Model Parameterization and PP-Wave Amplitude Versus Angle and Azimuth (AVAZ) Direct Inversion for Fracture Quasi-Weaknesses in Weakly Anisotropic Elastic Media
Homogeneous isotropic or vertically transverse isotropic rocks containing a single set of aligned, vertical fractures exhibits an effective long-wavelength horizontally transverse isotropy (HTI) or orthorhombic anisotropy. The estimation for properties of subsurface fractures has significant application in characterization of naturally fractured rocks. The purpose of this work is to demonstrate an approach of amplitude versus angle and azimuth (AVAZ) direct inversion for fracture characterization utilizing the observable wide-azimuth seismic reflection data in weakly anisotropic elastic media. The simplest single fracture system is HTI model. Much attention has been devoted to the weak-contrast and weak-anisotropy HTI model due to its significance for reservoir characterization. Treating the fractures as linear-slip interfaces, we begin with the derivation for perturbations of stiffness matrix at a planar weak-contrast interface separating two weakly anisotropic HTI half-spaces that share the same fracture normal, as a function of background elastic moduli and fracture parameters. Using the perturbation matrix and scattering function, we then derive a linearized PP-wave reflection coefficient of a weakly HTI medium in terms of P- and S-wave moduli, density, and fracture weaknesses, which builds a linearized relationship between the fracture parameters and reflection coefficient with the priority calculation for the azimuth of fracture normal based on the least square ellipse fitting method. Finally, we reformulate the reflectivity caused by weakness differences to parameterize the weaknesses for the so-called quasi-weaknesses and propose a method of Bayesian AVAZ direct inversion in seismic detection of subsurface fractures. Cauchy and Gaussian probability distribution are used for the a priori information of model parameters and the likelihood function, and the maximum a posteriori estimate of quasi-weaknesses is reasonably estimated with the nonlinear iteratively reweighted least squares algorithm. Synthetic and real data illustrate the applicability of the proposed AVAZ inversion method in fracture characterization.
KeywordsBayesian AVAZ inversion Horizontally transverse isotropy and orthorhombic anisotropy Fracture quasi-weaknesses Maximum a posteriori estimate
We would like to express our gratitude to the sponsorship of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41674130, U1562215), and National Basic Research Program of China (2014CB239201), National Grand Project for Science and Technology (2016ZX05027004-001, 2016ZX05002005-09HZ), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities for their funding in this research. We also thank Alexey Stovas and another anonymous reviewer for their constructive suggestions.
- Downton J (2005) Seismic parameter estimation from AVO inversion. Ph.D. Thesis, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
- Gassmann F (1951) Über die elastizität poröser medien. Vier. der Natur. Gesellschaft Zürich 96:1–23Google Scholar
- Gray D, Todorovic-Marinic D (2004) Fracture detection using 3D azimuthal AVO. CSEG Rec 29:5–8Google Scholar
- Hampson DP, Russell BH, Bankhead B (2005) Simultaneous inversion of pre-stack seismic data. SEG Tech Progr Expand Abstr 2005:1633–1637Google Scholar
- Ikelle LT (1997) Parameterization of AVAZ (amplitude variation with azimuth) inversion. J Seism Explor 6:19–34Google Scholar
- Liu E, Martinez A (2012) Seismic fracture characterization: concepts and practical applications. EAGE Publication, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Mesdag P (2016) A new approach to quantitative azimuthal inversion for stress and fracture detection: 86th annual international meeting, SEG, expanded abstracts, pp 357–361Google Scholar
- Narr W, Schechter WS, Thompson L (2006) Naturally fractured reservoir characterization. SPE Publication, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Scales JA, Smith ML (1994) Introductory geophysical inverse theory. Samizdat Press, GoldenGoogle Scholar
- Schoenberg M, Protazio J (1990) ‘Zoeppritz’ rationalized and generalized to anisotropy. J Acoust Soc Am 88:S46Google Scholar
- Thomsen L (2007) Understanding seismic anisotropy in exploration and exploitation: 2002 SEG/EAGE distinguished instructor short course [M]. Society of Exploration GeophysicistsGoogle Scholar