Advertisement

Delineating taxonomic identity of two closely related Vigna species of section Aconitifoliae: V. trilobata (L.) Verdc. and V. stipulacea (Lam.) Kuntz in India

  • Padmavati G. Gore
  • Kuldeep TripathiEmail author
  • Aditya Pratap
  • Kangila V. Bhat
  • Suraj D. Umdale
  • Veena Gupta
  • Anjula Pandey
Notes on neglected & underutilized crops
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Vigna trilobata (L.) Verdc. and V. stipulacea (L.) Kuntz. of section Aconitifoliae were studied based on morphological characters to address taxonomic delineation. We have attempted to resolve the identities of these two species by studying a representative set of collections (125 accessions) across diverse eco-geographical zones of India. Agro-morphological traits were recorded for 47 descriptor states to differentiate the two species. Remarks on some additional characters not reported in earlier studies were highlighted with an aim to facilitate field identification of these taxa and use in their genetic resource management. Key diagnostic characters essential for delineating identities of these two species were presented.

Keywords

Comparative characters Morphology Taxonomic delineation Vigna trilobata V. stipulacea 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to the Director, ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, and Dean, ICAR-IARI, New Delhi for their support and encouragement in undertaking this work. We thank the Director, ICAR-IIPR, Kanpur for facilitating field trial. Dr Anuradha Agrawal, ICAR-NBPGR, Dr M Latha and Dr Joseph John, Regional Station (RS) Thrissur and Dr Kamala Venkateswaran, RS, Hyderabad, ICAR-NBPGR are acknowledged for the help rendered by them in different ways.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the content of manuscript and study undertaken.

Supplementary material

10722_2019_767_MOESM1_ESM.doc (201 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 201 kb)

References

  1. Abou-El-Enain M, Loufty M, Shehata A (2007) Seed surface characters and their systematic significance in the genus Lathyrus (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Vicieae). Feddes Repert 118(7–8):269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ghamdi F, Al-Zahrani R (2010) Seed morphology of some species of Tephrosia Pers (Fabaceae) from Saudi Arabia Identification of species and systematic significance. Feddes Repert 121(1–2):59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alsina M (1988) Estudio morfológicoy anatómico de las semillas del género Ornithopus L. (Fabaceae). Acta Botánica Malacitana 13:171–178Google Scholar
  4. Bhat R, Karim AA (2009) Exploring the nutritional potential of wild and underutilized legumes. Compe Rev Food Sci Food Saf 8:305–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bioversity International, Rome (1980) Descriptors for Vigna mungo and V. radiata (Revised). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisht IS, Bhat KV, Lakhanpaul S, Latha M, Jayan PK, Biswas BK, Singh AK (2005) Diversity and genetic resources of wild Vigna species in India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 52:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandel KPS, Laster RN (1991) Origin and evolution of Asiatic Vigna species. In: Sharma B, Mehra RB (eds) Golden jubilee celebration symposium on grain legumes. IARI, New Delhi, pp 25–45Google Scholar
  8. Chandel KPS, Lester RN, Starling RJ (1984) The wild ancestors of urd and mungbeans [(Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V. radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Bot J Linn Soc 89:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chernoff M, Plitmann U, Kislev M (1992) Seed characters and testa texture in species of the Vicieae: their taxonomic significance. Isr J Bot 41(3):167–186Google Scholar
  10. Corner E (1976) The seeds of Dicotyledons, vol I. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. de Queiroz RT, de Gaulart AM, Tozzi Azevedo, Lewis GP (2013) Seed morphology: an addition to the taxonomy of Tephrosia (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae, Millettieae) from South America. Plant Syst Evol 299(2):459–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Difo VH, Onyike E, Ameh DA, Njoku GC, Ndidi US (2015) Changes in nutrient and antinutrient composition of Vigna racemosa flour in open and controlled fermentation. J Food Sci Technol 52:6043–6048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Difo VH, Venkataramanab PB, Ndakidemi PA, Matemua AO (2018) Under-exploited wild Vigna species potentials in human and animal nutrition: a review. Global food security 18:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dixit TM (2014) Lectotypification of Dolichos stipulaceus (Leguminosae: pilionoideae). Webbia J Plant Tax Geogr 69(2):255–258Google Scholar
  15. Dixit TM, Sutar SP, Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Rao SR (2011) Vigna indica, a new name for Vigna trilobata var. pusilla and a note on section Aconitifoliae in India. Rheedea 21:1–7Google Scholar
  16. Gaikwad S, Gore R, Randive S, Garad K (2014) Vigna yadavii (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae), a new species from Western Ghats. Biodiversity Data Journal, India, p 2Google Scholar
  17. IBPGR (1980) IBPGR (International Board for Plant Genetic Resources) descriptors for mungbean. IBPGR, RomeGoogle Scholar
  18. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Descriptors Wild Vigna characterizationGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirkbride JH, Gunn CR, Weitzman AL (2003) Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae) vol. 1. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1890Google Scholar
  20. Koul KK, Nagpal R, Raina N (2000) Seed coat microsculpturing in Brassica and allied genera (Subtribes Brassicinae, Raphaninae, Moricandiinae). Ann Bot 86(2):385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Latha M, Scariah S, Krishnaraj MV, Presannakumari KT, Bhat KV, Bisht IS, John K (2014) Vigna Konkanensis (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) a new species from the West Coast of India. Webbia J Plant Tax Geogr 69(1):49–52Google Scholar
  22. Macorni E, Ruggeri S, Carnovale E (1997) Chemical evaluation of wild underexploited Vigna spp. Seeds Food Chem 59:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning JC, Staden JVV (1987) The Functional Differentiation of the Testa in Seed of Indigofera parviflora (Leguminosae: papilionoideae). Bot Gaz 148(1):23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marechal R, Mascherpa JM, Stainier F (1978) E´tude taxonomique d’un groupe complexe d’espe`ces des genres Phaseolus et Vigna (Papilionaceae) sur la base de donne´es morphologiques et polliniques traite´es par l’analyse informatique [Taxonomic study of one complex group of species from the Phaseolus-Vigna genera based on morphology and palynology data treated to computer analysis]. Boissiera 28:1–273Google Scholar
  25. Nagaraj NC, Muniyappa V, Satyan BA, Shanmugam N, Jayarajan R, Vidhyasekaran P (1981) Resistance source for mungbean yellow mosaic virus. In: Proceedings of the national seminar on disease resistance in crop plants, pp 69–72Google Scholar
  26. Nath D, Dasgupta T (2015) Study of some vigna species following scanning electron microscopy (SEM). IJSRP 5(9):1–6Google Scholar
  27. Ojiewo C, Monyo E, Desmae H, et al. (2017) Genomics, genetics and breeding of tropical legumes for better livelihoods of smallholder farmers. Plant Breed 00:1–13  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12554 Google Scholar
  28. Oyatomi O, Fatokun C, Boukar O, Abberton M, Ilori C (2016) Screening wild Vigna species and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) landraces for sources of resistance to Striga gesnerioides, In: Maxted N, Dulloo EM, Ford-Lloyd BV(eds), Enhancing crop genepool use: capturing wild relatives and landrace diversity for crop improvement. CAB Int, pp 27–31Google Scholar
  29. Pandiyan M, Ramamoorthi N, Ganesh SK, Jebraj S, Pagarajan P, Balasubramanian P (2008) Broadening the genetic base and introgression of MYMY resistance and yield improvement through unexplored genes from wild relatives in mungbean. Plant Mut Rep 2:33–38Google Scholar
  30. Patil P, Malik SK, Sutar S, Yadav SR, John J, Bhat KV (2015) Taxonomic importance of seed macro- and micro-morphology in Abelmoschus (Malvaceae). Nord J Bot 33(6):696–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paulino VJ, Pessine E, Teixeira SP (2010) Estudos morfoanatômicos da semente e da plântula de espécies de Anileiras (Indigofera L., Leguminosae). Acta Botanica Brasilica 24(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratap A, Gupta DS, Singh BB, Kumar S (2013) Development of super early genotypes in greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Res 36:105–110Google Scholar
  33. Pratap A, Gupta S, Malviya N, Tomar R, Maurya R, John KJ, Madhavan L, Singh NP (2015) Genome scanning of Asiatic Vigna species for discerning population genetic structure based on microsatellite variation. Mol Breed 35:178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmidt L (2000) Guide to Handling of Tropical and Subtropical Forest Seed’ Danida Forest Seed Centre, pp 532Google Scholar
  35. Tateishi Y (1996) Systematics of the species of Vigna Subgenus Ceratotropis. In: Srinivas P, Kitbamroong C, Miyazaki S (eds) Mungbean germplasm: collection, evaluation and utilization for breeding program. JIRCAS, Tsukuba, pp 9–24Google Scholar
  36. Tomooka N, Vaughan D, Moss H, Maxted N (2002) The Asian Vigna: Genus Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis genetic resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tomooka N, Kaga A, Vaughan DA (2006) The Asian Vigna (Vigna subgenus Ceratotropis) biodiversity and evolution. In: Sharma AK, Sharma A (eds) Plant genome: biodiversity and evolution. Part C Phanerogams (angiosperms-dicotyledons), vol 1. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 87–126Google Scholar
  38. Tomooka N, Kaga A, Isemura T, Vaughan DA (2011) Vigna. In: Kole Chittaranjan (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources legume crops and forages. Springer, NY, pp 291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tomooka N, Naito K, Kaga A, Sakai H, Isemura T, Ogiso-Tanaka E, Iseki K, Takahashi Y (2014) Evolution, domestication and neo-domestication of the genus Vigna. Plant Genet Resour Charact Util 12(1):168–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tripathi K, Bhalla S, Srinivasan K, Prasad TV, Gautam RD (2013) Physical and biochemical basis of resistance in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] accessions to pulse-beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). Legume Research: An Intern J 36(5):457–466Google Scholar
  41. Umdale SD, Aitawade MM, Gaikwad NB, Madhavan L, Yadav SR, Rao SR, Bhat KV (2017) Pollen morphology of Asian Vigna species (genus Vigna; subgenus Ceratotropis) from India and its taxonomic implications. Turk J Bot 41:75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Umdale SD, Chavan JJ, Ahire ML, Kshirsagar PR, Gaikwad NB, Bhat KV (2018) Vigna khandalensis (Santapau) Raghavan et Wadhwa: a promising underutilized, wild, endemic legume of the Northern Western Ghats, India. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65:1795–1807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verdcourt B (1970) Studies in the Leguminosae Papilionoideae for the ‘Flora of Tropical East Africa: IV’. Kew Bulletin 24:507–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yadav SR, Bhat KV, Latha M, John JK, Malik SK, Aitwade M, Rao SR, Scariah S, Nissar M, S Umdale, P Patil, Krishnan G, Khedsana R (2014) Genus Vigna in India, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi and Shivaji University, Kolhapur, 70pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic ResourcesNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses ResearchKanpurIndia
  3. 3.Department of BotanyYashwantrao Chavan Institute of ScienceSataraIndia

Personalised recommendations