Chloroplast sequence data differentiate Maleae, and specifically Pyrus, species in the USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System
- 133 Downloads
The USDA-ARS National Plant Germplasm System (NPGS) maintains a large collection of Maleae, including 49 Malus taxa, 36 Pyrus taxa, and 24 additional genera with ornamental and plant breeding value. These plant genetic resources are primarily maintained clonally as trees or shrubs in field conditions, and seeds are also conserved for some species. We used NPGS Maleae taxa to assess the genetic diversity across the tribe Maleae and placed Pyrus taxa within this broader context using analytical methods that displayed the genetic relationships as a network, rather than as a traditional dendrogram. Sequence variation from four conserved chloroplast regions unraveled the complex and often reticulate genetic relationships among and within 109 economically important Maleae taxa. In a broad sense, chloroplast haplotypes differentiated Pyrus species within Sections Pyrus and Pashia. The genetic relationships amongst Pyrus species were found to be complex, likely resulting from multiple hybridization and expansion/contraction events during the speciation process. Knowledge of the genetic relationships among Maleae genera and/or species may aid in the selection of materials for use as rootstocks and or breeding (hybridization) programs. Future collection efforts to augment the NPGS accessions within the tribe Maleae will improve the coverage and representation and assure conservation of important Rosaceae genetic resources in the NPGS.
KeywordsChloroplast Genetic diversity Maleae Pear Pyrus
We thank Dr. Kevin Conrad at the U.S. National Arboretum for providing leaf samples for Maleae analyses and for providing an internal manuscript review. We also thank the curation teams at the Corvallis, OR and Geneva, NY repositories for providing leaf materials for genetic analyses. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial).
Human and animal rights
The authors have no research involving human participants and/or animals.
- Aldasoro JJ, Aedo C, Muñoz Garmendia F (1996) The genus Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) in south-west Europe and North Africa. Bot J Linn Soc 121:143–158Google Scholar
- Hall T (2014) BioEdit. Biological sequence alignment editor for Win95/98/NT/2K/XP/7. http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/bioedit/bioedit.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
- Jiang S, Zheng X, Yu P, Yue X, Ahmed M, Cai D, Teng Y (2016) Primitive genepools of Asian pears and their complex hybrid origins inferred from fluorescent sequence-specific amplification polymorphism (SSAP) markers based on LTR retrotransposons. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149192 Google Scholar
- Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452. http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
- Medical Research Council (2014) Staden package. http://staden.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 15 Sept 2014
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (2017) Germplasm resources information network (GRIN-Global). GRIN taxonomy. https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. Accessed 7 Dec 2017
- Volk GM, Richards CM, Henk AD, Reilley AA, Bassil NV, Postman JD (2006) Diversity of wild Pyrus communis based on microsatellite analyses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 131:408–417Google Scholar
- Xiang Y, Huang C-H, Hu Y, Wen J, Li S, Yi T, Chen H, Xiang J, Ma H (2017) Evolution of Rosaceae fruit types based on nuclear phylogeny in the context of geological times and genome duplication. Mol Biol Evol 34:262–281Google Scholar