Genetic diversity of Finnish home garden rhubarbs (Rheum spp.) assessed by simple sequence repeat markers
- 58 Downloads
Rhubarb samples were collected from home gardens all around Finland to study their genetic diversity. Altogether, the study contained 647 samples, of which 539 were from home gardens. In addition, reference cultivars and samples from the Finnish national collection of rhubarb genetic resources located in the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) were included. Six SSRs, which amplified a total of 80 alleles, were used to calculate genetic distances between samples, and a dendrogram was built. The most common cultivar among the rhubarbs from Finnish home gardens (57%) was identical to ‘Queen Victoria’ in the Luke collection. Thirty-eight samples (7%) from citizens were identical to ‘The Sutton’ and ‘Strawberry’, which on the other hand were identical to each other. We detected misidentifications of rhubarb cultivars in our study. Under the same cultivar name there might be different genotypes, for example ‘Victoria’ was very heterogeneous. On the other hand, cultivars with different names may have the same genotype e.g. ‘Strawberry’ and ‘The Sutton’. In addition to providing information about genetic variability of rhubarbs in home gardens, the results of the study were used to update the Finnish national collection of rhubarb genetic resources: to remove duplicates, and to replace accessions of unknown origin with new polymorphic ones with more accurate information of their history. As far as we know, this is the first study where rhubarb samples have been collected widely from home gardens and evaluated with DNA markers.
KeywordsRhubarb Genetic diversity Simple sequence repeat (SSR) Cultivar identity
The authors wish to thank Marja-Riitta Arajärvi, Sirpa Moisander and Anneli Virta for excellent technical assistance. Finnish citizens and nurseries, as well as Morten Rasmussen (Norwegian Genetic Resource Centre), Lars Jacobsen (Aarhus University), Barbara Hellier (USDA-ARS Western Regional Plant Introduction Station), and the Finnish Plant Genetic Resources Programme are thanked for providing us the plant material. Pentti Alanko and Leena Lindén (University of Helsinki) are thanked for giving old plant catalogues and collecting information from the catalogues. The assistance of Maarit Heinonen for preparing the rhubarb call, Teija Tenhola-Roininen for selecting samples from the registered plants, and the coordinator of the Finnish Plant Genetic Resources Programme, Elina Kiviharju, for giving valuable comments to the manuscript is greatly appreciated. The Ministry of Education and Culture, Maiju ja Yrjö Rikalan Puutarhasäätiö, and Finnish Plant Genetic Resources Programme are acknowledged for the financial support of the study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Eneroth O (1860) Kasvutarha-kirja rahvaan hyödyksi. GW Wilén, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- Englund R (1983) Odlad rabarber och taxonomiska problem inom släktet Rheum, speciellt sektionen Rhapontica. Report, Dept. of Systematic Botany, Uppsala University, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
- Gilmore BS, Bassil NV, Barney DL, Knaus BJ, Hummer KE (2014) Short-read DNA sequencing yields microsatellite markers for Rheum. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 139(1):22–29Google Scholar
- Hintze S (1951) Rabarber. In: Svensk växtförädling Del II Trädgårdsväxterna Skogsväxterna. Natur och Kultur, Stockholm, pp 389–391 (in Swedish)Google Scholar
- Kuhl JC, DeBoer VL (2008) Genetic diversity of rhubarb cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 133(4):587–592Google Scholar
- Libert B, Englund R (1989) Present distribution and ecology of Rheum rhaponticum (Polygonaceae). Willdenowia Bd 19, H 1:91–98Google Scholar
- Lozina-Lozinskaja AS (1936) Sistematiceskij obzor dikorastuscich vidov roda Rheum L. Trudy Bot Inst Akad Nauk SSSR, Ser. 1. Fl Sist Vyss Rast 3:67–141Google Scholar
- Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet JP (2006). DARwin software. http://darwin.cirad.fr/darwin
- Ruoff E (2001) Vanhoja suomalaisia puutarhoja. Otavan Kirjapaino Oy, KeuruuGoogle Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
- Stanev S (1984) Rheum rhaponticum. In: Velchev V (ed) Červena kniga na NR Bǎlgarija 1. –Sofija, p 90Google Scholar
- Stocks C (2009) Forgotten fruits: the stories behind Britain’s traditional fruit and vegetables. Windmill Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Stojanoff N (1937) Über die Autochtonität des Rila-Rhabarbers. Izv Carsk Prir Inst Sofija 10:247–258Google Scholar
- Turner DM (1938) The economic rhubarbs: a historical survey of their cultivation in Britain. J R Hortic Soc 63:355–370Google Scholar
- USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Plant Germplasm System (2018) Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN-Taxonomy). National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=31110. Accessed 29 Aug 2018
- Zandstra BH, Marshall DE (1982) A grower’s guide to rhubarb production. Am Veg Grower 30(6):9–10Google Scholar