Advertisement

Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 86, Issue 2, pp 195–210 | Cite as

Comparison on physiological adaptation and phosphorus use efficiency of upland rice and lowland rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation

  • Tao Song
  • Feiyun Xu
  • Wei Yuan
  • Yingjiao Zhang
  • Tieyuan Liu
  • Moxian Chen
  • Qijuan Hu
  • Yuan Tian
  • Weifeng Xu
  • Jianhua Zhang
Original paper
  • 218 Downloads

Abstract

As one of the most widely promoted water-saving irrigation strategies for rice, alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD) can not only save water but also increase mineral nutrient use efficiency. In this study, we compared the growth conditions of four rice varieties (two lowland and two upland varieties) under three irrigation regimes: continuously flooded (CF), alternate wetting and moderate soil drying (AWD15) and alternate wetting and severe soil drying (AWD30). AWD15 and AWD30 enabled the plants to receive fewer irrigation events and less irrigation water than CF, thereby saving both water resources and labor. AWD15 reduced redundant vegetative growth, promoted root growth, and increased the root-shoot ratio and harvest index. AWD15 increased the grain yield, water use efficiency (WUE) and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) of upland rice and maintained the grain yield while increasing the WUE and PUE of lowland rice. More developed root systems under AWD helped upland rice to maintain a higher water status than lowland rice when plants were subjected to soil drying, which resulted in superior performance in grain yield in upland rice. AWD30 could not reconcile the demands of higher yield and the desire to reduce irrigation water use because it decreased grain yield. The results indicate that AWD15 irrigation of rice can not only increase rice yield and WUE but also enhance PUE, which can potentially reduce the use of phosphorus fertilizers. The results provide theoretical and technical support for improving rice cultivation.

Keywords

Water use efficiency Phosphorus use efficiency Root growth traits Water-efficient irrigation Root oxidation activity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31761130073), Research Grant of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (KXGH17005), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622801), Shenzhen Overseas Talents Innovation and Entrepreneurship Funding Scheme (The Peacock Scheme, KQTD201101) and Hong Kong Research Grant Council (AoE/M-05/12, AoE/M-403/16, CUHK14122415, 14160516, 14177617).

Author contributions

JZ and WX designed experiments. TS, FX, WY, YZ, TL, MC, QH and YT performed experiments. TS, FX, WY and YZ analysed data. JZ, WX, TS, FX, WY and YZ wrote the manuscript. JZ and WX critically commented and revised it.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Belder P et al (2004) Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowland conditions in Asia. Agric Water Manag 65:193–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch H (1958) The effect of soil drying on humus decomposition and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 10:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwell MSA, Brookes PC, de la Fuente-Martinez N, Murray PJ, Snars KE, Williams JK, Haygarth PM (2009) Effects of soil drying and rate of re-wetting on concentrations and forms of phosphorus in leachate. Biol Fertil Soils 45:635–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0375-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouman BAM, Tuong TP (2001) Field water management to save water and increase its productivity in irrigated lowland rice. Agric Water Manag 49:11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bünemann E, Keller B, Hoop D, Jud K, Boivin P, Frossard E (2013) Increased availability of phosphorus after drying and rewetting of a grassland soil: processes and plant use. Plant Soil 370:511–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butterly CR, Bünemann EK, McNeill AM, Baldock JA, Marschner P (2009) Carbon pulses but not phosphorus pulses are related to decreases in microbial biomass during repeated drying and rewetting of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1406–1416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabangon R, Castillo E, Tuong T (2011) Chlorophyll meter-based nitrogen management of rice grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Field Crops Res 121:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cock J, Yoshida S, Forno DA (1976) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper J, Lombardi R, Boardman D, Carliell-Marquet C (2011) The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves. Resour Conserv Recycl 57:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das S, Chou M-L, Jean J-S, Liu C-C, Yang H-J (2016) Water management impacts on arsenic behavior and rhizosphere bacterial communities and activities in a rice agro-ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 542:642–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhillon J, Torres G, Driver E, Figueiredo B, Raun WR (2017) World phosphorus use efficiency in cereal crops. Agron J 109:1670–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dodd IC, Puértolas J, Huber K, Pérez-Pérez JG, Wright HR, Blackwell MS (2015) The importance of soil drying and re-wetting in crop phytohormonal and nutritional responses to deficit irrigation. J Exp Bot 66:2239–2252Google Scholar
  13. Fageria N (2003) Plant tissue test for determination of optimum concentration and uptake of nitrogen at different growth stages in lowland rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fageria N, Santos A, Heinemann A (2011) Lowland rice genotypes evaluation for phosphorus use efficiency in tropical lowland. J Plant Nutr 34:1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng L, Bouman B, Tuong T, Cabangon R, Li Y, Lu G, Feng Y (2007) Exploring options to grow rice using less water in northern China using a modelling approach: I. Field experiments and model evaluation. Agric Water Manag 88:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong Y, Guo Z, He L, Li J (2011) Identification of maize genotypes with high tolerance or sensitivity to phosphorus deficiency. J Plant Nutr 34:1290–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GRiSP (ed) (2013) Rice almanac. 4th edn. International Rice Research Institute, Los BaňosGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerra LC (1998) Producing more rice with less water from irrigated systems, vol 5. IWMI, ColomboGoogle Scholar
  19. Haygarth P, Hepworth L, Jarvis S (1998) Forms of phosphorus transfer in hydrological pathways from soil under grazed grassland Eur J Soil Sci 49:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heffer P, Prud homme M, Muirheid B, Isherwood K (2006) Phosphorus fertilisation: issues and outlook. Proceedings-international fertiliser society, IFS, 1999Google Scholar
  21. Iovieno P, Bååth E (2008) Effect of drying and rewetting on bacterial growth rates in soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:400–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarvis P et al (2007) Drying and wetting of Mediterranean soils stimulates decomposition and carbon dioxide emission: the “Birch effect”. Tree Physiol 27:929–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jeong K (2016) Phosphorus remobilization during grain filling in rice, PhD thesis. Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW.Google Scholar
  24. Kukal S, Aggarwal G (2003) Puddling depth and intensity effects in rice–wheat system on a sandy loam soil: I. Development of subsurface compaction. Soil Tillage Res 72:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luo L (2010) Breeding for water-saving and drought-resistance rice (WDR) in China. J Exp Bot 61:3509–3517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Luo L, Mei H, Yu X, Liu H, Feng F (2011) Water-saving and drought-resistance rice and its development strategy. Chin Sci Bull 56:804–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mao Z (2001) Water efficient irrigation and environmentally sustainable irrigated rice production in China. Int Comm Irrig Drain. http://www.icid.org/watmao.pdf
  28. Matsuo N, Mochizuki T (2009) Growth and yield of six rice cultivars under three water-saving cultivations. Plant Prod Sci 12:514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McNeill A, Sparling G, Murphy D, Braunberger P, Fillery I (1998) Changes in extractable and microbial C, N, and P in a Western Australian wheatbelt soil following simulated summer rainfall. Soil Res 36:841–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mishra H, Rathore T, Pant R (1990) Effect of intermittent irrigation on groundwater table contribution, irrigation requirement and yield of rice in Mollisols of the Tarai region. Agric Water Manag 18:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng S, Bouman B (2007) Prospects for genetic improvement to increase lowland rice yields with less water and nitrogen. Frontis 21:249–264Google Scholar
  33. Ramasamy S, Ten Berge H, Purushothaman S (1997) Yield formation in rice in response to drainage and nitrogen application. Field Crops Res 51:65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richards M, Sander BO (2014) Alternate wetting and drying in irrigated rice. http://hdl.handle.net/10568/35402
  35. Richardson AE et al (2011) Plant and microbial strategies to improve the phosphorus efficiency of agriculture. Plant Soil 349:121–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rijsberman FR (2006) Water scarcity: fact or fiction? Agric Water Manag 80:5–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Roberts T, Stewart W (2002) Inorganic phosphorus and potassium production and reserves. Better Crops 86:6–7Google Scholar
  38. Sandhu B, Khera K, Prihar S, Singh B (1980) Irrigation needs and yield of rice on a sandy-loam soil as affected by continuous and intermittent submergence. Indian J Agric Sci 50:492–496Google Scholar
  39. Smil V (2000) Phosphorus in the environment: natural flows and human interferences. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:53–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sun Y et al (2012) The effects of different water and nitrogen managements on yield and nitrogen use efficiency in hybrid rice of China. Field Crops Res 127:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tabbal D, Bouman B, Bhuiyan S, Sibayan E, Sattar M (2002) On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice; case studies in the Philippines. Agric Water Manag 56:93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tuong T, Bouman B, Mortimer M (2005) More rice, less water-integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Prod Sci 8:231–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner BL, Baxter R, Whitton BA (2003) Nitrogen and phosphorus in soil solutions and drainage streams in Upper Teesdale, northern England: implications of organic compounds for biological nutrient limitation. Sci Total Environ 314–316:153–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00101-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Vance CP (2001) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and phosphorus acquisition. Plant nutrition in a world of declining renewable resources. Plant Physiol 127:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang L, Chen F, Zhang F, Mi G (2010) Two strategies for achieving higher yield under phosphorus deficiency in winter wheat grown in field conditions. Field Crops Res 118:36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Z, Zhang W, Beebout SS, Zhang H, Liu L, Yang J, Zhang J (2016) Grain yield, water and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice as influenced by irrigation regimes and their interaction with nitrogen rates. Field Crops Res 193:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang K et al (2017) Low straw phosphorus concentration is beneficial for high phosphorus use efficiency for grain production in rice recombinant inbred lines. Field Crops Res 203:65–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang J, Zhang J (2010) Crop management techniques to enhance harvest index in rice. J Exp Bot 61(12):3177–3189Google Scholar
  49. Yang J, Liu K, Wang Z, Du Y, Zhang J (2007) Water-saving and high-yielding irrigation for lowland rice by controlling limiting values of soil water potential. J Integr Plant Biol 49:1445–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yao F et al (2012) Agronomic performance of high-yielding rice variety grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Field Crops Res 126:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yue B et al (2006) Genetic basis of drought resistance at reproductive stage in rice: separation of drought tolerance from drought avoidance. Genetics 172:1213–1228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang H, Xue Y, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J (2009) An alternate wetting and moderate soil drying regime improves root and shoot growth in rice. Crop Sci 49:2246–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang H, Chen T, Wang Z, Yang J, Zhang J (2010) Involvement of cytokinins in the grain filling of rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. J Exp Bot 61:3719–3733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tao Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • Feiyun Xu
    • 3
  • Wei Yuan
    • 3
  • Yingjiao Zhang
    • 3
  • Tieyuan Liu
    • 1
  • Moxian Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Qijuan Hu
    • 2
  • Yuan Tian
    • 2
    • 5
  • Weifeng Xu
    • 3
  • Jianhua Zhang
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Life Sciences and State Key Laboratory of AgrobiotechnologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongChina
  2. 2.Shenzhen Research InstituteThe Chinese University of Hong KongShenzhenChina
  3. 3.Center for Plant Water-use and Nutrition Regulation and College of Life Sciences, Joint International Research Laboratory of Water and Nutrient in Crop, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetic Breeding and Multiple Utilization of CropsFujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityFuzhouChina
  4. 4.Department of BiologyHong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongChina
  5. 5.State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life ScienceShandong Agricultural UniversityTaianChina

Personalised recommendations