Advertisement

Differentiation of Greek grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) based on the combination of ampelographic description and microsatellite markers

  • Maritina StavrakakiEmail author
  • Despoina Bouza
  • Katerina Biniari
Research Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Greek vineyards are characterized by a great number of indigenous grapevine cultivars as well as grapevine cultivars of eastern origin. Due to their age-old lineage and cultivation in Greece, most of those cultivars exhibit an even greater number of biotypes and mutations which frequently lead to an improper use of synonyms and homonyms. The aim of this study was the identification and discrimination of twelve grapevine cultivars cultivated in Greece by means of the seventy-four OIV descriptors, followed by the molecular analysis of five microsatellite markers on each grapevine biotype and cultivar during the years 2015, 2016, and 2017, on the basis of a list of ampelographic descriptors developed by the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV in OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species, 2nd edn, Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin, 2009. http://oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/description-of-grape-varieties), followed by the molecular analysis of five microsatellite markers. The studied grapevine cultivars were clustered according to their origin; grapevine cultivars of eastern origin were placed within the same cluster of the dendrogram, while the high degree of genetic similarity of grapevine cultivars ‘Avgoulato’, ‘Korithi lefko’, ‘Kolokythas’ and ‘Baresana’ bear to one another corroborates the hypothesis that all of them were formed by mutations from the same single cultivar. With regard to the indigenous grapevine cultivars, ‘Zalovitiko’ proved to be a synonym of ‘Xinomavro’, while the low degree of genetic similarity between grape cultivars ‘Korithi mavro’ and ‘Korithi lefko’ suggests that they are different and do not constitute colour mutations, as it had been believed so far. In most cases, the molecular findings confirmed the results of the ampelographic description. More importantly, they indicated that only the combination of the ampelographic description with molecular markers can allow for a more effective identification and discrimination of grapevine cultivars.

Keywords

Genotyping Grapevine variety Phenotyping SSR Vitis vinifera L. 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This manuscript complies with the Ethical Rules applicable for this journal, as stated in the Instructions of Authors.

Funding

No funding was received.

Human animal rights

The research did not involve human participants and/or animals.

Informed consent

Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the requisite authorities.

References

  1. Arroyo-García R, Ruiz-García L, Bolling L, Ocete R, López MA, Arnold C, Ergul A, Söylemezoflu G, Uzun HI, Cabello F, Ibáñez J, Aradhya MK, Atanassov A, Atanassov I, Balint S, Cenis JL, Costantini L, Gorislavets S, Grando MS, Klein BY, McGovern PE, Merdinoglu D, Pejic I, Pelsy F, Primikirios N, Risovannaya V, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA, Snoussi H, Sotiri P, Tamhankar S, This P, Troshin L, Malpica JM, Lefort F, Martinez-Zapater JM (2006) Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., ssp sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms. Mol Ecol 15(12):3707–3714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avise JC (2001) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution, 4th Printing. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  3. Babiniotis G (2009) Etymological dictionary of modern Greek (in Greek). Lexicology Centre, AthensGoogle Scholar
  4. Biniari K (2005) Identification and genetic study of grapevine cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers (PCR). Dissertation, Agricultural University of AthensGoogle Scholar
  5. Biniari K, Stavrakaki M (2019) Genetic study of native grapevine varieties of northern, western and central Greece with the use of ampelographic and molecular methods. Not Bot Horti Agrobo.  https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitz L, Zinelabidine LH, Ruehl E, Bitz O (2015) Microsatellite analysis of traditional eastern grapevine varieties and wild accessions from Geisenheim collection in Germany. Vitis 54:17–21Google Scholar
  7. Bowers JE, Dangl GS, Vignani R, Meredith CP (1996) Isolation and characterization of new polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci in grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Genome 39:628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Celik H, Karli A(2003) The use of in ovulo embryo culture for cross-breeding studies of empty—seeded table grape cultivars. In: Hajdu E, Borbás É (eds) Proceedings of VIIIth IC on grape genetics and breeding. Acta Hortic 603, ISHS 2003Google Scholar
  9. Davidis OX (1982) Greek Ampelology, Volume 3, Elements of Ampelography (in Greek). Agricultural University of Athens, University Press, AthensGoogle Scholar
  10. De Andrés MT, Benito A, Perez-Rivera G, Ocete R, Lopez MA, Gaforio L, Muñoz G, Cabello F, Martínez-Zapater JM, Arroyo-García R (2012) Genetic diversity of wild grapevine populations in Spain and their genetic relationship with cultivated grapevines. Mol Ecol 21(4):800–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fregoni M (1991) Origines de la Vigne et de la Viticulture. Musumeci Editeur, Quart (Vale d’Aosta), ItalyGoogle Scholar
  12. Galet P (2000) Dictionnaire Encyclopédique des Cépages. Hachette pratique, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. Grassi F, Labra M, Imazio S, Spada A, Sgorbati S, Scienza A, Sala F (2003) Evidence of a secondary grapevine domestication centre detected by SSR analysis. Theor Appl Genet 107:1315–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1321-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guillon JM (1896) Les cépages orientaux. G. Carre, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Katramis N (1880) Philological analects of Zante (in Greek). Zante, GreeceGoogle Scholar
  16. Kourakou S (2017) Xinomavro. The wine-grape variety of Central-western Macedonia. Publications of Foinikas, AthensGoogle Scholar
  17. Krimbas V (1943) Greek Ampelography, vol I (in Greek). Ministry of Agriculture, AthensGoogle Scholar
  18. Krimbas V (1944) Greek Ampelography, vol II (in Greek). Ministry of Agriculture, AthensGoogle Scholar
  19. Lefort F, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (2001) Genetic comparison of Greek cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. by nuclear microsatellite profiling. Am J Enol Vitic 52(2):101–108Google Scholar
  20. Levadoux LD (1956) Wild and cultivated populations of Vitis vinifera L. Ann Amel Plant 6:59–118Google Scholar
  21. Logothetis BX (1970) The development of the vine and of viticulture in Greece, based on archeological findings in the area. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  22. Logothetis BX (1975) Contributions de la vigne et du vin à la civilisation de la Grèce et de la Méditerranée orientale. Annuaire de la Faculté Agronomique de l’Université de Thessaloniki 17:1–286Google Scholar
  23. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LE, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Merkouropoulos G, Michailidou S, Alifragkis A, Zioziou E, Koundouras S, Argiriou A, Nikolaou N (2015) A combined approach involving ampelographic description, berry oenological traits and molecular analysis to study native grapevine varieties of Greece. Vitis 54:99–103Google Scholar
  25. Negrul AM (1938) Evolution of cultivated forms of grapes. C R Acad Sci USSR 18:585–588Google Scholar
  26. Negrul AM (1946) Origin of the cultivated grapevine and its classification. In: Baranoc A, Kai YF, Lazarevski MA, Negrul AM, Palibin TV, Prosmoserdov NN (eds)Ampelographia of USSR, vol. I. Moscow, Russia, pp 159–216Google Scholar
  27. OIV (2009) OIV descriptor list for grape varieties and Vitis species, 2nd edn. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin. Retrieved March 4, 2015 from http://oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/description-of-grape-varieties
  28. OIV (2013) OIV international list of vine varieties and their synonyms. Organisation Internationale de la Vigne et du Vin. Retrieved March 4, 2015 from http://oiv.int/en/technical-standards-and-documents/description-of-grape-varieties
  29. Palaiologos Gr (1836) On viticulture and enology (in Greek). Royal Printing, AthensGoogle Scholar
  30. Poniropoulos E (1888) Viticulture and enology (in Greek). N. Michalopoulos, AthensGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulliat V (1888) Mille variétés de vignes. Description et synonymies, 3ème ed. Coulet, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  32. Rohlf FJ (2000) NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system (Version 2.1). Exeter Software, Setauket, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  34. Schneider A, Raimondi S, Pirolo CS, Marinoni DT, Ruffa P, Venerito P, La Notte P (2014) Genetic characterization of grape cultivars from Apulia (Southern Italy) and synonymies in other mediterranean regions. Am J Enol Vitic 65(2):244–249.  https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2013.13082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sefc KM, Lefort F, Grando MS, Scott KD, Steinkellner H, Thomas MR (2001) Microsatellite markers for grapevine. A state of the art. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed) Molecular biology and biotechnology of the grapevine. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 433–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sibthorp J, Smith EJ (1806–1809) Florae Graecae prodromus; sive Plantarum omnium enumeratio, vol 1 and 2. Typis Richardi Taylor et Socii, in vico Shoe Lane, veneunt apud Johannem White, in vico Fleet Street, LondiniGoogle Scholar
  37. Stavrakaki M, Biniari K (2016) Genotyping and phenotyping of twenty old traditional Greek grapevine varieties (Vitis vinifera L.) from Eastern and Western Greece. Sci Hortic 209:86–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stavrakakis MN, Biniari K (1998/9) Genetic study of the grape cultivar Rhoditis by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Agric Res 220:45–52Google Scholar
  39. Stavrakakis MN, Stavrakaki M, Biniari K, Bouza D (2019) Ampelography of the forgotten Greek grapevine cultivars (in Greek). Embryo Publications, Athens (in press)  Google Scholar
  40. This P, Martínez-Zapater JM, Peros JP, Lacombe T (2011) Natural variation in Vitis. In: Adam-Blondon AF et al (eds) Genetics, genomics, and breeding of grapes. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 30–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Viala P, Vermorel V (1909) Traité Général d’Ampélographie (Volumes 7). Maison éd, ParisGoogle Scholar
  42. Vlachos M (1986) Ampelography (in Greek). ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  43. Vouillamoz JF, McGovern PE, Ergül A, Söylemezoglu G, Tevzadze G, Meredith CP, Grando MS (2006) Genetic characterization and relationships of traditional grape cultivars from Transcaucasia and Anatolia. Plant Genet Resour 4(2):144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walpole RMA (1818) Memoirs relating to European and Asiatic Turkey, and other countries of the East, 2nd edn. Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zois LX (1898) Filological and historical dictionary of Zante (in Greek), vol I. O. Foskolos. Zante, GreeceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Viticulture, Faculty of Crop ScienceAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations