Effects of co-inoculation of two different plant growth-promoting bacteria on duckweed
- 286 Downloads
Aseptic Lemna minor was soaked for 4 h in pond water where wild L. minor was naturally flourishing. Seven of the eight surface-colonizing bacterial strains were found capable of promoting the growth of L. minor. This high appearance of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) suggests that association of environmental bacteria is generally beneficial rather than harmful for host plants. One of the PGPB, Pseudomonas sp. Ps6, enhanced the growth of L. minor by 2–2.5-fold in 10 days. This activity was higher than that previously reported for Acinetobacter calcoaceticus P23, which enhanced growth of L. minor by 1.5–2-fold. Ps6 mostly adhered to and colonized the root rather than the frond, a leaf-like structure of duckweed where P23 preferentially adheres. It was expected that these two strains can share niches, coexist, and enhance the growth of duckweed additively upon co-inoculation. However, contrary to expectation, the growth of L. minor was enhanced by only 2.3-fold by co-inoculation of these two bacteria. P23 lowered the initial adhesion of Ps6 cells by 98.2% on the fronds and by 79.5% on the roots. However, initial adhesion of P23 cells to the roots increased dramatically, by 47.2-fold, following co-inoculation with Ps6. However, the number of P23 cells decreased dramatically to 0.7% on the root and to 3.6% on the frond after 10 days, whereas Ps6 cells increased by 12.5-fold on the frond and kept 69% on the root, thereby eventually restoring the population on the plant surfaces. Because duckweed is the fastest growing vascular plant and it is easy to grow an aseptic and axenic plant, the duckweed/bacteria co-culture system will be a model platform for studying multiple interactions among host plants and the associated bacteria.
KeywordsLemna minor Plant growth-promoting bacteria Acinetobacter Pseudomonas Three-way symbiosis
Plant growth-promoting bacteria
We are thankful to Dr. Kyoko Miwa (Hokkaido University) for her critical reading of our manuscript and a number of helpful suggestions. This study was supported by the Advanced Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program (ALCA) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Grant Number JPMJAL1108, Kobayashi International Scholarship Foundation, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant Number 16K14844.
YY, RJ, and MM conceived and designed the research. YY performed most of the experiments with the help of RJ. YY and MM interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. RJ revised the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
- Appenroth K-J, Ziegler P, Sree KS (2016) Duckweed as a model organism for investigating plant-microbe interactions in an aquatic environment and its applications. Endocytobiosis Cell Res 27:94–106Google Scholar
- Cheng JJ, Stomp A-M (2009) Growing duckweed to recover nutrients from wastewaters and for production of fuel ethanol and animal feed. Clean 37:17–26Google Scholar
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (2011) Agricultural statistics 2011. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. ISBN 978-0-16-090545-2Google Scholar
- Sundara Rao WVB, Sinha MK (1963) Phosphate dissolving organisms in the soil and rhizosphere. Ind J Agric Sci 33:272–278Google Scholar
- Toyama T, Kuroda M, Ogata Y, Hachiya Y, Quach A, Tokura K, Tanaka Y, Mori M, Morikawa M, Ike M (2017b) Enhanced biomass production of duckweeds by inoculating a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus P23, in sterile medium and non-sterile environmental waters. Water Sci Technol 76:1418–1428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar