in improving the seed set rate in PMeS rice by reducing the unsuccessful fertilization and the early embryo abortion rates caused by abnormal pollen development. Furthermore, these observations confirmed that OsMND1 does participate in regulating meiosis in polyploid rice, suggesting that the effects of OsMND1 might be involved in the processes of pairing, synapsis and recombination during early meiosis. Additionally, the expression levels of some important meiosis-related genes as determined by RT-qPCR indicated that OsMND1 is a crucial player in establishing homologous chromosome pairing and in repairing meiotic DSBs through homologous chromosomes, and is related to HOP2, DMC1 and ZEP1, but independent of RAD51. A stable meiosis is an important precondition of normal pollen development and a high seed set rate in polyploid rice. The unique regulating mechanisms of meiosis and pollen development in PMeS rice presents a very interesting problem for polyploidy breeding theory and application, which requires a solution.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

After several years of crosses between indica and japonica rice lines followed by backcrosses, the PMeS line HN2026-4x, was selected and bred by Cai et al. (2007). It is a sub-autopolyploid, and it may be a Ph-like genetic material because of its especially stable meiotic behavior, which is similar to the diploid line HN2026-2x (Cai et al. 2007; He et al. 2010). Balilla-4x is autopolyploid with disorganized meiotic behaviors and a low seed set rate, without the PMeS background. It is the direct doubling of the diploid line Balilla-2x.

All of the rice plants used were grown in a standard greenhouse under a 16-h-light at 30 °C and 8-h-dark at 25 °C cycle in Wuhan, China.

Isolation of OsMND1

MND1 plays a critical role in meiosis in Arabidopsis. The MND1 family protein (NP_001329788.1) of A. thaliana was sequenced by BLASTP in NCBI, There is a high homology sequence on the ninth chromosome in the rice genome. Total RNA was isolated from the panicles of two polyploid rice lines, HN2026-4x and Balilla-4x undergoing meiosis with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA. Then, OsMND1 was cloned by PCR amplification with the specific primers MND1-F (5′-atgtcgaagaagaggggtct-3′) and MND1-R (5′-ttactgcagatattcgaaat-3′). The amplified cDNA fragments were gel-purified, sub-cloned into the simple 19-T vector and then sequenced.

Construction of overexpression and RNAi vectors

A full-length 624-bp coding sequence of OsMND1 was cloned into the transgenic vector pCU3 (Chen et al. 2007), which contains the strong promoter Ubi. The primers used were OsMND1-F1 (5′-ataggatccatggatatcagaccatctggaagtg-3′, with the BamHI site underlined) and OsMND1-R1 (5′-ataggatccctacagtgacaagtcgccaccca-3′, with the BamHI site underlined). Then, the recombinants were selected and sequenced. Two 624-bp fragments specific to OsMND1 cDNA were amplified by PCR with primers OsMND1-xf (5′- atactcgaggggagaggatcatgtcgaagaag-3′, with the XhoI site underlined) and OsMND1-er (5′-atagaattcttgctgagttgggttacatacgg-3′, with the EcoRI site underlined), and primers OsMND1-xr (5′-atatctagatttgctgagttgggttacatacg-3′, with the XbaI site underlined) and OsMND1-bf (5′-ataggatccgggagaggatcatgt-3′, with the BamHI site underlined). After digestion with corresponding restriction enzymes, the two fragments were sub-cloned into vector pHANNIBAL (Biovector Science Lab, Inc., Beijing, China) to generate the recombinant pHANNIBAL-dbmnd1 (Chen et al. 2007). Finally, the fragment in pHANNIBAL-dbmnd1 containing an intron flanked by two 624-bp opposite fragments was digested by NotI and subcloned into pART27 (Biovector Science Lab, Inc), resulting in the RNAi vector, pART-dbmnd1.

Both constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 and independently transferred into two polyploid rice lines, HN2026-4x and Balilla-4x. OsMND1 overexpression plants (B-O) and OsMND1 RNAi plants (HN-RNAi) were produced.

Subcellular localization analysis

OsMND1 cDNA was cloned by PCR amplification from panicles undergoing meiosis. The amplified PCR product was directly cloned into pPK100. An Agro-infiltration procedure for the transient protein expression in tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves was performed according to the method described by Li et al. (2005). 4-week-old leaves were infiltrated with the bacterial cultures through abaxial air spaces. Simultaneously, onion (Allium cepa L.) epidermises were infected by microinjection. The GFP fluorescence was observed at 12 h intervals with a BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).The protocol of nuclear location was performed according to He et al. (2007).

Phenotypic analysis

Anthers were stained using 1% I2–KI for 2–3 min for fertility observations. For viability investigations, anthers were treated with 100 µg/mL fluorescein diacetate (FDA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min. Five independent experiments were designed and each experiment had five replicates. All of the images were taken with a BX51 microscope (Olympus).

RNA extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from rice panicles with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and used to synthesize the first-strand cDNA. RT-PCR was carried out to amplify the OsMND1 transcripts with 40 PCR cycles, using first-strand cDNA as a template. Two housekeeping genes (ACTIN1 and GAPDH) were also amplified as the controls. All of the primer information is presented in Supple. Table 1.

The 25-µL RT-PCR reactions contained 2.5 µL of diluted cDNA, 2 µL of 7.5 µM primers, 12.5 µL of 2 × qPCR mix and 8 µL SDW. RT-qPCR was performed on a Rotor Gene 3000 system (Corbett Research) using a SYBR green detection protocol according to the manufacturer’s instructions (SYBR Premix Ex Taq System; Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). A linear standard curve and threshold cycle number versus log (designated transcript level) were constructed using a series of dilutions of each PCR product; and the transcript levels in all of the unknown samples were determined according to the standard curve. Five biological repeats were performed for each sample.

Semi-thin analysis of the anther structure

The anther semi-thin analysis method of He et al. (2010) was used. At every stage, half-thin sections (100 nm) were tested. All of the images were taken with a BX51 microscope (Olympus).

Meiotic analysis

For meiotic behavior studies, we used the previously published methods of Yan et al. (1998) with some modifications. The young panicles (40–60 mm), including flowers in meiosis, were fixed for 1–2 d with 3:1 ethanol:acetic acid and stored with 95% ethanol at 4 °C until observation. The flowers in meiosis were incubated in 1 mol/L cellulase (Onozuka R-10) and 1 mol/L pectinase (SERVA Feinbiochemica, Heidelberg, Germany) at 26 °C for 30 min, and then stained in carbol fuchsin. Chromosomal behaviors could be observed with a BX51 microscope (Olympus). All samples were tested in five independent experiments with five replicates each. Thus, n = 30 × 5 independent biological replicates.

Southern blot analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of wild type and the putative transgenic lines. Plasmid DNA and genomic DNA were digested with suitable restriction enzymes at 37 °C overnight. Digested DNA was separated on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich) and blotted onto Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1–2 d. The membrane was hybridized with a DIG-labelled specific probes RNAi-NPT-F (5′-TGGCTGCTATTGGGCGAAGT-3′) and RNAi-NPT-R (5′-GCCCCTGATGCTCTTCGTCC-3′), and overexpression-HYG-F (5′-ATGCTTTGGGCCGAGGACTG-3′) and overexpression-HYG-R (5′-GCGCGTCTGCTGCTCCATAC-3′) at 42 °C overnight. The hybridized membrane was washed and detected according to the protocol of High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit I (Roche, USA).

Bioinformatics analysis

All of the homologous sequences were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Sequence alignments were generated with DNA Star. ExPASy was used to forecast the primary structure of the MND1 protein. Signal peptide and transmembrane domains were analyzed by TMHMM Server2.0. The subcellular localization prediction came from WOLFPSORT.

Statistical analysis

All of the values shown are the averages of the means of five replicates. The results were analyzed for variance using the SAS/STAT statistical analysis package (version 6.12; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to determine significant differences. Averaged means followed by common letters are not significantly different at P = 0.05 using a protected least-significant difference.

Accession code GenBank: AK070961.


Cloning and bio-informatics analysis of OsMND1

The Oryza sativa gene homologue of the A. thaliana AtMND1 and yeast gene has been named OSMND1. A 624-bp fragment of cDNA from OsMND1 was amplified with gene-specific primers using a cDNA library of meiotic rice panicles. The information indicated from RACE (Gene ID: 4346611) that OsMND1 was located on the 9th chromosome, which included 10 exons and 9 introns, and encoded a putative protein of 208 amino acids (Supple. Fig. 1). The putative protein was C1054H1667N285O336S6, with a molecular mass of 23,899.9 kD and an isoelectric point value estimated at 5.03 for the whole protein, which indicated it was an acidic protein. The TMHMM Server 2.0 program predicted that the protein lacked a membrane-spanning domain, and no signal peptide domain was found, indicating that it was not a secreted protein. Thus, it was predicted to be located in the nucleus. The secondary structure provided by Phyre2 indicated that this protein belongs to the MND1 super family, which included two β-chains and five α-helixes in the crystal structure; the helix structure was discovered at 75–143 amino acids. Finally, 197 residues were modelled with 100.0% confidence by the single highest scoring template, the protein 3D structure of OSMND1 were established by template-based modeling of Phyre2, based on template c4y66C (Kang et al. 2015) (Supple. Fig. 1b).

A database search using the BLAST 2.0 program indicated that the cDNA sequence possessed significant homology to the meiotic genes in yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), mouse (Mus musculus) and Arabidopsis (Supple. Fig. 2). The neighbor joining (NJ) trees using bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates were constructed using MEGA 5 (Liu et al. 2018). Comparing the OsMND1 cDNA with those of yeast, mouse and Arabidopsis, the identities were 42%, 42% and 74%, respectively. The OsMND1 protein was also similar to the proteins of these organisms, with amino acid sequence similarities of 42.9%, 42.9% and 74.4%, respectively. This indicated that MND1 was conserved among different species, suggesting that it might play similar functions in regulating meiosis.

Expression pattern of OsMND1 and its protein subcellular localization

The OsMND1 expression level in panicles of HN2026-4x was higher than in the diploid lines (HN2026-2x and Balilla-2x) or in the other low seed set rate line, Balilla-4x (Supple. Fig. 3a). The high-level expression of OsMND1 was discovered in the reproductive tissues, such as meiotic panicles and mature seeds, and also almost half expression was found in the roots. Furthermore, the relative expression was very low in stems and leaves. This was consistent with the predicted function of regulating meiosis (Supple. Fig. 3b).

A 35S-GFP-OsMND1 fusion construct was transformed transiently by microinjection into onion and tobacco epidermal cells, the result revealed that the fusion protein was localized in the nucleus, suggesting that OsMND1 acts in the nucleus (Supple. Figs. 4a1–a3, b1–b3).

The functional analysis of OsMND1 by overexpression and RNAi confirmation of the transgenic lines

To test whether transgenic lines were really positive, OsMND1 overexpressed lines were checked for the antibiotic marker gene hygromycin and the Ubi promoter by PCR (data not show). The results suggested that nine lines were positive. Then, the relative gene expression level of OsMND1 in overexpression lines was investigated further by qRT-PCR to confirm the prior results, and the data demonstrated that the gene expression level improved significantly in the five different lines compared with the wild type (Fig. 1a). To verify the prior PCR and RT-qPCR results, and avoid false positive information, Southern blotting was performed. DNA fragments of the antibiotic hygromycin gene were amplified by the s-hyg-F/s-hyg-R primer pair, and then a digoxin-labeled probe was designed using the random primer method. Genomic DNA was isolated and fully digested with EcoRI, and the plasmid was digested by XhoI. The Southern blot information indicated that line 1 (wild Balilla-4x) had no signal, lines 2 and 3 (putative transgenic plants) had positive signals, and line 4 (the over-expression plasmid) had a positive signal of a different size (Fig. 1b). These results suggested that positive plants had been produced and identified for further investigations.

OsMND1 RNAi plants were checked for the antibiotic marker gene (NPT II) and the Ubi promoter by PCR. The results suggested that 11 lines were positive (data not shown). To confirm this result, the relative gene expression level of OsMND1 in positive RNAi plants was investigated further by RT-qPCR. After RNAi was introduced, the expression levels in five RNAi-expressing lines were only 60.7% of that in the wild type (Fig. 1c). Southern blotting was performed to verify the PCR and qRT-PCR results and to avoid false positives (Fig. 1d). DNA fragments of G418 from the RNAi vector were amplified by specific primers, and then a digoxin-labeled probe was designed using the random primer method. From these results, we concluded that truly positive RNAi-expressing plants had been produced and identified for further investigations.

Fig. 1

Identification of the overexpression and RNAi lines in the polyploid rice. a Relative expression levels of OsMND1 in overexpression lines compared with B-4x (Ballina-4x). b Southern blots of overexpression lines. From lines 1–4: Ballina-4x, Ballina-4x overexpression line 1, Ballina-4x overexpression line 2, and OsMND1 overexpression plasmid, respectively. c Relative expression levels of OsMND1 in RNAi lines compared with HN-4x (HN2026-4x). d Southern blot results of RNAi lines. From Lines 1–4: RNAi line, HN2026-4x, OsMND1 RNAi plasmid and OsMND1 RNAi plasmid, respectively

OsMND1 regulates pollen fertility and viability, the seed set rate, and early embryo development

OsMND1 overexpression improved pollen fertility and viability, normal early embryo development and the seed set rate (Supple. Table 2). The OsMND1 overexpression line seed set rate ascended significantly, and the average seed set rate of 10 independent lines was 50.49%, while it is only 30.58% in the wild type (Supple. Table 2). OsMND1 RNAi restricted the pollen fertility and viability, and early embryo development. The seed set rate decreased significantly compared with HN2026-4x (Supple. Table 2). The pollen fertility and viability of HN2026-4x-OsMND1 RNAi dropped significantly (Fig. 2b1–b4, c, d), while the pollen fertility of the Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression line increased (Fig. 2a1–a4, c, d). The pollen fertility and viability of HN2026-4x-OsMND1 RNAi were 44.8% and 20.3%, respectively, but the pollen fertility and viability were still 85.2% and 52.5%, respectively, in HN2026-4x. After OsMND1 overexpression in Balilla-4x, the pollen fertility was as high as 66.7%, but it was only 52.4% in Balilla-4x. The viability in Balilla-4x was only 33.7%, but it increased in the Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression line to as high as 64.3%, which was almost two times that in Balilla-4x (Fig. 2d). These results implied that OsMND1 overexpression was directly beneficial to pollen fertility and viability, and significantly improved the pollen viability (Fig. 2a1–a4, b1–b4). In conclusion, we also found that the relative OsMND1 expression level was related to pollen fertility and viability, and the seed set rate.

In the interest of investigating the detailed reasons for the OsMND1 expression level causing changes in the seed set rate, the embryo abortion rate was tested at different stages in OsMND1-overexpression Balilla-4x lines and HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi-expressing lines. The data indicated that the OsMND1 expression level was related to the seed set rate and the embryo abortion type (Supple. Fig. 5). Among the abnormal embryos in the Balilla-4x lines, abortion arrested at 3 d after pollination was 16.5%; at 15 d after pollination 38.7% of the abnormal embryos were blocked, and as high as 46.4% of the ovules did not complete fertilization. However, in the aborted embryos of the OsMND1-overexpression lines, only 20.4% of the abnormal embryos did not complete fertilization, with 12.2% of the abortions occurring during early embryo development, while most of the aborted embryos appeared in the filling period (Supple. Fig. 5). These results indicated that OsMND1 overexpression played an important role in reducing the early embryo abortion ratio led by sterile pollen and unsuccessful fertilization. The abnormal embryo development schedule was also analyzed at different stages in HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi-expressing lines. The unsuccessful fertilization of HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi lines was the main reason for abnormal embryo formation, with a frequency of almost 70.7%, which was markedly higher than that in HN2026-4x. These observations implied that the low seed set rate of HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi was affected by OsMND1’s functional interference.

Fig. 2

The OsMND1-expression level affected pollen fertility and viability (Bar = 100 µm) (n = 30 × 5 independent biological replicates: all samples were tested in five independent experiments with each included 30 rice plants). a1 Pollen of Balilla-4x stained by I2-KI. a2 Pollen of Balilla-4x stained by FDA. a3 Pollen of the OsMND1 over-expression Balilla-4x line stained by I2-KI. a4 Pollen of the OsMND1 over-expression Balilla-4x line stained by FDA. b1 Pollen of HN2026-4x stained by I2-KI. b2 Pollen of HN2026-4x stained by FDA. b3 Pollen of OsMND1 RNAi HN2026-4x stained by I2-KI b4 Pollen of OsMND1 RNAi HN2026-4x stained by FDA. c The OsMND1-expression level affected pollen fertility. d The OsMND1-expression level affected pollen viability. B-CK Balilla-4x; B-O Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression; HN-CK HN2026-4x; HN-RNAi HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi

OsMND1 functioned in regulating pollen development

To elucidate why OsMND1 improved the pollen development, the microstructure of pollen of Balilla-4x-OsMND1 overexpression lines and wild type lines were studied. Pollen fertility was increased significantly because of OsMND1 overexpression in Balilla-4x lines with low seed set rates. In the wild type line, without the PMeS background, before meiosis (Fig. 3a) and the MMC (megaspore mother cell) stage, the three cell wall layers and the tapetum of the anther formed successfully, but the four MMCs were non-uniform in size (Fig. 3b), and some of these collapsed when they were slightly more vacuolated. The MMC of the wild type shrunk and became a smaller size than those of the overexpression lines. Some of the MMCs began to disintegrate (Fig. 3c), and the tetrad of the wild type was separated from the tapetum (Fig. 3d). The single nucleus pollen shriveled and became abnormal in shape (Fig. 3i). The mature pollen was irregular and could not be stained by I–KI (Fig. 3k). However, in Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression lines, before meiosis (Fig. 3e), the three cell wall layers of the anther and the tapetum formed normally and were similar to those of the wild type. The four MMCs were similar in size with a normal shape (Fig. 3f), and the tetrad was closely linked with the tapetum (Fig. 3g, h). The single nucleus pollen began to accumulate starch and became crescent shaped (Fig. 3j). At the mature stage, pollen cells were round and filled with starch (Fig. 3m). These results suggested that OsMND1 overexpression improved the pollen fertility and viability by regulating pollen meiosis. To analyze the pollen development in OsMND1 RNAi lines, the microstructures of pollen in OsMND1 RNAi and wild type plants was studied in detail. OsMND1 RNAi impeded pollen development significantly. The pollen fertility decreased markedly due to the OsMND1 RNAi. No detectable difference was discovered between wild type and OsMND1 RNAi lines before meiosis or at the MMC stage (Fig. 4a, e, b, f), the three cell wall layers of the anther and tapetum formed successfully (Fig. 4b, f), but at the early stage of meiosis, the tapetum of the OsMND1 RNAi plant was swollen (Fig. 4g), while it was normal in the wild type (Fig. 4c). At the tetrad stage, the size of the tetrad was not uniform, and it was separated from the tapetum in the OsMND1 RNAi plants (Fig. 4h); however, the tetrad was closely connected to the tapetum in the wild type (Fig. 4d). Single nucleus-containing pollen in the OsMND1 RNAi plant was empty and irregular in shape (Fig. 4j, l), and the mature pollen as aberrant and wizened, with no abundant starch accumulation. Therefore, the fertility of this pollen was very low (Fig. 4n). The single nucleus-containing and mature pollen of the wild type were normal in shape and contained an abundant amount of starch (Fig. 4i, k, m).

Fig. 3

Transverse sectional analysis of the anther development of the Balilla-4x and the Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression lines (n = 20 × 5 independent biological replicates; all of the samples were tested in 5 independent experiments, each including 30 rice plants)Cross sections of Balilla-4x (a–d, I, and K) and B-O (Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression; e–h, j, l). a Three cell wall layers and the tapetum formed at the early pre-meiotic stage in Balilla-4x. b Different sized MMCs in Balilla-4x, arrow indicates the small cell, c Tetrad beginning to disintegrate (arrow) at the meiotic stage in Balilla-4x. d The tetrad separated from the tapetum gathered at the center in Balilla-4x. e Three cell wall layers and the tapetum formed at the early pre-meiotic stage in B-O. f The four MMCs were of similar size with normal shapes in B-O. g The tetrad is closely linked with the thick tapetum in B-O. h The tetrad is still closely linked with the tapetum in B-O. i Abnormal vacuolated pollen in Balilla-4x. j Crescent-shaped normal pollen in B-O. k Sterile mature pollen in Balilla-4x. l Round pollen filled with starch in B-O. PMC, pollen mother cell; E epidermis; En endothecium; ML middle layer; T tapetum; Ms microsporocyte; Tds tetrads; Msp microspore. Bars = 25 µm

Fig. 4

OsMND1 RNAi impeded pollen development. (n = 20 × 5 independent biological replicates; all of the samples were tested in 5 independent experiments, each including 30 rice plants) Transverse sections of HN2026-4x (a–d, I, K, and M) and HN2026-4x RNAi (e–h, j, l, n). a The three cell wall layers formed at the early pre-meiotic stage in HN2026-4x. b The tapetum formed successfully at the MMC stage in HN2026-4x. c The tapetum is normal at meiosis in HN2026-4x. d The tetrad (arrow head) connected with the tapetum in HN2026-4x. e The three cell wall layers formed at the early pre-meiotic stage in HN2026-4x RNAi. f The tapetum formed successfully at the MMC stage in HN2026-4x RNAi. g At the early stage of meiosis, the tapetum was swollen in HN2026-4x RNAi. h The tetrad separated from the tapetum in HN2026-4x RNAi. i Normal pollen at the vacuolated stage in HN2026-4x. j Irregular shaped pollen (arrow head) in HN2026-4x RNAi at the vacuolated stage. k Round and normal pollen in HN2026-4x. l Irregular pollen degrading (arrow head) in HN2026-4x RNAi. m Round mature pollen with starch in HN2026-4x. n Aberrant mature pollen lacking abundant starch accumulation in HN2026-4x RNAi. E epidermis; En endothecium; ML middle layer; T tapetum

OsMND1 functioned in maintaining meiotic stability in rice

Normal Balilla-4x is a non-PMeS background line, and the meiotic disturbance leads to a drop in the seed set rate. To better understand the mechanism of male sterility in non-PMeS Balilla-4x, the chromosomal behavior in PMCs of Balilla-4x and B-O (Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression) were compared. In the wild type, the homologous chromosomes underwent pairing and synapsis at zygotene (Fig. 5a2), and at pachytene, the chromosomes continued to condense but showed more lines, leading to an abnormal chromosome state (Fig. 5b2). In the subsequent diakinesis stage (Fig. 5c2), many univalents, trivalents, and even multivalents appeared. Each cell had an average of 1.25 univalents and 0.25 trivalents, resulting in the presence of lagging chromosomes at anaphase I (Figs. 5d2, 7b, 5e2) and anaphase II (Fig. 5h2), and lagging chromosomes were found in almost 46.81% of the whole cells (Supple. Table 3). In an OsMND1 overexpression Balilla-4x line, chromosomes condensed normally at zygotene (Fig. 5a1) and homologous chromosomes began to pair and synapsis (Fig. 5b1) at pachytene. At diakinesis (Fig. 5c1) normal chromosome segregation occurred and bivalent or quadrivalent structures appeared, with each cell having only an average of 0.06 univalents and 0.02 trivalents, which was beneficial to normal chromosome behavior at metaphase I (Fig. 5d1; Fig. 7b), anaphase I (Fig. 5e1–g1), and anaphase II (Fig. 5h1), and only 23.91% of the checked cells had lagging chromosomes. This was amended significantly compared with the wild type Balilla-4x (Supple. Table 3). However, no visible difference could be found in the second division (Fig. 5i1, i2), and the four sister cells formed (Fig. 5j1, j2).

Fig. 5

OsMND1 overexpression affected the behavior of chromosomes in meiosis. (n = 20 × 5 independent biological replicates; all of the samples were tested in 5 independent experiments, each including 30 rice plants) Male meiocyte meiotic analysis of Balilla-4x (a2–j2) and B-O (Balilla-4x OsMND1 over-expression: a1–j1). a1 Chromosomes condensed normally at zygotene. a2 The homologous chromosomes underwent pairing and synapsis at zygotene in Balilla-4x. b1 Homologous chromosomes began to pair and synapsis at pachytene in B-O. b2 At pachytene the tangled chromosomes (arrow) appeared confused in Balilla-4x. c1 Normal chromosome segregation and bivalent or quadrivalent structures appeared at diakinesis in B-O. c2 Many univalents, trivalents, and even multivalents (arrow) appeared at diakinesis in Balilla-4x. d1 Metaphase I, chromosomes arrayed on a line in B-O. d2 Lagging chromosomes (arrow) discovered in Balilla-4x. e1 Chromosomes undergo equal division at anaphase I in B-O. e2 Unequal division with many lagging chromosomes (arrow) at anaphase I in Balilla-4x. f1 Preparing for the first division at anaphase I in B-O. f2 Preparing for the first division at anaphase I in Balilla-4x. g1 Prophase I with two cells in B-O. g2 Prophase I with two cells in Balilla-4x. h1 Metaphase II, two sister cells form equally in B-O. h2 Two sister cells form with lagging chromosomes in Balilla-4x. i1 Second division in B-O. i2 Second division in Balilla-4x. j1 Four sister cells form a tetraspore in B-O. j2 Four sister cells formed in Balilla-4x. Bars = 10 µm

The aberrant kinetics of homologous chromosome in OsMND1 RNAi meiocytes was investigated. Meiosis in PMeS lines was relatively normal, and the seed set rate was very high. At zygotene, homologous chromosomes displayed successful pairing and synapsis in PMeS line HN2026-4x (Fig. 6a2). Homologous chromosomes were synapsed fully with the formation of the SC during pachytene (Fig. 6b2). By diakinesis (Fig. 6c2), chromosomes further condensed to produce very short chromosomal pairs. At metaphase I, chromosomes were in a line (Fig. 6d2) and no lagging chromosomes were discovered at anaphase I in HN2026-4x (Fig. 6e2), with each cell having an average of 1.25 univalents and 0.03 trivalents (Fig. 7a). Additionally, only 13.79% of the checked cells were found to have lagging chromosomes (Supple. Table 3). No visible differences were found during anaphase I and prophase II between HN2026-4x RNAi and HN2026-4x (Fig. 6f1, f2, g1, g2). The normal four sister cells were produced because of stable chromosomal behavior and consistent division in HN2026-4x (Fig. 6f2, g2, h2, i2). In HN2026-4x OsMND1-RNAi, signal lines that did not pair were observed at zygotene (Fig. 6a1). At pachytene (Fig. 6b1), chromosomes entwined excessively and showed more signal lines, indicating non-synaptic chromosomes. At diakinesis (Fig. 6c1), chromosomes connected to each other so that they could not spread out, and gathered in the center of the cell, with each cell having an average of 4.58 univalents and 0.62 trivalents (Fig. 7a). Then, at metaphase I (Fig. 6d1), anaphase I (Fig. 6e1, f1) lagging chromosomes appeared, and 51.22% of the checked cells had lagging chromosomes (Supple. Table 3). In addition, the division appeared slowly at anaphase II (Fig. 6i1), indicating that the division time was inconsistent. Prior to the four sister cells forming, abnormal cells were produce because of lagging chromosomes and inconsistent divisions (Fig. 6j1). These observations suggested that the effects of OsMND1 might be to maintain the balance of synapsis and recombination.

Fig. 6

OsMND1 RNAi affected the behavior of chromosomes during meiosis (n = 20 × 5 independent biological replicates; all of the samples were tested in five independent experiments, each including 30 rice plants) chromosomal behavior of HN2026-4x RNAi (a1–j1); HN2026-4x (a2–j2) male meiocytes at various stages. a1 Some signal lines are not pairing at zygotene in HN2026-4x RNAi. a2 Homologous chromosomes underwent pairing and synapsis at zygotene in HN2026-4x. b1 At pachytene, chromosomes entwined (arrow head) excessively in HN2026-4x RNAi, arrow indicates tangled area. b2 Homologous chromosomes are fully synapsed with the completion of the SC in HN2026-4x. c1 At diakinesis, arrow shows non-homologous chromosomes gathered together in HN2026-4x RNAi. c2 Chromosomes further condense to produce very short chromosomal pairs at diakinesis in HN2026-4x. d1 Lagging chromosomes (arrow head) appeared at anaphase I in HN2026-4x RNAi. d2 No lagging chromosomes at anaphase I in HN2026-4x. e1 Anaphase I with lagging chromosomes (arrow) in HN2026-4x RNAi. e2 Anaphase I with no lagging chromosomes in HN2026-4x. f1 Preparing for the first division at anaphase I in HN2026-4x RNAi. f2 Preparing for the first division at anaphase I in HN2026-4x. g1 Prophase II with two cells in HN2026-4x RNAi. g2 Prophase II with two cells in HN2026-4x. h1 The first division finished in HN2026-4x RNAi. h2 Metaphase II, the first division finished in HN2026-4x. i1 At anaphase II, the division is inconsistent in HN2026-4x RNAi, arrow head indicates late division. i2 At anaphase II, the division consistent in HN2026-4x. j1 Four sister cells form a tetraspore in HN2026-4x RNAi. j2 Four sister cells form a tetraspore in HN2026-4x. Bars = 10 µm

Fig. 7

OsMND1 affects the chromosomal behavior of pollen mother cells in meiotic prophase I (n = 30 × 5 independent biological replicates; all of the samples were tested in 5 independent experiments, each including 30 rice plants). a The chromosomal behavior of pollen mother cells in RNAi lines (HN-RNAi) compared with HN-CK (HN2026-4x). b The chromosomal behavior of OsMND1 in overexpression lines (B-O) compared with B-CK (Ballina-4x) PMCs: pollen mother cells; Mv: multivalent, means the association of more than four chromosomes; Qv quadrivalent IV; Tv trivalent; Bv bivalent; Uv univalent. B-CK Balilla-4x; B-O Balilla-4x OsMND1 overexpression; HN-CK HN2026-4x; HN-RNAi HN2026-4x OsMND1 RNAi

OsMND1 affected other meiosis-related gene expression levels

To understand why OsMND1 affects the dynamic behavior of meiosis and its signal transduction pathway, the key related genes, such as HOP2, DMC1, RAD51 and ZEP1 were investigated (Fig. 8). The qRT-PCR results indicated that the relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, and ZEP1 in OsMND1-overexpression lines were 4.36, 4.51, and 8.71 times higher than in the wild type, respectively; however, the expression level of RAD51 did not change significantly. In the OsMND1 RNAi lines, the relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, and ZEP1 were 0.46, 0.85, and 0.89 times than in the wild type, respectively, but unexpectedly the expression level of RAD51 increased markedly.

Fig. 8

OsMND1 overexpression and RNAi affect other meiosis-related gene expression levels. a The relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, RAD51, and ZEP1 in B-O (Balilla-4x overexpression line) compared with B-CK (Balilla-4x). b The relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, RAD51, and ZEP1 in H-RNAi (HN2026-4x RNAi) compared with H-CK (HN2026-4x)


The PMeS background plays a critical role in the stability of meiosis in polyploid rice

Because the gene duplications result in complicated chromosomal behaviors, most polyploid rice have disorganized meiosis, leading to a high frequency of abnormal pollen (Cai et al. 2007). The breeding of polyploid rice had no breakthroughs for a long time because of the low seed set rate. The discovery and application of PMeS materials played a pivotal role in addressing this problem (Cai et al. 2007; He et al. 2010). PMeS line HN2026-4x undergoes a normal meiosis, similar to that of its diploid, but Balilla-4x does not have the PMeS background. Thus, it has a low pollen fertility level and seed set rate because of the aberrant meiosis (He et al. 2010). Nevertheless, little is known about the meiotic stability-controlling mechanism of polyploid rice. Determining the meiotic mechanisms will be difficult until breakthroughs in PMeS line breeding have been realized (Cai et al. 2007; He et al. 2010).

Polyploidization is the multiplication of the whole chromosomal complement (Doyle et al. 2008; Leitch and Leitch 2008; Li et al. 2016b). The new polyploid has to be equipped with mechanisms enabling it to cope with the genomic stress of chromosomal doubling in the early stages of its formation to overcome reduced fitness and realize stability. The gradual stabilization of polyploids is thought to be associated with chromosomal DNA changes, and meiotic regulation for a balanced anaphase segregation is very important (Lukaszewski and Kopecky 2010; Grandont et al. 2013). Cytological diploidization has long been viewed as a critical step for polyploid speciation. This process is fundamentally different in autopolyploid and allopolyploid species (Cifuentes et al. 2010). Polyploid genomes face special challenges during meiosis that are solved by specific restrictions on the positions of crossover recombination events and, thus the positions of chiasmata. A critical feature is an increase in the effective distance of meiotic crossover interference (Bomblies et al. 2016). Recombination is a main mechanism generating diversity in all of the sexual organisms through crossovers (COs). The frequency of COs is thus a key factor in increasing the variability in natural populations and in breeding (Suay et al. 2014). However, the meiotic regulation of polyploid wheat and rape (Brassica spp.) has been studied for a long time and a degree of understanding has been achieved (Griffiths et al. 2006; Nicolas et al. 2009; Xin et al. 2016). Previous reports have indicated that changes in the ploidy level can be associated with an increase in the recombination rate, suggesting that this could be a general trend (Pecinka et al. 2011). The frequency of recombination is higher in auto- or allotetraploids than in diploids, and the same result was also reported in rape and in cotton (Gossypium spp.) (Pecinka et al. 2011). Ph1, the main locus responsible for the cytological diploidization of wheat (Griffiths et al. 2006; Greer et al. 2012) was shown to affect CO formation both between homeologs (Greer et al. 2012) and homologs (Lukaszewski and Kopecky 2010). This result was consistent with the general trend to improve the CO frequency in polyploid species, and the genome repeats contribute in different levels of CO suppression between homeologs in B. napus allohaploids (Suay et al. 2014). In the non-PMeS background Balilla-4x, the disturbance in meiosis decreased the seed set rate, with 46.81% of the whole cells containing lagging chromosomes. By contrast, the meiosis of PMeS is normal and relatively similar to that in its diploid, and the seed set rate is maintained. Until now, the control mechanisms of polyploid rice meiosis have been poorly understood, and we believe that PMeS rice has different control skills regarding the formation and repair of DSBs and interference from the non-PMeS background line. There will be much research activity in this field in the future.

OsMND1 regulates the early stage of meiosis

OsMND1, which is involved in rice meiosis, is the homologous gene of yeast MND1, and has high homology with the gene in Arabidopsis. MND1 plays an important role in homologous chromosome pairing, synapsis and recombination, but its function in rice is not understood. In the PMeS line HN2026-4x, OsMND1 was expressed mainly in meiotic spikes, and at the same time, OsMND1 was found to be expressed in roots and early stage embryos undergoing vigorous division. There were significant differences in the expression levels of OsMND1 in the diploid and polyploid meiotic spikes. OsMND1 expression level in the meiotic panicles of the PMeS line HN2026-4x was significantly higher than in the other non-PMeS line (Balilla-4x) or the diploid lines (HN2026-2x and Balilla-2x) (Supple. Fig. 3A). We will confirm whether OsMND1 plays roles both in meiosis and mitosis in the future. In this study, OsMND1-overexpression improved meiotic chromosomal behavior and pollen development of non-PMeS Balilla-4x with low seed set rate. However, OsMND1-RNAi led to unequal chromosome segregation and chromosomal lagging. Each cell of OsMND1-RNAi rice had an average of 4.58 univalents and 0.62 trivalents, leading to 51.22% of the cells having lagging chromosomes. The yeast mnd1 mutant is defective in meiotic inter-homolog interactions, and arrests in meiotic prophase I due to the activation of a DNA damage checkpoint. With most of the DSBs unrepaired, a low level of mature recombinants is produced and the meiotic nuclear division fails, resulting in defective SC formation (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002). These results confirmed that OsMND1 participated in the meiosis of polyploid rice and that the gene may play a role in the chromosomal recombination process at the early stage. These meiotic behavioral observations in OsMND1 overexpression and OsMND1-RNAi lines suggested that the effects of OsMND1 might be to maintain the balance of synapsis and recombination. The formation of COs exclusively between homologous chromosomes is very important, and reducing the number of CO guarantees correct chromosomal segregation (Pecinka et al. 2011). The AHP2 of Arabidopsis is homologous to S. cerevisiae’s HOP2 and S. pombe’s MEU13 (Nabeshima et al. 2001), which act in regulating homology between pairing partners, and their mutation leads to chromosomal fragmentation and unbalanced chromosome segregation during early meiosis (Schommer et al. 2003). We speculated that PMeS line HN2026-4x was bred in a different genetic background, which was considered as a distant hybridization offspring. Maybe this allopolyploid species inherited or evolved recombination-modifying loci that suppressed CO formation between the “homeologous chromosomes” inherited from the different parental species, and the loci regulated some basic mechanisms of chromosome recognition. Thus, we hypothesize that the PMeS background contributed to maintaining meiotic stability for polyploid rice and that OsMND1 plays a key role in regulating the recombination rate, the number of the COs and DSB repairs.

To compare the OsMND1 functions between diploid and polyloid, the seeding rates of the overexpression and RNAi lines in the diploid were identified and investigated (Supple. Figs. 6, 7; Supple. Table 4). OsMND1 overexpression in the diploid line (Balilla-2x) did not significantly affect the pollen fertility level and the seed set rate compared with the wild type. OsMND1 RNAi in the diploid line (HN2026-2x) significantly reduced the seed set rate to only between 11.50–31.43%, while it was 88.41% in the wild type (Supple. Figs. 6, 7). Intriguingly, the tiller number with OsMND1 overexpression in the diploid line (Balilla-2x) increased by 32% compared with the wild type. We will conduct further research in this area.

Coaction factor of OsMND1

MND1 and HOP2 are conserved proteins that form a complex by interacting with each other, and the HOP2/MND1 complex acts on the unstable interactions between intact DNA duplexes that occur prior to DSB induction (Nabeshima et al. 2001; Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002). The comparison suggests that HOP2 and MND1 affect recombination through a mechanism distinct from those of the RAD51 and DMC1 proteins (Tsubouchi and Roeder 2002; Lee et al. 2015). The HOP2/MND1 complex joins the meiotic homologous recombination, when the function of either MND1 or HOP2 is lost, which leads to unsuccessful DNA repair in Arabidopsis (Uanschou et al. 2013). RAD51-mediated IS repair is independent of HOP2/MND1 (Vignard et al. 2007; Uanschou et al. 2013). However, emerging evidence has revealed that HOP2/MND1 is expressed in somatic tissues in humans, and that it functions in conjunction with the Rad51 recombinase to repair damaged telomeres through the alternate mechanism of telomere lengthening (Zhao and Sung 2015). In our research, the qRT-PCR results indicated that the relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, and ZEP1 in OsMND1 overexpression lines were 4.36, 4.51, and 8.71 times those in wild type, respectively; however, the expression level of RAD51 did not change distinctly. The relative expression levels of HOP2, DMC1, and ZEP1 in the OsMND1 RNA lines were reduced significantly to 0.46, 0.85, and 0.89 times those in wild type, respectively. Unexpectedly, the expression level of RAD51 was markedly upregulated. This indicated that OsMND1 as a crucial player in establishing homologous chromosome pairs and in repairing meiotic DSBs, using the pathways of HOP2, DMC1, and ZEP1. Our outcome corroborated to some degree, those found in other organisms. We speculate that OsMND1 may play an essential role in the establishment of homologous chromosome pairing and in repairing meiotic DSBs through homologous chromosomes. MEICA1 interacts with TOP3α, which is essential for processing recombination intermediates and limiting meiotic crossover formation. Meiotic DSB formation is a key factor for chromosome associations in meica1. Furthermore, MEICA1 acts downstream of DMC1 (Hu et al. 2017). The detailed relationship between OsMND1 and MEICA1 is an interesting future topic. OsMND1 is expressed in pollen and root, and we hypothesize that OsMND1 may have roles in the regulation of both meiosis and mitosis. This hypothesis needs to be studied in the future. However, DMC1 only functions in meiosis. According to our results, OsMND1 is expressed in the anther, root, and embryo, but in Arabidopsis, it is only expressed in meiosis. Thus, we speculate that MND1 in rice may have different functions.

Polyploidy may confer a new degree of plasticity to an organism, although polyploidization may also confer unstable meiotic challenges (Chen 2010; Hollister et al. 2012). Rice is considered as an ancient aneuploidy (Vandepoele et al. 2003), and polyploidy has tremendous advantages in yield and stress resistance (Zhang et al. 2015). The extensive application of PMeS lines in polyploid rice breeding has great potential. How duplicated gene(s) can affect rice meiosis and the pollen development pattern could be interesting for biological and agricultural applications. Solving the mechanism of meiosis in PMeS rice requires more integrative research.



This project was supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 31270356, 31271690, and 31571639), 2017 Hubei Science and Technology Department Innovation Team 2017 (CFA023), 2016 Wuhan Yellow Crane Talents (science) Foundation, and SRF for ROCS, SEM (2015-1098). We thank International Science Editing ( for editing this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Yuguo Xiong and Lu Gan contributed equally to this paper, and cooperated to perform all of the experiments. Yaping Hu completed the gene cloning and vector construction. Wenchao Sun, Xue Zhou, Jinming Zhang, and Bo Peng contributed to making figures and tables. Zhaojian Song and Xianhua Zhang were responsible for plant materials and nursery maintenance. Yang Li, Zhifan Yang, and Weifeng Xu provided important guidance for molecular experiments and data analyses. Jianhua Zhang provided many suggestions and revised the manuscript. Yuchi He and Detian Cai cooperated to design the research and write the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10725_2019_476_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 26579 KB)


  1. Bomblies K, Higgins JD, Yant L (2015) Meiosis evolves: adaptation to external and internal environments. New Phytol 208:306–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bomblies K, Jones G, Franklin C, Zickler D, Kleckner N (2016) The challenge of evolving stable polyploidy: could an increase in “cross over interference distance” play a central role? Chromosoma 125:287–300. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugreev DV, Huang F, Mazina OM, Pezza RJ, Voloshin ON, Cameriniotero RD, Mazin AV (2014) Hop2-mnd1 modulates rad51 binding to nucleotides and DNA. Nat Commun 5:4198–4198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai DT, Chen JG, Chen DL, Dai BC, Zhang W, Song ZJ, Yang ZF, Du CQ, Tang ZQ, He YC, Zhang DS, He GC, Zhang YG (2007) The breeding of two polyploid rice lines with the characteristic of polyploid meiosis stability. Sci China Life Sci 50:356–366. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen ZJ (2010) Molecular mechanisms of polyploidy and hybrid vigor. Trends Plant Sci 5:57–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen RZ, Zhao X, Shao Z, Wei Z, Wang YY, Zhu LL, Zhao J, Sun MX, He RF, He GC (2007) Rice UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase1 is essential for pollen callose deposition and its cosuppression results in a new type of thermosensitive genic male sterility. Plant Cell 19:847–861. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng ZK (2013) Analyzing meiotic chromosomes in rice. Methods Mol Biol 990:125–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi P, San FJ, Sehorn MG, Petukhova GV, Sung P (2007) Bipartite stimulatory action of the Hop2–Mnd1 complex on the Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev 21:1747–1757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cifuentes M, Grandont L, Moore G, Chevre MA, Jenczewski E (2010) Genetic regulation of meiosis in polyploid species: new insights into an old question. New Phytol 186:29–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cloud V, Chan YL, Grubb J, Budke B, Bishop DK (2012) Rad51 is an accessory factor for Dmc1-mediated joint molecule formation during meiosis. Science 337:1222–1225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doyle JJ, Flagel LE, Paterson AH, Rapp RA, Soltis DE, Wendel JF (2008) Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annu Rev Genet 42:443–461. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eckardt NA (2000) Sequencing the rice genome. Plant Cell 12:2011–2017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grandont L, Jenczewski E, Lloyd A (2013) Meiosis and its deviations in polyploid plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 140:171–184. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray S, Cohen PE (2016) Control of meiotic crossovers: from double-strand break formation to designation. Annu Rev Genet 50:175–210. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greer E, Martín AC, Pendle A, Colas I, Jones AM, Moore G, Shaw P (2012) The Ph1 locus suppresses Cdk2-type activity during premeiosis and meiosis in wheat. Plant Cell 24:152–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G (2006) Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439:749–752. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He YC, He YQ, Qu LH, Sun MX, Yang HY (2007) Tobacco zygotic embryogenesis in vitro: the original cell wall of the zygote is essential for maintenance of cell polarity, the 2 apical–basal axis and typical suspensor formation. Plant J 49:515–527. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He YC, Wei Q, Ge J, Jiang AM, Gan L, Song ZJ, Cai DT (2010) Genome duplication effects on pollen development and the interrelated physiological substances in tetraploid rice with polyploid meiosis stability. Planta 232:1219–1228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollister JD, Arnold BJ, Svedin E, Xue KS, Dilkes BP, Bomblies K (2012) Genetic adaptation associated with genome-doubling in autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa. PLoS Genet 12:1–10. Google Scholar
  20. Hu Q, Li YF, Wang HJ, Shen Y, Zhang C, Du GJ, Tang D, Cheng ZK (2017) MEICA 1 (meiotic chromosome association 1) interacts with TOP3α and regulates meiotic recombination in rice. Plant Cell 29:1697–1708. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang HA, Shin HC, Kalantzi AS, Toseland CP, Kim HM, Gruber S, Peraro MD, Oh BH (2015) Crystal structure of Hop2-Mnd1 and mechanistic insights into its role in meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 43:3841–3856. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Keeney S (2001) Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 52:1–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee JY, Terakawa T, Qi Z, Steinfeld JB, Redding S, Kwon Y, Gaines WA, Zhao W, Sung P, Greene EC (2015) DNA recombination. Base triplet stepping by the Rad51/RecA family of recombinases. Science 349:977–981. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2008) Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320:481–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Heyer WD (2008) Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance. Cell Res 18:99–113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li J, Krichevsky A, Vaidya M, Tzfira T, Citovsky V (2005) Uncoupling of the functions of the Arabidopsis vip1 protein in transient and stable plant genetic transformation by agrobacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:5733–5738. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Defoort J, Tasdighian S, Maere S, Van de Peer Y, Smet RD (2016a) Gene duplicability of core genes is highly consistent across all angiosperms. Plant Cell 28:326–344. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li X, Shahid MQ, Wu JW, Wang L, Liu XD, Lu YG (2016b) Go to: comparative small RNA analysis of pollen development in autotetraploid and diploid rice. Int J Mol Sci 17:499–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu YM, Zhao ZF, Wei G, Zhang P, Lan H, Zhang SZ, Li C, Cao MJ (2018) Characterization of the ZmbHLH122 transcription factor and its potential collaborators in maize male reproduction. Plant Growth Regul 85:113. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lukaszewski AJ, Kopecky D (2010) The Ph1 locus from wheat controls meiotic chromosome pairing in autotetraploid rye (Secale cereale L). Cytogenet Genome Res 129:117–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo Q, Li YF, Shen Y, Cheng ZK (2014) Ten years of gene discovery for meiotic event control in rice. J Genet Gemnomics 41:125–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mercier R, Grelon M (2008) Meiosis in plants: ten years of gene discovery. Cytogenet Genome Res 120:281–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nabeshima K, Kakihara Y, Hiraoka Y, Nojima H (2001) A novel meiosis-specific protein of fission yeast, Meu13p, promotes homologous pairing independently of homologous recombination. EMBO J 14:3871–3881. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nicolas SD, Leflon M, Monod H, Eber F, Coriton O, Huteau V, Chevre AM, Jenczewski E (2009) Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids. Plant Cell 21:373–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nishizawa-Yokoi A, Nonaka S, Saika H, Kwon YI, Osakabe K, Toki S (2012) Suppression of Ku70/80 or Lig4 leads to decreased stable transformation and enhanced homologous recombination in rice. New Phytol 196:1048–1059. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nonomura KI, Nakano M, Fukuda T, Eiguchi M, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Kurata N (2004) The novel gene homologous pairing aberration in rice meiosis1 of rice encodes a putative coiled-coil protein required for homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. Plant Cell 16:1008–1020. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ogawa T, Yu X, Shinohara A, Egelman EH (1993) Similarity of the yeast RAD51 filament to the bacterial RecA filament. Science 259:1896–1899. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osman K, Higgins JD, Sanchez-Moran E, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FC (2011) Pathways to meiotic recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 190:523–544. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pecinka A, Fang W, Rehmsmeier M, Levy AA, Scheid OM (2011) Polyploidization increases meiotic recombination frequency in Arabidopsis. BMC Biol 9:1–7. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Petukhova GV, Pezza RJ, Vanevski F, Ploquin M, Masson JY, Camerini-Otero RD (2005) The Hop2 and Mnd1 proteins act in concert with Rad51 and Dmc1 in meiotic recombination. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12:449–453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pezza RJ, Voloshin ON, Vanevski F, Camerini-Otero RD (2007) Hop2/Mnd1 acts on two critical steps in Dmc1-promoted homologous pairing. Genes Dev 21:1758–1766. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rampler E, Stranzl T, Orban-Nemeth Z, Hollenstein DM, Hudecz O, Schlögelhofer P, Mechtler K (2015) Comprehensive cross-linking mass spectrometry reveals parallel orientation and flexible conformations of plant HOP2-MND1. J Proteome Res 14:5048–5062. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schommer C, Beven A, Lawrenson T, Shaw P, Sablowski R (2003) AHP2 is required for bivalent formation and for segregation of homologous chromosomes in Arabidopsis meiosis. Plant J 36:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Storme ND, Geelen D (2013) Sexual polyploidization in plants—cytological mechanisms and molecular regulation. New Phytol 198:670–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suay L, Zhang DS, Eber F, Jouy H, Lode M, Huteau V, Coriton O, Szadkowski E, Leflon M, Martin O, Falque L, Jenczewski E, Paillard S, Chèvre AM (2014) Crossover rate between homologous chromosomes and interference are regulated by the addition of specific unpaired chromosomes in Brassica. New Phytol 201:645–656. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tian Y, Yang H, Zhang HW, Dai Q, Fang J, Qing XG, Lu XY (2010) The molecular mechanisms of male reproductive organogenesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Growth Regul 61:11–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tsubouchi H, Roeder GS (2002) The Mnd1 protein forms a complex with Hop2 To promote homologous chromosome pairing and meiotic double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 9:3078–3088. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Uanschou C, Ronceret A, VonHarder M, DeMuyt A, Vezon D, Pereira L, Chelysheva L, Kobayashi W, Kurumizaka H, Schlogelhofer P, Grelon M (2013) Sufficient amounts of functional HOP2/MND1 complex promote interhomolog DNA repair but are dispensable for intersister DNA repair during meiosis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25:4924–4940. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Peer YVD (2003) Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids. Plant Cell 15:2192–2202. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vignard J, Siwiec T, Chelysheva L, Vrielynck N, Gonord F, Armstrong SJ, Schlögelhofer P, Mercier R (2007) The interplay of RecA-related proteins and the MND1-HOP2 complex during meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Genet 3:1894–1906. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xin Q, Shen Y, Li X, Lu W, Wang X, Han X, Dong FM, Wan LL, Yang GS, Hong DF, Cheng ZK (2016) MS5 mediates early meiotic progression and its natural variants may have applications for hybrid production in Brassica napus. Plant Cell 28:1263–1278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yan HM, Song YC, Li LJ, Bi XZ, Fu BY (1998) Physical location of rice Pi-5(t), Glh and RTSV genes by ISH of BAC clones. Wuhan Univ J Natl Sci 3:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yu HX, Wang M, Tang D, Chen FL, Zhang CQ, Gong ZY, Gu MH, Cheng ZK (2010) OsSPO11-1 is essential for both homologous chromosome pairing and crossover formation in rice. Chromosoma 119:625–636. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang J, Liu Y, Xia EH, Yao QY, Liu XD, Gao LZ (2015) Autotetraploid rice methylome analysis reveals methylation variation of transposable elements and their effects on gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7022–7029. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhao WX, Sung P (2015) Significance of ligand interactions involving Hop2-Mnd1 and the RAD51 and DMC1 recombinases in homologous DNA repair and XX ovarian dysgenesis. Nucleic Acids Res 43:4055–4066. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Green Transformation of Bio-Resources, School of Life SciencesHubei UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering, School of Life SciencesHubei UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Wuhan Polylpoid Biology Technology Limited CompanyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  5. 5.School of Chemistry and Environmental EngineeringHanjiang Normal UniversityShiyanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations