Advertisement

GeoJournal

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Accessibility analysis of protestant churches in Shanghai, China

  • Kun Zhang
  • Songlin ZhangEmail author
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

Geographical accessibility is closely related to people’s daily lives and has been extensively studied. One understudied area is the accessibility of churches that provide for the spiritual needs of a large number of people. Based on census data, this paper explores the geographical accessibility of Protestant churches in the inner city of Shanghai, the largest metropolis in China. Two spatial research methods, the two-step floating catchment area and the raster catchment overlay methods, are used to examine church accessibility. To determine the church catchment, this study established a 40-min public transportation radius. A WebGIS API is utilized to obtain the real transit time between the designated locations. The results show that 97% of the people living in inner cities, or approximately 10.39 million people, can travel to at least one church within 40 min via public transportation. The downtown area enjoys very good accessibility, and there are many places of worship for adherents to choose from there. Very poor accessibility (beyond 40 min) was found in the peripheral area, located mainly near the mouth of the Huangpu River and the southeast corner of the Outer Ring of Shanghai. This study could be of great significance for urban planners in considering religious services in traffic planning and for the site selection of churches.

Keywords

Protestant church Accessibility 2SFCA method Shanghai 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Number 2017ECNU-HWFW028) and the Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (19ZR1459700).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bays, D. H. (2003). Chinese protestant christianity today. The China Quarterly, 174, 488–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, J., & Conroy, M. (1977). Accessibility measures and the social evaluation of urban structure. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 9(9), 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, X. (2017). Take the edge off: A hybrid geographic food access measure. Applied Geography, 87, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiaretto Yan, K. S. (2017). When the gospel meets the China dream: Religious freedom and the golden rule. International Bulletin of Mission Research, 42(3), 212–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferraro, K. F., & Albrecht-Jensen, C. M. (1991). Does religion influence adult health? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 30(2), 193.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1387213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hong, Z., & Yan, J. (2015). Mapping accessibility and shortage of the protestant church in China: Applying two spatial research methods. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 2(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  7. Hunter, A., & Chan, K.-K. (1993). Protestantism in contemporary China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jin, Z., & Qiu, Y. (2010). Blue book of religions, Chinese Religious report. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, A. P., Haynes, R., Sauerzapf, V., Crawford, S. M., Zhao, H., & Forman, D. (2008). Travel times to health care and survival from cancers in northern England. European Journal of Cancer, 44(2), 269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kindopp, J., & Hamrin, C. L. (2004). God and Caesar in China. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lee, R. C. (1991). Current approaches to shortage area designation. Journal of Rural Health, 7, 437–450.Google Scholar
  12. Lim, C., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 914–933.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luo, W., & Wang, F. (2003). Measures of spatial accessibility to health care in a GIS environment: Synthesis and a case study in the Chicago region. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(6), 865–884.  https://doi.org/10.1068/b29120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meisenhelder, J. B., Schaeffer, N. J., Younger, J., & Lauria, M. (2011). Faith and mental health in an oncology population. Journal of Religion and Health, 52(2), 505–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-011-9497-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L., & Wigan, M. R. (1978). Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research A, 13, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Padeiro, M. (2018). Geographical accessibility to community pharmacies by the elderly in metropolitan Lisbon. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 14(7), 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures Project. (2010). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://globalreligiousfutures.org/countries/china/religious_demography#/?affiliations_religion_id=0&affiliations_year=2010.
  18. Radke, J., & Mu, L. (2000). Spatial decomposition, modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs. Geographic Information Sciences, 6(2), 105–112.Google Scholar
  19. Reyes, M., Paez, A., & Morency, C. (2014). Walking accessibility to urban parks by children: A case study of Montreal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://www.stats-sh.gov.cn/html/sjfb/201803/.
  21. SINA Corporation. (2018a). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://finance.sina.com.cn/china/dfjj/20130129/074614433388.shtml.
  22. SINA Corporation. (2018b). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://sh.sina.com.cn/news/b/2016-12-30/detail-ifxzczff3424485.shtml.
  23. Stauffer, M. T. (1922). The christian occupation of China: A general survey of the numerical strength and geographical distributon of the christian forces in China, Made by the Special Committee on Survey and Occupation, China Continuation Committee, 1918–1921.Google Scholar
  24. Tencent. (2013). Retrieved April 11, 2019 from http://sh.qq.com/a/20131204/002591.htm.
  25. Wachs, M., & Kumagai, T. (1973). Physical accessibility as a social indicator. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(5), 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiao, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Tang, Z. (2017). An assessment of urban park access in Shanghai—Implications for the social equity in urban China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Geographic Information ScienceEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.College of Surveying and Geo-InformaticsTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations