Advertisement

Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution

, Volume 66, Issue 2, pp 349–362 | Cite as

Physical characteristics of fruits and seeds of Opuntia sp. as evidence of changes through domestication in the Southern Mexican Plateau

  • Cristian López-Palacios
  • Juan Antonio Reyes-Agüero
  • Cecilia Beatriz Peña-ValdiviaEmail author
  • Juan Rogelio Aguirre-Rivera
Research Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The Opuntia genus has high diversity and wide distribution in Mexico; it has fruit (1) with thin skin and seeds surrounded by sweet and abundant pulp, (2) with thin skin and seeds surrounded by scarce or null pulp, known as dry fruits, (3) with thick, succulent, acid and edible peel, with seeds surrounded by sparse pulp, known as acid prickly pear or “xoconostle”, and (4) with intermedial characteristics between 1 and 2 types, and named “xocotuna”. The aim of this study was to characterize the fruits and seeds of 114 variants from 17 cactus species (Opuntia, Cactaceae) collected in the Mexican Plateau. The biomass of the skin, pulp and the normal and aborted (dehydrated) seeds from fruits of those variants and species obtained from 347 collects, from the Southern High Plateau of Mexico, were determined; as well as total soluble solids content (°Brix) in the pulp and quantified the length, width, and thickness of the seeds, the total number of normal and aborted and the hardness of the normal ones. The sampling units were 347 collects, with six repetitions per variant and one fruit as an experimental unit. The statistical treatment of the data included Pearson correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA) and conglomerates. The fruit biomass and number of aborted seeds were the most important variables according to the PCA and separated the species and variants according to a gradient. In the classification, the tendency to higher content of aborted seeds was observed in Opuntia albicarpa and Opuntia ficus-indica, species from much humanized environments and with the highest degree of domestication. The home gardens or backyard environment concentrated the greater Opuntia variant diversity. The pulp biomass is closely related to the proportion of normal and aborted seeds.

Keywords

Dendrogram Domestication Opuntia Multivariable analysis Plant human selection Principal components analysis 

Supplementary material

10722_2018_712_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 kb)

References

  1. Adewale BD, Aremu CO, Amazue UE (2012) Intra-specific variability and diversity analysis of African yam bean by seed size parameters. J Agric Biol Sci 7:454–461Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar-Estrada A, Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre JR (2003) Caracterización de la semilla de 403 variantes de nopal (Opuntia spp.). In: Esparza F, Salas MA, Mena J, Valdez RD (eds) Memoria del IX Congreso Nacional y VII Internacional Sobre el Conocimiento y Aprovechamiento del Nopal. Gobierno del Estado de Zacatecas, Zacatecas, pp 117–120Google Scholar
  3. Álvarez AR, Peña-Valdivia CB (2009) Structural polysaccharides in xoconostle (Opuntia matudae) fruits with different ripening stages. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 11:26–44Google Scholar
  4. Anderson EF (2001) The cactus family. Timberm Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbera G, Inglese P, La-Mantia T (1994) Seed content and fruit characteristics in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica Mill.). Sci Hortic 58:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds. Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellón MR, Barrientos-Priego AF, Colunga-García MP, Perales H, Reyes-Agüero JA, Rosales SR, Zizumbo-Villarreal D (2009) Diversidad y conservación de recursos genéticos en plantas cultivadas. In: Sarukhán J, Dirzo R, González R, March I (eds) Capital natural de México, vol II. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, pp 355–382Google Scholar
  8. Bravo HH (1978) Las cactáceas de México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  9. Britton NL, Rose JN (1919) The cactaceae, vol 1. Carnegie Institution of Washingon, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Casas A, Barbera G (2002) Mesoamerican domestication and diffusion. In: Nobel PS (ed) Cacti: biology and uses. Berkeley University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 143–162Google Scholar
  11. Colunga P, Hernández E, Castilla A (1986) Variación morfológica, manejo agrícola tradicional y grado de domesticación de Opuntia spp. en el Bajío Guanajuatense. Agrociencia 65:7–49Google Scholar
  12. Davitashvili N, Karrer G (2010) Taxonomic importance of seed morphology in Gentiana (Gentianaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 162:101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Díaz-Medina EM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez EM, Díaz-Romero C (2007) Chemical characterization of Opuntia dillenii and Opuntia ficus-indica fruits. Food Chem 103:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Felker P, del Rodríguez SC, Casoliba RM, Filippini R, Medina D, Zapata R (2005) Comparison of Opuntia ficus-indica varieties of Mexican and Argentine origin for fruit yield and quality in Argentina. J Arid Environ 60:405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gallegos-Vázquez C, Cervantes-Herrera J, Barrientos-Priego AF (2005) Manual gráfico para la descripcipción varietal del nopal tunero y xoconostle (Opuntia spp.). Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas-Secretaría de Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación y Universidad Autíonoma de Chapingo, ChapingoGoogle Scholar
  16. García-Nava F, Peña-Valdivia CB, Trejo C, García R, Reyes JA, Aguirre JR (2015) Biophysical and physiological characteristics of nopalitos (Opuntia spp. Cactaceae) as influenced by domestication. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:927–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. García-Nava F, López HM, Peña-Valdivia CB, Romo GC, Marmolejo SY (2018) Chemical characteristics of non-starch polysaccharides of Opuntia cladodes as evidence of changes through domestication. Food Biosci 22:69–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson AC, Nobel PS (1986) The cactus primer. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Granados A, Castañeda AD (1991) El Nopal, Historia, Fisiología, Genética e Importancia Frutícola. Editorial Trillas, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffith MP (2004) The origin of an important cactus crop, Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae): new molecular evidence. Am J Bot 91:1915–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffiths MP, Porter JM (2009) Phylogeny of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae). Int J Plant Sci 170:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guerrero-Muñoz P, Zavaleta-Mancera HA, Barrientos-Priego AF, Gallegos-Vázquez C, Núñez-Colin CA, Valadez-Moctezuma E, Cuevas-Sánchez JA (2006) Técnica para el estudio de la micromorfología interna de semillas duras en Opuntia. Rev Fitotec Mex 29:37–43Google Scholar
  23. Hammer K, Khoshbakht K (2015) A domestication assessment of the big five plant families. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:665–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harlan JR (1975) Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  25. Icker-Bond SM, Rydin C (2011) Micromophology of the seed envelope of Ephedra L. (Gnetales) and its relevance for the timing of evolutionary events. Int J Plant Sci 172:36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen DH (1986) Chihuahuan desert nopaleras: defaunated big mammal vegetation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:595–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leishman MR, Murray BR (2001) The relationship between seed size and abundance in plant communities: model predictions and observed patterns. Oikos 94:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. López-Palacios C, Peña-Valdivia CB, Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Ramírez-Tobías HM, Soto-Hernández RM, Jiménez-Bremont JF (2015) Inter- and intra-specific variation in fruit biomass, number seeds, and physical characteristics of seeds in Opuntia spp. Cactaceae. Genet Resour Crop Evol 62:1205–1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luna-Páez A, Valadez-Moctezuma E, Barrientos-Priego AF, Gallegos-Vázquez C (2007) Caracterización de Opuntia spp. Mediante semilla con marcadores RAPD e ISSR y su posible uso para diferenciación. J Prof Assoc Cactus Dev 9:43–59Google Scholar
  30. Majure LC, Puente R, Griffith MP, Judd WS, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2012) Phylogeny of Opuntia s.s. (Cactaceae): Clade delineation, geographic origins, and reticulate evolution. Am J Bot 99:847–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Minuto L, Roccotiello E, Casazza G (2011) New seed morphological features in Moehringia L. (Caryophyllaceae) and their taxonomic and ecological significance. Plant Biosyst 145:60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monroy-Gutiérrez T, Martínez-Damián M, Barrientos-Priego A, Gallegos-Vázquez C, Cruz-Alvarez O, Vargas-Madríz H (2017) Compuestos bioactivos y capacidad antioxidante en frutos de xocotuna, tuna y xoconostle (Opuntia spp.). Chil J Agric Anim Sci 33:263–272Google Scholar
  33. Monroy-Vázquez ME, Peña-Valdivia CB, García NJR, Solano E, Campos H, García E (2017a) Chemical scarification and ozone in seed dormancy alleviation and seedlings growth of wild and domesticated Opuntia, Cactaceae. Ozone Sci Eng 39:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monroy-Vázquez ME, Peña-Valdivia CB, García-Nava JR, Solano-Camacho E, Campos H, García-Villanueva E (2017b) Imbibición, viabilidad y vigor de semillas de cuatros especies de Opuntia con grado distinto de domesticación. Agrociencia 51:27–42Google Scholar
  35. Muñoz-Urias A, Palomino-Hasbach G, Terrazas T, García-Velázquez A, Pimienta-Barrios E (2008) Variación anatómica y morfológica en especies y entre poblaciones de Opuntia en la porción sur del Desierto Chihuahuense. Bol Soc Bot Méx 83:1–11Google Scholar
  36. Obeso JR, Martínez I, García D (2011) Seed size is heterogeneously distributed among destination habitats in animal dispersed plants. Basic Appl Ecol 12:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perales HR, Aguirre JR (2008) Biodiversidad humanizada. In: Capital natural de México. Vol 1: Conocimiento actual de la biodiversidad. Conabio, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  38. Pimienta E, Engleman EM (1985) Desarrollo de la pulpa y proporción en volumen de los componentes del lóculo maduro en tuna (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller). Agrociencia 62:51–56Google Scholar
  39. Pimienta-Barrios E, Muñoz-Urias A (1995) Domestication of Opuntia and agricultural varieties. In: Barbera G, Inglese P, Pimienta-Barrios E (eds) Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. International Technical Cooperation Network on Cactus Pear, FAO Publications, RomeGoogle Scholar
  40. Reyes-Agüero JA, Vallejo RM (in press) El matorral crasicaule. In: Flores J, Martínez G (eds) Biodiversidad de San Luis Potosí. CONABIO y Gobierno del Estado de San Luis Potosí. San Luis Potosí, MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  41. Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Flores-Flores JL (2005) Variación morfológica de Opuntia (Cactaceae) en relación con su domesticación en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México. Interciencia 30:476–484Google Scholar
  42. Reyes-Agüero JA, Carlín-Castelán F, Aguirre JR, Hernández HM (2007) Preparation of Opuntia herbarium specimens. Halsetonia 13:76–82Google Scholar
  43. Reyes-Agüero JA, Aguirre-Rivera JR, Carlín-Castelán F, González-Durán A (2009) Catálogo de las principales variantes silvestres y cultivadas de Opuntia en la Altiplanicie Meridional de México. UASLP, SAGARPA y CONACyT, San Luis PotosíGoogle Scholar
  44. Romo-Campos L, Flores-Flores JL, Flores J, Álvarez-Fuentes G (2010) Seed germination of Opuntia species from an aridity gradient in Central Mexico. J Prof Ass Cactus Dev 12:181–198Google Scholar
  45. Scheinvar L (1995) Taxonomy of utilized opuntias. In: Barbera G, Inglese P, Pimienta-Barrios E (eds) Agro-ecology, cultivation and uses of cactus pear. FAO, RomaGoogle Scholar
  46. Schirra M, Inglese P, La Mantia T (1999) Quality of cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] fruit in relation to ripening time, CaCl2 pre-harvest sprays and storage conditions. Sci Hortic 81:425–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Segura S, Scheinvar L, Olalde G, Leblanc O, Filardo S, Muratalla A, Gallegos C, Flores C (2007) Genomic size and ploidy levels in Mexican cactus pear species Opuntia (Tourn.) Mill. series Streptacanthae Britton et Rose, Leucotricha DC., Heliabravoanae Scheinvar and Robustae Britton et Rose. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:1033–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker RP, Famiani F, Baldicchi A, Cruz-Castillo JG, Inglese P (2011) Changes in enzymes involved in photosynthesis and other metabolic processes in the fruits of Opuntia ficus-indica during growth and ripening. Sci Hortic 128:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Zona MediaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíRioverdeMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación de Zonas DesérticasUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíSan Luis PotosíMexico
  3. 3.Posgrado en BotánicaColegio de PostgraduadosMontecilloMexico

Personalised recommendations