Advertisement

Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 87, Issue 2, pp 329–339 | Cite as

Proteome analysis and phenotypic characterization of the lesion mimic mutant bspl in barley

  • Xiaoqin Zhang
  • Bin Tian
  • Yunxia Fang
  • Tao Tong
  • Junjun Zheng
  • Dawei XueEmail author
Original Paper
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

Characterization and molecular mechanism dissection for lesion-mimic mutation can help to gain an in-depth insight into regulatory mechanisms of programmed cell death in plants. In present study, the barley lesion mimic mutant bspl (barley spotted 1eaf) was used to investigate the formation of the bspl lesion mimic phenotype in barley using proteomics and quantitative real-time (qRT)-PCR techniques. The experiment showed that the formation of the bspl phenotype was directly related to light. Cell necrosis spontaneously formed in multiple parts of the leaf, and H2O2 accumulated continuously along with the formation of lesions. A total of 31 differentially expressed protein spots were identified using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry analysis of the expressed proteins between the bspl and the wild-type. These differentially expressed proteins are involved in different biological processes, mainly related to defense, photosynthesis, nitrogen acid metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism. The expression of 15 genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR, and the results showed that the transcription level was basically consistent with the change in the protein level. The decreased expression of ATPase β subunit, cytochrome B6-F complex, photosystem I reaction center subunit VI, and other proteins may lead to the blockage of electron transport during photosynthesis, leading to cell death. Moreover, the overexpression of chitinase, thaumatin-like protein, PR-1a and other proteins, and the increased expression of NADPH-thioredoxin reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase may increase the disease resistance and stress resistance of bspl. This study will provide a new insight into the molecular mechanism underlying bspl-induced cell death in plants.

Keywords

Barley Lesion mimic mutant Phenotype Proteome qRT-PCR 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by National Key Technology Research and Development Program (2015BAD01B02) to DX and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401316) to XZ. We would like to thank LetPub (http://www.letpub.com) for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Professor Longbiao Guo for improving English language.

Author contributions

DX and XZ conceived the research work. XZ, BT, YF, TT and JZ conducted experiments, and prepared the figures and tables. DX, XZ and BT wrote the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Badigannavar AM, Kale DM, Eapen S, Murty GS (2002) Inheritance of disease lesion mimic leaf trait in groundnut. Hered 93:50–52.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boussiba S, Rikin A, Richmond AE (1975) The role of abscisic acid in cross-adaptation of tobacco plants. Plant Physiol 56:337–339.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.56.2.337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, Simons G, Wolter M, Frijters A (1997) The barley mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell 88:695–705.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81912-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B (2004) Blue silver: a very sensitive colloidal coomassie g-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 25:1327–1333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.200305844 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen P, Hu H, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Dong G, Cui Y, Qian Q, Ren D, Guo L (2018a) Genetic analysis and fine-mapping of a new rice mutant, white and lesion mimic leaf1. Plant Growth Regul 85:425–435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-018-0403-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen G, Wang Y, Wang X, Yang Q, Quan X, Zeng J, Dai F, Zeng F, Wu F, Zhang G, Chen Z (2018b) Leaf epidermis transcriptome reveals drought-Induced hormonal signaling for stomatal regulation in wild barley. Plant Growth Regul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-018-0450-0 Google Scholar
  7. Cornelissen BJ, Hooft van Huijsduijnen RA, Van Loon LC, Bol JF (1986) Molecular characterization of messenger rnas for ‘pathogenesis related’ proteins la, lb and lc, induced by tmv infection of tobacco. EMBO J 5:37–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1986.tb04174.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dietrich RA, Delaney TP, Uknes SJ, Ward ER, Ryals JA, Dangl JL (1994) Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell 77:565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90218-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finnie C, Bakjensen KS, Laugesen S, Roepstorff P, Svensson B (2006) Differential appearance of isoforms and cultivar variation in protein temporal profiles revealed in the maturing barley grain proteome. Plant Sci 170:808–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fukayama H, Uchida N, Azuma T, Yasuda T (1996) Relationships between photosynthetic activity and the amounts of rubisco activase and rubisco in rice leaves from emergence through senescence. Jpn J Crop Sci 65:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ge C, Pan EZ, Jiang J, Zhang H, Zeng X, Dong D, Hu G, Xue J D (2015) Map-based cloning of a spotted-leaf mutant gene OsSL5 in Japonica rice. Plant Growth Regul 75:595–603.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-9962-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han XY, Yang Y, Chu-Lang YU, Zhang WH, Sheng-Hai YE, Chen B (2014) A proteomic study on a disease-resistance-enhanced rice lesion mimic mutant. Chin J of Rice Sci 28:559–569.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2014.06.001 Google Scholar
  13. Hinkle PC, Mccarty RE (1978) How cells make ATP. Sci Am 238:104.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0378-104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooft van Huijsduijnen RA, Cornelissen BJ, van Loon LC, van Boom JH, Tromp M, Bol JF (1985) Virus-induced synthesis of messenger rnas for precursors of pathogenesis-related proteins in tobacco. Embo J 4:2167.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1985.tb03911.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu G, Yalpani N, Briggs SP, Johal GS (1998) A porphyrin pathway impairment is responsible for the phenotype of a dominant disease lesion mimic mutant of maize. Plant Cell.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.10.7.1095 Google Scholar
  16. Kang SG, Bae H (2010) Proteome analysis and characterization of phenotypes of lesion mimic mutant spotted leaf 6 in rice. Proteomics 7:2447–2458.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kosslak RM, Dieter JR, Ruff RL, Chamberlin MA, Bowen BA, Palmer RG (1996) Partial resistance to root-borne infection by phytophthora sojae in three allelic necrotic root mutants in soybean. J Hered 87:415–422.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kristian Sass BJ, Sabrina L, Peter R, Birte S (2004) Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis pattern (ph6–11) and identification of water-soluble barley seed and malt proteins by mass spectrometry. Proteomics 4:728–742.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200300615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kruger NJ, Hammond JBW (1994) The bradford method for protein quantitation. Methods Mol Biol 32:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-268-X:9 Google Scholar
  20. Lim PO, Kim HJ, Nam HG (2007) Leaf senescence. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:115–136.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu S, Cheng Y, Zhang X, Guan Q, Nishiuchi S, Hase K (2007) Expression of an nadp-malic enzyme gene in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is induced by environmental stresses; over-expression of the gene in arabidopsis confers salt and osmotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 64:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-007-9133-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loon LC, Strien EA (1999) The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of pr-1 type proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 55:85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.1999.0213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CM (2006) Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:135–162.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorimer GH, Badger MR, Andrews TJ (1976) The activation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase by carbon dioxide and magnesium ions. equilibria, kinetics, a suggested mechanism, and physiological implications. Biochemistry 15: 529  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00648a012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lu L (1996) Chinese barley science. China Agriculture Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. Mei Y, Hai-Lan LI, Xie J (2007) Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (rubisco). Acta Phytophysiol Sin 78:155–162.  https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2007.02.054 Google Scholar
  27. Menubouaouiche L, Vriet C, Peumans WJ, Barre A, Van Damme EJ, Rougé P (2003) A molecular basis for the endo-β-1,3-glucanase activity of the thaumatin-like proteins from edible fruits. Biochimie 85:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00058-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miklis M, Consonni C, Bhat RA, Lipka V, Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R (2007) Barley mlo modulates actin-dependent and actin-independent antifungal defense pathways at the cell periphery. Plant Physiol 144:1132–1143.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.098897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Min K, Ha SC, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Yun DJ, Kim KK (2004) Crystal structure of osmotin, a plant antifungal protein. Proteins 54:170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muradov A, Petrasovits L, Davidson A, Scott KJ (1993) A cdna clone for a pathogenesis-related protein 1 from barley. Plant Mol Biol 23:439–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00029021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noctor G, Foyer CH (1998) Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Biol 49:249–279.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Osmond RI, Hrmova M, Fontaine F, Fincher GB (2001) Binding interactions between barley thaumatin-like proteins and (1,3)-β-D-glucans. Kinetics, specificity, structural analysis and biological implications. Eur J Biochem 268:4190–4199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robert N, Roche K, Lebeau Y, Breda C, Boulay M, Esnault R (2002) Expression of grapevine chitinase genes in berries and leaves infected by fungal or bacterial pathogens. Plant Sci 162:389–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00576-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schultheiss H, Dechert C, Király L, Fodor J, Michel K, Kogel KH (2003) Functional assessment of the pathogenesis-related protein pr-1b in barley. Plant Sci 165:1275–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00336-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shirano Y, Kachroo P, Shah J, Klessig DF (2002) A gain-of-function mutation in an arabidopsis toll interleukin1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell 14:3149–3162.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.005348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun Y, Wenyi LU, Zhang Y, Wang G, Sun J, Xue D (2014) Genetic and physiological analyses of barley lesion mimic mutant bspl. J Hangzhou Norm Univ 13:602–605.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-232X.2014.06.008 Google Scholar
  37. Tang S (2014) Study on the light adaptation of leaves in alternate breathing pathways. Dissertation/master’s thesis. Northwest Normal University, Lan ZhouGoogle Scholar
  38. Van LL, Rep M, Pieterse CM (2006) Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol 44:135–162.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang J, Ye B, Yin J, Yuan C, Zhou X, Li W (2015) Characterization and fine mapping of a light-dependent leaf lesion mimic mutant 1 in rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 97:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang F, Wu W, Wang D, Yang W, Sun J, Liu D (2016) Characterization and genetic analysis of a novel light-dependent lesion mimic mutant, lm3, showing adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in common wheat. PLoS ONE 11:e0155358.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wheeler GL, Jones MA, Smirnoff N (1998) The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin c in higher plants. Nature 393:365–369.  https://doi.org/10.1038/30728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang XT, Xiong YM (2005) The progress in studies of thioredoxin reductase. Foreign Med Sci-Sect Medgeogr 26:148–151Google Scholar
  43. Zhang XQ, Xue DW, Zhou WH, Fei-Bo WU, Zhang GP (2011) Screening and identification of the mutants from two-row barley cultivar zju3 induced by ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS). J Zhejiang Univ 37:169–174.  https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9209.2011.02.008 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life and Environmental SciencesHangzhou Normal UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations